PDA

View Full Version : Yahweh Chats About Cannibalism and Other Fetishes


no_nomen
December 7th, 2003, 05:38 PM
Yahweh Chats About Cannibalism and Other Fetishes

---------------------------------------------------

The Bizarre Nature of Jewish (and Christian) Religion
Editor National Militant

"How odd of God to choose the Jews.
Yet odder still for those who choose
a Jewish God but spurn the Jews."


Instead of rehashing old quotes from the Talmud like many publications do we at National Militant simply devised a better way to quote Jewish religious tomes that are available for easy referance to anyone. The Talmud is a vile set of volumes if anything ever existed. But the vileness of the Jewish religion can easily be seen far back into the days of the Hebrews and provide much insight into the bizarre and alien nature by reviewing various accounts from the Old Testament.

Yahweh Chats About Cannibalism

In this most vile account the Israelites make their God angry and so in the midst of a siege God chastises them and proclaims that they will suffer famine. But there is a way out according to Yahweh:

Deuteronomy 28:53-55 "And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the LORD thy God hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee: So that the man that is tender among you, and very delicate, his eye shall be evil toward his brother, and toward the wife of his bosom, and toward the remnant of his children which he shall leave: So that he will not give to any of them of the flesh of his children whom he shall eat: because he hath nothing left him in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee in all thy gates."

And during yet another siege:

II Kings 6:26-29 "And as the king of Israel was passing by upon the wall, there cried a woman unto him, saying, Help, my lord, O king. And he said, If the LORD do not help thee, whence shall I help thee? out of the barnfloor, or out of the winepress? And the king said unto her, What aileth thee? And she answered, This woman said unto me, Give thy son, that we may eat him to day, and we will eat my son to morrow. So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son, that we may eat him: and she hath hid her son."

Are these isolated incidents? In 70 A.D. under the command of the Roman General Titus a siege was commenced against the city of Masada. Which according to Jewish tradition SIX BILLION Jews were killed. Yes, Jewish quackery tells us that the "holocaust" at Masada killed many more Jews than were in existance in the entire world. Sound familiar?

During the siege cannibalism was common. Babies were boiled to feed the starving parents. Hard to believe? The Jewish historian Josephus made a very clear recount of this event in his writings.

Is It A Wall Only For Wailing?

2 Kings 9:8 - "For the whole house of Ahab shall perish: and I will cut off from Ahab him that pisseth against the wall, and him that is shut up and left in Israel"

The aspect of urinating against a wall is so crucial to Hebraic thought it is mentioned 5 other times in:
1 Samuel 25:22, 1 Samuel 25:34, 1 Kings 14:10, 1 Kings 16:11, and 1 Kings 21:21.

Paternal Molestation Of Daughters Is Law

The father of a daughter not deemed by the husband as a virgin inspects his daughter's vagina and shows the cloth or "token" with the proof on it to the elders.

Deutoronomy 22:13-17 "If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her, And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid [virgin]: Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate: And the damsel's father shall say unto the elders, I gave my daughter unto this man to wife, and he hateth her; And, lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, I found not thy daughter a maid; and yet these are the tokens of my daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city."

God of Israel Commands Images Of Golden Emerods

Samuel 6:4-5 "Then said they, What shall be the trespass offering which we shall return to him? They answered, Five golden emerods, and five golden mice, according to the number of the lords of the Philistines: for one plague was on you all, and on your lords. Wherefore ye shall make images of your emerods, and images of your mice that mar the land; and ye shall give glory unto the God of Israel: peradventure he will lighten his hand from off you, and from off your gods, and from off your land."

The King James Dictionary defines "emerods" as "hemorrhoids."

Yes, It Gets Weirder

Judges 19:22-30 recounts the story of a member of the Levitical tribe; who served as the priests. And being masters of Yahweh's word they got first picks on women, wine, and wealth. In this particurally noxious tale a Levite entering a house of a "pious man" is propositioned for sexual activity by men of the town. The owner of the house offers his virgin daughter and the Levite's concubine instead.

The sodomites, apparently bisexual, rape the concubine and beat her to a pulp in front of the house. The Levite demands that the concubine get up. When she does not rise he cuts her body into twelve pieces and sends these parts all around Israel.

