PDA

View Full Version : making VNN TV reality


Alex Linder
June 4th, 2004, 04:11 PM
http://www.vnnforum.com/main/2004b/60404hartmannmediareview.htm

Media Review: Democracy Now!
by Richard Hartmann

4 June 2004

If you've put on your local public access channel lately, you might have seen a program called "Democracy Now!" It seems to be some kind of leftist, outside-the-mainstream deal; anti-war, anti-Zionist, riding the wave of popular sentiment that's sweeping the world today. This is the sort of thing we should be getting into, from our own perspective, on that same wave. I've seen the program countless times (though I haven't actually watched it). It's been regular, consistent, and very professional. Raw footage from Occupied Palestine, of public rallies and events and speeches, phone interviews, video interviews, news and commentary, all broadcast regularly on public access. We can do this too, with footage of our own rallies and events, of interviews and so on, and footage of Occupied America - AmeriKwa - Detroit, L.A., etc. Browned-out areas of our former country. Even entertainment. How about a show called 'The Equality Bus: Bringing Diversity to a Town Near You,' where a bunch of niggers are bused into some suburban shopping mall and let loose and the ensuing chaos filmed. Hey, that's integration, and people need to experience it. It is only the lack of real experience, real contact with 'diversity' that the Great Lie is able to exist and be maintained. It is only the suburban, middle class white who, having no contact with real blacks, can have this television image of them, and this image drives the voting patterns and resulting demographic changes. If whites were to actually be exposed to real diversity, rather than television diversity, the whole game would be up. One of our key tasks is therefore to expose whites to real diversity on our own terms and timetable, before it comes to them and us and we have nowhere left to flee. This can be done through video and public access programming.
Well, that's down the line, of course. We'd need a bus. But we can certainly expose visually to whites now through use of public access and online broadcast what we can one day expose physically to them when we have greater means.

Democracy Now! probably has jews involved, and money. It seems to be aligned with the whole Soros 'MoveOn.com' current in left-wing politics, which, while anti-Zionist, is riddled with Jews from top to bottom, from Soros at the top to the likely-jew host of Democracy Now! at bottom. But the quality of the video is no better than what we can produce and reach the public with via public access. We can produce the same sort of programming, relatively easily. We have television, both through traditional broadcast and through the internet, it's just a matter of uploading a video. Any website can do this. Why aren't we doing this yet? What's our excuse? VNN can soon be hosting video and online television programming, just as WR already does and other groups likely will be doing in the future. We should spearhead it.
Like Democracy Now!, we can be reaching the general public via public access with totally uncensored, raw original footage of things that the mainstream media labor tirelessly to censor. As already said, footage of both Occupied, war-ravaged Palestine and Occupied, Black-ravaged AmeriKwa, can be aired, easy. A picture is worth a thousand words, and can easily cancel out 40 years of TV-Government brainwashing, because it is a powerful reality, more powerful than streams of words that ring increasingly hollow these days. Between September 11th and the failure of the Iraq war, the system is losing its credibility. It's our time to capitalize.

All it takes is people and equipment. We have people, we just need the equipment. That means money. We have that too, all of us, in our pockets, and just a bit of it pooled together can amount to much and equal lots of power. We shouldn't be expecting anything to be handed to us. We are it. Who will be willing to contribute? Just a handful of people, making substantial contributions, can raise a sufficient amount of money for a high quality video and audio system that will do the job. With that alone we can produce endless propaganda: documentaries, interviews, footage of the 'Kwa, of the Mexican invasion, of the Black Plague, of Orthodox Jews scowling at you from street corners as they suspiciously consort with each other, sidelocks and black overcoats ablaze. We will also be able to air professional quality, on-scene footage of our future demonstrations, which we plan to do with some consistency. We can broadcast these all over the country, if VNN supporters would pony up the dough for access in their local areas. This is not hard, and it is necessary. On top of that, it's of value and benefit to ourselves. VNN TV. Who wouldn't want that? Is it not worth it? An idea whose time has come...

I'm sure Alex and others have innumerable ideas in this direction, ready to be put into action the moment they can be. This is just a small flowing of ideas of things that can be done cheaply and immediately once we have the equipment needed. I want to hear other's ideas on this. This will be posted on forum.

