white-history.com HELP ME OUT

[I.T.]

On White-History.com is says the Egyptians were White because of red hair mummies. OKAY !
Where did these red-heads come from if they existed in large numbers and when did they enter Africa, displacing the native populations that have been there for thousands of years?
Lastly and most importantly, seeing as how these features are most common in Europe, why would they traverse miles and miles of desert, pass through either all of north Africa (from the west) or cross the burning sands of the middle east (from the northeast), passing up many convenient locations, just to end up in another desert in Africa and halt at the borders of so-called "nubia", just so they can create a civilization before everyone else when they could have stayed home and did it?

[A.B.]

Don´t take white history too seriously. I recommend The Races of Europe by Carleton Coon to get a good insight in the issue. It is, of course, full of flaws, but still much more scolarly and better than Kemp.

[BryanVP]

Both you suckaz might wanna re-check your grammar before acting too well read on zee topic.

Originally Posted by IntheHells

On White-History.com is says the Egyptians were White because of red hair mummies. OKAY !
Where did these red-heads come from if they existed in large numbers and when did they enter Africa, displacing the native populations that have been there for thousands of years?
Lastly and most importantly, seeing as how these features are most common in Europe, why would they traverse miles and miles of desert, pass through either all of north Africa (from the west) or cross the burning sands of the middle east (from the northeast), passing up many convenient locations, just to end up in another desert in Africa and halt at the borders of so-called "nubia", just so they can create a civilization before everyone else when they could have stayed home and did it?

Sumer predates Egypt by 3,000 years. Sumer had a written language 400 years before white men colonized Egypt.

Hate to break it to you, but Sumer is the middle east. The architecture used to build the pyramids in Egypt was almost identical to those in Sumer. Aryans from the Indus valley traveled towards Africa, Asia, and Europe. These areas close to the Indus Valley were colonized first. Aryans even reached The Americas before Asiatic people. The Mayans, for example built the original Ziggurat/Pyramid structures through out the American continents, and the Aztecs and Mayans wiped them out and copied the designs.

Originally Posted by A.B.

Don´t take white history too seriously. I recommend The Races of Europe by Carleton Coon to get a good insight in the issue. It is, of course, full of flaws, but still much more scolarlyand better than Kemp.

[I.T.]

First of all Sumer was not white and according to National Geographic Egypt was a native development.

YouTube - The Real Scorpion King

YouTube - The Real Scorpion King

[I.T.]

Originally Posted by BryanVP

Both you suckaz might wanna re-check your grammar before acting too well read on zee topic.



Sumer predates Egypt by 3,000 years. Sumer had a written language 400 years before white men colonized Egypt.

Hate to break it to you, but Sumer is the middle east. The architecture used to build the pyramids in Egypt was almost identical to those in Sumer. Aryans from the Indus valley traveled towards Africa, Asia, and Europe. These areas close to the Indus Valley were colonized first. Aryans even reached The Americas before Asiatic people. The Mayans, for example built the original Ziggurat/Pyramid structures through out the American continents, and the Aztecs and Mayans wiped them out and copied the designs.

This is like a research or an opinion paper without giving any objective sources. This is not it works, you back up your opinion with some strong evidences because anybody can say anything.

Please where are your facts my friend?


Desperate measures i see. The only time middle easterners are white enough for you guys is only when you need them to be.

I bet most of you will never have one of these "aryans" over for dinner.


I want to really learn something from WNs when it comes to who is considered white because when it comes to Ancient Egypt y'all classify Arabs, Jews and other semitic people as white.
You also seem to classify Iranians as white but when they and other Asiatic people come to so called "white countries" you guys start complain that they're really white but GYPSIES.

You guys can't have it BOTH ways either Asiatic people are not white or you guys simply like using them to claim Ancient Egypt since semitic people were close to Africa.

Somebody clarify that for me please.

Sincerely.

[hengest]

Originally Posted by IntheHells

On White-History.com is says the Egyptians were White because of red hair mummies. OKAY !
Where did these red-heads come from if they existed in large numbers and when did they enter Africa, displacing the native populations that have been there for thousands of years?
Lastly and most importantly, seeing as how these features are most common in Europe, why would they traverse miles and miles of desert, pass through either all of north Africa (from the west) or cross the burning sands of the middle east (from the northeast), passing up many convenient locations, just to end up in another desert in Africa and halt at the borders of so-called "nubia", just so they can create a civilization before everyone else when they could have stayed home and did it?