"Great" Hebrew Patriarchs

With the assistance of the American writer and historian John Remsburg, 1848-1919, we shed some light on the behavior of these "great" men looked up to as heroes by Jews and Christians alike. Commentary in quotes is from Remsburg.

Abraham - "An insane barbarian patriarch who married his sister, denied his wife, and seduced her handmaid; who drove one child into the desert to starve, and made preparations to butcher the other."

Jacob - "Another patriarch, who won God's love by deceiving his father, cheating his uncle, robbing his brother, practicing bigamy with two of his cousins, and committing fornication with two of his housemaids."

Moses - "...a man who exterminated whole nations to secure the spoils of war, a man who butchered in cold blood thousands of captive widows, a man who tore dimpled babes from the breasts of dying mothers and put them to a cruel death; a man who made orphans of thirty-two thousand innocent girls, and turned sixteen thousand of them over to the brutal lusts of a savage soldiery."

David - "...desiring to lead an enemy's troops against his own countrymen; a thief and robber, plundering the country on every side; a liar, uttering wholesale falsehoods to screen himself from justice...torturing and slaughtering thousands of men, women, and children, making them pass through burning brick-kilns, carving them up with saws and axes, and tearing them into pieces under harrows of iron...a drunken debauchee, dancing half-naked before the maids of his household; a lecherous old libertine, abducting and ravishing the wife of a faithful soldier...having his faithful soldier put to death after desolating his home; a hoary-headed fiend, foaming with vengeance on his dying bed, demanding with his last breath the deaths of two aged men, one of whom had most contributed to make his kingdom what it was, the other a man to whom he had promised protection."

Thine Daughter's Dainty Hand For A Sack Of Foreskins

What better way to follow up commentary on David than recounting the "foreskin story." So humorous, so barbaric, so unbelieveable it could only be the actions of a great Hebrew patriarch. Open your Bibles to I Samuel 18:25-27:

"And Saul said, Thus shall ye say to David, The king desireth not any dowry, but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king's enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines. And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king's son in law: and the days were not expired. Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife."
(snip)

A God Of Fecal Matter?

Malachai 2:2-3 "If ye will not hear, and if ye will not lay it to heart, to give glory unto my name, saith the Lord of hosts, I will even send a curse upon you, and I will curse your blessings: yea, I have cursed them already, because ye do not lay it to heart. Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces, even the dung of your solemn feasts; and one shall take you away with it."

Ezekiel 4:12-13 "And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight. And the Lord said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them."

Is This Your God?

This has been such a small sampling and a broad view of this sick and depraved racial and religious blight. Unfortunately there is not enough space at this time to do a complete review of the matter. If anyone reading these accounts and the plethora of others much like it does not feel something sick in their stomach then perhaps they are victims of "pisseth against the brain."

No man or woman having any shred of deceny or self-respect would abide to any doctrine that praises a sadistic God who orders his people to be humiliated with dung and resort to cannibalism. Nor any that holds such deviant scum as the patriarchs as "forthright men" should be tolerated much less taught to children.

Christians today complain, with good purpose, of the filth and degeneracy in the popular mass media but how much of this filth can be found in over one half of the Bible, Old Testament, that they use to guide the future of their families and community?

X1965ChainImmigrants
December 8th, 2003, 03:44 PM
Almost as much blood for the Lord in Leviticus as in a girl's Anne Rice vampire novel!

...the bullock shall be killed before the LORD....And the skin of the bullock, and all his flesh, with his head, and with his legs, and his inwards, and his dung...the priest shall dip his finger in some of the blood, and sprinkle it seven times before the LORD, even before the vail.

4:18
And he shall put some of the blood upon the horns of the altar which is before the LORD, that is in the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall pour out all the blood at the bottom of the altar of the burnt offering, which is at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/lev/4.html
http://bible.gospelcom.net/cgi-bin/bible?SearchType=AND&language=english&version=NIV&searchpage=0&search=lord+blood&x=16&y=13

waj44
May 1st, 2004, 04:37 PM
Yahweh Chats About Cannibalism and Other Fetishes

---------------------------------------------------

The Bizarre Nature of Jewish (and Christian) Religion
Editor National Militant

This article is nothing but trash and distortions.

