View Single Post
Old August 2nd, 2008 #954
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Default

Now to Gerdes’ hysterical babbling in posts # 937 and # 938.

# 937:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
15 unanswered questions about Sobibor.

Please notice the dullards continued refusal to answer / provide the following. It seems the following is just too inconvenient for her to answer and/or provide:
Poor Gerdes, he’s obviously so desperate that he turns to lying in the most obvious and transparent manner. All of his questions have actually been given better answers than their silliness and irrelevance merits, in my post # 916 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=916 .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
1 - Tell us on what EXACT dates her partner shermer was physically in the Sobibor camp.

2 - Show us photographs that prove he ever steped foot in the camp.
This was my answer:

Quote:
Questions irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ) and also without relevance in the context of the NAFCASH challenge.

Nice guy’s answer to irrelevant questions:

1. Shermer is not my "partner", however desperate poor Gerdes is to make him into that.

2. I don’t know if Shermer was physically in Sobibor camp and if there are any photos showing him there, and I couldn’t care less.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
3 - Tell us on what EXACT dates her other partner Kola was physically in the Sobibor camp.

4 - Show us photographs that prove he ever steped foot in the camp.

5 - Show us photographs of Kola actually excavating the alleged graves.

6 - Show us photographs proving that said graves actually exist.
This was my answer:

Quote:
Questions irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ), and also of limited if any relevance in the context of the NAFCASH challenge.

Nice guy’s answer to these questions of limited if any relevance:

1. Prof. Kola is not my "partner", however desperate poor Gerdes is to make him into that. He is, if anything, a potential source of information.

2. The dates on which Prof. Kola conducted his investigations at Sobibor in 2001 must have been prior to the Reuters press release of 23 November 2001:

Quote:
(Reuters Nov., 23, 2001)

MASS GRAVES FOUND AT NAZI POLISH DEATH CAMP

"Polish archaeologists excavating the Nazi death camp in Sobibor said on Friday they had found mass graves at the site, which was evacuated by German occupying forces in October 1943 after a prisoner uprising. The excavations were the first since World War Two at the former camp, which was subsequently forested over. They could provide valuable new evidence on the number of victims, mainly Jews, who died in the Sobibor gas chambers. According to official Polish accounts, 250,000 people were killed in Sobibor, which was opened in May 1942 and lies close to the eastern border with Ukraine.''We uncovered seven mass graves with an average depth of five meters. In them there were charred human remains and under them remains in a state of decay. That means that in the final stage the victims were burned,'' archaeologist Andrzej Kola was quoted by the Polish PAP news agency telling a news conference. He said the largest grave measured 70 meters by 25 meters, the others 20 by 25 meters.''We also found a hospital barracks. The people there were probably shot, as we found over 1,800 machine gun cartridges,'' Kola said.''In the woods we found remnants of barbed wire, which enabled us to reconstruct the boundary of the camp.'' Few prisoners survived Sobibor among them some of the 300 who broke out of the camp on October 14, 1943. Eighty were caught soon after escaping, but some survived the war."
2. No photos of Prof. Kola in person doing excavation work have to my knowledge been published. However, I have been informed by the director of the Sobibor Archaeology Project, Mr. Yoram Haimi, that the photos shown under http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...nia/index.html are related to Prof. Kola’s archaeological investigation in 2001.

3. While no photographs are required to prove that the mass graves actually exist, the three photographs from the above-mentioned series obviously show substances taken with a core drill out of Sobibor mass graves, which are clearly distinguishable from the light brown soil of Sobibor.







The light gray substance on the first two photos must be ashes of human bone and tissue.

The black substance on the second photo must be wood ash.

The white substance on the third photo must be either bone ash or lime.

My assumptions regarding the nature of these substances are supported by

a) their aspect
b) their context (Prof. Kola’s investigation in 2001, the essential result of which was finding the mass graves) , and
c) the absence of any alternative theory (at least Gerdes has provided none) as to what these substances might be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
7 - Tell us what the results were of the analysis of those soil core samples that she claims are: "ashes of human bone and tissue for the light gray stuff, wood ashes for the black stuff and pure bone ashes or lime for the white stuff."
This was my answer:

Quote:
Question irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ) and also of limited if any relevance in the context of the NAFCASH challenge.