Simple answer: we don't know, because there are no written accounts from the period, but sufice it to say, that Whitey migrated to, and populated those areas, for whatever reasons.
The archaelological evidence indicates that they did.

[cillian]

Originally Posted by IntheHells

On White-History.com is says the Egyptians were White because of red hair mummies. OKAY !
Where did these red-heads come from if they existed in large numbers and when did they enter Africa, displacing the native populations that have been there for thousands of years?
Lastly and most importantly, seeing as how these features are most common in Europe, why would they traverse miles and miles of desert, pass through either all of north Africa (from the west) or cross the burning sands of the middle east (from the northeast), passing up many convenient locations, just to end up in another desert in Africa and halt at the borders of so-called "nubia", just so they can create a civilization before everyone else when they could have stayed home and did it?

Burning sand of the middle east? This was at a time when the tigris euphrates valley (the middle east) was lush and fertile, and so was egypt. Its a desert now because of over farming drains the minerals from the soil, the land becomes barren.

The middle east desert is not "sand", not like at the beach, its really really dry dirt, like piles of dust.

Besides people did have boats back then too.

June 17 — The world's oldest known boat, built 7,000 years ago out of tarry, bitumen-covered slabs, has been found in an unlikely place: the Kuwaiti desert.

If the assessment of British and Kuwaiti archaeologists is correct, the slabs, found covered on one side with barnacles and warehoused in a stone building at a site called As-Sabiyah, would push back the date for the oldest known boat by more than 2,000 years.

According to an upcoming paper in the Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies and a paper published in the June 7 issue of the journal Science, the current oldest boat record-holder is a vessel found in an Egyptian tomb dating to 3,000 B.C. Evidence for log canoes, thought to be more like rafts than boats, goes back much further, to 8,000 B.C. The age of the entire As-Sabiyah site, including the boat remains, has been carbon-14 dated to 5,511-5,324 B.C.

[Proud White Guy]

Egypt is a good place to start. They were Greeks, not like the greaseball variety you see these days, they were "White" Same thing with the "Italians"

The pyramids were built with slave labor, they bred with the ruling class and ultimately dumbed down the country. This is why they never recovered, their gene pool got so polluted it was unrecoverable.

This is exactly why none of the slave countries survived, they were overrun, just like America.

Not one "White " civilization survived, cause they bought in the cheap labor, and fucked themselves.

Egypt= Dead
Spain=Dead
Italy=Dead
Greece=Dead
America=Dead.

The " White" race has survived, but the jew is not our only problem. We caused a lot of this ourselves too.

Here's a good link and it explains why.

http://www.white-history.com/

[I.T.]

In 1997, the German Institute for Archaeology headed an excavation of the tombs of the nobles in Thebes-West, Upper Egypt. At this time, three types of tissues were sampled from different mummies: meniscus (fibrocartilage), skin, and placenta. Archaeological findings suggest that the mummies dated from the New Kingdom (approximately
1550_/1080 BC)..... The basal epithelial cells were packed with melanin as expected for specimens of Negroid origin."

The people who bear the greatest resemblence to the ancient Egyptians, at present, are the Nubians; and next are the Ethiopians.

The raw values in Table 6 suggest that Egyptians had the ‘super-Negroid’ body plan described by Robins (1983). The values for the brachial and crural indices show that the distal segments of each limb are longer relative to the proximal segments than in many ‘African’ populations. - Zakrzewski (2003)

"Art objects are not generally used by biological anthropologists. They are suspect as data and their interpretation highly dependent on stereotyped thinking. However, because art has often been used to comment on the physiognomies of ancient Egyptians, a few remarks are in order. A review of literature and the sculpture indicates characteristics that also can be found in the Horn of (East) Africa (see, e.g., Petrie 1939; Drake 1987; Keita 1993). Old and Middle Kingdom statuary shows a range of characteristics; many, if not most, individuals depicted in the art have variations on the narrow-nosed, narrow-faced morphology also seen in various East Africans. This East African anatomy, once seen as being the result of a mixture of different "races," is better understood as being part of the range of indigenous African variation".

Aristotle -

""Those who are too black are cowards, like for instance, the Egyptians and Ethiopians".