Aryan Lord
May 1st, 2004, 07:12 PM
Quote:

Yahweh Chats About Cannibalism

....the vileness of the Jewish religion can easily be seen far back into the days of the Hebrews and provide much insight into the bizarre and alien nature by reviewing various accounts from the Old Testament.

No man or woman having any shred of deceny or self-respect would abide to any doctrine that praises a sadistic God who orders his people to be humiliated with dung and resort to cannibalism.

Christians today complain, with good purpose, of the filth and degeneracy in the popular mass media but how much of this filth can be found in over one half of the Bible, Old Testament, that they use to guide the future of their families and community?

Actually Jarl have you read the bible? Ever? If you did then you would know that it is approximately 80% of the bible,not 50%. Also 2/3 of the books of the bible are in the Old Testament.

Aryan Lord
May 1st, 2004, 08:06 PM
:eek:

AL, Thanks!

WOW! That's even worse!

Not having a Bible right handy near the computer to check I was relying on Editor of the National Militant. Looks like he was being kind in his estimate of percentages. Thanks for the heads-up!




Vlad,

Very good observation! It looks like the WN movment better do some massive house cleaning before they worry about the Jews. If you act and think like a Jew you are a Jew!

LOL _ And as Varg Vikernes puts it so well:

... insane; it is contra-effective and dangerous to our survival. It starts with their symbolical murder of Aryan children - which they call baptism. This is a ritual murder of the Aryan soul, they symbolically drown the Pagan man and bring him back to life as an Artificial Jew, by “shouting out” the name of the Jewish soul that is to replace the Aryan one. First they destroy our Aryan soul, with Christianity, and then they use this to destroy our Aryan blood - as the resistance to this genocide has been broken down by the murder of our Aryan souls!

So wake up my friends! Wake up from the Jewish sleep and reclaim Your Aryan souls, by hailing Wuotan! Fight for the truth, like our forefathers did, like the Third Reich did! Like WE do! Wake up brothers and sisters, wake up and follow the call of Wuotan! Follow the voice of your blood, and of your heart! It will not lie to you! Heil Wuotan!

As long as you have your Jewish faith (and act like Jews) you are Artificial Jews and shall be treated accordingly!






I love Varg Vikernes and I love anyone who loves him. ;)

waj44
May 2nd, 2004, 07:30 AM
...:eek:

...Bible Quotes = "Trash and Distortions" ?

...:confused:

Bible quotes taken out of context and without understanding = Trash and distortions.

waj44
May 2nd, 2004, 07:37 AM
LOL _ And as Varg Vikernes puts it so well:

... insane; it is contra-effective and dangerous to our survival. It starts with their symbolical murder of Aryan children - which they call baptism. This is a ritual murder of the Aryan soul, they symbolically drown the Pagan man and bring him back to life as an Artificial Jew, by “shouting out” the name of the Jewish soul that is to replace the Aryan one. First they destroy our Aryan soul, with Christianity, and then they use this to destroy our Aryan blood - as the resistance to this genocide has been broken down by the murder of our Aryan souls!


Varg is a moron who doesn't have a clue. One's soul isn't replaced in Baptism. See the following for some facts:

BAPTISM

The practice of baptism as a religious symbol did not begin with Jesus. Baptism, which means literally the immersion in water, was practiced among the people of the Old Testament as well as the people who belonged to pagan religions. The universal meaning of baptism is that of "starting anew," of dying to an old, way of life and being born again into a new way of life. Thus, baptism was always connected with repentance which means a moral conversion, a "change of mind," a change in living from something old and bad to something new and good.

Thus, in the Gospel we find John the Baptist baptizing the people as a sign of repentance in preparation for the Kingdom of God which was coming to men with Christ the Messiah. Christ himself was baptized by John not because he was sinful and needed to repent, but because in allowing himself to be baptized he showed that indeed he was God's "Beloved Son," the Saviour and Messiah, the "Lamb of God who takes upon himself the sins of the world" (See Mt 3, Mk 1, Lk 3, Jn 1-3).