Nice guy’s answer to question of limited if any relevance:

I am not familiar at this moment with the results of such analysis, which have not been published. However, it seems reasonable to assume that if such analysis was done – which is probably the case – , the results confirmed my assumptions mentioned in answer B.3 above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
8 - Show us proof that the "huge ash mountain" of Sobibor is actually comprised of human ash.
This was my answer:

Quote:
Question irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ), but of relevance for the "bonus reward" of the NAFCASH challenge.

Nice guy’s answer to question of limited relevance:

All captioned photos showing this mound of ash, while not necessarily if at all describing it as "huge" or as a "mountain", refer to it as being made up of or containing human ash. Photos of this mound include, without limitation, the photos shown under item IV.2.3 in my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 and those shown under the following links:

http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...obibor039.html

http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...obibor040.html

http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...obibor043.html

http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...obibor082.html

The aspect of the substance that the mound consists of, which has a light gray coloration different from the light-brown color of the soil at Sobibor (see photos mentioned in answer B.3 above) suggests the accuracy of captions describing this mound as a mound consisting of or containing human ashes.

So does the associated documentary and eyewitness evidence proving that Sobibor was an extermination camp and that the bodies of the victims were disposed of by burning them, which is mentioned in my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 .

The conclusion that the mound in question is comprised of human ash is thus the conclusion that is borne out by all known evidence and belied by none. It is also the conclusion towards which various sources of evidence independent of each other converge. This convergence of various sources of evidence independent of each other, alone or together with the absence of any evidence to the contrary, is proof that the mound in question is comprised of human ash.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
9 - Show us were the huge pit is that this "mountain of human ash" was dug out of.
This was my answer:

Quote:
Question irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ), and also without relevance for the "bonus reward" or the main reward of the NAFCASH challenge, as currently worded under http://www.nafcash.com/ .

Nice guy’s answer to irrelevant question:

The human ashes that the mound at Sobibor is comprised of may have been dug out of one of more of the pits discovered by Prof. Kola in 2001. They were probably brought to the surface by postwar robbery digging, which would mean it is impossible to determine which of the grave pits contained these specific ashes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
10 - We're waiting for Roberta to publish, in "SKEPTIC" magazine, proof that there exists just one mass grave that contains just one percent of the alleged mass murder at Sobibor and Treblinka. On what date can we expect this to be published Roberta?
This was my answer to the first sentence:

Quote:
Question irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway with all the mass graves it entails, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ), but of relevance within the context of the NAFCASH challenge. It will be answered in the form required on the NAFCASH site when the necessary information is available, interest and availability on the part of SKEPTIC magazine provided.
This was my answer to hysterical howling now summarized in the second sentence:

Quote:
Questions irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ) and also without relevance in the context of the NAFCASH challenge.

Nice guy’s answer to irrelevant questions:

When the archaeological work is done and the results have been evaluated. According to my last conversation with Yoram Haimi, this professional archaeologist considers it below his level to publish evidence just in order to address the claims of a hopeless crackpot. Archaeological evidence is published for the purpose of enhancing scientific and historical knowledge and for everyone’s benefit. When the results of the current archaeological investigations are published in a scientific magazine, they will include much more than just the evidence necessary to meet the NAFCASH challenge requirements. And I will see to it that Mr. Gerdes gets a free copy of the scientific magazine in which this evidence shall be published.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Roberta:

“Actually I’m able to prove the existence of all of these mass graves by simply referring to Prof. Kola’s description. Proof is contained in Prof. Kola’s published report about his findings on site, and in the documentary and eyewitness evidence about the mass killings at Sobibor, which is compatible with Kola’s findings.”

11 - And where can we find this published report?
This was my anwer to an identically worded previous question:

Quote:
While Kola made the above-quoted public statement about the findings of his archaeological research, he has not yet published an archaeological report like he did following his excavations at Belzec in 1997-1999.
Quote:
12 - Or did you lie about it being published?
Answer to new question: No, unlike stinking liar Gerdes I don’t lie. In the above excerpt from a post of mine, which Gerdes is quoting out of context, I used the term "published report" in a sense that includes Kola’s brief description of his archaeological findings in an interview with a Polish news agency that is mentioned in the Reuters press release of 23 November 2001:

Quote:
(Reuters Nov., 23, 2001)