Aristotle -

"Why are the Ethiopians and Egyptians bandy legged? Is it because of that the body of itself creates, because of disturbance by heat, like loss of wood when they become dry? The condition of their hair supports this theory; for it is curlier than that of other nations..."

Lycinus -

"Egyptians are black skinned with thick lips and thin legs".

Ammiuanus Marcellinus

"...the men of Egypt are mostly brown or black with a skinny desiccated look."

[I.T.]

Egyptology: Hanging in the Hair

by Anu M'bantu and Fari Supia

F0R YEARS, EGYPTOLOGY has been fighting a losing battle to hold onto an ancient Egypt that is Caucasian or, at worst, sun-tanned Caucasian.

At the 1974 UNESCO conference Egyptology was dealt a fatal blow. Two African scholars wiped the floor with 18 world-renowned Egyptologists. They proved in 11 different categories of evidence that the ancient Egyptians were Africans (Black). Following that beating, Egyptology has been on its knees praying to be saved by science. Their last glimmer of hope has been the hair on Egyptian mummies.

The mummies on display in the world's museums exhibit Caucasoid-looking hair, some of it brown and blonde. These mummies include Pharaoh Seqenenre Tao of the 17th dynasty and the 19th dynasty's Rameses II. As one scholar put it: "The most common hair colour, then as now, was a very dark brown, almost black colour although natural auburn and even rather surprisingly blonde hair are also to be found."

Many Black scholars try skillfully to avoid the hair problem. This is a mistake!

In 1914, a white doctor in Detroit initiated divorce proceeding against his wife whom he suspected of being a "closet Negro". At the trial, the Columbia University anthropologist, Professor Franz Boas (1858-1942), was called upon as a race expert. Boas declared: "If this woman has any of the characteristics of the Negro race it would be easy to find them . . . one characteristic that is regarded as reliable is the hair. You can tell by microscopic examination of a cross-section of hair to what race that person belongs."

With this revelation, trichology (the scientific analysis of hair) reached the American public. But what are these differences?

The cross-section of a hair shaft is measured with an instrument called a trichometer. From this you can get measurements for the minimum and maximum diameter of a hair The minimum measurement is then divided by the maximum and then multiplied by a hundred. This produces an index. A survey of the scientific literature produces the following breakdown:

San, Southern African 55.00
Zulu, Southern African 55.00
Sub-Saharan Africa 60.00
Tasmanian (Black) 64.70
Australian (Black) 68.00
Western European 71.20
Asian Indian 73.00
Navajo American 77.00
Chinese 82.60

In the early 1970s, the Czech anthropologist Eugen Strouhal examined pre-dynastic Egyptian skulls at Cambridge University. He sent some samples of the hair to the Institute of Anthropology at Charles University, Prague, to be analyzed. The hair samples were described as varying in texture from "wavy" to "curly" and in colour from "light brown" to "black". Strouhal summarized the results of the analysis:

"The outline of the cross-sections of the hairs was flattened, with indices ranging from 35 to 65. These peculiarities also show the Negroid inference among the Badarians (pre-dynastic Egyptians)."

The term "Negroid influence" suggests intermixture, but as the table suggests this hair is more "Negroid" than the San and the Zulu samples, currently the most Negroid hair in existence!

In another study, hair samples from ten 18th-25th dynasty individuals produced an average index of 51! As far back as 1877, Dr. Pruner-Bey analyzed six ancient Egyptian hair samples. Their average index of 64.4 was similar to the Tasmanians who lie at the periphery of the African-haired populations(1).

A team of Italian anthropologists published their research in the Journal of Human Evolution in 1972 and 1980. They measured two samples consisting of 26 individuals from pre-dynastic, 12th dynasty and 18th dynasty mummies. They produced a mean index of 66.50.
Ancient Egyptian Wig
Royal Ontario Museum, Canada

Young Bishari's of North Africa, Egypt, 1890
Click photo to enlarge

Ancient Egyptian wig is made of human hair attached to a net.
18th Dynasty Egypt
The overall average of all four sets of ancient Egyptian hair samples was 60.02. Sounds familiar . . ., just check the table!

Since microscopic analysis shows ancient Egyptian hair to be completely African, why does the hair look Caucasoid? Research has given us the answers.