In the Christian Church the practice of baptism takes on a new and particular significance. It no longer remains merely a sign of moral change and spiritual rebirth. It becomes very specifically the act of a person's death and resurrection in and with Jesus. Christian baptism is man's participation in the event of Easter. It is a "new birth by water and the Holy Spirit" into the Kingdom of God (Jn 3:5).

Baptism in the Church begins with the rejection of Satan and the acceptance of Christ. Before being baptized, a person -- or his sponsors or godparents for him -- officially proclaims the symbol of Christian faith, the Creed. Because the godparent speaks on behalf of the child, sponsors his entrance into the Church and "receives" the child out of the baptismal waters into the Church and cares for his spiritual life, the godparent himself must be a member of the Church.

After the proclamation of faith, the baptismal water is prayed over and blessed as the sign of the goodness of God's creation. The person to be baptized is also prayed over and blessed with sanctified oil as the sign that his creation by God is holy and good. And then, after the solemn proclamation of "Alleluia" (God be praised), the person is immersed three times in the water in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.

Through the act of immersion, the baptized person dies to this world and is born again in the resurrection of Christ into eternal life. He is clothed with the "garments of salvation" symbolized by the white baptismal robe which is the "new humanity" of Jesus himself who is the new and heavenly Adam (See Jn 3, Rom 5, 1 Cor 15). Thus, the words of the Apostle Paul are chanted as the newly-baptized is led in procession around the baptismal font three times as the symbol of his procession to the Kingdom of God and his entrance into eternal life: "For as many as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. Alleluia" (Gal 3:27).

In ancient times this procession was made from the baptistery to the church where the newly-baptized received Holy Communion at the celebration of the Divine Liturgy. Baptisms were normally done in connection with the Easter Liturgy; our present procession around the church building on Easter night is nothing more than our remembrance that we are baptized, that we have left the life of this world to enter the eternal life of the Risen Christ in the Kingdom of God. This new life is given to us in the life of the Church, most specifically in the Divine Liturgy. Before the baptismal procession and the reading of the Epistle and the Gospel is fulfilled in the reception of Holy Communion, however, the newly-baptized is given the gift of the Holy Spirit in the sacrament of Chrismation.

waj44
May 2nd, 2004, 03:45 PM
The trouble is that there are 1001 convenient interpretations of a given sentence that can be tailor made by the crafty stiletto-tongue preacher to fit 1001 situations.

Let's toy with this idea for fun.

Of course, people can put their personal spin on the scriptures, but when they go against the traditional interpretations, the spin is exposed as bogus. But when people don't know any better, they will accept whatever they like. This is why it means nothing if someone goes through the Bible cherry-picking verses and assigning or implying incorrect meanings.

Fanatics whose minds are clouded with obsessive Christ hatred will see evil in every verse.

Draco
May 2nd, 2004, 06:46 PM
Fanatics whose minds are clouded with obsessive Christ hatred will see evil in every verse.

I'm not a fanatic, just an anti-semite. Since I hate jews, I hate Christ.

One of those 2+2=4 kind of things.

It'll sink in later man.

Nigger_Boy
May 2nd, 2004, 08:32 PM
This article is nothing but trash and distortions.

Yes, Old Testament quotes are pretty much trash, since it was jewish "scholars" and jewish scribes (scribblers) who wrote it. But then again everything kikes do is a sick distortion.

Consider the irony. Jewish "scholars" write a book about their sick little belief systems. In this book, which we call the Bible, the jews have their "god", whose name is Yahweh, "choose" a certain favorite tribe. Gee, I wonder who that sick bastard Yahweh (invisible lord who can't be seen or known) is going to choose? Great post no nomen. I'm just pointing out the irony of a jew written book of fairy tales and myths "choosing" a favorite people.

It's a little like a lottery run by jews where the only winners just happen to be jews. Or something like that. Jews are a blight unto the nations and the misfortune of humanity.

And don't forget, Yahweh is the very beloved god of the jews. This is the same jewish God who suppposedly DROWNED THE ENTIRE WORLD because something about the gentiles really pissed him off. And guess who got saved, of all those countless drownings? Eight jews (all members of one family) who then supposedly spawned all of humanity. Doh!