We need to build our White Media. The time is right. It will be made available to the countless white men who want to contribute their talents and spread their message to our people, like those great men who convened in Topeka on May 15th and in New Orleans last weekend. It will be integral when the day comes that we're running election campaigns, an essential part of it. Campaign money will have to go towards massive airing of our programming, of round-table discussions and speeches and events, which will become increasingly frequent. We are going professional, as many have probably perceived. The world's offering itself up. It's ours to be had. Let's take it.

WhiteAlert
June 4th, 2004, 05:42 PM
I believe that "Democracy Now" program is also regularly shown on FSTV (Free Speech TV), a "public interest" channel carried by Dish Network satellite and also probably on Direct TV as well as some cable companies. FSTV puts out generally left-wing stuff, but is also strongly pro-Palestine and anti-zionist. While the quality isn't always very high, they somehow manage to fill up their channel 24/7, something even mainstream conservatives were unable to do when they tried it with NET a few years ago. Other groups that have "public interest" channels on satellite are religious and university sponsored for the most part.

William Krieger
June 4th, 2004, 06:32 PM
I'll put up $100 dollars for this. I know there are lots of VNN and WR affiliated people who will go out and shoot the footage, participate in broadcasts, and I know Alex would be willing to narrate and write scripts for videos. Anyone in this field who knows the sort of equipment we'd need for decent video/audio production, let us know, price, etc., and post links to info.

This thread should become a place where members come and state their contributions toward this practical project, as well as discuss the idea in general and share their thoughts on the directions it can go. This way to get everyone enthused about the idea and show how possible it really is. Also, those of you who would take active part in it, let us know.

Those of you who contribute nothing ought to be ashamed, yea, we know how much you pay for jew cable. This can be done. Come on, do your part.

William Krieger

Draco
June 4th, 2004, 07:31 PM
I'll put up $100 dollars for this. I know there are lots of VNN and WR affiliated people who will go out and shoot the footage, participate in broadcasts, and I know Alex would be willing to narrate and write scripts for videos. Anyone in this field who knows the sort of equipment we'd need for decent video/audio production, let us know, price, etc., and post links to info.

This thread should become a place where members come and state their contributions toward this practical project, as well as discuss the idea in general and share their thoughts on the directions it can go. This way to get everyone enthused about the idea and show how possible it really is. Also, those of you who would take active part in it, let us know.

Those of you who contribute nothing ought to be ashamed, yea, we know how much you pay for jew cable. This can be done. Come on, do your part.

William Krieger

I keep hearing about Macs and how one is basically a small-scale TV studio. A traditional media outlet is fucking expensive, however, I'd love to chip in for some software. Someone with a Mac and talent could volunteer or be paid a fee for a project. The NA had brilliant Flash animation cartoons, which seems economically feasible.

Try finding an artist who will draw the kind of stuff we would want created. Many comic book artists are jews or anti-white liberals. We need our own software production, and a Mac seems the best way.

Us PC owners are handicapped in this area.

I keep playing with a script for an updated "1984", where a young man who would have been a Viking king in saner times finally succumbs and loves "Big Brother Bernstein", and the two-minute hate has been replaced with false-flag calls to revolution, ala SF. Haven't worked out the Ministries or anything yet. More of a black comedy than drama.

Grog007
June 4th, 2004, 07:34 PM
HR and Alex, yopu bothshould get out more. Here in the twin cities, MOA or Mall of American (Actually owned and operated by two canuck (Alberta) jew Brothers) is the hot spot for all black teen agers. You don't need a bus as all the city buses go there. And I am sure itz the same for many other regional malls also. Check out the papers, especially suburban papers to read about the incidents at them. Just grab a digital camera and head out and be a mall rat -- better yet get some shots while riding the bus from the city out there. This just shows how deaf -- like the three monkeies lemmings are, see no evil, the papers are only weeklies; hear no evil, speak no evil nope not even on the radio until the trial if itz a murder or soem guard throwing someone out; see no evil, not on my televitz. Bet you Saint Louis has a big regional mall and the same.

Karl Ramstrom
June 4th, 2004, 08:13 PM
Pro-white media is a good idea, that, so far, no one has done well. White Revolution tried it, but it looked cheap and unprofessional. And the news anchors they used weren't any good. They were flat, colorless, and stiff. If you're really serious about this, take your time and make your news team look professional. They need to have good personalities, good diction, and be photogenic. No fucking skinheads need apply! And use a male anchor and a female anchor. And train someone how to use a camera this time, for god's sake, so it doesn't come off looking like a 14 year nerd was operating it, like White Revolution's embarrassing effort.

bizmark
June 4th, 2004, 10:50 PM
I keep hearing about Macs and how one is basically a small-scale TV studio. A traditional media outlet is fucking expensive, however, I'd love to chip in for some software. Someone with a Mac and talent could volunteer or be paid a fee for a project. The NA had brilliant Flash animation cartoons, which seems economically feasible.