Hair is made of keratin protein. Keratin is composed of amino acid chains called polypeptides. In a hair, two such chains are called cross-chain polypeptides. These are held together by disulphide bonds. The bulk of the hair, the source of its strength and curl, is called the cortex. The hair shafts are made of a protective outer layer called the cuticle.

We are informed by Afro Hair - A Salon Book, that chemicals for bleaching, penning and straightening hair must reach the cortex to be effective. For hair to be permed or straightened the disulphide bonds in the cortex must be broken. The anthropologist Daniel Hardy writing in the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, tells us that keratin is stable owing to disulphide bonds. However, when hair is exposed to harsh conditions it can lead to oxidation of protein molecules in the cortex, which leads to the alteration of hair texture, such as straightening.

Two British anthropologists, Brothwell and Spearman, have found evidence of cortex keratin oxidation in ancient Egyptian hair. They held that the mummification process was responsible, because of the strong alkaline substance used. This resulted in the yellowing and browning of hair as well as the straightening effect.

This means that visual appearance of the hair on mummies cannot disguise their racial affinities. The presence of blonde and brown hair on ancient Egyptian mummies has nothing to do with their racial identity and everything to do with mummification and the passage of time. As the studies have shown, when you put the evidence under a microscope the truth comes out. At last, Egyptology's prayers have been answered. It has been put out of its misery

Never mind forget that study EGYPT WAS A CAUCASIAN CIVILIZATION THIS PROVES IT.

YouTube - Queen Tiye was a Caucasian and Dont you Forget it!

YouTube - Queen Tiye was a Caucasian and Dont you Forget it!

YouTube - AFRICA & THE REAL GREEKS 1 of 3

YouTube - AFRICA & THE REAL GREEKS 1 of 3

YouTube - AFRICA & THE REAL GREEKS 2 of 3

YouTube - AFRICA & THE REAL GREEKS 2 of 3

YouTube - AFRICA & THE REAL GREEKS 3 of 3

YouTube - AFRICA & THE REAL GREEKS 3 of 3

[BryanVP]

Originally Posted by I.T.

First of all Sumer was not white and according to National Geographic Egypt was a native development.

A Cheesy youtube documentary that revolves around a B Level Sci-Fi flick. Great sources there.

Originally Posted by I.T.

This is like a research or an opinion paper without giving any objective sources. This is not it works, you back up your opinion with some strong evidences because anybody can say anything.

Please where are your facts my friend?


Desperate measures i see. The only time middle easterners are white enough for you guys is only when you need them to be.

Wrong. The Sumerians were fair skinned, and had red, blonde, brown, and black hair. Blue, green, and brown eyes. It's even documented when the Arabs first traveled to Sumer. It was much like modern day. At first they allowed a few of them in, and tried to help them out. Compassion was their weakness though, and The Akkadians eventually invaded them.

http://wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/SUMER.HTM

Among the earliest civilizations were the diverse peoples living in the fertile valleys lying between the Tigris and Euphrates valley, or Mesopotamia, which in Greek means, "between the rivers." In the south of this region, in an area now in Kuwait and northern Saudi Arabia, a mysterious group of people, speaking a language unrelated to any other human language we know of, began to live in cities, which were ruled by some sort of monarch, and began to write. These were the Sumerians, and around 3000 BC they began to form large city-states in southern Mesopotamia that controlled areas of several hundred square miles. The names of these cities speak from a distant and foggy past: Ur, Lagash, Eridu. These Sumerians were constantly at war with one another and other peoples, for water was a scarce and valuable resource. The result over time of these wars was the growth of larger city-states as the more powerful swallowed up the smaller city-states. Eventually, the Sumerians would have to battle another peoples, the Akkadians, who migrated up from the Arabian Peninsula. The Akkadians were a Semitic people, that is, they spoke a Semitic language related to languages such as Hebrew and Arabic. When the two peoples clashed, the Sumerians gradually lost control over the city-states they had so brilliantly created and fell under the hegemony of the Akkadian kingdom which was based in Akkad, the city that was later to become Babylon.


But that was not the end of the Sumerians. The Akkadians abandoned much of their culture and absorbed vast amounts of Sumerian culture, including their religion, writing, government structure, literature, and law. But the Sumerians retained nominal control over many of their defeated city-states, and in 2125, the Sumerian city of Ur rose up against the Akkadians and gained for their daring control over the city-states of southern Mesopotamia. But the revival of Sumerian fortune was to be short-lived, for after a short century, another wave of Semitic migrations signed the end of the original creators of Mesopotamian culture.