Now I'm not taking the OT literally but simply pointing out the idiocy of this jewish "holy" book. Jews began with lies and are a race of people who simply have to keep lying and lying to maintain the facade. What a diseased people!

waj44
May 3rd, 2004, 08:05 AM
I'm not a fanatic, just an anti-semite. Since I hate jews, I hate Christ.

One of those 2+2=4 kind of things.

It'll sink in later man.

Well, I've been involved in WN for a while, seen alot of things, met a lot of people. IOW, I didn't just fall off the turnip truck. I've heard all this anti-Christ crap a million times. It was crap even before I became a Christian.

MacDiarmid
May 3rd, 2004, 08:51 AM
Well, I've been involved in WN for a while, seen alot of things, met a lot of people. IOW, I didn't just fall off the turnip truck. I've heard all this anti-Christ crap a million times. It was crap even before I became a Christian.

You hit it on the nose "waj44." "This anti-Christ crap..." These are the howlings of anti-Christ's towel boys. How strange, though, that these haters of Christ and Christians, fall like submissive children into the army of anti-Christ. They're sons of Satan, like the jews that Christ warned about and REJECTED as the "chosen people." He cast them off and White Gentiles built the Faith.

These unformed brethren in the White movement have no sense of salvation history and become withered leaves on the tree waiting for a gust of wind to blow them into oblivion. They reject God, and as a consequence, reject their European heritage. Sadly, too many of these children, when the pimples heal on their tender faces, will be cauldrons of anger and rage, hate-filled men whose only god becomes the twisted reflection they see each day in the mirror.

The most ironic thing, because of their ignorance of Christianity, is that, in this grand drama of salvation history, they are allies with the jew and his gathered evil. They are, for lack of a better term.... Secret Jews!

MacDiarmid
Ne obliviscaris!! (Forget Not!!)

Whirlwind
May 3rd, 2004, 09:56 AM
Job 38:1 "Then the Lord answered Job out of the WHIRLWIND, and said (2) Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?"
Whee! Wasn't that fun? And completely omni-directional.

waj44
May 3rd, 2004, 02:07 PM
The most ironic thing, because of their ignorance of Christianity, is that, in this grand drama of salvation history, they are allies with the jew and his gathered evil. They are, for lack of a better term.... Secret Jews!

Agree. I would also call them "useful idiots" in the service of the Jew.

Antiochus Epiphanes
May 3rd, 2004, 03:54 PM
There is always room for a few more in my army. lol According to jesus salvation comes though the jews. So I will stick with Wotanism which is the heritage of Europe and my ancestors and you can go on and pretend alot of hooked nose semitic babbling from the middle east is European heritage. lol

I think the monotheistic God idea comes from the ancient Egyptians and the kikenvermin stole it from them when off stealing geld under Joseph and worshippping chtnoic earth-fertility deities along with Jahveh who later "won out." over moloch and astaroth and the rest. LOL The story of Elijah competing against the baal-priests shows the hebes still believed in them, imho. I'd like to see a copy of Savitri Devi's book on Akhenaton, there may be more to this hypothesis.

PLus, you have the first resurrection story with Osiris. So you might think that the idea of JHC rising up was an Aryan invention too. LOL If you think the ancient Egyptians were Aryan that is---

waj44
May 3rd, 2004, 03:57 PM
So it was mortal men who made the traditional interpretations. We get to choose the interpretation we are most comfortable with and all others therefore become bogus.

So if I'm more comfortable with catholicism, the baptist becomes bogus. If I'm more comfortable with baptist, catholic becomes bogus.


Considering that the Baptists didn't exist until 1500, one obviously has to look elsewhere.

There really are only two "traditional" forms of Christianity: Orthodoxy and Catholicism. But having said that, there still exists a certain core of traditional Christianity that even Orthodoxy, Catholicism, AND the Baptists share. I would even stretch the definition of tradition to include that in many cases. The anti-white, pro-Jew garbage that we see today isn't part of that.



I've been there and done that. It is all false, all made up by men long since dead and that is the Truth.

Well, I'm glad that you have surveyed the world and determined what is true. I'm sure everyone will be relieved.

