PDA

View Full Version : TAA #3 - Content


ohgolly
August 13th, 2005, 04:17 PM
Mr. Linder, I understand that you plan to focus #3 on the jew domination of law schools. Considering current news, I'd like to suggest that you either relegate that to page two, or postpone it, and lead with the Sheehan story. The jewsmedia is giving the story attention but carefully avoiding the woman's main point, that her son died fighting for Israel. What a gold mine and attention grabber, perhaps even among the lemmings, this could be.

Tench
August 13th, 2005, 04:48 PM
Why not lead with this eye opener?

www.cfra.com/images/news/fug.jpg

Write a story about the dead corrections officer that these two left in their wake.

How Jefferson said two different peoples cannot exist in the same government and such......

Just a thought. Leave your remarks if you want.

Rounder
August 13th, 2005, 04:49 PM
Mr. Linder, I understand that you plan to focus #3 on the jew domination of law schools. Considering current news, I'd like to suggest that you either relegate that to page two, or postpone it, and lead with the Sheehan story. The jewsmedia is giving the story attention but carefully avoiding the woman's main point, that her son died fighting for Israel. What a gold mine and attention grabber, perhaps even among the lemmings, this could be.

Good idea, ohgolly. And thanks for starting this highly pertinent thread. Focusing TAA's front page on contemporary news that's super extensively reported via the kikes' media, and pointing out the true politically incorrect facts to the lemmings, is a damn excellent suggestion.

BTW, Alex says TAA 3 will be finished not later than Sept 1st. And I'm sure he'd appreciate suggestions for content, here. (So I'll put my 2 cents in, too):

Don't forget to enlarge the print, Alex. And I'd like to see ordering instructions for TAA plastered on page one. Perhaps a 2 inch by 2 inch blocked advertisement at top left of page, that includes my address and phone number, and your address and email address. Also VNN's two website addresses. This should greatly increase the number of contacts. Whatchathink ??

One more thing. Include the TAA edition number, ie., "4TH EDITION - FALL 2005" (or whatever). The term "Issue #3" sounds like it's only our 3rd edition, when it's really our 4th.

odin
August 13th, 2005, 06:51 PM
The term "Issue #3" sounds like it's only our 3rd edition, when it's really our 4th.Huh? Why is it called "issue 3" if it's really the 4th? Was the 1st un-numbered and the 2nd called "issue 1" etc.?

bluedog39
August 13th, 2005, 07:50 PM
Why not split page 1 of the next issue between "guns" and "butter" ? "Guns" being the disasterous war in Iraq and the threat of a new war against Iran; "butter" being the hollowing out of the US economy that is weekly being documented by Paul Craig Roberts and virtually noone else[except Lou Dobbs on a superfiicial level]. Issues of basic survival get the attention of everyone except the brain-dead. Remember the Bolsheviks took power [albeit via a coup d' etat] with the slogan of "Peace, Land and Bread". The internal pages could be more explicit re the role of Jews/Zionists/Israel.

Tench
August 13th, 2005, 07:58 PM
Israel?

Even the very word "Israel" is god awfully boring.

They've been beating the dead corpse of Israel nightly on the big 3 news for decades, and still no one Ive every watched TV with even batted an eye lash.

Israel is a code word for change the channel, see what else is on.

bluedog39
August 13th, 2005, 08:00 PM
Israel?

Even the very word "Israel" is god awfully boring.

They've been beating the dead corpse of Israel nightly on the big 3 news for decades, and still no one Ive every watched TV with even batted an eye lash.

Israel is a code word for change the channel, see what else is on.
OK, just say Jews.

Mush
August 13th, 2005, 10:50 PM
If your goal is to torpedo Sheehan, then yes, put her on the front page.

This exactly the sort of thing I was alluding to in the "Why no false fronts" thread. The Sheehan story is a perfewct "side door" to get people to understand about jews. No, she doesn't use the word jews. No, she doesn't say "The GD kikes killed me son!"

What she does is get our point across, to the masses, without the "white supremicist" baggage. If we hitch her wagon to ours, it is ust what they want. It will be the perfect way to discredit her.

