PDA

View Full Version : The Constitution will not save US


Ossian
December 19th, 2003, 03:45 AM
If you will study the backgrounds of the men who wrote the Constitution, you will find all their families originated in an area that covered a very small part of the globe, perhaps even a few hundred square miles.

The Constitution didn’t create the men; men created the Constitution. Without such men in leadership, without the presence of a homogeneous society of above average
intelligence, a constitutional form of government is unachievable and inconceivable.
So when someone tells me he doesn’t believe in race, but wants to "uphold the Constitution," he reminds me of a man who would dearly love to drive his car, but is out of gas.

A constitutional government was in force in the U.S. until the Civil War erupted. After that bloodbath the ancient fraud of 'democracy' took over -- the age-old trick of religious madmen who in attempting to create heaven on earth only succeed in creating hell on earth.

In a pluralistic, racially mixed, one-man, one-vote society, the Constitution can be compared to the Pyramids of Egypt, which look down on a country polluted by a racial sludge that sits on its haunches and asks itself what creatures could possibly have created such architectural wonders.

The Constitution stands over us today, not as a beacon, but as a gravestone memorializing a great race. Gross immorality, dysgenic breeding resulting in de-evolution, political corruption and a failed (or tendentious) educational system have moved us thousands of leagues away from the intentions of the Founding fathers. The Constitution has been amended many times and will be amended again and again to serve the purposes of the races who have usurped our turf. It has become the Maginot Line, the illusion of safety in a blitzkrieg that has already penetrated it.

The "conservative" clutches at the Constitution like a man who faces impending doom while calling upon God to save him. But there is no answer from heaven about some sheets of parchment that have lost all their divinity.

I do not know what the future of the white race holds.

I do know that Nature gives no quarter, that there is no guarantee of survival for either dinosaurs or white men-- I do know that to meet the challenges that are all but overwhelming them, Whites must re-equip themselves with the survival instincts of the Norseman, who was full of love for his family and his kind, but ruthless against anyone who lifted a hand against him.

Randolph
December 19th, 2003, 11:45 AM
The problem is not with the Constitution, instead it is with the Supreme Court (which is part of the government) and it's opinions regarding the "true" intent of the framers of the Constitution.

You are correct in stating that the beginning of the end of our original Constitution was during the Civil War. You may also throw in the 16th Amendment that is the most unique of all amendments in the Constitution. All other Amendments were "shall nots" directed to the federal government or federal office holders. In 1913, for the first time, the federal government was given a new constitutional power. The power to tax was the single greatest breach of our freedoms.

This is where we have to start our fight for regaining our country again. The ZOG knows that their whole foundation is dependent on the individual income tax and this is why they will throw anyone in the federal prison for telling others to not pay their income taxes.

What I am saying is we need to abolish the 16th Amendment!

no_nomen
December 20th, 2003, 03:21 PM
A MOUSE IN BEN’S POCKET

[from Joshua Mouse's Notes On the Constitutional Convention]

A cabal of businessmen, mostly Free Masons, met in secret sessions. They were charged, as their respective credentials stated, to propose amendments to the Articles of Confederation. They soon adopted a different, more sinister agenda.

In their public capacity, authorized by the Legislatures of several independent States "to amend or revise the Articles of Confederation"; they were obligated to Convene in Public.

But Secret Societies, by definition and necessity, meet in secret. As for business or commercial negotiations, especially those which involve trade secrets: the historical Maxim is that it’s nobody else’s business. The fact that the Free Press and the general public were barred from the Convention, raised many hackles and suspicions. Patrick Henry, from his vantage point outside the bar, in Virginia, thought he smelt a rat.

The year was 1787. The place: Philadelphia’s State House. Security was tight. A pundit was heard to exclaim: "Nary a mouse could breech the guard." But one did. His name was Joshua. His notes read (in pertinent part) as follows:

JUNE 23, 1787, 2 O’clock P.M. -- The argument between Mason and Hamilton wearied the Master, who called a recess.

B. Franklin, G. Washington and A. Hamilton retired to the table near my post, discretely distant from the others. Grasping fast my notepad, I scurried into the generous pocket of Franklin’s coat to better hear, while taking repast of crumbs his careless valet had missed on last cleaning.

GW: To continue the conversation began over dinner last night: of this I am certain: to indenture the common herd to serve us like our black slaves, will require their tacit consent. We must therefore devise an instrument that they will unanimously misperceive to be in their best interests, over our own. It must appear to be not only for them, but more importantly, deriving from, of and by the common people, while the ultimate power is reserved to us.

AH: (Addressing Franklin): The proposition of our friend and lodge Brother, George, deserves our most profound scrutiny and assistance. If General Washington’s martial talents are excelled by others, it is his experience and expertise in Agriculture; and especially in the management, breeding, and domestication of black human animals.

BF: Gentlemen, we have long had before us a model of a contract such as George advocates. Back in ‘34, when I was a young printer, I published Anderson’s Constitutions; which established the formal, written government for the fraternity of Free Masons. Surely you have both studied it as you have progressed through the Degrees.

Recall its Article 10, which permits even probates of each Lodge to merge their opinions with the majority, to be addressed to their Master. Not, mind you, that the Master need act on the instructions of the lowly. And consider Article 39, which provides for secret election of the Grand Master and other officers; with its appearance that Power lies with the majority; but is silent about the provocateurs who mingle with it, fomenting the consensus of opinion.

In combination, the Articles of Anderson’s Constitutions establishes a government which superficially appears to be of, by and for the general Lodge membership, but which in their legal language make all meaningful power to reside in the hands of the Ruling Elite.

Anderson’s is an exemplary model for accomplishing what George proposes; that is: drawing the labor of all inhabitants, of every race -- with the exception of ourselves and our posterity-- into a condition of tacitly-consensual servitude; to be human resources for our eternal Agri-Business.

(Old Ben pushed a soiled handkerchief into my sanctuary. The discussion continued for several more minutes; but muffled to my ear).

I scampered from Franklin’s coat as the threesome arose, and resumed my post near the woodpile.

A. Hamilton received permission to address the Convention. "Gentlemen," he began, "I propose a new form of government; a proposal which will end our impasse and which, I predict, will garner the unanimous approval of the governed..."

.

Magog
December 27th, 2003, 03:08 AM
to write a new one.

LindaLou
December 28th, 2003, 10:45 PM
Yes let's write a new one!! I'm for that.. ;)

isn't that what our gov....does every day anyway?
Any thoughts on that?

Xuxalina Rihhia
November 17th, 2004, 03:32 AM
Yes let's write a new one!! I'm for that.. ;)

isn't that what our gov....does every day anyway?
Any thoughts on that?

"Our" Talmudic Jewish "government" sodomizes the Constitution every day! They are not True Governors, they are criminal mis-governors. And the term 'President' means "to preside over"; it does not mean being a Jewish Barbarian King, like FDR, Ike the Kike Eisenhower, the Jewvandal Lynchin' Bitch Johnson, G. H.W. Bush or Osama bin Bush!!!
:mad:

Antiochus Epiphanes
November 17th, 2004, 09:35 AM
"if the law of liberty is not written on the hearts of men, no written document will save it"

Judge Learned Hand