MASS GRAVES FOUND AT NAZI POLISH DEATH CAMP

"Polish archaeologists excavating the Nazi death camp in Sobibor said on Friday they had found mass graves at the site, which was evacuated by German occupying forces in October 1943 after a prisoner uprising. The excavations were the first since World War Two at the former camp, which was subsequently forested over. They could provide valuable new evidence on the number of victims, mainly Jews, who died in the Sobibor gas chambers. According to official Polish accounts, 250,000 people were killed in Sobibor, which was opened in May 1942 and lies close to the eastern border with Ukraine.''We uncovered seven mass graves with an average depth of five meters. In them there were charred human remains and under them remains in a state of decay. That means that in the final stage the victims were burned,'' archaeologist Andrzej Kola was quoted by the Polish PAP news agency telling a news conference. He said the largest grave measured 70 meters by 25 meters, the others 20 by 25 meters.''We also found a hospital barracks. The people there were probably shot, as we found over 1,800 machine gun cartridges,'' Kola said.''In the woods we found remnants of barbed wire, which enabled us to reconstruct the boundary of the camp.'' Few prisoners survived Sobibor among them some of the 300 who broke out of the camp on October 14, 1943. Eighty were caught soon after escaping, but some survived the war."
I’m sure that the context of my statement shows that I was referring to Prof. Kola’s statement in this press interview. Therefore, Gerdes is requested to provide the number of my post he took this quote from and a link to that post. Reading my post as a whole will surely reveal that I was referring to Prof. Kola’s statement in the press interview mentioned by Reuters, and that the liar here is the one who tried to make believe I was referring to the publication of a comprehensive and detailed archaeological report, i.e. Mr. Gerdes.

The post number and the link, Mr. Gerdes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
13 - BTW Roberta, why do you keep running from the queations about the soil core samples of Sobibor?
This was my answer to an identically worded previous question:

Quote:
Question irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ) and also without relevance in the context of the NAFCASH challenge.

Nice guy’s answer to irrelevant question:

As lying Gerdes well knows, the only one who has been running away from questions regarding these core drill samples:

http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F5.html


http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F6.html


http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F7.html


is Gerdes himself. I have asked him several times what, other than ashes of human bone and tissue, wood ashes, bone ash or lime the substances distinguishable from the light-brown soil in these samples could possibly be. He has neither provided an alternative explanation and nor had the courage to at least openly admit that he has no alternative explanation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
14 - What do the frauds at the Sobibor Archaeology Project say those core samples are comprised of?
This was my answer to a set of previous questions including the above:

Quote:
Question irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ) and also without relevance in the context of the NAFCASH challenge.

Nice guy’s answer to irrelevant question:

1. Unlike Mr. Gerdes and others of his ilk, the members of the Sobibor Archaeology Project are not frauds. They are serious and competent archaeologists.

2. What I have learned from them about these samples is that they pertain to Prof. Kola’s archaeological investigation in 2001, see above answer B.2.

3. This means that if – as is probably the case – these core samples were analyzed to confirm that they contain what their aspect suggests, this was done in 2001 by or on behalf of Prof. Kola’s team, and not by or on behalf of the Sobibor Archaeology Project.
I might add that I don’t know what the members of the Sobibor Archaeology Project say about the composition of these samples. In my last phone conversation with Yoram Haimi, I forgot to ask this question. I shall ask it next time we speak.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
15 - Can you show us a single bone or a single tooth that has been found at Sobibor?
Answer to new question, irrelevant for the purpose of proving mass murder at Sobibor (which has already been proven anyway, see my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ) and also of little if any relevance in the context of the NAFCASH challenge:

I have already shown a photo of artificial teeth found on the area of Sobibor:

http://www.undersobibor.org/excavation09.jpg

If I remember correctly (if not, I’m showing them for the first time), I have also already shown these photographs of bone fragments found in the area of Sobibor extermination camp:

http://www.holocaustresearchproject....fragments.html

http://www.holocaustresearchproject....n%20brick.html

This photo, included im my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 among others, also shows human bones among the ashes:

A glass display case containing ashes and bones of victims of the Sobibor extermination camp.
http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_mul...5968_1_web.jpg

All 15 imbecile questions have thus been reasonable answered to the best of my present knowledge. Answers will be expanded as I learn more about the subject matter of the questions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
* * * * *

* Please notice Roberta's cowardly response to questions # 10 (notice I said response, not answer. And her response was:

It will be answered in the form required on the NAFCASH site when the necessary information is available, interest and availability on the part of SKEPTIC magazine provided.
First of all, I wouldn’t continue calling me a coward if I were you, Gerdes. That’s because every time you do, I can point to the flagrant examples of your own cowardice listed in post # 903 under http://206.41.117.128/showpost.php?p...&postcount=903 , as I shall do from now on, and thus show our readers time and again that you’re projecting your own behavior.