Fredrik Haerne
May 3rd, 2004, 04:09 PM
They reject God, and as a consequence, reject their European heritage.

*ROTFLOL*

Good one! :D

I note that the sticklickers have yet to try to explain those descriptions of cannibalism. You just get the usual "You are taking things out of context!" but no explanations. Almost as if ... there are no good explanations.

In truth, the Bible is most of the time pretty clear, pretty easy to read, and that is why the sticklickers have to come up with countless excuses for every passage, because a lot of it is dung and crazy.


Just say NO to universalist religions! Only YOU can stop universalism!

waj44
May 3rd, 2004, 04:11 PM
It does not matter the whole concept have been in jew hands for thousands of years and have been jewified they put there crazy slant on it. As for Savitri Devi book about Akhenaton it was called hymn to the sun I read most of it. You can find it on line.

Come on, that nazi crank, Devi? The woman was nuts.

BTW, she was so "pro-white" that she married a wog and spent most of her life living in some shit hole in India. Hitler would have probably had her thrown into a concentration camp for racemixing!

Fredrik Haerne
May 3rd, 2004, 04:14 PM
Come on, that nazi crank, Devi? The woman was nuts.

BTW, she was so "pro-white" that she married a wog and spent most of her life living in some shit hole in India. Hitler would have probably had her thrown into a concentration camp for racemixing!

Ahh, the Jewing of history! I note that the sticklickers learn from the Jews they worship.

"Nazi crank"? So you don't like nazists, boy? Then you're in the wrong place. Free Republic is waiting for you.

The truth is that she married an Indian nationalist out of convenience. Then they got divorced when the arrangement had played out its role, and there were no hard feelings; it was an example of nationalists cooperating. But of course, a sticklicker has to lie about any nationalist who isn't worshipping the jew-on-a-stick. They are dangerous that way. Dual loyalties.

What comes first, sticklickers, your race or your religion? If your god told you you should work for the destruction of the White race, would you do it? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Draco
May 3rd, 2004, 04:17 PM
Jewsus!

Fun for the little Aryan children, itz!!

http://members.rogers.com/tuan_vantu/jeebus.jpg

Yummy!

http://www.corporatemofo.com/Pix/020828_jeebus.jpg

Say you love Jewsus! SAY IT!!!

http://www.fama.net/Illustration/Officer_Friendly.gif

Used to have a hilarious drawing of Roman Centurions throwing darts at Jewsus while he was nailed to that stick. Think it was in a Loompanics catalog.

FranzJoseph
May 3rd, 2004, 04:31 PM
What comes first, sticklickers, your race or your religion? If your god told you you should work for the destruction of the White race, would you do it? A simple yes or no will suffice.

Is not George Bush america's unofficial pontif (maximus?) and supported by many xians, and

Is his behavior an indicator of the xians who support him, and

Is it unfair to note your question has been answered by this fact?

More, given Bush's pronouncements on taking orders from his "god", if there are honorable nationalist xians their first job would be repudiating him, it would be logical to assume.

Let's be fair:

Honorable Christians on this forum are repudiating President Bush so we are not dealing with anything like a monolith here.

Let's face it, if us pagans have a special disgust for our own members who behave ingraciously, it follows that honorable xians should have a special disgust and hate for King George.

Treat the good ones good and ignore the bad ones. It works.

waj44
May 3rd, 2004, 08:49 PM
Ahh, the Jewing of history! I note that the sticklickers learn from the Jews they worship.

"Nazi crank"? So you don't like nazists, boy? Then you're in the wrong place. Free Republic is waiting for you.

The woman was a crank. Anybody can see that.


The truth is that she married an Indian nationalist out of convenience. Then they got divorced when the arrangement had played out its role, and there were no hard feelings; it was an example of nationalists cooperating. But of course, a sticklicker has to lie about any nationalist who isn't worshipping the jew-on-a-stick. They are dangerous that way. Dual loyalties.

Yada, yada, yada. You got more excuses than a nigger.

No race conscious white women is going to marry a wog for any reason. And what kind of white person prefers the company of non-whites to people of her own kind? You telling me that's normal? Gimme a break.

I've read Devi's books and the book written about her. She was a wack job.