I bet most of you will never have one of these "aryans" over for dinner.

The sand niggers that currently inhabit the region are not Aryan.

I want to really learn something from WNs when it comes to who is considered white because when it comes to Ancient Egypt y'all classify Arabs, Jews and other semitic people as white.
You also seem to classify Iranians as white but when they and other Asiatic people come to so called "white countries" you guys start complain that they're really white but GYPSIES.

There. You've just learned a little bit, nigger. Read up. Sumer was already established by the time the leeching, semitic trash showed up.

You guys can't have it BOTH ways either Asiatic people are not white or you guys simply like using them to claim Ancient Egypt since semitic people were close to Africa.

Somebody clarify that for me please.

Sincerely.

Who has ever classified Asiatic people as white??? Are you getting VNN confused with that Pan Aryan forum? I agree. Asiatic people are not white.

[I.T.]

I am not going to argue with you over the Sumerians this is about the race of the Egyptians so prove to me they were anything other than Black.

The Libyan desert area, particularly around the Fezzan, also shows a range of physical types. Of note is the mummified form of a Negro child, dated to around 3000 B.C, discovered at the Uan Muhuggiag rock shelter by a team of Italian archaeologists. What makes this skeleton interesting is that it is so well preserved that it challenges the notion that the Egyptians were the original pioneers of mummification. The Italian excavation suggests that many practices associated with Egypt, may have already been established on an indigenous basis in the areas adjoining the Nile Valley, prior to the rise of the Egyptian dynasties. This finding is consistent with the general pattern noted above- the appearance of long-standing cultural and skeletal elements from a variety of indigenous peoples, in the areas close to Egypt. It is also consistent with a movement of peoples, up from the Saharan Zone into the Nile Valley, as noted by Afrocentric critic Mary Leftkowitz. The presence of numerous artistic motifs from Saharan rock art, found in later Egyptian iconography and use, (Wilkinson 1999) also lends support to the long-standing cultural sharing and linkages between Egypt and the surrounding Saharan

[cillian]

"Tutankhamun was not black, and the portrayal of ancient Egyptian civilisation as black has no element of truth to it," Zahi Hawass - Secretary General of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities - so he should know.

[I.T.]

Hawass took that repudiated and stated that "There is no Scientific evidence in existence which sugguest that the Ancient Egyptians were anything other than Indigenous Northeast Africans".



http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/vi...eID=1414281487


Hawass cannot spout his normal (They were neither black nor Arab) BS while being going against an actual Anthropologist!

Anyways I think the people who went into Egypt and really saw them would be in a better position to racially classify the Egyptians.

[I.T.]

Get off of Hawass go-nads he is not qualified to make any decisions involving Anthropology as HE IS A HISTORIAN. I'm not surprised that the Arab did a back flip when he got word of the French teams reconstruction it's what he wanted.

HAWASS IS A HISTORIAN and has no credentials to make such statement and assert it as fact a he is not and Anthropologist and cannot prove is statements. Refer to the video on the first page in which Hawass and Keita (an actual anthropologist) are interviewed by National Geographic about Ancient Egyptian origins and both state that these peoples were origially of Northeast African origin and states that there is no Scientific evidence to sugguest otherwise.

Hawass, in a 2007 publication of "Ancient Egypt Magazine", also asserted that none of the facial reconstructions resemble Tutankhamun, claiming for example that the French reconstruction ended up with a person that looked French, whose features do not resemble any known Egyptians. He asserts that in his opinion, the most accurate representation of the boy king is the mask from his tomb.[105] In addition, according to the LA Times, the archaeological inspector for the Supreme Council of antiquities, Ahmed Saleh, disagrees with some of Hawass' statements, stating that the procedures used in the facial re-creation made Tutankhamun look Caucasian, "disrespecting the nation's African roots". http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:...lnk&cd=1&gl=us

http://www.ancientegyptmagazine.com/

e Geographical Origins and Population Relationships of Early Ancient Egyptians
Professor S.O.Y. Keita
Department of Biological Anthropology
Oxford University