Next on Drudge: "Sheehan has ties to white supremicist movement!"

It sinks her and hurts us. Game: jews.

Alex Linder
August 13th, 2005, 11:25 PM
Except right now the controlled right is tying her to the left. Freeper children tie her to DU, and Limbaugh ties her to Joe Wilson. It might be worthy printing her quote on the cover with her photo. One one of the covers.

Fritz Kuhn
August 13th, 2005, 11:39 PM
Next on Drudge: "Sheehan has ties to white supremicist movement!"

They're already doing it.

http://lonestartimes.com/index.php?p=1341

"This whole episode with Cindy Sheehan is kind of like that. She’s guilty of insane rhetoric – calling Bush "Fuhrer" and saying that he wants to make American a fascist state. She also voiced vaguely anti-Semitic rhetoric when she alleged that the Iraq War was all about protecting Israel, i.e. a Jewish conspiracy (a similar opinion is frenquently expressed by David Duke and his ilk)."

Oy Ze Hate
August 14th, 2005, 12:55 AM
They're already doing it.

http://lonestartimes.com/index.php?p=1341

"This whole episode with Cindy Sheehan is kind of like that. She’s guilty of insane rhetoric – calling Bush "Fuhrer" and saying that he wants to make American a fascist state. She also voiced vaguely anti-Semitic rhetoric when she alleged that the Iraq War was all about protecting Israel, i.e. a Jewish conspiracy (a similar opinion is frenquently expressed by David Duke and his ilk)."

Well war seems endless in the middle east. It's like a veritable breeding ground for war and strife. Even moreso than Afruca. Though Afircans' religious affiliations are rarely discussed. On the other hand, the middle east scenario is "Muslim vs. Jew". Those are both religions. The wars are ideological there, rather than racial or tribal as in the case of niggers in Africa.

Who is our only democratic ally in the all-important oil producing region again? I keep forgetting.

Guilty of insane rhetoric? Mein gott, you'd think they'd just dismiss her as a loon instead of leveling mental delusions against the woman who mentions Israel's interests in the latest war in middle east land.

There is no Israel? There is no jews? They are powerless and constantly being blamed for everything that goes on at their regional doorstep? As if Israel were just some innocent bystander in this Iraq war. Totally unconcerned with what the crazy American imperialists are up to on their front doorstep. Almost lol. It's so obvious a grade school kid could figure it out. And yet the morons keep defaulting to Channel 9, where news of the latest evil done by the terrible terrorists of Muslimville never ceases to assault.

For fuck sake. These people must be willfully blind.

Rounder
August 14th, 2005, 09:06 AM
Hey Alex, you might also include on page one, a list of VNN'ers whom you authorize to be interviewed by the media, ie., You, Me, Chain perhaps, White Will, Agis and anybody else you want to list. Phone numbers must be included too, of course.

We're gonna be gettings lots and lots of media interview opportunities, ya know, parallel with the increase and effectiveness of TAAs.

Steve B
August 14th, 2005, 11:22 AM
If your goal is to torpedo Sheehan, then yes, put her on the front page.

This exactly the sort of thing I was alluding to in the "Why no false fronts" thread. The Sheehan story is a perfewct "side door" to get people to understand about jews. No, she doesn't use the word jews. No, she doesn't say "The GD kikes killed me son!"

What she does is get our point across, to the masses, without the "white supremicist" baggage. If we hitch her wagon to ours, it is ust what they want. It will be the perfect way to discredit her.

Next on Drudge: "Sheehan has ties to white supremicist movement!"

It sinks her and hurts us. Game: jews.

As Alex said: Zionist attack dogs are linking Sheehan with the left. O’Reilly said Sheehan "is in bed with the radical left", and, later suggested that "this kind of behavior borders on treasonous." Fatboy Limblow said Sheehan was "trying to pull a little bit of a swindle" and that "she had been totally co-opted by the whole Michael Moore leftist mentality."

