Antiochus Epiphanes
June 18th, 2004, 01:00 PM
Fred said elsewhere:
"Highly dangerous if we would allow tactical rhetoric to make us denounce a party as a traitor and join the True Faith Splinter Party of the Week. There were splinter parties in the nineties as well, didn't last long any of them. This one has perhaps four hundred members and a psychotic leader who makes sure all normal people leaves the party, so instead of accountants you have skinheads and instead of competence you have street fights.... Way to make Swedish retired folks and couples with children vote for you. A party that treats their votes with contempt just because they aren't muscle-bound youths is a party that needs to go.
No, I suggest, as always, a two-pronged approach. A country should have one party or other organization that tells the truth about the Jews -- which of course will make them small as a peanut, but no matter. Then the country should have one party that is anti-immigrant but does not name the Jew, and which therefore can grow to throw out the darklings and protect free speech. That is good for the Jew-naming party as well; as a comparison, it is a hell of a lot easier for a communist party to gain followers in a socialist country like Sweden than in a conservative one."
That "two pronged strategy" is a winner and it's why in the US there is a place both for an uncompromising core party or membership group like NA and also a larger anti-immigrant party. right now however we have some fools trying to turn NA into the watered down thing and of course there is no anti-immigrant party whatsoever. SNA-FU.
"Highly dangerous if we would allow tactical rhetoric to make us denounce a party as a traitor and join the True Faith Splinter Party of the Week. There were splinter parties in the nineties as well, didn't last long any of them. This one has perhaps four hundred members and a psychotic leader who makes sure all normal people leaves the party, so instead of accountants you have skinheads and instead of competence you have street fights.... Way to make Swedish retired folks and couples with children vote for you. A party that treats their votes with contempt just because they aren't muscle-bound youths is a party that needs to go.
No, I suggest, as always, a two-pronged approach. A country should have one party or other organization that tells the truth about the Jews -- which of course will make them small as a peanut, but no matter. Then the country should have one party that is anti-immigrant but does not name the Jew, and which therefore can grow to throw out the darklings and protect free speech. That is good for the Jew-naming party as well; as a comparison, it is a hell of a lot easier for a communist party to gain followers in a socialist country like Sweden than in a conservative one."
That "two pronged strategy" is a winner and it's why in the US there is a place both for an uncompromising core party or membership group like NA and also a larger anti-immigrant party. right now however we have some fools trying to turn NA into the watered down thing and of course there is no anti-immigrant party whatsoever. SNA-FU.