VDARE on a nigger presidency and alleged White Nationlist support for it

melcur · May 6th, 2008

Interesting article, send the author an email here > peter_bradley_paleo@hotmail.com

May 05, 2008

Is Worse Better? Some Surprising White Support For Obama

By Peter Bradley

If you pay a visit to Barack Obama's official campaign website, you will find a host of subgroups in the "People" section boosting his candidacy. The man who will help us overcome race has separate categories for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Latinos, First Americans (he is not talking about the ancestors of Kennewick Man) and, of course, African Americans. If you are white and racist enough to notice you are not part of Obama's rainbow, don't worry. You can still join groups for students, women, veterans or the LGBT crowd.

If you are just what Obama notoriously called a "typical white person" who is not part of these groups, then you are out of luck. But maybe not for much longer.

A significant number of white race activists—they often call themselves "white nationalists", analogous to black nationalists, Hispanic nationalists or Zionists and not the same thing as white supremacists—are supporting an Obama presidency as the lesser of two evils and, possibly, the catalyst for a wake up call for white America.

Newhouse News reporter Jonathan Tilove covered the 2008 American Renaissance conference in late February and quoted a number of whites who were ready to support the Senator from Illinois.

"We are facing the election of Barack Obama, or, even worse, McCain," said Sam Dickson, Atlanta attorney and longtime racial activist during his closing speech. [A View Of Obama From The Trenches Of White Nationalism, February 27, 2008) ]

Maryland attorney Howard Fezell wondered if black racial loyalty to Obama could make some whites wonder why they can't do the same. "Only white voters are expected to look beyond race," he said.

Even Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance, praised Obama's campaign strategy and stated that he does not know who he will vote for in November.

Paul Gottfried, who also spoke at the event, speculated that most of the over 250 people in attendance would most likely support Obama over McCain. "Better a black who is honest about who he is than a conservative who is really delivering the liberal agenda," declared Gottfried.

There seem to be three main reasons for this unexpected support for Obama's candidacy.

First: John McCain's stands on affirmative action, immigration, official English, the Confederate flag, and other racially-tinged issues are, in fact, pretty much the same as Obama's.

The Republican nominee recently told a black audience that his vote against the MLK holiday was the greatest mistake of his political career. He equates immigration reform with "bigotry." As I write this, McCain is promising a renewed "War on Poverty" and criticizing an ad by North Carolina Republicans that draws attention to the race-baiting comments of Obama's spiritual mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Larry Auster of the mildly white-nationalist View from the Right blog writes: "at least the Democratic president, as he welcomes Al Sharpton to the White House, won't be giving us lectures on 'true conservatism.'" Auster views McCain as a virtual death sentence for conservatism in America.

Second: Iraq and neoconservative foreign policy. Almost all paleoconservatives and paleolibertarians are against the war and interventionism abroad.

If we must have race quotas and amnesties, at least a President Obama would get us out of a costly war. McCain could well get us into an even deadlier conflict with Iran.

Third, and most important: an Obama presidency could shake up the current racial dynamics and bring about an end to white guilt and passivity over racial issues.

As Jared Taylor told Jonathan Tilove, "I think many smarter, far-thinking blacks are going to be worried that any time they start talking about discrimination, certainly institutional racism, people are going to say, 'Hey, look, you've got a black president for heaven's sake.'"

TakiMag's Christopher Roach made the point that an Obama presidency could make whites more racially aware even more bluntly: "a political equivalent of the O.J. Trial for four years might be the right catalyst for this sort of 'consciousness raising.'"

The Obama record on race is eye-opening for those who will look. The racialism of his autobiography, the anti-white comments of his wife and of his spiritual mentor, his attendance at Louis Farrakhan's Million Man March, his support for the Jena Six race attackers, his insulting "race speech" and slurs about "typical whites" and "bitter" people in rural America all point to a man who has more in common with Al Sharpton than Ward Connerly.

Marcus Epstein agrees on the potential for a white backlash. "We can be sure that a president Obama will be push for the same anti-white policies of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, while posing as a post-racial unifier," he says. "The question is whether or not the public will buy that facade."

As director of Pat Buchanan's American Cause, Epstein receives quite a bit of feedback from blacks on the true meaning of an Obama presidency. One of the more printable responses came from a black man who told him: "You [presumably whites] have had 100 [sic]presidents, why can’t we have one?"

The whites who support Obama tend to be young, affluent liberals who truly believe the Obama campaign is about racial unity. But blacks are not supporting Obama so they can hold hands and sing Dave Matthews songs with rich white kids from the suburbs (I recently saw a news clip of a free Dave Matthews concert given in support of Obama and literally every face in the crowd was white).