Can the jewsmedia do a complete 180 and then link Sheehan with the "White supremicist movement", which is viewed by Sally Spreadlegs and Joe Sixpack as far right wing reactionary "nutjobs"? Even the lemmings won't buy a switcheroo like that. I say VNN should go with Sheehan and not "sit on this one" as some are advocating.

JoeSixPack
August 15th, 2005, 10:36 PM
Can the jewsmedia do a complete 180 and then link Sheehan with the "White supremicist movement", which is viewed by Sally Spreadlegs and Joe Sixpack as far right wing reactionary "nutjobs"?
Hey!

I don't see them as that! LOL :D

I'M the far right wing reactionary nutjob!

But including some info about Sheehan might not be a bad idea.

There are a lot of ways you could go with this one. If I was in charge of the tabloid content, I'd emphasize the current AIPAC/Rove/TreasonGate.

That s41t is about to blow up. Name those "neoCON" JEWS!

Alex Linder
August 15th, 2005, 11:30 PM
Everyone's trying to use Sheehan. Best use is simply her average face and her quote: "...to defend America, not Israel."

That slides into the average man's mind the concept that israel and America aren't necessarily on the same side. that would have a chance of getting through to the ribbonheads.

Alex Linder
August 15th, 2005, 11:32 PM
Why not lead with this eye opener?

www.cfra.com/images/news/fug.jpg

Write a story about the dead corrections officer that these two left in their wake.

How Jefferson said two different peoples cannot exist in the same government and such......

Just a thought. Leave your remarks if you want.

Why use a story in which a rough-looking white woman is a criminal when we can find stories with better looking white women who are purely victims?

Alex Linder
August 15th, 2005, 11:33 PM
Mr. Linder, I understand that you plan to focus #3 on the jew domination of law schools. Considering current news, I'd like to suggest that you either relegate that to page two, or postpone it, and lead with the Sheehan story. The jewsmedia is giving the story attention but carefully avoiding the woman's main point, that her son died fighting for Israel. What a gold mine and attention grabber, perhaps even among the lemmings, this could be.

We'll have something on Sheehan in there, possibly a cover. There are two covers, of course.

Alex Linder
August 15th, 2005, 11:46 PM
As Alex said: Zionist attack dogs are linking Sheehan with the left. O’Reilly said Sheehan "is in bed with the radical left", and, later suggested that "this kind of behavior borders on treasonous." Fatboy Limblow said Sheehan was "trying to pull a little bit of a swindle" and that "she had been totally co-opted by the whole Michael Moore leftist mentality."

Can the jewsmedia do a complete 180 and then link Sheehan with the "White supremicist movement", which is viewed by Sally Spreadlegs and Joe Sixpack as far right wing reactionary "nutjobs"? Even the lemmings won't buy a switcheroo like that. I say VNN should go with Sheehan and not "sit on this one" as some are advocating.

The jews will do with Sheehan what they always do, see Frontpagemag. They'll put her quote next to David Duke's, thereby proving she's a jew-hater.
At the same time they'll claim she's a crazed leftist who hates America. The idiots who slurp the Repsop won't notice the contradiction.

The jews will do what they do. it's not particularly relevant to us in this case.

The gold here is an average woman making our case in neutral language. A ribbonhead says: my son died for Israel, not America.

All we have to do is print her quotes. Throw in a few more facts, to make a more fleshed out case. A ribbonhead agreeing with the WN position will definitely get into the heads of the people we're trying to reach. Sheehan is the type we're trying to reach. No matter how jews try to spin it, most people will sense she's pretty close to some truth. She's increasing the doubt in the body politic. People are just like animals: they aren't good at thinking, but they're good at sensing danger. They are beginning to sense that this war in Iraq is not going well. The summer patriotism is over and the fall is setting in. Sheehan increases their feeling that the bushies aren't getting the job done. They don't need to know much more, just get the sense the winds are shifting.

Tench
August 15th, 2005, 11:51 PM
Why use a story in which a rough-looking white woman is a criminal when we can find stories with better looking white women who are purely victims?