Second, where’s the "cowardly" part of my reply? I’m only making a perfectly logical statement: the question will be answered in the form required on the NAFCASH site (i.e. by publishing the evidence in SKEPTIC magazine), provided that the editors of SKEPTIC magazine are interested in publishing this evidence. If the editors of SKEPTIC magazine are not interested in publishing this evidence, I cannot force them to do so, can I? Think before writing, you numb nut.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
No lying cowardly jewbitch.
Careful with the "lying" crap, Gerdes. He who sits in a glass house shouldn’t throw stones, as a German saying goes. You haven’t caught me lying once, whereas I have caught you lying so often that I long ceased to count your lies. Have a look at the screenshots from our Topix discussions in post http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=914 , for two good examples of what a filthy stinking liar you are. And as announced in that post, we will now take a look at our early Topix discussions, when I still bothered to count your lies. Emphases have been added.

Topix post # 70 under http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...L8H7P8C/p4#c70 :

Quote:
Meanwhile, I note that the liar is still babbling about "750,000 to 3 million", which I never claimed, and furthermore quoting my statements out of context – my "inability", after all, was stated to be related either to obliteration of the grave structures by robbery digging or to my own lack of means, time and required authorizations, therefore having no relevance whatsoever.

Just keep on lying and twisting your opponent’s words, Gerdes. Every lie will be duly noted.
# 142 under http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...8H7P8C/p7#c142

Quote:
Please notice how stinking liar Gerdes keeps lying through his teeth, obviously in the hope that readers are so dumb as to read his posts alone and believe everything he tells them. Let’s count the lies in this one paragraph:

1. I haven’t "refused" to show mass graves on the September 1944 photograph. I have clearly stated, quoting Alex Bay, that I don’t think mass graves can be made out in the churned-out mess of soil visible on this air photograph, not because they didn’t exist but because the various earth movements in that area that took place after these graves had been dug make it impossible to make out the outlines of any mass grave from the air. I also asked Gerdes why the ground looks so churned-up from the air as it does on this photo, if Treblinka was a mere "transit camp". Of course the stinking liar simply ignored my question.

2. What applies to mass graves applies all the more for the pits underneath the furnaces, which were hardly as huge as Vassili Grossman claimed; descriptions by defendants at trials before West German courts suggest a smaller size. Gerdes keeps waving the straw-man of Grossman’s exaggerated figures even though I never endorsed these figures, on the contrary. Incidentally, I once made a calculation of the size of the incineration grids and the pits underneath, based on the trial findings of West German courts and a description provided by one of the Ukrainian guards of Treblinka. It can be found in my article

Incinerating corpses on a grid is a rather inefficient method …
http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/20...

3. Gerdes keeps on pretending that I claimed "between 750,000 and 3 million people" murdered at Treblinka, even though I never stated that I considered the higher number even remotely possible and clearly stated that I consider 750,000 to be the likeliest and best supported order of magnitude.

Three misrepresentations of an opponent’s statements in one paragraph, three repeated rotten lies. I love the way Gerdes keeps showing himself up for the trash that he is.
# 262 under http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...H7P8C/p13#c262 :

Quote:
>Ok folks, time for another recap.

Read: it’s time for Gerdes to start lying again.

>To date, this is all the "proof" that Roberta has provided for the alleged Treblinka holocaust:

That’s the first lie, as we shall see below. Or no, let's be generous and assume that Gerdes simply forgot the documentary and eyewitness evidence I mentioned in my post # 103 on page 6.

>Exhibit A (This is the foundation of her claim that 750,000 to 3 million jews were murdered at >Treblinka.):

First lie: Grossman’s account was used only in what concerns Grossman’s mention of teeth on or in the soil of Treblinka. I made it very clear that I didn’t consider Grossman’s overblown estimate of 3 million dead even remotely possible and that I considered 750,000 the most probable order of magnitude.

