PDA

View Full Version : The new American family


John in Woodbridge
August 22nd, 2004, 09:47 AM
http://home.comcast.net/~jk121764/family.jpg

Mike in Denver
August 22nd, 2004, 01:24 PM
This is insidious and I suspect it will happen more and more, and with our best young men. At the engineering company I work, there are a number of young white men. They are bright, extremely well-educated, and diligent in their work. They are also mostly single, very bashful, and socially inexperienced.

Think of the predicament a twenty-five year old farm boy, now with a masters degree in Electrical Engineering, finds himself in, in a social situation, perhaps even in his church. Every young white woman he meets has had ten or more lovers, uses language like a sailor, and has probably slept with a couple of niggers. Contrasting that, at work he finds numerous young, single Hindu women. They are demure, quiet, feminine, and as well educated in engineering as he.

Where I work, for example, there are four young woman from India. Three are plain, but not ugly, one to be fair, even by my standards (high) is an absolute little doll. All four are engaged to young white engineers. Remember, the young men have been systematically de-cultured, and if they have any instincts to racial preservation, those instincts are deeply buried.

This side of it is far worse than the opposite. The young Indian men have a great deal of difficulty marrying white woman. The same family that happily will give a daughter to marry a white man, will scream bloody horror if their son does not marry his mother’s arraigned Indian bride. The few Indian men I know who have defied their mothers, have ended up with dumb, blond sluts --- much the same pattern as nigger men.

I don’t know the solution. I was married for about eleven years (early 1975 to late 1985.) Things were much easier then. I had no difficulty meeting young acceptable white women, with decent traits, and without the modern white woman’s trail of whore-like behavior. The young decent white man today has a very difficult row to hoe. I wish it were not so.

Enkidu

I'd better clarify something: I wrote, "dumb, blond sluts." I'm not suggesting anything about blonds here, just that men of the darker races seem to have a special attraction to this.

FranzJoseph
August 22nd, 2004, 05:42 PM
This whole business is such a blatant imperial tactic I'm surprised they resort to it so openly.

In the three decades following World War II, American GIs brought loads of non-white "war brides" home. The reason for it was sort of obvious. Guys where were a bit dweeby and could not attract a local girl still had lots to offer a Japanese or Filipino girl. Statistically this activity was small, but not small enough to stay off the radar entirely. Way back in the fifties there was a Marlon Brando movie called Sayonara about the "social problem" of race mixing in Japan. It was pretty blatant about the saintliness of mysogeny.

The same process is afoot now, it's just come home. Where 40 years ago it was a young sailor coming home from Yukasuka with a mama-san, now it's a young engineer taking what comes off the boat here. Either way it succeeds in its purpose of breaking America's remaining local and regional cohesion.

Worse is that it's also seen as cool. Even in the sixties bringing home the nonwhite wife was at least frowned upon. Not now. I'd wonder about how many of Enkidu's young engineers are at least partly motivated by rebelling against their perceived whitebread-ness. Particularly engineers, who are usually seen as the first of the first among nerds.

Imperialism thrives on this, that's all. Dividing people by race (and making them hyperaware of it) becomes almost surreal when you realize that all of these mixed race marriages will be a subrace of their own. The only thing parents in these unions can do to protect the offspring is to make the Hate Laws stronger and more pervasive because they have no group of their own at all.

Mixed-raced kids will be inclined to love Big Brother. So Big Brother wants to see more and more of them. The exceptions do not apply. The trend serves power.

Mike Jahn
August 23rd, 2004, 11:16 PM
This is insidious and I suspect it will happen more and more, and with our best young men. At the engineering company I work, there are a number of young white men. They are bright, extremely well-educated, and diligent in their work. They are also mostly single, very bashful, and socially inexperienced.

Think of the predicament a twenty-five year old farm boy, now with a masters degree in Electrical Engineering, finds himself in, in a social situation, perhaps even in his church. Every young white woman he meets has had ten or more lovers, uses language like a sailor, and has probably slept with a couple of niggers. Contrasting that, at work he finds numerous young, single Hindu women. They are demure, quiet, feminine, and as well educated in engineering as he.



This is a great post, finally we are dealing with the REAL issue which is that young White women are increasingly attracted to non-intellectual, flashy, showoff, extremely extroverted, trashy, Black behavior.

Yes, the intellectual White guys who are shy are regarded as the lowest of the low in the eyes of White women these days. I have watched this pattern occur so many times that it's obvious what's going on. White women are simply obsessed with public displays of men who physically strut around...a guy could be as dumb as a retard but if he walks "cocky" and puts on a lot of arrogant facial expressions he will have women all over him. I find it amazing that women see no value in intelligence and that they are only attracted to this silly prancing around like a peacock. And these are the women of our noble White race???? :(

Take a close look at the guys who get the hottest and most women these days among the younger generation...these are the White guys who act the most BLACK. They strut and prance and jerk their bodies up and down and the White women just can't get enough of it. And then we are surprised that White women started having sex with Blacks??? They already worshipped every behavioral trait that Black men possessed!!! No surprise there!!!

Also, how were your Shy engineer friends supposed to remain loyal to their race when the women of their race despised their personality traits??

The future of the so-called White male "nerds" will be their mating with Asian women and an entirely new sub-race of Half-Asians developing and it's not merely the Jewish media which is responsible for this...White women are to blame....I'm sorry to break it to the White women but a guy isn't "cool" or a real "winner" or "Badass" simply because he moves his arms and body around on the dance floor like a ghetto chimp.

That's the other problem...the whole stupid dance scene which is entirely a Black/Hispanic fad that Whites now worship as well. The guy from the White Extinction website posted a great article about it in which he said that young White men today are being graded as "quality" or "low-rate" based on their ability to master the "art" of the African Congo tribal dances.....

