|
January 9th, 2011 | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
The jew continues to lie about the Civil War
I am outraged by this pack of lies.
Five myths about why the South seceded By James W. Loewen About This Jew retelling of American history as it should, and could, be taught Sunday, January 9, 2011; 12:00 AM One hundred and fifty years after the Civil War began, we're still fighting it -- or at least fighting over its history. I've polled thousands of high school history teachers and spoken about the war to audiences across the country, and there is little agreement even on why the South seceded. Was it over slavery? States' rights? Tariffs and taxes? As the nation begins to commemorate the anniversaries of the war's various battles -- from Fort Sumter to Appomattox -- let's first dispense with some of the more prevalent myths about why it all began. MORE Last edited by Fred O'Malley; January 9th, 2011 at 10:56 AM. |
January 9th, 2011 | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Jews Caused the Civil War - Part 2 The Civil War was actually fought over States Rights but the ownership of the media; the newspapers, magazines, publishing houses and etc., HAVE BEEN USED TO CREATE A HATRED OF THE WHITE RACE BY THE BLACKS, AND THE BLACKS HAVE NEVER BEEN ABLE TO SEE PAST THE END OF THEIR NOSES OR THEIR NEXT WELFARE CHECK HANDED OUT BECAUSE THE JEWS USE THE WHITE RACE TO SUPPLY THE FREE FOOD, MEDICINE, CLOTHING, HOUSING AND ETC. BUT THE BLACKS HAVE REMAINED SLAVES, JUST A DIFFERENT FORM OF SLAVERY. You think not then just think about this, the old slave owners both white and black had to pay for their slaves food, clothing, medical expenses and provide housing. THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDES FOR ITS SLAVES; FOOD, CLOTHING, MEDICAL EXPENSES, AND PROVIDES HOUSING. Exactly the same thing, therefore the Blacks changed from one slavery to another and were simply too stupid to understand what happened to them. And they blamed the White Man when it was really the Jews who did it to them. Is it possible that the Civil War was fought for reasons other than those traditionally offered? Is it possible that the real reasons for the war are among the secrets that some wish not to be revealed? Is it possible that slavery and states rights were not the real causes of the War? MORE Last edited by Fred O'Malley; January 9th, 2011 at 11:07 AM. |
January 9th, 2011 | #3 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
Reasons that are “traditionally offered” are backed up by extensive scholarship that looks carefully at letters, diaries, pamphlets, newspapers and other primary sources from that time. The real problem is that you have to re-word your question. Stop asking “Why did the South go to war?” The “South” didn’t exist. It is a gross generalization to treat “the South” like a football team where a coach calls the plays. There was a geographical area called the South and we can all agree where that place was. But places don’t make political decisions – people do. There were, for example, one million people living in Missouri. Another million lived in Virginia. (See 1860 Census http://www.civilwarhome.com/population1860.htm) Both those states were deeply divided about their loyalty to the North, slavery, tariffs, jews and going to war. Within each state, you had formal centers of power – mayors, city councils, governors, legislatures, militia. You also had informal centers of influence – newspapers, universities, political parties, the very wealthy, plantation owners, manufacturers, etc. There was consensus about some issues. But even where there was consensus, there was disagreement about specifics. The commitment was also different among various players. Finally, you had the lemmings – just like today. Most people changed their opinion from week to week. If you begin to dig into the history of what happened inside each state and why each state legislature voted as it did, you will eventually begin to see what the reasons were inside each center of power and influence. That’s the best way to understand the Civil War from the “South’s” point of view. |
|
January 9th, 2011 | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
The South had every right to secede
When the feral gov't refused to abide by the documents which gave it birth, it became tyranical, this is what caused the war of northern aggression. The Civil War was the enslavement of all Americans by their tyrannical gov't. We all lost that war, the north was just too propagandized to understand what was happening, and they still are.
