View Single Post
Old July 16th, 2008 #666
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Default

Hi EG,

Of all the instructively self-portraying trash you last produced, I found this part particularly amusing:

Quote:
Originally Posted by EireannGoddess View Post
Revisionists have created more than reasonable doubt; they have proven the Lie. It's up to you Holocaustians to shore up your faith by evidence and proof. For whether you like it or not, Holocaustianity is not a faith. It is not to be accepted at face value as some holy truth - concocted by the juden as emissaries from from their desert god.

Facts, evidence, dna, Proof based upon logic - not belief - are required and, due to the enormity of the Lie, and the heavy price America and Europe paid and continue to pay at the altar of Holocaustianity, the proof had best be above reproach or question - there will be hell for you pay in the near future if you jews do not do this. You will FINALLY get your holocaust. A real one, one that will not have to be made up. And, there will be no eyewitnesses left to lie.
Wow, that's quite a bloodthirsty little thing we have here.

I have some questions for the bloodthirsty little thing:

1. Just how are "Revisionists" supposed to have "proven the Lie" ?

How are "Revisionists" supposed to have proved that a sinister Jewish conspiracy manipulated or suppressed thousands of documents, trained thousands of false incriminating eyewitnesses (apparently chosen for the telepathic capabilities, which would keep them from straying too far from what their colleagues had said even if they had no way of hearing or reading it), coerced or otherwise induced a couple of thousand indicted perpetrators, especially before West German courts, into falsely incriminating themselves, silenced all potential exonerating witnesses throughout Europe and the rest of the world, fooled governments and other administrative authorities, criminal justice authorities and historians and demographers all over the world (unless, of course, you want to tell us that all these people were in the pay of said conspiracy) and brainwashed or otherwise induced millions of non-victims living in Israel, the US and other countries into concealing their origins and identity so it could be claimed that they had been murdered (also considering that these millions therefore had to renounce to compensation claims against the German government - the conspiracy must have paid them better)?

Let's see the proof, baby. And it better be beyond reproach or question.

2. If the answer to question 1 should be that "Revisionists" have not actually "proven the Lie", what doubt are they supposed to have created, and how and why is this doubt supposed to be reasonable?

3.

a) What would you accept as "proof based on logic" that Nazi genocidal policies caused the death of at least 5 million Jews during World War II?

b) What rules or standards of evidence you can show us are your requirements based on?

c) In what respect is the converging documentary, eyewitness, physical and demographic evidence that has led criminal investigators and historians to conclude on the factuality of this genocide supposed to be anything other than "proof based on logic"?

d) What events in history that you accept as factual do you consider to have been demonstrated by "proof based on logic", and how is the proof that convinced you of the factuality of these events supposed to differ from the proof that has convinced criminal investigators and historians of the factuality of the Nazi genocide of the Jews?

I'm waiting for your answers to these questions, sweetheart. Not exactly with baited breath, but I expect the answers to be fun.