Clearly these two main groups of Obama supporters are on a collision course.

It is not hard to predict which race is in for a rude awakening.

Personally, I plan to vote for the Constitution Party which just nominated Chuck Baldwin as its presidential candidate. Baldwin is an immigration patriot and a strong conservative on all issues. A vote for him will send a clear message to the GOP that the McCain-Bush type of Republican Party is unacceptable and unworthy of support.

But an Obama presidency at least offers the possibility of an energized right wing movement in which paleos and whites of the Jared Taylor-Sam Francis school can find a home.

Just as forced integration and busing woke up many northern white ethnics in the 1960s and 70s, a black race-driven president who uses his office to excuse black rioters and defend black gangs who attack white kids will be a real eye-opener for many a nice white liberal—to say nothing of the slumbering "conservative" masses.

http://www.vdare.com/bradley/080505_obama.htm

richyrichard · May 7th, 2008

The suggestion is wholly irresponsible. The solution to our problem is not to support our enemies. That is treason.

Our enemies must be opposed. Totally.

Starr · May 7th, 2008

It is only truly treason if your reasons for doing so are to help advance the cause of our enemy. And no one will be supporting Obama for that reason. I will surely not be voting for him, though nor McCain who is just as much our enemy.

Mike Jahn · May 7th, 2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by richyrichard

The suggestion is wholly irresponsible. The solution to our problem is not to support our enemies. That is treason.

Our enemies must be opposed. Totally.

How do you oppose them? By not voting? Voting for McCain?

Kievsky · May 7th, 2008

Letting the Republikud party sit out from power for a while would be a good thing. Let them get the message, real clear, that there's no support for John McAmnesty or any other such Chamber of Commerce/multiculted pols.

Look at how Pat Buchanan got some steel in his spine. The Republikudniks definitely read him.

AntonF · May 7th, 2008

Vote for the Constitution Party or the Libitarian Party if Bob Barr is their presidential nominee. Why vote for a white hating leftist commie nigger????? It's impossible for me to vote for McInsane. At this point in time, voting has ZERO chance of ever solving our problems. Did voting solve our problems when this nation was 75% white????? Did it solve our problems when this nation was 85% white????? Now we're only about 60% white and maybe less than that and a large portion of whites are cheering on this nigger Obama.

James Watson · May 7th, 2008

I wouldn't care if Malcolm X became President. The Repugs betrayed this country, and the penalty for this treason is obliteration. I don't care if the niggers burn this fuckin' country down to the ground

, as long as these scumbag Repigs are out of office.

Yeah, I know the Repug Party was hijacked by the neo-cons, but the dumb fuck Christians went along with this treason and should be punished. And I don't care if the Democrats are worse, this treason must be dealt with.

REVENGE is what I want! Fuck everything else! Repug treason is a festering sore that has to be dealt with before anything else.

BTW, I'm not voting, but I'll LMAO if Obama becomes President.

Just to see the look on the faces of scumbags like Limbaugh, Hannity, and these other traitors would be worth 4 years of

.

Jett Rink · May 7th, 2008

Voting 3rd party wont do anything but give McCain an edge.

3rd party and throwing away your vote accomplishes nothing.

In the past, voting had no way of accomplishing anything, but this time it really does matter, we have a chance to toss White traitors out of their positions of power, this is the most amazing time in history, because these White traitors have been preaching for years that niggers are our equals, talking about how they worked all their lives to "Uplift Black People", well its about time that they get to choke on their own fumes.

KMRATHELL · May 7th, 2008

This whole process should be very educational to anyone who thought niggers exercised the power of thought. They vote in a bloc for this nigger Obama. Nothing good will come of a nigger having this kind of power over Whites. All these scenarios of good coming from it are a lot of bullshit.

Jett Rink · May 7th, 2008

Obama will probably have more White people in his cabinet than Bill Clinton did.

Johann Steffansson · May 7th, 2008

Watch the documentary "Hacking Democracy". Voting is irrelevant in the Kwa. These are selections, not elections, and you nor I have anything to do with the process.

I've already voted.....9 times in 6 states. For whom? I wont know till I see who wins.

Mike in Denver · May 7th, 2008

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Watson

I wouldn't care if Malcolm X became President. The Repugs betrayed this country, and the penalty for this treason is obliteration. I don't care if the niggers burn this fuckin' country down to the ground

, as long as these scumbag Repigs are out of office.

Yeah, I know the Repug Party was hijacked by the neo-cons, but the dumb fuck Christians went along with this treason and should be punished. And I don't care if the Democrats are worse, this treason must be dealt with.

REVENGE is what I want! Fuck everything else! Repug treason is a festering sore that has to be dealt with before anything else.

