|
October 3rd, 2009 | #1 | |
Member
|
The World According to jews: Why Women have sex
This is a rather interesting article in that the jews are continuing their "scientific"/feminist based research as to why we women have sex.
There's a slight nod to the fact that love and is a factor, but one has to read the entire article to find it. It still portrays women as sluttish and stupid, having sex for a variety of selfish reason and none of it related to procreation [based on the most ideal genetics, ie, genetics is offered as a reason for "stealing men from other women", or marriage and the desire to bear children out of biological instinct. And, of course, race is not even a factor, according to jewish notions of women/or "science". I thought VNN would be a good place to post this article in view of both sides that are often argued here when it comes to Aryan women and mating. However, this "seminal" article, taken from Newsweek, is purposefully posted in that this rag does still have influence on the pseudo intellectual or marginally educated Aryan folk who believe that reading and using Newsweek as a guidepost both that both instructs and proves that they are, indeed, discerning and intelligent readers when of course the opposite is true in most instances. The online poll that is the partial basis for this book appears to not have been broken down as to race, and lumps all women [and their sexual motivation] into one messy group composed of the female of the species. There is also no indication that the poll was vetted to rule out males who might have taken it, ie, homosexual males, "transgender" males [and, judging by the rather distinctly masculine replies, I would wager that there are more than a few of the latter involved in this poll, as well as, perhaps, men answering just for the fun of it]. Quote:
Last edited by EireannGoddess; October 3rd, 2009 at 02:16 PM. |
|
October 3rd, 2009 | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,525
|
It's true, the article is indeed as you describe it, however there is a second insinuation there as well, it does pervert the female motivation for sex...but it devalues the male motivation entirely, the female despite being quite perverted by them, is still "quite complex" compared to the males motivation which is considered as "purely motivated by pleasure", there is no noble intention on the male aspect for sexual relations with a female at all, it's even less than animalistic, as an animal is by nature bound to reproduce.
It does mention later in the argument that "it isn't to say males aren't multifaceted" however, it later continues by stating "But the brain is the primary driver of female arousal" negating the "multifaceted motivations" of males entirely or at best delegating it to a more "primitive" motivation. I.e. That it is driven either by their privy's, lust or emotion..which really if looked at isn't suggestive that it is "complex" to say the least. Last edited by Karl Von Clausewitz!; October 3rd, 2009 at 02:39 PM. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|