PDA

View Full Version : Aryan subgroups?


Lauren Inniss
August 14th, 2009, 10:49 PM
Hello,

I am interested in learning about the Aryan "subgroups" that I have heard about - Nordic, Alpine, Mediterranean, and Slavic. Does anyone have any links or information about these distinctions?

Robert Bandanza
August 14th, 2009, 10:54 PM
Hello,

I am interested in learning about the Aryan "subgroups" that I have heard about - Nordic, Alpine, Mediterranean, and Slavic. Does anyone have any links or information about these distinctions?

Here is one site that pretty much sums it all up. It does not just show Nordid peoples.

http://nordish.com/

They are called subraces BTW.

Tulpar
September 6th, 2009, 11:51 PM
Aryan subraces:

Nordid
-Hallstatt
-Keltic
etc...

Cromagnid
-Dalofaelid
-Bruenn
etc...

Non-Aryan european subraces:

Mediterranid
-Atlantid
etc...

Alpinid
-Sudetid
etc...

"white" subraces altered by extra european influence and non-white subraces caucasized by white or Aryan elements:

-Baltid
-Irano-Nordid
-Aethiopid
-Scando-Lappid
-Berberid
-Armenid
-Anatolid
-Indid
-Pontid
etc...

Non-exhaustive list of course.

George Witzgall
September 7th, 2009, 12:03 AM
tulpar, are these sub-groups (or sub-races) defined anthropologically (based on physical characteristics)? or genetically, using a clustering algorithm like STRUCTURE (you remember this from the "are russians white" thread)?

clearly the genetic data is more detailed and would lead to more quantifiable clustering into definitive sub-races (and races for that matter). thus in my opinion races and sub-races should be exclusively defined genetically.

when K=3 for the STRUCTURE algorithm, the braodly defined negroid, caucasoid, and mongoloid (and pacific islander for K=4) races are clearly in evidence for indigenous africans, europeans, and asians (and pacific islanders). this is a good start for helping to define the races.

then within the caucasid race are the indigenous european, semitic, etc... sub-races. and within the european subrace are the sub-groupings you refer to. does this sound about right?

Tulpar
September 7th, 2009, 12:45 AM
tulpar, are these sub-groups (or sub-races) defined anthropomorphically or genetically, using a clustering algorithm like STRUCTURE (you remember this from the "are russians white" thread)?

Anthro.


clearly the genetic data is more detailed and would lead to more quantificable clustering into definitive sub-races (and races for that matter). thus in my mind races and sub-races should be exclusively defined genetically.

Someone from a non-cromagnid subrace might pocess cromagnid component when analyzed, so I would say it is not too realiable for defining subrace.


then within the caucasid race are the indigenous european, semitic, etc... sub-races. and within the euro subrace are the sub-groupings you refer to. does this sound about right?

"Semitic" is a group of language and not a group of races or subracial group(s). Your average jew for example belongs to the Armenid category (Altered Taurids) as they pocess extreme dinaric characteristics, while you average semitic speaker in the near East fall under the mediterranid subrace. I am not familiar with the orientalid types, but I would say that they would fall under the "altered mediteranid" category, the Pontids are an example of altered mediteranid (East-Mediterranids altered by Uralid components.)

The main mediterranid types of Europe are the Atlanto-Mediterranid (Northern mediterraneans) and the Iberids (Southern mediterraneans.)


Atlanto-Mediterranean or Iberid, is the phenotype brought by the first West European settlers around 45,000 years ago. The main difference with the East-Med, is that is not so Dolicocephalic pronounced, and Brachycephalism is not uncommon. The hair colour can vary from dark-blond to dark-brown, but the most common is brown, eye colour can vary from brown to grey.
This race remains more pure in Ireland, Wales, the Basque Country, Brittany and some parts of Scotland. It's found all over the Atlantic European coast but no so pure. It's majoritary in Spain, with few levels of East-Med and Nordic influence, and it is found in England, Denmark, the Netherlands and France but so mixed with the Nordic subrace that could be considered as a different subrace (Nord-Atlantid).

The second one is the original subrace of the first populations of the Middle East. A Neolithic subrace which expanded through the Mediterranean Sea 8,000 years ago. Mainly Dolicocephalic, blondism is not rare, though brunette is more common, eye colour can vary from dark-brown to blue. The pure form of this subrace is almost extinct as a cause of the Negroid influence in most of the Middle East, although it can be found almost pure in isolated populations in Syria and some Berberic villages in the Algerian Kabylia.