BTW, I'm not voting, but I'll LMAO if Obama becomes President.

Just to see the look on the faces of scumbags like Limbaugh, Hannity, and these other traitors would be worth 4 years of

.

Good first post, welcome! The Republican party must be destroyed.

Enkidu

May 6th, 2008	#1
melcur Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 5,217	VDARE on a nigger presidency and alleged White Nationlist support for it Interesting article, send the author an email here > peter_bradley_paleo@hotmail.com May 05, 2008 Is Worse Better? Some Surprising White Support For Obama By Peter Bradley If you pay a visit to Barack Obama's official campaign website, you will find a host of subgroups in the "People" section boosting his candidacy. The man who will help us overcome race has separate categories for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Latinos, First Americans (he is not talking about the ancestors of Kennewick Man) and, of course, African Americans. If you are white and racist enough to notice you are not part of Obama's rainbow, don't worry. You can still join groups for students, women, veterans or the LGBT crowd. If you are just what Obama notoriously called a "typical white person" who is not part of these groups, then you are out of luck. But maybe not for much longer. A significant number of white race activists—they often call themselves "white nationalists", analogous to black nationalists, Hispanic nationalists or Zionists and not the same thing as white supremacists—are supporting an Obama presidency as the lesser of two evils and, possibly, the catalyst for a wake up call for white America. Newhouse News reporter Jonathan Tilove covered the 2008 American Renaissance conference in late February and quoted a number of whites who were ready to support the Senator from Illinois. "We are facing the election of Barack Obama, or, even worse, McCain," said Sam Dickson, Atlanta attorney and longtime racial activist during his closing speech. [A View Of Obama From The Trenches Of White Nationalism, February 27, 2008) ] Maryland attorney Howard Fezell wondered if black racial loyalty to Obama could make some whites wonder why they can't do the same. "Only white voters are expected to look beyond race," he said. Even Jared Taylor, editor of American Renaissance, praised Obama's campaign strategy and stated that he does not know who he will vote for in November. Paul Gottfried, who also spoke at the event, speculated that most of the over 250 people in attendance would most likely support Obama over McCain. "Better a black who is honest about who he is than a conservative who is really delivering the liberal agenda," declared Gottfried. There seem to be three main reasons for this unexpected support for Obama's candidacy. First: John McCain's stands on affirmative action, immigration, official English, the Confederate flag, and other racially-tinged issues are, in fact, pretty much the same as Obama's. The Republican nominee recently told a black audience that his vote against the MLK holiday was the greatest mistake of his political career. He equates immigration reform with "bigotry." As I write this, McCain is promising a renewed "War on Poverty" and criticizing an ad by North Carolina Republicans that draws attention to the race-baiting comments of Obama's spiritual mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Larry Auster of the mildly white-nationalist View from the Right blog writes: "at least the Democratic president, as he welcomes Al Sharpton to the White House, won't be giving us lectures on 'true conservatism.'" Auster views McCain as a virtual death sentence for conservatism in America. Second: Iraq and neoconservative foreign policy. Almost all paleoconservatives and paleolibertarians are against the war and interventionism abroad. If we must have race quotas and amnesties, at least a President Obama would get us out of a costly war. McCain could well get us into an even deadlier conflict with Iran. Third, and most important: an Obama presidency could shake up the current racial dynamics and bring about an end to white guilt and passivity over racial issues. As Jared Taylor told Jonathan Tilove, "I think many smarter, far-thinking blacks are going to be worried that any time they start talking about discrimination, certainly institutional racism, people are going to say, 'Hey, look, you've got a black president for heaven's sake.'" TakiMag's Christopher Roach made the point that an Obama presidency could make whites more racially aware even more bluntly: "a political equivalent of the O.J. Trial for four years might be the right catalyst for this sort of 'consciousness raising.'" The Obama record on race is eye-opening for those who will look. The racialism of his autobiography, the anti-white comments of his wife and of his spiritual mentor, his attendance at Louis Farrakhan's Million Man March, his support for the Jena Six race attackers, his insulting "race speech" and slurs about "typical whites" and "bitter" people in rural America all point to a man who has more in common with Al Sharpton than Ward Connerly. Marcus Epstein agrees on the potential for a white backlash. "We can be sure that a president Obama will be push for the same anti-white policies of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, while posing as a post-racial unifier," he says. "The question is whether or not the public will buy that facade." As director of Pat Buchanan's American Cause, Epstein receives quite a bit of feedback from blacks on the true meaning of an Obama presidency. One of the more printable responses came from a black man who told him: "You [presumably whites] have had 100 [sic]presidents, why can’t we have one?" The whites who support Obama tend to be young, affluent liberals who truly believe the Obama campaign is about racial unity. But blacks are not supporting Obama so they can hold hands and sing Dave Matthews songs with rich white kids from the suburbs (I recently saw a news clip of a free Dave Matthews concert given in support of Obama and literally every face in the crowd was white). Clearly these two main groups of Obama supporters are on a collision course. It is not hard to predict which race is in for a rude awakening. Personally, I plan to vote for the Constitution Party which just nominated Chuck Baldwin as its presidential candidate. Baldwin is an immigration patriot and a strong conservative on all issues. A vote for him will send a clear message to the GOP that the McCain-Bush type of Republican Party is unacceptable and unworthy of support. But an Obama presidency at least offers the possibility of an energized right wing movement in which paleos and whites of the Jared Taylor-Sam Francis school can find a home. Just as forced integration and busing woke up many northern white ethnics in the 1960s and 70s, a black race-driven president who uses his office to excuse black rioters and defend black gangs who attack white kids will be a real eye-opener for many a nice white liberal—to say nothing of the slumbering "conservative" masses. http://www.vdare.com/bradley/080505_obama.htm