If any of you guys have daughters, PLEASE discourage this mindless and destructive Negroid Body culture as much as possible.....

Sean Martin
August 23rd, 2004, 11:33 PM
http://whiteextinction.com/newsweek2.jpeg
Newsweek Promotes Miscegenation

http://whiteextinction.com/Newsweektrash.jpg
Anti-White Male Propaganda

Anima Eternae
August 23rd, 2004, 11:51 PM
Mixed-raced kids will be inclined to love Big Brother. So Big Brother wants to see more and more of them. The exceptions do not apply. The trend serves power

Cite your source, please?



...

MOMUS
August 24th, 2004, 12:05 AM
He doesn't have to cite a source to you, sophomoric punk. That is his considered opinion. It is mine too. It is the opinion of most thinking Whites on this forum. It just makes sense. Are you truly reading McDonald? Can you not extrapolate?
When you first trolled this forum you told of the "Eurasian" forums you frequented. Think of those characters and ask yourself whether they would want to see more or less race-mixing.
Do we need Jim Crowe to point out the obvious for you?

Cite your source, please?



...

Bragi
August 24th, 2004, 12:07 AM
Franz, Nordblod, KLM, and other Europeans (not on the island of Brtain) I don't know about are testament to the pseudo-fact that those who learn English as a second language learn it oh so much better than those who are born to it.

Hey America, Europe is a whole lot smarter than you. And if they've got a Muslim problem, well it's a far smaller problem than a nigger problem no matter which way you cut it.

Anima Eternae
August 24th, 2004, 01:01 AM
He doesn't have to cite a source to you, sophomoric punk.

Sophomore? You're rife with hypocrisy, my small-noggin friend.



That is his considered opinion. It is mine too. It is the opinion of most thinking Whites on this forum. It just makes sense. Are you truly reading McDonald? Can you not extrapolate?

No, he claimed a fact. He says trends validate his position, I'd like to see it.


When you first trolled this forum you told of the "Eurasian" forums you frequented. Think of those characters and ask yourself whether they would want to see more or less race-mixing.

No, MOMUS, you are the biggest troll of all. The fact that your pavlovian responses are just as dogmatic as the other side of the spectrum is sheer amusement. You refer to yourself as a "free thinker". Utter hilarity. But for reference, why not head over to FreeRepublic, a primarily white site, and see how many oppose race-mixing?

On top of that, I can say that over 81% of my kind prefer their own. Do you have any stats for your side to back to you up?




...

FranzJoseph
August 24th, 2004, 04:44 PM
Cite your source, please?


Local but solid. Every MexAmerican marriage to a white hereabouts is on disability and some sort of Social Security. Nobody taking the king's pence is in a position to do anything but sing the king's tune.

Ask yourself: Why is the US supporting resettlement of Hmong tribesman and Somalian Bantu unless they want a dependable dependant class in the future?

As Somalis or Hmong they might stay cohesive. When they intermarry they won't.

(NF: There are staticstics but I cannot site them without giving away a source close to me. A relative was briefly involved with counseling Hmongs, and the people who are bringing them into America know precisely what they are doing and why.)

Also, there is not a doubt in my mind this will spray mud on lots of mixed race people to whom it does not apply. But as Lenin put it, you can't make an omlette without breaking some eggs. And it's Lenin's heirs who are in charge of this country right now. They are the friends of none of us.

MOMUS
August 25th, 2004, 11:11 AM
By god, you are a tireless troll. Even when dead wrong you have the chuzpah to keep rattling, as if sheer volume of response will lend validity to your sophomoric stance.


[QUOTE=Anima Eternae]Sophomore? You're rife with hypocrisy, my small-noggin friend.You are the experts on hypocricy, you and your trollish pals. Your response partakes of the flavor of a Doc Martin reply; fatuously stupid verbiage and childish name-calling to support an ill-thought whopper of a lie.
Have you thought to suggest to your professor to invite Doc Martin to speak at your school? Dr. Martin is working on his masters degree at Bible College and will soon have his associate degree in psychology. He has a perfect 4.0 GPA at Bible College. He is also a highly self-esteemed public speaker.


No, he claimed a fact. He says trends validate his position, I'd like to see it. So, any statement that you don't wholely agree with must have a source, and the source, I suppose, must be "valid", ie. jew-approved. Screw you mutt, White men can say what they like on this forum without approval from a half-bred pc punk from academica judaica.
If you can't see the trends we mention the you don't belong on this forum, but you know that already.



No, MOMUS, you are the biggest troll of all. The fact that your pavlovian responses are just as dogmatic as the other side of the spectrum is sheer amusement. You refer to yourself as a "free thinker". Utter hilarity. But for reference, why not head over to FreeRepublic, a primarily white site, and see how many oppose race-mixing?Pavlovian and dogmatic in the same sentence, pretty cute. Otherwise your post is meaningless ad hominem. Arf, asshole!

On top of that, I can say that over 81% of my kind prefer their own. Do you have any stats for your side to back to you up?Thank you for making my point. 81% of mix-breeds prefer more mixed-breeds.
Are you among that majority?
BTW, your stats, do they have a source? Do you care to cite it?
That is a nice admission that you are on the side of race-mixing, rather Doc Martinish in it's Freudian revelation.

He doesn't have to cite a source to you, sophomoric punk. That is his considered opinion. It is mine too. It is the opinion of most thinking Whites on this forum. It just makes sense. Are you truly reading McDonald? Can you not extrapolate?
When you first trolled this forum you told of the "Eurasian" forums you frequented. Think of those characters and ask yourself whether they would want to see more or less race-mixing.
Do we need Jim Crowe to point out the obvious for you?
Originally Posted by Anima Eternae
Cite your source, please?