Because people are highly attuned to the fact that you are using beauty only to stir up their emotions of 'hatred', which they have been taught to suppress at their community churches.

Remember victims dont choose themselves, people will just say, hey thats just a fluke, too bad that girl was beautiful, but thats the odds. What we want to do is spark a thought in the readers mind like, what would make this white woman as average as she might be, choose to be under such a spell by this raw primitive nigger?

The story I suggested is current news, nationwide, and it has a dead law enforcement agent attached to it, which garners sympathy and possible recruits among the law enforcement 'community'.

Not to mention they are such an odd and odd-looking couple. A great story could be written up about them, that would make white egalitarians think twice, if only for a little while.

Antiochus Epiphanes
August 16th, 2005, 01:02 AM
Why use a story in which a rough-looking white woman is a criminal when we can find stories with better looking white women who are purely victims?

Well Alex Tench was just telling me in this other thread how Jews are White and that Jews are not really the problem, it's all the White liberals. The thread in "this just in" subforum about Farrakhan. Tench says we're idiots for saying a kind word or two about Farrakhan. Tench says Farrakhan is a bad dude and we're pathetic. But hey, maybe Tench is an experienced editor, ya know? Give us some more pointers Tench. Tell us more about yourself. Do you have experience in newsmedia? All ears????

Whirlwind
August 16th, 2005, 07:31 AM
Covering the kol nidre oath would fit well in an issue aimed at law school profs, IMO. No one taking this oath should be in a paid position requiring so much as a signature.

Antiochus Epiphanes
August 16th, 2005, 11:22 AM
How about a piece on: metzizah b'peh: ritual child abuse by Jew

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=21940

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/st...9p-287485c.html

Quote:
Mike caught in row over rabbi's herpes
By MAGGIE HABERMAN
DAILY NEWS CITY HALL BUREAU

City officials have moved to ban a rabbi suspected of infecting infants with herpes from performing an ancient circumcision rite, prompting religious Jewish leaders to plead with Mayor Bloomberg to intervene.
Bloomberg sat down at City Hall yesterday with dozens of ultra-Orthodox rabbis, who said they are concerned that such a ban would set a bad precedent, according to several people at the meeting.

The mayor "basically accepted a suggestion that the time should be given for both sides to sit down and iron this thing out," said Rabbi David Niederman, who praised Bloomberg.

But several sources said the mayor promised that the city would never ban a religious practice outright - but also held firm that he "has an obligation" to uphold laws.

The Daily News first reported in February that the city Health Department was investigating whether Rockland County-based Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer gave herpes to a baby through the practice of metzizah b'peh - in which the rabbi uses his mouth to suck blood from the circumcision wound. The baby later died.

On Aug. 1, the Health Department sent Fischer's lawyer a draft of an order banning the rabbi from performing metzizah b'peh in the city, officials said. Fischer has until next week to respond.

But the threat of such an order alarmed the ultrareligious community.

The controversy is still roiling at a time when Bloomberg, who has had a somewhat strained relationship with the Orthodox community, is looking to repair things before the November election.

Originally published on August 12, 2005

Antiochus Epiphanes
August 16th, 2005, 11:24 AM
When I read about that barbaric practice, I think to myself 2 things:

1-- we MUST educate the public about these wicked Jews! People have no CLUE how SICK they are!

2-- why make stuff up about jews when there is the overpowering stench of the TRUTH? With Jews, "truth is stranger than fiction!"

Antiochus Epiphanes
August 16th, 2005, 01:13 PM
Chain has expressed the opinion that an article on the implications of rising fuel prices would be good for this issue. Boy, does that seem timely to me! Can we recycle a good piece by Kievsky or get Rob to write a new one?

Rounder
August 16th, 2005, 04:01 PM
How about a piece on: metzizah b'peh: ritual child abuse by Jew

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=21940

I clicked on the NYDailyNews link, and it came up "This page cannot be found". Where can I go to make a copy of that actual newspaper article. I want a copy for my "Hot Files", and to send to the jewish editor of The Springsfield, New-Leader, Rober Leger, just to hear his spin on Rabbi perverts performing oral sex on infants.

