Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts
Local Blogs
Miscellaneous


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > General Discussion
Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old June 11th, 2004   #1
Librarian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Closer than you think
Posts: 1,385
Default A BNP riddle

Firstly, it's obvious that the BNP won several seats in Oldham, but the result was frustrated by fraud. Secondly, the BNP won several more seats in Burnley.

Now, the question is this. Why was the BNP prevented from winning in Oldham, but allowed to win in Burnley?

Answer ...

Had the BNP gained any Council seats in Oldham, there would have been a series of race riots. Those riots would have resulted in numerous deaths and enormous damage to property. More to the point, it would have sent a wake-up call to whites that could not have been ignored - particularly if the civil authorities lost control and had to call in the military.

The BNP were allowed to win in Burnley because their seats there underpin Griffin's position. Had those seats been lost, then Griffin would have fallen. The fact that it encourages whites to think that 'something is being done' is useful, but not the main objective.

Now, here's another question.

Why should the system go to such lengths to ensure that Griffin remains leader?
Librarian is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.
Page generated in 0.16328 seconds with 13 queries.