I believe they meant what they wrote. Quote:
The Articles of Secession of the various Confederate States of America http://americancivilwar.com/documents/ Last edited by Fred O'Malley; January 9th, 2011 at 01:31 PM. |
|
January 9th, 2011 | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,749
|
Quote:
__________________
Smash jewish supremacy. Smash globalism. Smash ZOG. Use ad blockers at all times to starve off the (((beast))). |
|
January 9th, 2011 | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,749
|
Quote:
+ a novel claim for which no reliable, independent sources are cited + a claim on which interests hinge (in this case, interests via proxy of black interests, i.e., "White guilt" - because Whites pulled blacks out of the jungle into the most advanced civilization the world has ever known and did not immediately bestow upon them lucrative government jobs, eight figure sport and "rap" salaries, crack, malt liquor and White hoes, Whites are forever in debt to the negroes for this -inspired "guilt") = roughly 90% probability that what is said is crap and should be thrown out. Throw in the fact that it's the very ish Washington Post publishing this drivel and the bullshit factor skyrockets to 95-99% probability.
__________________
Smash jewish supremacy. Smash globalism. Smash ZOG. Use ad blockers at all times to starve off the (((beast))). Last edited by H.B.; January 9th, 2011 at 02:21 PM. |
|
January 9th, 2011 | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Quote:
www.thebirdman.org (see the properties of the MORE link.) Still, the truth is still the truth, regardless of the side of the mason Dixon Line on which you find yourself. The real question is, do you buy the propaganda or do you think for yourself and dig for the reality which has been intentionally hidden from you? |
|
January 9th, 2011 | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
|
January 9th, 2011 | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Quote:
|
|
January 9th, 2011 | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,749
|
Quote:
My response was directed at the Washington Post piece - did not even read the Birdman piece. Never really read much of Birdman's material - never was interested - so much of it seemed like a rehashing of what everyone else was saying. Nor would I waste any time critiquing the Birdman because he was simply a person with a blog and should not be held to the same standard as someone who writes for a living for a major press organ.
__________________
Smash jewish supremacy. Smash globalism. Smash ZOG. Use ad blockers at all times to starve off the (((beast))). |
|
January 9th, 2011 | #11 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Quote:
You really should assess the Birdman's work for yourself, it is well worth the read. Last edited by Fred O'Malley; January 9th, 2011 at 02:30 PM. |
|
January 9th, 2011 | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
I believe in the link I posted about the author, he clearly makes the case for representing history as it clearly was not. His intention is to lie, being a jew, he wants to destroy all vestiges of truthful history and he believes he has hit on a convincing argument the sheeple will accept. It is the jewish way, after all.
|
January 9th, 2011 | #13 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,921
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
January 9th, 2011 | #14 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
The Civil War destroyed the Confederacy and all States belonging to it. It allowed the Northern military governments in each occupied Sothern state to put in place traitors and collaborators who were then used to "re-admit" enough of those states to the Union and to ratify the Reconstruction Amendments - among them, the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery. If you look at the order in which state legislatures ratified it, you'll see it closely matches the advance of Union troops into the Southern states. Slavery was perfectly legal. The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments are probably not. |
|
January 10th, 2011 | #15 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Quote:
The fed gov't decided they had the power and the people no longer had any. The Civil War was the exercise of force which decided that question. States' Rights vs. Monetary Monopoly by Thomas J. DiLorenzo Quote:
[img] Lincoln Unmasked by Thomas J. DiLorenzo Quote:
|
|||
January 10th, 2011 | #16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 130
|
when the jews don't lie they keep us in the dark as to the actual reality of a situation and issues. But most of the time its outright lies.
|
January 10th, 2011 | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
|
January 10th, 2011 | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
|
January 10th, 2011 | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
Last edited by Fred O'Malley; January 10th, 2011 at 07:50 PM. |
January 11th, 2011 | #20 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
But when it comes to American history, whites don't need the jews to fool themselves. We do enough of our own myth-making and mis-representation. The truth is that this never should have been one country. The differences between northern and southern colonies were apparent before the Revolution. Sure, there were good reasons to form a confederation and then a republic but it was always half-ass. We were always two nations. The history between 1787 and 1860 was a series of compromises trying to keep things together. The Civil War settled that. The North simply killed and burned its way into total power and subjugated those who disagreed. Since they won . . . they got to write the history. Just imagine what you would know about tariffs, the central bank issue, jews, Lincolns, trade issues . . . etc . . . if the South had won the war. As it is, all that has been lost and replaced with propaganda about the "noble cause of freeing the slaves." |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|