What comes first, sticklickers, your race or your religion? If your god told you you should work for the destruction of the White race, would you do it? A simple yes or no will suffice.

God doesn't tell people to do that. Only satan or men tell people to do that. Why would God tell people to create something He created? Your question doesn't even make sense.

waj44
May 3rd, 2004, 08:52 PM
Where are these traditionals hiding now that the zionist cult is in control? Where are these elusive righteous christians that we hear so much about but see none of? They exist only in fantasy or maybe in history.

The vast majority are multicultural globalists in Israel's terror camp. Where are the good christians? Dead?

The greatest Jew fighters in history were Christians. No traditional Christian can be pro-Jew. Its impossible. If someone is pro-Jew and calls themselves a Christian, they lie.

waj44
May 4th, 2004, 12:30 AM
Fredrik asks waj a very simple question:

Your question makes as much sense as asking if God would tell me to worship Satan. Its a ridiculous question.

waj44
May 4th, 2004, 01:00 AM
This waj person reminds me more and more of a jew.

LMAO!

Well, at least you make me laugh.

waj44
May 4th, 2004, 01:29 AM
Well, do not laugh too hard you might choke on your bagel.

Quit making idiotic comments and I won't have to laugh.

waj44
May 4th, 2004, 01:48 AM
Coming from you that is funny. What would jesus do?

Probably laugh.

Whirlwind
May 4th, 2004, 06:42 AM
waj44 please refer back to post #38.
"God doesn't tell people to do that. Only satan or men tell people to do that. Why would god tell people to create (destroy?) something he created?"
Is this the same god of the flood? The god who created the folks of Sodom and Gamorrah? Come on now, the O.T. is full of this killing his creation stuff. Which makes your answer no answer at all. The question remains- which is more important? Religion, race, or nation? Not that difficult to answer. Though the answer may be more revealing than you are able to accept.

waj44
May 4th, 2004, 07:22 AM
waj44 please refer back to post #38.
"God doesn't tell people to do that. Only satan or men tell people to do that. Why would god tell people to create (destroy?) something he created?"
Is this the same god of the flood? The god who created the folks of Sodom and Gamorrah? Come on now, the O.T. is full of this killing his creation stuff. Which makes your answer no answer at all. The question remains- which is more important? Religion, race, or nation? Not that difficult to answer. Though the answer may be more revealing than you are able to accept.

Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed due to their homosexual perversion and that Abraham couldn't find even one decent person in that place.

The flood came for more than one reason, but one was because of the Nephalim - the giant mongrels who were the offspring of the sons of God and the daughters of men. They caused "violence to increase in the earth." Therefore, some say interracial marriage was a cause of God destroying the world with a flood.

God sometimes will destroy men for wickedness. I suppose, therefore, that if our race became thoroughly evil, God might destroy us too. But I don't think that's really what's happening to us now, rather we're just suffering because of our disobedience of God's laws. If we straightened out, we could save ourselves.

Fredrik Haerne
May 4th, 2004, 01:46 PM
Waj is bending over backwards to amuse us! In regard to Savitri Devi he shows the inferior's hatred of his betters, which is only natural. And he dodges a simple question just like we all knew he would:

God doesn't tell people to do that. Only satan or men tell people to do that. Why would God tell people to create something He created? Your question doesn't even make sense.

Come on now, show your true colors. I'm not asking why he would tell you to do that. And besides, don't you sticklickers insist that god's ways are inscrutable? I am asking if you would obey him or not if he told you to do that. My guess is you would say "I'm sure he has his reasons. And I want to go to heaven, so I'll jump through any loops he holds up for me."

You say he abandoned the Jews, right? God hates Jews? Suppose he would change his mind? Are you saying it is impossible for him to change his mind? How can you be sure of that? Suppose he wanted the world to be inhabited only by Jews and niggers, and he ordered you to do what you can to make that happen. Never mind his reasons -- for all you know he could just be bored of it all, or maybe he has decided to make something good out of the Jews and niggers once Whites are out of the picture. But it doesn't matter, and you know it. The question that matters is, and I ask again:

If God told you to work for the destruction of the White race, would you do it?

