heaven above
August 20th, 2004, 09:46 PM
This is why many do not agree, nor support, English Warrior/ICE.
He has the temerity to say that 'I have lost it' !
Someone has lost it,haven't they EW ? And it isn't me .
BNP rights for whites.
============================================
Today, 12:38 AM #32
EW
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 745
Location: England
Re: BNP LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which person to pick? This for any longer standing Nationalist would / is one of the most difficult questions to answer, at least when your first asked the question. Sadly though the reality of a leadership challenge seems to be becoming a reality with every passing week and month. I personally would like to see a situation where we as Nationalists didn’t have to choose between these two great Nationalists who both have given a lot to Nationalism and who both can play good parts in the future of Nationalism.
The question in my mind should be apart the skills of the past. Both men have their own styles and own very different personalities. They have dedicated their lives to the Cause and both deserve the recognition for that.
However, we as Nationalists in the BNP are entering new processes, new phases and meeting new challenges in which we most adapt, stream-line and be more flexible than ever before.
It is for that reason that I have picked Nick Griffin to guide us through these potentially very dangerous times. I mean no disrespect to Mr Tyndall for choosing Nick. It is not taking away or questioning the efforts and feats which Mr Tyndall as performed for Nationalism in setting up the party which we all love, the BNP.
But as I said we are in a new time facing new tasks and having to face and talk about issues of policy and how they will directly effect members of the public’s lives. We have now tasted the power by getting councillors elected and we want more!
Mr Griffin in my opinion is more suited to this modern task of sorting out the micro details of our National policies. Making sure we dot the I’s and cross the T’s. This makes us more professional and shows more confidence to the British public, which will hopefully encourage them to go out in even greater numbers than ever before!
At the last election we increased our Euro vote seven times over reaching, when we include all the other elections we were fighting at the same time, over a million votes! This as never been done in the history of British Nationalism.
We may have strong and heated debates. But at the end of the day the correct decision is always made in the end. We, the members are satisfied with the results of these debates. So, why change a winning team?
EW
He has the temerity to say that 'I have lost it' !
Someone has lost it,haven't they EW ? And it isn't me .
BNP rights for whites.
============================================
Today, 12:38 AM #32
EW
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 745
Location: England
Re: BNP LEADERSHIP CHALLENGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which person to pick? This for any longer standing Nationalist would / is one of the most difficult questions to answer, at least when your first asked the question. Sadly though the reality of a leadership challenge seems to be becoming a reality with every passing week and month. I personally would like to see a situation where we as Nationalists didn’t have to choose between these two great Nationalists who both have given a lot to Nationalism and who both can play good parts in the future of Nationalism.
The question in my mind should be apart the skills of the past. Both men have their own styles and own very different personalities. They have dedicated their lives to the Cause and both deserve the recognition for that.
However, we as Nationalists in the BNP are entering new processes, new phases and meeting new challenges in which we most adapt, stream-line and be more flexible than ever before.
It is for that reason that I have picked Nick Griffin to guide us through these potentially very dangerous times. I mean no disrespect to Mr Tyndall for choosing Nick. It is not taking away or questioning the efforts and feats which Mr Tyndall as performed for Nationalism in setting up the party which we all love, the BNP.
But as I said we are in a new time facing new tasks and having to face and talk about issues of policy and how they will directly effect members of the public’s lives. We have now tasted the power by getting councillors elected and we want more!
Mr Griffin in my opinion is more suited to this modern task of sorting out the micro details of our National policies. Making sure we dot the I’s and cross the T’s. This makes us more professional and shows more confidence to the British public, which will hopefully encourage them to go out in even greater numbers than ever before!
At the last election we increased our Euro vote seven times over reaching, when we include all the other elections we were fighting at the same time, over a million votes! This as never been done in the history of British Nationalism.
We may have strong and heated debates. But at the end of the day the correct decision is always made in the end. We, the members are satisfied with the results of these debates. So, why change a winning team?
EW