|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
January 22nd, 2012
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
Wow! Judge Orders Obama to Haul His Black Ass to Georgia if He Wants to be on the 2012 Ballot
JUDGE WHACKS OBAMA IN ELIGIBILITY CASE
'Defendant has failed to enlighten the court with legal authority' Published: 1 day ago by BOB UNRUHEmail | Archive A Georgia judge has refused a demand from Barack Obama to quash a subpoena to appear at a series of administration hearings Jan. 26 at which residents of the state are challenging, as allowed under a state law, his name on the 2012 presidential ballot. WND reported this week when Obama outlined a defense strategy for a number of state-level challenges to his candidacy in 2012 which argue that states have nothing to do with the eligibility of presidential candidates. “Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates,” Obama’s lawyer argued in a motion to quash a subpoena for him to appear at the hearings in Atlanta Jan. 26. “The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant,” the lawyer said. Judge Michael M. Malihi, however, took a different view. “Defendant argues that ‘if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as president of the United States’ to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend,” he wrote in his order, released today. “Defendant’s motion suggests that no president should be compelled to attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed to enlighten the court with any legal authority,” the judge continued. “Specifically, defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.’” Hearings have been scheduled for three separate complaints raised against Obama’s candidacy. They all are raised by Georgia residents who are challenging Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot for various reasons, which they are allowed to do under state law. Top constitutional expert Herb Titus contends that a “natural born citizen” is born of parents who are citizens. That argument also is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett in 1875. The case includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen.” That case states: The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. An extensive analysis of the issue was conducted by Titus, who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. He also was the founding dean of the College of Law at Regent University, a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney in the Department of Justice. “‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” he said. “Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.” If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said. “Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.” |
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#5 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Obama using SSN from Connecticut which WAS NEVER ASSIGNED TO HIM.
Last edited by Fred O'Malley; January 22nd, 2012 at 06:38 PM. |
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Judge Michael Malihii denied Obama motion to dismiss and ruled Obama must prove his qualification to be on ballot in 2012. This is a clear victory for Truth, whatever it is, and for Orly Taitz, who has been questioning and filing since BEFORE Mr. Barry [Soetero] Obama was sworn into office. Obama must now prove he is by definition a "natural born" citizen, and even if born in Hawaii... as he claims... it does NOT matter, because his father was NOT American, but a British subject of Kenya. What is amazing is that the Democratic party itself, did NOTHING to check this simple matter back in 2007-2008.
|
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
|
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
 Georgia judge orders Obama to appear in Atlanta court By CHUCK WILLIAMS - [email protected] A Georgia judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta Thursday for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president. Orly Taitz, the California attorney who brought the legal challenge to Obama’s name on the March Georgia presidential primary ballot, says this is what she has been working for over the last three years. “This will be 100 times bigger than Watergate,” she said Saturday morning, referring to the scandal that brought down President Richard Nixon in 1974. “There are high ranking judges and federal officials who are involved in this cover up. The ramifications of this trial will be enormous.” Taitz said she expects the president’s legal team to fight his appearance in the Georgia court. “But he’s in a catch-22,” she said. “If he is appealing this decision, then he looks guilty. The whole nation understands this man is a fraud.” Taitz has led the “Birther” movement that insists Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. She is also familiar to Georgia courts. Taitz represented two soldiers in U.S. District Court in Columbus who sought to avoid deployment by arguing Obama wasn’t the commander-in-chief because he wasn’t eligible to be president. Federal Judge Clay Land warned Taitz against filing a frivolous suit, then fined her $20,000 after he denied the second claim. This is one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the country, so far without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama’s name off the state’s ballot in the March presidential primary. An Obama campaign aide fail and such complaints around the country have no merit. The hearing is set for Thursday before an administrative judge. Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president’s lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up. The Office of State Administrative Hearings handles disputes between the public and state agencies. For example, if the state Department of Revenue wants to revoke a business owner’s alcohol license, the owner could appeal to the Office of State Administrative Hearings. Read more here: http://www.ledger-enquirer.com/2012/...#storylink=cpy |
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
The story has gone viral: http://www.google.com/search?q=Georg...ient=firefox-a
|
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
This from The canada Free Press:
Since the most powerful people in America fear the wrath of Obamanation, maybe you should too! They are indeed a dangerous bunch, after all… Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous. But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand. Do you think there is no reason for this? The Basic Facts Barack Hussein Obama is foreign born, period (Kenya) Regardless of his birth place, his parents had foreign loyalties (strike 2) He has foreign loyalties, demonstrated in every policy decision (strike 3) He’s not Christian, but Muslim He’s not “black,” but Arab There is NO U.S. birth certificate, other than the forged COLB NO Hawaiian hospital will confirm his birth place (he has named two) His policies are designed to destroy the Constitutional Republic, not to uphold or defend (strike 4) He won’t go away without a blood bath These are the basic facts as they exist today. This is the basis for where we are headed… MUCH more: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999 |
|
January 22nd, 2012
|
#11 |
|
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
who dat babees daddee?