Professor A. J. Boyce
University Reader in Human Population
Oxford University

"Another source of skeletal data is limb proportions, which generally vary with different climatic belts. In general, the early Nile Valley remains have the proportions of more tropical populations, which is noteworthy since Egypt is not in the tropics. This suggests that the Egyptian Nile Valley was not primarily settled by cold-adapted peoples, such as Europeans." -

And:[quote]

"The nature of the body plan was also investigated by comparing the intermembral, brachial, and crural indices for these samples with values obtained from the literature. No significant differences were found in either index through time for either sex. The raw values in Table 6 suggest that Egyptians had the “super-Negroid” body plan described by Robins (1983). The values for the brachial and crural indices show that the distal segments of each limb are longer relative to the proximal segments than in many “African” populations (data from Aiello and Dean, 1990). This pattern is supported by Figure 7 a plot of population mean femoral and tibial lengths; (data from Ruff, 1994), which indicates that the Egyptians generally have tropical body plans." - Sonia Zakrzewski (2003)


And:


Ancient Egypt Anatomy of a Civilisation(Paperback) by Barry Kemp (Author) Publisher: Routledge; 2 edition (December 12, 2005) p.54

"Moving to the opposite geographic extremity, the very small sample populations available from northern Egypt from before the 1st Dynasty(Merimda, Maadi and Wadi Digla) turn out to be significantly different from sample populations from early Palestine and Byblos, suggesting a lack of common ancestors over a long time. If there was a south-north cline of variation along the Nile Valley it did not, from this limited evidence, continue smoothly on into Palestine. The limb-length proportions of males from the Egyptian sites group them with Africans rather than with Europeans"

Face it.. Europeans and anyone related to them are incapable of such tropical adaptations. There are some things that Europeans and Africans share in common, but high limb to trunk ratio is not one of them. Nor is Black skin:

"Determination of optimal rehydration, fixation and staining methods for histological and immunohistochemical analysis of mummified soft tissues

A-M Mekota1, M Vermehren2

Biotechnic & Histochemistry

2005, 80(1): 7_/13

"Materials and methods In 1997, the German Institute for Archaeology headed an excavation of the tombs of the nobles in Thebes-West, Upper Egypt. At this time, three types of tissues were sampled from different mummies: meniscus (fibrocartilage), skin, and placenta. Archaeological findings suggest that the mummies dated from the New Kingdom (approximately 1550_/1080 BC)...... The basal epithelial cells were packed with melanin as expected for specimens of Negroid origin."

Now the burden of proof is on you! There is no evidence in existence to prove that Egypt was a White civilization. NONE ! So you all must discredit my primary sources, debunked my anthropological studies, and then you must explain how the cultural similarities between Africa and Egypt came about. So here is what you all must do

1 Debunk my Anthropological studies that support the Egyptian civilization to be Black.

2 Debunk my primary sources in which some of the most esteemed and credible historians in the ancient world describe the Egyptians to be Black.

3 Debunk the cultural similarities between Egypt and other parts of Africa

then


4 Anthropological studies that prove Egypt was a White Civilization.

5 Primary sources were ancient historians describe the Egyptians as being White.

6 I want to know cultural similarities between Europe and Egypt.

[BryanVP]

[I.T.]

Exactly their is no evidence that Egypt was anything other than a Black civilization so you resort to images from the 19th century.


Ignorance is bliss. You're quite scholarly by the way. Great research

[cillian]

This is an x-ray of Tutankhamun's skull.

Which one looks most like Tut's?

[I.T.]

Originally Posted by cillian

This is an x-ray of Tutankhamun's skull.

Which one looks most like Tut's?

No you have a picture, in which you and anyone else will use a bias subjective observation, which cannot come to a logical and decisive conclusion...Do you understand!


Are you retarded ? This is not a rebuttal many certified anthropologist have looked at ancient Egyptian skeletons and have classified many of them as negriods you posting two skeletons online and then asking me with no experience in anthropology to racially classify to pixies shows your stupidity..

LMAO GTF out of here! You are deluusional for the simple fact that you still hold on to the belief of "white Egypt" in this day in age, despite the overwhelming Scientific evidence flatlining such an outright ignorant and racist assertion!



and Bryan YOU ARE LAME AND HAVE NO ARGUMENT, it's okay that you have nothing intellectually to add to this debate , But this is not the thread for such child like behavior so just click your back arrow back to stormfront and talk about how ni99ers can't read and what not.

[cillian]