Polignano's "A Party of Our Own"

It's a good idea to consider the name of the party that Randolph suggested, American Heritage Party. Now, if we spin off that name, we can say that we want the party to be composed of the same respresentation of people that was in existance during a certain time, be it colonial times, the fifties, any time. In that way we don't have to say "no blacks", or "no Jews", we will just say that's how it was, and we want our party to reflect our heritage, so, in order to have it that way, we can't have Jews or blacks. This means we don't have to raise issues that alarm the more "delicate" Whites. Oh, it can be a White party, and it can be said that it stands for the interests of Whites. But it doesn't have to say it is pro-national socialism or any other ism. It does not have to dictate any religious doctrine. The shrinking violets will have a hard enough time getting over their ridiculous guilt for things they are not guilty of, never mind scaring them off with a different political philosophy. If you stick to the very basics of what would help them on an individual level you have a better chance, I think. Make very concrete and clear points on topics they have concerns over which NO OTHER PARTY addresses. Or, if they do, they never carry out their constituants wishes anyway. We stand for x, y, z. Include no more immigration, no more affirmative action, that sort of thing.