Just who is really Obama’s father?
Exclusive: Jack Cashill offers plausibility Barack Sr. was enlisted after conception As I was wrapping up my research on my forthcoming book, “Deconstructing Obama,” I asked three of the independent investigators with whom I had been consulting who they thought was the biological father of President Barack Obama. To the uninitiated, this may seem a bizarre question. But those who have followed this story – now, perhaps, including Hawaii’s blundering Gov. Neil Abercrombie – will not be surprised to learn that I got three different answers, each of them plausible. In the book, I follow all three lines of inquiry, but new evidence strengthens the case against Barack Obama Sr. Thanks to the investigative work of Jerome Corsi, WND readers know the basic holes in the Obama story. Bottom line: When Obama told the nation’s schoolchildren in September 2009, “My father left my family when I was 2 years old, and I was raised by a single mother,” he was lying. There never was a family. Obama and his mother, Ann Dunham, found themselves in Seattle when Obama was weeks old, and Obama Sr. left Hawaii for good in June 1962. This was before Obama’s first birthday and before Obama Sr.’s presumed wife and son returned to Hawaii. This much is beyond dispute. Although there is evidence of a Dunham-Obama divorce, there is no hard evidence of a wedding – no witnesses, no photos, no rings, no signed marriage certificate – and, of course, no long-form birth certificate, either. Stand up for truth and transparency — and the Constitution! Magnetic bumper sticker declares: “Birther on Board” The lack of documentation comes to play in a previously overlooked passage from “Dreams from My Father.” As Obama tells the story, Obama Sr. had children with at least four different women, two of them American, two African. Ruth Nidesand, a white American, had two children by Obama Sr., Mark and David, the latter of whom died young in a motorcycle accident. When Obama Sr. died in 1982, lawyers contacted anyone who might have claim to the estate. “Unlike my mum,” Obama tells his half-sister Auma in “Dreams,” “Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark’s father was.” Ruth obviously could produce a marriage license and a birth certificate for her son Mark. Although Obama alludes to finding his own “birth certificate” in “Dreams,” Ann Dunham apparently could not produce one that tied him to Obama Sr., this despite a potential payoff if she did. Then, too, those who have read “Dreams” are almost invariably surprised by the fond memories Ann’s father, Stanley Dunham, has of his putative son-in-law. These memories do not deceive. A photo taken on the occasion of Obama Sr.’s celebratory departure from Hawaii shows a smiling Stanley Dunham – looking all the world like a young Barack Obama Jr. – standing right next to the African guy who allegedly knocked up his 17-year-old daughter and is now abandoning them. As the father of two daughters, this doesn’t smell right at all. One of my correspondents – let’s call him Frank Hardy – is convinced that the Dunham family left for Hawaii abruptly right after Ann’s graduation in June 1960 because Ann was pregnant. He makes a good case. If a black guy had impregnated Ann, this would explain the family’s abrupt departure to Hawaii, the one state in the union where a mixed-race baby could grow up almost unnoticed. It certainly explains the move to Hawaii better than the dreamy rationale Stanley Dunham offers in “Dreams.” This scenario makes sense of any number of other details as well, like Ann’s angry resistance to the move, her mother’s willingness to quit her job as an escrow officer in nearby Bellevue, Wash., Ann’s poor performance in her limited first-semester courses at the University of Hawaii, her failure to enroll for the second semester and, most of all, her otherwise inexplicable return to Seattle in August 1961 – if not earlier. True, to make this scenario work, we have to add one major variable, but it is a credible one. Imagine Ann coming home from class one day in Hawaii in fall 1960 in one of her all-concealing muumuus – she had written friends that muumuus were worn on campus – and telling her father about a charming, larger-than-life Kenyan in her class. The scheming Stanley befriends Barack Sr. and enlists him in his plot. He explains that a boy named Barack, the legitimate son of a Kenyan, could move through American life more seamlessly than a boy named, say, Stanley, the illegitimate son of an American black. Stanley tells Barack Sr. that he can make it worth his while. Ann understands. As to Barack Sr., he has to contribute nothing to the proceedings but his name – with his “son” born in February 1961, not August. A marriage license from Maui – the county specified in the divorce papers – assures that no marriage announcement will appear in the Honolulu papers. Ann will leave in time for the 1961 fall semester at the University of Washington – perhaps months before – and she will not return until Obama Sr. leaves for Harvard. Frank Hardy has found another clue that bolsters his argument. In an online forum dated March 14, 2009, Ann’s high-school classmate Joelle Hannum comments innocently, “I can remember the rumors about [Ann] and another classmate who were involved with and married African-American men, and believe me in those days it was looked at with a LOT of negativity.” As another friend had earlier testified, Ann never dated “the crew-cut white boys.” A thorough investigator, Hardy called Joelle Hannum to follow up. He immediately wrote down what she told him: “By request of President Obama, we [she and her classmates] have decided not to give out any more information. I have to hang up now. Goodbye.” I am occasionally asked why any of this matters. The fact is that Obama rode to the presidency on an apocryphal story. The dissembling that he has had to do to hold it together has cost at least one good man his freedom and his career. If nothing else, our commander in chief owes Lt. Col. Terry Lakin the truth. http://www.wnd.com/2011/01/253097/
