[Roberto Muehlenkamp]

Originally Posted by T.F. Scheb

Mr. Gerdes said:

She's doing something even more disgraceful than slinking away.

She's just refusing to answer any and all relevant questions that prove that there was no Sobibor or Treblinka holocausts.

All he has is . . . conjecture

We have forensics

Actually I have evidence, including but not limited to forensic or archaeological evidence (see my posts # 172 under http://206.41.127.17/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=172 , # 194 under http://206.41.127.17/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=194 , # 777 under http://206.41.127.17/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=777 and # 1242 under http://206.41.127.17/showpost.php?p=...postcount=1242 , as well as my blog article update under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogsp...th-update.html and its predecessors ), whereas what "Revisionists" have can at best be called conjectures, and rather imbecilic ones at that. And you better be careful with invoking Krege’s crap as "forensics" (if that's what you had in mind), because it was a shot in the shoot for "Revisionism" (as shown in my post # 194 under http://206.41.127.17/showpost.php?p=...&postcount=194 , among others).

Hollow though your claim is, you are still doing better than Gerdes, however. In his posts # 1749 to 1751, the whimpering coward just repeats the same crap he has copied and pasted many times before, instead of posting the simple statement required to break the "ignore" deadlock and get this discussion going again. And that although I went as far as giving him the exact wording of that statement, in my post # 1748 under http://206.41.127.17/showpost.php?p=...postcount=1748 :

See my post # 1744 under http://206.41.127.17/showpost.php?p=...postcount=1744 and its predecessors.

As whimpering coward Gerdes well knows, all he has to do for me to dig out answers to his irrelevant and imbecilic questions that have been already provided, and add whatever answers are still missing, is to post the following statement, following his above-quoted baloney:

"I am prepared to, from now on, also answer questions and respond to challenges myself, and to address my opponent’s arguments and the evidence presented by my opponent (all of it)."

That's all it takes to break the "ignore" deadlock and get the discussion going again, as Gerdes well knows.

However, as he has shown ever since my post # 1536 under http://206.41.127.17/showpost.php?p=...postcount=1536, our friend Gerdes (obviously the fellow portrayed below):



it too much a



to post this simple statement.

So the ignore situation remains unchanged.