George Witzgall
September 7th, 2009, 01:11 AM
Anthro.


hmm I would prefer if races/sub-races were defined genetically since physical characteristics are subject to environmental factors (e.g. injuries, or variations in hormonal levels, etc..). it is too fuzzy to group people anthropologically.

edit: so I take it aryan is the best, which is the best sub-race within aryan? this is a joke btw..

Tulpar
September 7th, 2009, 01:55 AM
hmm I would prefer if races/sub-races were defined genetically since physical characteristics are subject to environmental factors (e.g. injuries, or variations in hormonal levels, etc..). it is too fuzzy to group people anthropologically.

My point was specifically in terms of subracial classification. When it comes to other grounds, then yes genetical analysis is better.


edit: so I take it aryan is the best, which is the best sub-race within aryan? this is a joke btw..

No matter I will still answer.

For physical brute strenght the Bruenn, for physical endurance and agility the Skandonordid for intellectual capabilities the Hallstatt.

varg
September 7th, 2009, 10:26 AM
how does the baltid subgroup have nonwhite influences you retard?

Arent you supposedly a turk?

Tulpar
September 7th, 2009, 11:04 AM
how does the baltid subgroup have nonwhite influences you retard?

http://www.hitsusa.com/1-good-ones/school-shooter.JPG
http://img.mtv3.fi/mn_kuvat/mtv3/viihde/isoja_kuvia_2008/557238.jpg
http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/9115/12051482.gif
http://img.mtv3.fi/mn_kuvat/mtv3/urheilu/luistelu/2008/580017.jpg
http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/9640/suvor3.jpg
http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/7259/4502.jpg

You tell me, genius?


Arent you supposedly a turk?

No, that is just a made up claim.

varg
September 7th, 2009, 11:11 AM
Yea.. and guess what dummy. There is race mixing in every White country on earth. Mixing with lapps is NOT the majority of finns. yet you focus on a small minority

you come to a stupid conclusion from a few hand picked photos you found on the internet...

90% of people online who claim to know about racial classification have no background or any idea in what they're talking about.. they have a few biased hand picked photos of a tiny minority within that subgroup to try to prove their point...

The majority of finns dont look like that


No, that is just a made up claim. Excuse me. I mean Syrian: not white..

Correct me if i'm wrong, but in one of your first posts you admitted you were Syrian and NOT Aryan

Hows that brown skin working for you? and what the fuck are you doing in Europe

Tulpar
September 7th, 2009, 11:17 AM
Yea.. and guess what. There is race mixing in every White country. Mixing with lapps is not the majority of finns

That is far more elevated than simple isolated cases of race-mixing one would find in other white countries, there is no comparison to be made between the two cases.

http://www.moonzstuff.com/images/dna_N_large_RG.jpg

Tulpar
September 7th, 2009, 11:27 AM
Excuse me. I mean Syrian: not white..

Correct me if i'm wrong, but in one of your first posts you admitted you were Syrian and NOT Aryan

I admitted it many times, not just once and my skin is crystal clear white, but feel free to picture me as being brown or even coal black if that pleases you.

I am a lilly white, brunette haired with hazel eyes I have lived in Europe all of my life and not in a single instance have I been called non-white. As a matter of fact, many times europeans would pester me about claims of how "a tan would do me good" because I am so pale.

varg
September 7th, 2009, 11:31 AM
Get out of Europe nigger

Go back to your homeland..you know the one that borders Iraq, Turkey, and Jordan... Did you come for the welfare?

Funny a nonwhite criticizing actual White Europeans... as if his opinion means anything.. subhuman

Tulpar
September 7th, 2009, 11:33 AM
Get out of Europe nigger

Typical response from someone who just lost an argument.


Funny a nonwhite criticizing actual White europeans... as if his opinion means anything.. subhuman

N is extra european and I am not "criticizing" them just stating the obvious, the Third Reich even referred to them as "Finn-Mongols".

varg
September 7th, 2009, 11:50 AM
There was no argument. Just me pointing out the truth: There is a tiny tiny tiny minority in Finland who have mixed with lapps and appear asiatic. Just like how there is a tiny tiny minority of mixed people in all White countries.

