How this subforum works...

[Alex Linder]

I'm going to arrange all material in here the way I think best. Not looking for comments in this forum, just looking for news articles. We will arrange the material by the name of the victim. And we also have individual country threads in which we update non-specific debates over 'Holocaust' laws, free speech, and so on.

[Alex Linder]

Our goal here is to convey to people the global nature of the attack on Aryan institutions such as free speech and free association; and also to make it clear that the jews are the driving force behind these multitudinous and egregious persecutions of innocent men and women.

[Mike Jahn]

Our goal here is to convey to people the global nature of the attack on Aryan institutions such as free speech and free association; and also to make it clear that the jews are the driving force behind these multitudinous and egregious persecutions of innocent men and women.

Does this cover only events in which the Aryan defendant received prison time or can legal fines imposed against speech be included in this?

I have an example of a fine against Rudolf Hess' grandson in Germany

http://www.historiography-project.org/nonsense/20020124hessdachau.html

[Alex Linder]

Sure, that counts. Anything where Whites are persecuted by jews for their politics.

[Alex Linder]

The point is, this forum is a showcase for people who don't realize just how vicious and global the Giant Jewish Hate Machine really is.

All the people coming into our little museum will know abouy threats to free speech will come from Fox News and Mark Steyn. And all these yap about is that "Danish" (actually jew) editor who printed the Allah-attacking cartoon.

Here ordinary white people can learn the truth: that WHITES are the victims of JEWS.

And that JEWS are the ones trying to MURDER the FIRST AMENDMENT, just as they have successfully stomped free speech to death in Europe.

[Alex Linder]

We have this forum arranged into threads for

- individuals facing persecution by jews
- legal situation within countries (specific laws, legislative debate, attempts to influence by outsiders, such as ADL)
- informal censorship within countries (private companies firing people for semitically incorrect remarks, for example, showing that the climate of fear and repression extends well beyond formal law)

Specific anti-free speech crackdowns (Germany busting CD producers, for instance) not tied to individuals will be posted on the "Legal Situation in (X)" threads.

[Kind Lampshade Maker]

Since news from the EU institutions tend to fall into a collective category, even though victims and persecuters are often representatives of individual countries, will you consider a separate category for the EU?
This goes for the Our Enemies forum, in case you plan to update that one. Of which I have news articles waiting

[Alex Linder]

Yes. Next time I see a story about some supranational body's attempt to smite speech, I will create the appropriate thread.

[Kind Lampshade Maker]

I found this, as a surface scratcher. Lizard face Jose Manuel Barroso said in a speech, over the weekend, that a referendum over the treaty of Lisbon is not in the best interest of the constituents. I don't remember how he said it. It was translated to German. But, how they translated it reflected an attitude of utmost arrogance on Barroso's part. This for starters. I'm Googling for the exact quote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=501526&in_page_id=1811

"...The 50-article charter of fundamental rights will be attached to the EU's new Reform Treaty, to be signed in Portugal today. The protesters were demanding a public vote on the treaty..."http://www.dw-world.de/image/0,,2704628_1,00.jpg

[Kind Lampshade Maker]

http://www.bonde.com/index.phtml?sid=487&aid=25326

"...The Danish Parliament dismissed referendum 11 December
Tuesday 11 December the Danish Parliament discussed the Lisbon Treaty and whether there will be a referendum or not. The Social Democrats supported them. Not long before midnight they had rejected the referendum they did not dare to discuss during elections campaign a few weeks ago.

New number system kept a secret
The governments have changed the numbering system in the Lisbon Treaty at the very last minute, meaning that almost all regulation numbers have been changed a third time. Two numbering systems have been kept within each numbering system to make sure that a comparison is impossible.

The governments have clearly kept the changes a secret to make sure that for example my office can not update our database, the www.euabc.com, or establish reader-friendly versions and explanations before the Lisbon Treaty is signed..."

[Kind Lampshade Maker]

http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2008/02/is-lisbon-treaty-unavoidable.html

"...It is an important day for Europe (not just the EU?) because it is now evident and established that the agenda of the political élite overrides the expressed will of a sovereign people. It is indeed a ‘great victory for France’ which rides roughshod over the French. Germany plans to ratify in June, ignoring the voice of the Germans, and Spain will follow later in the year, oblivious to the opinion of the Spanish. Only Ireland it seems is willing to listen to its people, though a ‘no’ vote here would doubtless be dismissed as an aberration which would only cause a further ‘pause for reflection’ with a subsequent vote (and another) until the Irish give the ‘correct’ answer.

President Barroso is adamant that a referendum vote holds as much legitimacy as a parliamentary one, and asserts: ‘We have never opposed ratification by referendum in countries that wish to do it’.

This, of course, is a lie, for wherever a referendum is held and the vote is ‘no’, the perpetual ignoring of the expressed will of the people effectively constitutes opposition to ratification by referendum..."