Antiochus Epiphanes
May 4th, 2004, 01:53 PM
The question is a self answering one, the christlings answer themselfs with there mantra of GOD, race then nation. They would be too afraid of the mythical hell to act otherwise. .....

False premise question. God- race-nation are different things. One more important than the other is too imprecise to answer. Render unto Ceasar is the answer. The point is, "God" as an undifferentiated transcendant reality is more fundamental than race or nation or species or matter vs energy for that matter. That is the point of God: the undifferentiated transcendant reality. Even your Wotanism perceived that much when it refered to the formless Void from whence Ymir emerged.

So in the same way dogs and cats and humans and congoids all are subject to gravity, they are all subject to certain other material or spiritual laws. Religion is a domain that deals with the spiritual and the corruption of it to "dictate" the material social order contrary to natural organic arrangments is where your jew thought control comes in.

But even the Jew has a place not unlike your Lucifer whose rebellion glorified creation. And so we must overcome the Jew and his subversive disorder thus restoring a harmonious social order to the world.

To say, render unto caesar what is caesar and unto God what is God's, is anything but subversive of legitimate civil authority. But also it implies an ideal harmony between the spiritual order and the material.

Anyhow I could carry on in this light except I have to assume my most assiduous reader Mr Jewonastick.

The bottom line is this question is like "which came first chicken or the egg." False premise, simplistic, and argumentative.

Here's a different answer that gets to the heart of the matter. Race exists as surely as do nations. If somebody's idea of "God" negates the fact and reality of race-- or the fact and reality that nations exist, like em or not-- then that idea of "God" is fundamentally flawed and what emerges from it will be flawed in turn.

Fredrik Haerne
May 4th, 2004, 02:09 PM
Antiochus, you're a good man, but sometimes you lay down arguments that twist and turn more than a nigger asked what two plus two makes. There are lots of strong intellects in this forum, but an intellectual who is also smart knows to speak clearly if he wants people to read the stuff. Good that you bring up Oden though. I will make it simple:

If Oden really would exist (and asatroende are too smart to believe he does, it's just a cultural and philosophical thing) and told me to work for the destruction of the White race, I would tell him to go screw himself. My loyalty is with the White race first, the standard bearer of Life.

Your turn now, waj! Show your true colors! Only one thing can be the most important to a man. What is the most important thing to you, your race or your god?

Antiochus Epiphanes
May 4th, 2004, 02:22 PM
Right well I do degenerate into a sophistry of sorts at times. That's the influence of my ed-jew-cation. LOL

Let's remember that incident where the chieftan considered conversion. Except he wanted to know if his ancestors would be in heaven or hell. The priest said hell, and the chieftan said, forget it than, I'd rather spend eternity with my ancestors in hell. Or something like that.

I certainly empathize with the chieftan. I dont really believe in any such personalized heaven or hell and generally I assume that physical death is the end of my sentient self aware existence. But I certainly would not condemn my pagan ancestors for disbelief that is idiocy. I try to consider why they held the beliefs they did and what universal spiritual truths may be derived from these spiritual traditions and how I might apply some of those truths to our own circumstances.

Antiochus Epiphanes
May 4th, 2004, 04:01 PM
Well, AE since you got the jesus all figured out, I suggest you start going around to all those millions of christians who are working for the ruin of there race. Do not worry I will not be in the back pewyelling "stick kikes for all", or anything or the sort. LOL

And as for render unto to Ceasar what is Ceasars and God what is Gods. I have heard that one twisted in to so many ways to justifiy so many things. What makes your version of it any different?

ha well I wont quit my day job.

As for my version, it is right because it allows people to respect the state when we tell them to and tear it down when we tell them to. LOL Get the idea? JewSA bad WhiteSA good. One disorder the other harmony. Here's why: God wills that Jews "go away" fast and we send the nigras back to Africka. He jes tole me so. LOL Get enough people saying that at once and it may just happen.

If you say what's to prevent the next guy from using your altered understanding of religion against you, well, that's like having guns. The point is the cat is out of the bag and there's no going back. You either use the technology or it gets used on you. Wanting to throw back to animism-paganism is like yearning for the old days when you could joust. Aint gonna happen.