Then there are ignorant nonwhite fools who focus on a minority of finns.. hand pick photos ONLY showing the mixed lapps.. and claim ALL finns look like that

You've already proven you have no idea what you are talking about. Just like most self appointed experts of racial classification online...

You have an axe to grind with White Europeans (Who you decided to immigrate to be around).. because you are a jealous nonwhite idiot

Go back to your nigger middle-eastern homeland and quit disgracing europe with your ignorance, stench, greasy hair and face, and your unibrow


There is absolutely no reason you should be living in Europe right now, don't you agree subhuman? Why dont you go back?

Tulpar
September 7th, 2009, 12:01 PM
Then there are ignorant nonwhite fools who focus on a minority of finns and claim ALL finns look like that.

I never claimed all Finns looked like that, just the ones who belong to the Baltid subrace.

And not all people living in Finland look like that true, the Finland-Swedes for instance certainly do not look mongoliform.

Edit: Oh and could you stop editing your same post every 5 seconds? Thanks.

TowardWewelsburg
September 10th, 2009, 04:25 PM
Here is one site that pretty much sums it all up. It does not just show Nordid peoples.

http://nordish.com/

They are called subraces BTW.

SNPA (Nordish.com) is now located on Apricity, here:

http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/

You may also be interested in the work of Richard MCculloch, who collaborated with the SNPA intensively and has picked up the torch of men such as Wilmot Robertson in defending Northern European genetic interests. You can find his excellent web site, which contains a great deal of information regarding Physical Anthropology, here:

http://www.racialcompact.com/

I also recommend you take a look at Karl Earlson's research, particularly if you're interested in ancient history:

http://www.white-history.com/earlson/index.htm

Of course, nothing is better than having an actual book to read. If you ever see a copy of Dr. Carleton Coon's The Races of Europe, which is long out of print, grab it! Dr. Hans F.K Günther is also a great resource. If you don't speak German, there is an English language translation of his Racial Elements of European history, which can be found rather cheaply at places like abebooks.com. Richard McCulloch's four books -- The Racial Compact (1994), The Nordish Quest (1989), Destiny of Angels (1986), and The Ideal and Destiny (1982) --are available for purchase through his site.

One last note: I believe the SNPA's most recent incarnation is not its finest. Much of the material from Günther was phased out, for example; this may have something to do with the Draconian laws in Europe. You can see its previous incarnations at archive.org

Lauren Inniss
September 10th, 2009, 05:43 PM
SNPA (Nordish.com) is now located on Apricity, here:

http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/

You may also be interested in the work of Richard MCculloch, who collaborated with the SNPA intensively and has picked up the torch of men such as Wilmot Robertson in defending Northern European genetic interests. You can find his excellent web site, which contains a great deal of information regarding Physical Anthropology, here:

http://www.racialcompact.com/

I also recommend you take a look at Karl Earlson's research, particularly if you're interested in ancient history:

http://www.white-history.com/earlson/index.htm

Of course, nothing is better than having an actual book to read. If you ever see a copy of Dr. Carleton Coon's The Races of Europe, which is long out of print, grab it! Dr. Hans F.K Günther is also a great resource. If you don't speak German, there is an English language translation of his Racial Elements of European history, which can be found rather cheaply at places like abebooks.com. Richard McCulloch's four books -- The Racial Compact (1994), The Nordish Quest (1989), Destiny of Angels (1986), and The Ideal and Destiny (1982) --are available for purchase through his site.

One last note: I believe the SNPA's most recent incarnation is not its finest. Much of the material from Günther was phased out, for example; this may have something to do with the Draconian laws in Europe. You can see its previous incarnations at archive.org

Thank you very much! I have a lot to read now :D

hengest
September 10th, 2009, 06:50 PM
There are just three root races....black, White and yellow; anything else is the result of race mixing.
There are no White racial sub-groups, there is only White or non-White.

TowardWewelsburg
September 10th, 2009, 09:00 PM
There are just three root races....black, White and yellow; anything else is the result of race mixing.
There are no White racial sub-groups, there is only White or non-White.