Technically there's nothing you can do on a Mac that can't be done on a PC. It's just a matter of how easy it is to do it. Apple is great at interfaces... they have ways of cutting all the crap out and letting you do exactly what you need to do, in an intuitive way. A Power Mac G4 1GHz or higher should be plenty for Final Cut Pro, but obviously the faster/newer the better. It's hard to find really good deals on older Macs because they hold their value much better than PCs, so it might be a better idea just to get the cheapest new G5 ($1700, I think?). Most Macs can also use normal monitors (at least with an adapter), so you don't have to buy theirs if you already have one. But for video editing I'd recommend a very large screen, 21" or more. Or two smaller screens.

Equally important is the video camera. You can buy a DV camera that will hook up to any Mac or PC with a Firewire (IEEE 1394) jack for under $500. For $3000 you can buy a top-of-the-line Canon XL1S which is truly almost a professional level camera. I've heard of some Hollywood movies being shot with an XL1.

A nice tripod is also critical if you want to shoot something that looks decent. Something with a nice, big, smooth pan head so that it's not jerky when you pan. Crappy pan heads are alright for non-pan shots, or for a steady pan from the start of a shot to the end, but if you want a pan to come to a smooth stop (or start up smoothly) then you've got to spend some money. Hmm, looking at the prices now, it seems you'd be looking at $500+ for just the tripod head for something semi-professional, although there are some nice looking pan heads in the $200 range. http://www.dvshop.ca/camera/heads.html

Angle
June 5th, 2004, 02:38 AM
"The Equality Bus" is a superb idea! That's the kind of thing I've been advocating - low budget, hilarious, fun, and politically acidic art and entertainment. All it requires is a number of individuals willing to discuss the project, willing to meet up and corral the equipment and doogas, and a bit of artistic savvy, and the project's a masterpiece. Great article.
Musical montages are very effective at enhancing the power of a message. This, if it gets made, will certainly be some kind of "Flying circus."

We've got the biggest shopping centre in Europe up here. Trigger Happy TV seems to pull off setting members of the public up, I don't see why "The Equality Bus" couldn't.

wizardcat
June 6th, 2004, 12:13 PM
One of the most important reasons I'm here at all, is to get an all-White, pro-White media. I would freaking LOVE to see an aggressive pro-White media project, with our own tapes, online downloads, civil rights (for Whites) presentations, and specialty DVDs to pass around for sale. You could sell them at gun shows, county fairs, any informal church/family/White Pride networks, and Internet sales. This is truly the most promising media revolution of the Twennty-first century, the Whites taking control and speaking out about our own lives and our own issues. 1488!!!!!!!

JB112
June 6th, 2004, 08:25 PM
From VNN Reader Mail 6/06/04:

Subject:

Re: Article, "Media Review: Democracy Now!"

A question:

What "equipment" -- hardware, software?

Briefly, as a hypothetical, how could $10K best be spent on "equipment" today?

Details. What to buy? Which models, specs?

Servers?

Desktops?

Media Software?

DV Cameras?

Monitors?

Notebook PCs?

Ed. Note: I'll leave this open to readers.

Alex Linder
June 7th, 2004, 03:05 AM
Why doesn't somebody describe the optimal system:

camera
computer
video editor
sound incorporation method and hardware
XXX(?)

and tell us if you've actually done it this way yourself.

and, part two, how do you turn your finished movie into something that can be packaged and distributed?

Alex Linder
June 7th, 2004, 03:08 AM
Why doesn't somebody describe the optimal system:

camera
computer
video editor
sound incorporation method and hardware
XXX(?)

and tell us if you've actually done it this way yourself.

and, part two, how do you turn your finished movie into something that can be packaged and distributed?

Somebody walk me through the steps to make a video that can be distributed to the entire world. Let's call it Boolie-Aid, a mockumentary based on a "Feed the Children" infomercial.

Enumerate and define the steps necessary to take this from concept to consumer.