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
|
January 23rd, 2012
|
#12 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 83
|
Quote:
Frank Marshall Davis, a communist negro, attested to having three ways with Obama's grandparents, I'm sure he had sex with Obama, too, and , what are the odds he didnt' have sex with their daughter, too? zero. There are probably thousands of negros who didn't write a book, about it though |
|
|
January 23rd, 2012
|
#13 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 211
|
Quote:
The correspondent is identified in Cashill's book as Don Wilkie. http://www.thetimesherald.com/articl...er-got-bad-rap Just before the 2008 election, undated nude photographs of Obama's mother were leaked. Internal evidence dated the photographs to late December, 1960. Cashill details all of this in his book. If Stanley were pregnant in June 1960, then she would have been six months pregnant in December, 1960, which she obviously was not, judging by the photographs. The photos were likely taken by Frank Marshall Davis, a communist pornographer with whom Obama, Jr. was friendly. If Davis was his real father, this, ironically, would mean that Obama is a natural-born citizen, unlike if his father was Barack H. Obama, Sr. |
|
|
January 23rd, 2012
|
#14 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
Posted on Sun, Jan. 22, 2012
Georgia judge orders Obama to appear in Atlanta court By CHUCK WILLIAMS, Ledger-Enquirer.com A Georgia judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta Thursday for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president. Orly Taitz, the California attorney who brought the legal challenge to Obama’s name on the March Georgia presidential primary ballot, says this is what she has been working for over the last three years. “This will be 100 times bigger than Watergate,” she said Saturday morning, referring to the scandal that brought down President Richard Nixon in 1974. “There are high ranking judges and federal officials who are involved in this cover up. The ramifications of this trial will be enormous.” Taitz said she expects the president’s legal team to fight his appearance in the Georgia court. “But he’s in a catch-22,” she said. “If he is appealing this decision, then he looks guilty. The whole nation understands this man is a fraud.” Taitz has led the “Birther” movement that insists Obama is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. She is also familiar to Georgia courts. Taitz represented two soldiers in U.S. District Court in Columbus who sought to avoid deployment by arguing Obama wasn’t the commander-in-chief because he wasn’t eligible to be president. Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/president-...#ixzz1kJIp5CFq |
|
January 23rd, 2012
|
#15 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
Quote:
This recent ruling is huge and the media for the most part is ignoring it. For the first time, in over four years of attempts, a judge finally gave someone standing to move a case to the evidence stage. I would like to see what legal excuse is going to be used to avoid this hearing that will take place this coming Thursday. |
|
|
January 23rd, 2012
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,498
|
I don't know anything either way about B.Obama's place of birth, but, by God, read up on Orly Taitz.
|
|
January 23rd, 2012
|
#17 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,633
|
Quote:
My best guess is that on a petition from the U.S. Attorney a U.S. District Court Judge will invoke federal supremacy, order the State Court subpoena quashed, order the State to put B. Soetoro's name on the ballot without further litigation, and threaten contempt procedings against anyone having the temerity to file any further motions. No one will have the balls to gainsay any of it, and that will be that... 
__________________
No way out but through the jews. |
|
|
January 26th, 2012
|
#18 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
Barack Obama has announced through his attorney that he will boycott the administrative hearings scheduled tomorrow in Georgia to review evidence of whether he legitimately is a candidate for the presidency, prompting an attorney for one set of the plaintiffs to describe the nation’s commander-in-chief as acting like a “5-year-old brat.”
He [judge] also had a warning about the costs of simply not showing up for a court hearing. “Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.” http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-boy...ility-hearing/ |
|
January 26th, 2012
|
#19 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
Quote:
“What Obama is asking now is totally insane,” it said. “He is asking the secretary of state of GA to take the trial away from the judge on the eve of the trial. He is mostly crying on the shoulder of the secretary of state of GA..." http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-boy...ility-hearing/ |
|
|
January 26th, 2012
|
#20 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 8,506
|
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...pped-down.html
Obama's Attorney Jablonski Slapped Down By Georgia SOS Over Obama's Ballot Access Hearing Tomorrow's hearing will be interesting to watch. Obama now has to either show up, or possibly be tossed off the primary ballot for March. Maybe Alvin Greene, who won the Democratic nomination for the South Carolina US Senate race, muh dicked a white lady at the university computer lab, and suggested that we pay off the federal deficit by selling Alvin Greene action figures will surprise us again by winning the Democratic presidential primary in Georgia?  
|
 |
| Share |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.
Page generated in 0.49305 seconds.