Antiochus Epiphanes
August 16th, 2005, 04:10 PM
I clicked on the NYDailyNews link, and it came up "This page cannot be found". Where can I go to make a copy of that actual newspaper article. I want a copy for my "Hot Files", and to send to the jewish editor of The Springsfield, New-Leader, Rober Leger, just to hear his spin on Rabbi perverts performing oral sex on infants.

mine works ok. you can go to the nydaily news "circ" room and buy a copy I in the mail I suppose. ("circ" room-- get it? circulation/ circumcision?)

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/336689p-287485c.html

Mike caught in row over rabbi's herpes

By MAGGIE HABERMAN
DAILY NEWS CITY HALL BUREAU

City officials have moved to ban a rabbi suspected of infecting infants with herpes from performing an ancient circumcision rite, prompting religious Jewish leaders to plead with Mayor Bloomberg to intervene.
Bloomberg sat down at City Hall yesterday with dozens of ultra-Orthodox rabbis, who said they are concerned that such a ban would set a bad precedent, according to several people at the meeting.

The mayor "basically accepted a suggestion that the time should be given for both sides to sit down and iron this thing out," said Rabbi David Niederman, who praised Bloomberg.

But several sources said the mayor promised that the city would never ban a religious practice outright - but also held firm that he "has an obligation" to uphold laws.

The Daily News first reported in February that the city Health Department was investigating whether Rockland County-based Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer gave herpes to a baby through the practice of metzizah b'peh - in which the rabbi uses his mouth to suck blood from the circumcision wound. The baby later died.

On Aug. 1, the Health Department sent Fischer's lawyer a draft of an order banning the rabbi from performing metzizah b'peh in the city, officials said. Fischer has until next week to respond.

But the threat of such an order alarmed the ultrareligious community.

The controversy is still roiling at a time when Bloomberg, who has had a somewhat strained relationship with the Orthodox community, is looking to repair things before the November election.

Originally published on August 12, 2005

Rounder
August 16th, 2005, 05:34 PM
mine works ok. you can go to the nydaily news "circ" room and buy a copy I in the mail I suppose. ("circ" room-- get it? circulation/ circumcision?)

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/336689p-287485c.html

Presto !! I got it that time. Thanks. I'll have lots of fun with this.

lawrence dennis
August 17th, 2005, 06:15 PM
Covering the kol nidre oath would fit well in an issue aimed at law school profs, IMO. No one taking this oath should be in a paid position requiring so much as a signature.I like this idea. I think it would be particularly important to mention this in any discussion of jew judges, especially supreme court kikes.

Ron Doggett
August 18th, 2005, 06:42 PM
I hope immigration will be in the 3rd issue. Here in Virginia it's becoming the issue, places like Herndon are on edge. It would also be a good chance to promote the film Line in the Sand.

Rounder
August 18th, 2005, 06:59 PM
I hope immigration will be in the 3rd issue. Here in Virginia it's becoming the issue, places like Herndon are on edge. It would also be a good chance to promote the film Line in the Sand.

I agree, Ron. Immigration is THE issue. BTW, Alex says he'll have #3 finished by Sept 1st.

Meanwhile, I urge VNN'ers to order and distribute Dr Ed Fields newspaper, Truth-at-Last. I spoke with him today and ordered $40 worth of his latest edition, just published. (300 or so copies). VNN'ers can either phone him weekdays after 2 PM at: 770-919-1252, or mail in their orders to: POB 1211, Marietta, GA 30061.

And I happen to know you've personally purchased and distributed countless thousands of his super effective, pro-White, anti-jew 12-page WN newspaper.

John Yaeger
August 27th, 2005, 08:16 AM
I've seen two articles on here that I think would be VERY powerful in an AA.

One is about the government suing for back rent from the people whose property they stole in the New London case.

The other is that reporter bitch that is trying to villify the old man whose wife was killed. I think Chain posted this one just yesterday. People need to know that they can't even be mad about their loved ones being killed...they are thought of as more guilty than the killers.