This simply isn't the case. To start with, there are four primary races: Negroid, Mongoloid, Europid, Australoid. In fact, Dr. Coon discarded the term Negroid in favour of Congoid due to the fact that the former term was associated almost exclusively with skin colour. The Australian aborigines do not belong to the same race as the Negroes of Africa.

While there are different systems of taxonomy in the realm of Physical Anthropology (Ripley, Coon, Woltmann, Hooton, Günther, etc.), which can make some of this terminology confusing when it is used without a frame of reference, such as a citation, the fact remains that genetic cleavages (sub-races) do exist within the European people. It doesn't matter what you choose to call them, but they do exist and can be quantified.

psychologicalshock
September 11th, 2009, 08:18 PM
This subject has already been critiqued before and no one has ever competently answered to the critique.


Show me where this "pure Nordic race" of yours ever existed in history. You can't. None of you can. None of you can demonstrate that there was ever a population of Aryans in which all phenotypes weren't present. None of you can demonstrate that there once existed a "Nordic" population, as you imagine it, which subsequently influenced and was influenced by other European populations to produce what you think is a motley crew.

That's why all this talk about a "Nordic race" is nonsense. You are arbitrarily picking out a particular phenotype present in Aryan populations, and inferring from this that these are the remnants of a race which has left its presence in European populations through admixture, without any historical or genetic evidence to the point. It's hocus pocus. Hilarious even. Most hilarious of all is that you're not even aware of the underlying assumptions.
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=930013

What's the point of doing genetic tests when you cannot find a population? Every single species biologists have classified through sequencing have had an actual physical population that could be identified, this is a paramount principal which most seem completely ignorant and blind to. If you cannot find a consistently interbreeding stable population within some time frame you have absolutely no basis whatsoever to come to the conclusion that there exists a species (or sub race as you like to say) where you think there is one.

At any rate the classical heroes - such as Grant and Guenthar didn't even contribute anything to this field, that is they had nothing unique to give anthropologically. The sub racial idea and "discovery" of the Nord was done by Deniker (Albeit commendably without any ideology) all Guenthar and Grant did was tag on their own opinions and historical outlook, basically they were thinking up a novel background for these sub races by observing Europid history. Comically, this outlook on history was rejected by the Third Reich itself (Which in all had only 5% pure Nords , meaning that this forum has approximately 0.00% Nords ) . In the end the only person worth recognizing for any sort of real work would probably be Deniker as someone who studied haplotype but failed to realize that what he was seeing was diversity . There is no sub race of Drosophilia with white eye color, or red eye color, or brown eye color that is genetic diversity at work if every novel genetic snippet made us a sub race then it would be viable to just say that each individual is his own sub race, if that is so what is the purpose of such a label to begin with? Species is a meaningful, well developed concept, sub race is not.

Ulysses Crane
September 15th, 2009, 12:27 AM
Aryan subraces:


Cromagnid
-Dalofaelid
-Bruenn
etc...


I thought Cromagnids were present in Europe before the Aryan invasion? If so, how would they be Aryan? I say this as a Dalofaelid myself.

Tulpar
September 16th, 2009, 03:21 AM
I thought Cromagnids were present in Europe before the Aryan invasion? If so, how would they be Aryan? I say this as a Dalofaelid myself.

That is to each person to decide. There is for example an ongoing debate on whether the Scotts are "germanic" enough, some people view them as germanic enough whilst others view them as non-germanics.

The same kind of "debate" could be argued about the Cromagnids, they are afterall the oldest people of Europe and unlike the other tribal subraces they are the ones who have the most Aryanic influence to them. And they are certainly closer to being considered "Aryan" than the mediterranids.

It shows as the Irano-Nordid subrace is quite present where the Aryan Kingdom was settled, even though this is proof of remnants from the Aryan presence, of course this type is not "Aryan" since it fell to race-mixing with that of the ones from the non-Aryan variety.

RickHolland
January 10th, 2010, 04:18 PM
http://www.hitsusa.com/1-good-ones/school-shooter.JPG
http://img.mtv3.fi/mn_kuvat/mtv3/viihde/isoja_kuvia_2008/557238.jpg
http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/9115/12051482.gif
http://img.mtv3.fi/mn_kuvat/mtv3/urheilu/luistelu/2008/580017.jpg
http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/9640/suvor3.jpg
http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/7259/4502.jpg


These saami mongoloids are not white.