>http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php ...

>Exhibit B (This is her “evidence” that she claims supports exhibit A):

>http://vho.org/GB/Books/t/4.html

Second lie: I never made any statement in the sense that exhibit this supports exhibit that. I also never stated that the site investigation reports quoted under http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/20... contain any quantification of the victims, let alone that they support the possibility of Grossman’s overblown estimate.

>Exhibit C (These are the photos that she claims supports exhibits B):

>http://www.death-camps.org/treblinka/lasttrac ...

Third lie: again the "supports exhibits" crap. My position has been that the site investigation reports are evidence to the physical aspects of the site by themselves and need no photographs to "support" them. All the photographs do is illustrate the reports' contents, or some of their contents.

>Exhibit D (Remember what she said about the following photo:"I think that 1, 2 and 3 are in all >probability pits for corpses which were used during the first phase of Treblinka and 4 is the >"Lazarett"):

>http://s27.photobucket.com/albums/c166/cortag ...
Remember that Gerdes keeps dodging my question about what, if not mass graves, the shapes I pointed out on the September 1944 air photograph could have been.

What, if not mass graves, could the shapes I pointed out on the September 1944 air photograph have been, Gerdes?

>Exhibit E (These are more photos that she claims supports her claim that there was "an area >of 20,000 square meters covered by human remains and human remains to a depth of 7.5 >meters."):

>http://www.death-camps.org/treblinka/photos.h ...

Fourth lie: My position has been that the site investigation reports are evidence of the site's physical aspects by themselves and need no photographs to "support" them. All the photographs do is illustrate the reports' contents, or some of their contents.

>Exhibit F (This is the article that she claims “proves” that there is a "huge concrete plate" that >covers every single square inch of the “area of 20,000 square meters covered by human >remains and human remains to a depth of 7.5 meters.")

The Polish newspaper article containing information that allows for this reasonable conclusion, yes. And Gerdes hasn’t yet explained what reason there is to doubt the accuracy of the information contained in that article.

>Please note: Don’t forget her own words about this phantom “huge concrete plate”:“No, >Gerdes, I cannot show you a photo of the concrete plate underneath the memorial stones. I’ll >try to find one (though the plate should be hard to see if there’s grass or so above it.”)

>http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/92506/t/Gold ...
What is there to note? The absence of a photograph of the concrete plate in my hands doesn’t make the plate a "phantom", except perhaps in photo-freak Gerdes' cloud-cuckoo-land.
# 263 under http://www.topix.com/forum/history/T...H7P8C/p13#c263 :

Quote:
>Exhibit G: We can't forget that Roberta claims that the 24 - 96 million teeth at Treblinka were >turned into "teeth meal" with plugs - just like this:

>http://s27.photobucket.com/albums/c166/cortag ...
>Yes folks, that's why, according to Roberta, not a single tooth has ever been located at
>Treblinka!– All the teeth were turned into “tooth meal” with “plugs!” LOL!!!

Fifth lie: I never endorsed a number of dead that would correspond to 96 million teeth.

Sixth lie: I never claimed that all ashed teeth were crushed. On the contrary, I quoted one eyewitness testimony (Grossman’s) and one document from the Polish militia about an operation against robbery diggers, transcribed in the Polish newspaper article, that expressly mentioned teeth visible or picked up by robbery diggers on the Treblinka site.

>She even quotes Grossman again (See exhibit A):“The earth is throwing out crushed bones, >teeth."

Seventh lie: Grossman was never quoted for anything other than his statement "The earth is throwing out crushed bones, teeth.", which is evidence that human teeth were visible on the Treblinka site at the time of its liberation. Gerdes is dumb enough to expose his sixth lie as such with his seventh lie.

>Yes Roberta, the earth "throws" out the evidence just in time for the jews to say they saw it, >then the earth magically swallowed them up again so no one else can see it! LOL!!! And finally –

Eighth lie: Gerdes ignores the mention of teeth picked up by robbery diggers in the Polish militia report quoted in the Polish newspaper article, English translation under http://rodohforum.yuku.com/reply/92506/t/Gold...