May 7th, 2008	#3
Starr Senior Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: the unholy land Posts: 8,334	It is only truly treason if your reasons for doing so are to help advance the cause of our enemy. And no one will be supporting Obama for that reason. I will surely not be voting for him, though nor McCain who is just as much our enemy. __________________ http://www.thephora.net/forum

May 7th, 2008	#5
Kievsky Killer Ape Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Democratic-Republic of Jewishagendastan Posts: 3,737	Letting the Republikud party sit out from power for a while would be a good thing. Let them get the message, real clear, that there's no support for John McAmnesty or any other such Chamber of Commerce/multiculted pols. Look at how Pat Buchanan got some steel in his spine. The Republikudniks definitely read him. __________________ There are no volunteer multiculturalists.

May 7th, 2008	#11
Johann Steffansson Doppelgänger Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: ObamaNation Posts: 630	Watch the documentary "Hacking Democracy". Voting is irrelevant in the Kwa. These are selections, not elections, and you nor I have anything to do with the process. I've already voted.....9 times in 6 states. For whom? I wont know till I see who wins. __________________ "Tolerance is the virtue of men who no longer believe in anything." - Gilbert Keith Chesterton Free Mein Kampf mp3 download: http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.p...428#post749428

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

May 7th, 2008	#2
richyrichard Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Southeast Texas Posts: 932	The suggestion is wholly irresponsible. The solution to our problem is not to support our enemies. That is treason. Our enemies must be opposed. Totally.

May 7th, 2008	#6
AntonF Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,319	Vote for the Constitution Party or the Libitarian Party if Bob Barr is their presidential nominee. Why vote for a white hating leftist commie nigger????? It's impossible for me to vote for McInsane. At this point in time, voting has ZERO chance of ever solving our problems. Did voting solve our problems when this nation was 75% white????? Did it solve our problems when this nation was 85% white????? Now we're only about 60% white and maybe less than that and a large portion of whites are cheering on this nigger Obama.

May 7th, 2008	#7
James Watson Registered User Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 10	I wouldn't care if Malcolm X became President. The Repugs betrayed this country, and the penalty for this treason is obliteration. I don't care if the niggers burn this fuckin' country down to the ground , as long as these scumbag Repigs are out of office. Yeah, I know the Repug Party was hijacked by the neo-cons, but the dumb fuck Christians went along with this treason and should be punished. And I don't care if the Democrats are worse, this treason must be dealt with. REVENGE is what I want! Fuck everything else! Repug treason is a festering sore that has to be dealt with before anything else. BTW, I'm not voting, but I'll LMAO if Obama becomes President. Just to see the look on the faces of scumbags like Limbaugh, Hannity, and these other traitors would be worth 4 years of .

May 7th, 2008	#8
Jett Rink Banned Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Squaresville Posts: 7,499	Voting 3rd party wont do anything but give McCain an edge. 3rd party and throwing away your vote accomplishes nothing. In the past, voting had no way of accomplishing anything, but this time it really does matter, we have a chance to toss White traitors out of their positions of power, this is the most amazing time in history, because these White traitors have been preaching for years that niggers are our equals, talking about how they worked all their lives to "Uplift Black People", well its about time that they get to choke on their own fumes.

May 7th, 2008	#9
KMRATHELL deken Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 1,834	This whole process should be very educational to anyone who thought niggers exercised the power of thought. They vote in a bloc for this nigger Obama. Nothing good will come of a nigger having this kind of power over Whites. All these scenarios of good coming from it are a lot of bullshit.