|
June 16th, 2006 | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 1,945
|
The Origin of the Races (Celtic Secrets)
This is a chapter from the book, Keeper of the Celtic Secrets by Betty Rhodes. I have no other information about it except the book's website The Red Thread which contains a lot of like-minded things. It's a very strange work; Blvatsky meets Zecharia Sitchen. Who/what is Betty Rhodes? I think we're going to be hearing more about this. -- FJ
Excerpt from "Keeper of the Celtic Secrets: Quote:
__________________
When I get re-elected I'm going to fuck the Jews" -- Jimmy Carter, 1980. |
|
June 17th, 2006 | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In the ancient native american traditions, it is an accepted "fact" that originally there were five distinct races. White, Red, Yellow, Brown, and Black. Any of the native american elders I have had the pleasure to speak with do not see the jews as White. They place them in the "brown" category. I see this person who wrote the above seems to dwell on attempting to equate jews/israelites/hebrews with White, and therefore makes me curious to know just who she is also.
|
June 17th, 2006 | #3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think I found her, Franz. There is a Betty Rhodes that does a genealogy for the lost tribes of israel in the jewsite brit-am. From what I can see, trying to prove that jews were the original ancestors of the White race. Can't say for sure. Am still scrutinizing their site.
http://www.britam.org/ |
June 17th, 2006 | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 1,945
|
Quote:
Even the Da Vince Code ain't as obvious as this: Quote:
__________________
When I get re-elected I'm going to fuck the Jews" -- Jimmy Carter, 1980. |
||
June 17th, 2006 | #5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, I am sure there is some valid reasoning in her works, but just geared toward supporting the jew theory that they are god's chosen.
I am not very familiar with Sitchen's works, meaning I have read something about them, but never have read his chronicles myself. He certainly poses some interesting theories, no more or less unbelievable than biblical accounts of the origin of mankind. Actually, more believable in many instances. Origin of mankind being that gray mysterious area that we all would like to know more of the truth about, but have so little to work with. Pre-jewish accounts of creation deal with a pantheon of "gods" both human in form and personifications of natural realities. The jews prefer the god of hate, bloodlust, etc., omitting from their reality the possiblity and probabilty that there is more than one "god". These are really deep murky waters to attempt to see anything clearly, but there are undisputable facts that leads one to understand that history, even ancient pre-history, is not what those who control our "education" would lead us to believe. To the extent that when one begins to speak about any of these things they are met with a rolling of the eyes and a "oh, you're one of those." remarks. I myself like to exercise the mind with various possibilities. I find it to be a relaxing interlude from analytical thought. And many times the possiblities lend a perspective to an analytical pursuit that had previously escaped me. This is a good area of the forum to relax with thoughts of possible not necessarily provable matters. Are you familiar with Sitchen's works? I would like to hear your perspectives. |
June 17th, 2006 | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 109
|
Thanks for this, I've been getting into this stuff recently, and the case looks good for extra-terrestrial intervention in the race of man.
I'm also pleseantly suprised this thread not met with a lot of cries of 'bullshit!' Sad that a lot of racists can use their reasoning to see through the anti-White bullshit, and not think the way the ruling elite want them to, but then completely close their minds to stuff like this, when just as much, if not more cover up goes on of ancient technology, and even ufo's of today, and refuse to look at, or even hear it, just like any anti. |
June 17th, 2006 | #7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It's allright, Doppelhaken, we have already determined that Betty Rhodes is not a reliable source of information.
Piecing together ancient history is a rather tedious and laborious project. One ends up perusing countless venues for pieces of the puzzle. For example Sumeria. There is the pre-semite Sumer and the semite Sumer. In pre-semite Sumer, the cuneform writings were based on symbols for word meanings. There was no "alphabet" involved. When the semite Sargon I conquered the existing land of Sumer, somewhere around 2300 BCE, one of the first things the semite "scholars" did was to change the cuneform symbols into an alphabet for their own use. Most of the surviving tablets are from Sargon's era, and so have already been corrupted by hebrew ways. Sargon I ruled from 2335 BCE to 2279 BCE. From what has been pieced together by tedious work of dedicated anthropologists and archeologists is that the people that Sargon conquered had come into the area somewhere around 5000 BCE. It is not sure where they came from. Vague references of "somewhere from the north". The language of these ones remains unrelated to any languages known to date. Sargon's semitic people were called Akkadians. At the time the Sumerians came into the area, the area was populated by a people referred to as Ubaidans. As always, when one culture replaces another, there is the initial overlapping of cultures that transforms into the culture of the invaders with remnants of the previous culture remaining intact. One has to sift through the culture of the invaders to find the fragments of the preceding culture. I hope I am not making this sharing of information too tedious. I merely wish to convey that serious investigation into ancient cultures is pretty involved. And there are always new pieces of the puzzle being discovered by those who dedicate their lives to unearthing more evidence. As I say, I am not very familiar with Sitchen's work, and have not taken time out to look it over. I do know that in the traditons of many ancient cultures are references to "gods" that came from "the heavens" to earth and proceeded to make humans in their own image. Some of the "gods" worked for the good of all things on Earth, some of them worked for the bad of all things on Earth. One of the Sumerian texts has been roughly translated as such: " What is good in a man's sight has been deemed evil by some gods. What is evil in man's sight has been deemed good by other gods. Who can fathom the counsel of the gods? Their plans are deep waters. The conduct of the gods befuddles the minds of mankind." |
June 24th, 2006 | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 917
|
As per old family journals containing knowledge from ancient Ireland, the origin of races are as follows:
1) Caucasoid, or the white races, descends from the Anunnaki, including the Elohiym godhead. Yes, the Israelites are the descendants of the Elohiym royal family. The jews aren't whites, their closest relatives are the Arabs. 4) Indigenous or Native peoples of the land, the brown races, descend from the evolved Homo sapiens and the Anunnaki - some not authorized by the Elohiym, but boys will be boys, and they made a good working stock. Indians if America? They are closest to the Asians and have many similar features. E) The bloodline of the Israelites makes up the multitudes of Celtic, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, Anglo-Saxon, and the true Jews. sounds like some jewish propaganda. Israelites have more in common with the Gypsies than Anglos. G) Mixed races are a result of intermarrying amongst all races of people producing various shades of skin tones, facial features, hair color and consistancy, and blood types. Examples might be the people of India, the Aborigines of Australia, the Blackfoot of North America, and the Polynesians. Indian culture is on of the oldest known to humanity. The Aborigines of Australia might be the oldest living species. They are not mix. In general sounds like typical pseudoscience written by some Zionists. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|