>Exhibit H (These are additional photos that Roberta claims “proves” the Treblinka holocaust >story):

http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_multimedia/G ...

http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_multimedia/G ...

http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_multimedia/G ...

http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_multimedia/G ...

http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_multimedia/G ...

http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_multimedia/G ...

http://www.infocenters.co.il/gfh_multimedia/G ...

Ninth lie: I never claimed that photos prove anything by themselves. On the contrary, I repeatedly pointed out that, like any other elements of evidence, photos only have a meaning in connection with other evidence like eyewitness testimonies, deportation documents and site investigation reports.

Gerdes forgot to mention the eyewitness testimonies and documentary evidence that are referred to in the articles listed in my post # 103 on page 6. That may be so because he doesn’t consider eyewitness testimonies and documents to be "real" evidence. Needless to say, Gerdes has not yet been able to explain what is "real" evidence as opposed to evidence that is not "real", and what rules or standards of criminal investigation or historical research his distinction is based on.
Shall I continue, Mr. Gerdes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
You accepted THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE.
And if I remember correctly, I did so before miserable coward Gerdes excluded Chelmno and Belzec from the challenge and limited an applicant’s publication choices to just SKEPTIC magazine. Right, Mr. Gerdes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
That means, you will submit to "SKEPTIC" magazine your "proof."
I didn’t say anything to the contrary, you sorry prick. In order to find out if SKEPTIC magazine are interested in publishing my proof I must submit it to them, don’t you think so? Duh!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
If - IF - "SKEPTIC" magazine rejects your submittal, then, we will discuss whether or not ARCHAEOLOGY magazine can be used as an alternative source in your attempt to become a claimant for the reward money.
Thanks for bringing this up again, Gerdes. At the time I accepted the challenge, IIRC, an applicant had the choice between publishing in SKEPTIC magazine and publishing in ARCHAEOLOGY magazine.

What we have now is that if SKEPTIC magazine are not interested in publishing my article, "we will discuss whether or not ARCHAEOLOGY magazine can be used as an alternative source in your attempt to become a claimant for the reward money" - which, for all I’ve seen of greasy slime-ball player Gerdes, will end in a NO to ARCHAEOLOGY magazine.

Why was to change made on the NAFCASH site, Mr. Gerdes? Why were an applicant’s already limited publication options further restricted?

I have submitted that you did this because you thought you had noticed a preference on my part for ARCHAEOLOGY over SKEPTIC magazine, an assumption that is supported by your fuss about unfavorable comments I made regarding Shermer’s qualities as a researcher, the obvious intention of which was to make sure that Shermer’s resentment against me would bar my access to SKEPTIC magazine and thus leave me with no publishing option at all. As you so aptly put it in one of your posts, you made that change just for me.

This, of course, means that you’re scared shitless of evidence meeting your challenge requirements being actually provided, and that you also know how full of shit your "Revisionist" articles of faith are. It makes you a liar and a coward par excellence.

But I’m open to hearing an alternative explanation for your having scratched ARCHAEOLOGY magazine.

Let’s hear, Mr. Gerdes.

Your cowardly silence shall be taken as meaning confirmation of my supposition.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
You're so transparent retardo.
That’s what I’m telling you, Mr. Gerdes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Thank you again for showing the world what a cowardly liar you are.
And that’s also what I’m telling you. Besides the ease with which I can point to examples of your own flagrant lies and your own flagrant cowardice, there’s also another reason why you should quit calling me names that fit you and you alone: anyone with half a brain, even those of your brothers-in-spirit who are not totally blinded by ideological tomato slices covering their eyes, are sure to have realized that there was never any cowardice or mendacity in my behavior, and that your accusations in this sense, apart from being projections of your own behavior, are completely baseless.

But of course you’re free to continue making a bloody fool of yourself as often as you like, Mr. Gerdes. The more often you do, the worse for you and "Revisionism", and the better for me and elementary common sense.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
BTW Roberta, have I ever told you that your priceless?
I would also quit this lame imitation of a term I have appropriately applied to you, Mr. Gerdes. Every reasonable reader has probably long realized that the reason for my spending time on you is your being a priceless demonstration object of "Revisionist" mendacity, cowardice, obnoxiousness and imbecility.

Keep making yourself and "Revisionism" look like shit, Mr. Gerdes. I’m enjoying every minute of it.