View Single Post
Old August 25th, 2008 #1014
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,001
Roberto Muehlenkamp
Default

6 days ago, poor Gerdes must have had another bad night in which he dreamed of me kicking his ass all over the place. The result was his post # 984 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=984 , which will be commented hereafter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Roberta (post #916):

Quote:
"No photos of Prof. Kola in person doing excavation work have to my knowledge been published. However, I have been informed by the director of the Sobibor Archaeology Project, Mr. Yoram Haimi, that the photos shown under http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...nia/index.html are related to Prof. Kola’s archaeological investigation in 2001.

While no photographs are required to prove that the mass graves actually exist, the three photographs from the above-mentioned series obviously show substances taken with a core drill out of Sobibor mass graves, which are clearly distinguishable from the light brown soil of Sobibor."

So the greasy jewbitch admits that she's been in contact with fellow greasball haimi.
There’s nothing to "admit" about having been in contact with a professional archaeologist conducting an investigation that may take care of what little room for rhetoric "Revisionism" still has. It’s something to be proud of.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
So why then does she not know the results of any analysis of said "substances taken with a core drill out of Sobibor mass graves?"
Because, as I told Gerdes in post # 916, it wasn’t the Sobibor Archaeology Project that took these samples. It was Prof. Kola in 2001. Gerdes should learn to first read, then think, and only then hit the keyboard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Roberta:

Quote:
"I am not familiar at this moment with the results of such analysis, which have not been published. However, it seems reasonable to assume that if such analysis was done – which is probably the case – , the results confirmed my assumptions mentioned in answer B.3 above."

Let's see the results of the analysis and lets see the photos of the other core samples.
We will see all that if and when a detailed report on the findings of Prof. Kola’s 2001 investigation is published, Mr. Gerdes. Time enough for you to train chewing the carpet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
How many core samples were taken?
I have no idea, and I don’t think anyone other than the people who conducted the 2001 investigation (who I’m not in contact with) currently has.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Later in the same post:

E.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
9 - Show us proof that the "huge ash mountain" of Sobibor is actually comprised of human ash.

Roberta:

Quote:
"The aspect of the substance that the mound consists of, which has a light gray coloration different from the light-brown color of the soil at Sobibor (see photos mentioned in answer B.3 above) suggests the accuracy of captions describing this mound as a mound consisting of or containing human ashes."

Notice how the lying jewbitch is trying to imply that there have been core samples taken from the mound.
What is noticeable is that Gerdes cannot read or is too dumb to understand what I wrote. What I’m saying is that on these core samples:

http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F5.html

http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F6.html

http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F7.html

you can see that the soil of Sobibor has a light-brown color, which is different from the light gray color of the mound. This means that the mound does not consist of soil. It consists of a light gray substance other than soil. What could that substance be, Mr. Gerdes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Let's see the photos of these alleged core samples and lets see the results of the analysis of the alleged samples.
The photos of the core samples – which I never said were from the mound, contrary to what gibbering idiot Gerdes claims – you see above. For the results of the analysis of these samples, we’ll have to wait until a detailed report on Kola’s 2001 investigation is published. Meanwhile, Gerdes may try answering some questions he has long been running away from:

1. What, other than human ashes (of bone and tissue), could the light gray substance on the core sample shown under http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F5.html possibly be?

2. What, other than wood ash, could the black substance on the core sample shown under http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F6.html possibly be?

3. What, other than either bone ash or lime, could the white substance on the core sample shown under http://www.sobibor.edu.pl/angielska/...adania/F7.html possibly be?

How about trying to answer these questions instead of yelling for analyses you know are not yet available to the public, Mr. Gerdes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Roberta:

Quote:
"...So does the associated documentary and eyewitness evidence proving that Sobibor was an extermination camp and that the bodies of the victims were disposed of by burning them, which is mentioned in my post # 777 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=777 ."

What burnt bodies?
Those of at least about 150,000 people shown by all known evidence to have been murdered and burned at Sobibor, Mr. Gerdes. Or do you know of any evidence that they were taken to the "Russian East"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Where?
In the section of former Sobibor extermination camp known as "Camp III", Mr. Gerdes. Where else?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Robeta:

Quote:
"...The conclusion that the mound in question is comprised of human ash is thus the conclusion that is borne out by all known evidence and belied by none. It is also the conclusion towards which various sources of evidence independent of each other converge. This convergence of various sources of evidence independent of each other, alone or together with the absence of any evidence to the contrary, is proof that the mound in question is comprised of human ash."

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!

Thank you Roberta.
Gratitude is all on my side, Mr. Gerdes. You have again shown that hollow derision is the best you can offer by way of an argument against my very reasonable conclusion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerdes
Have I ever told you that you're priceless?
No, Mr. Gerdes, that honor belongs to you. Thanks for once more showing what a priceless demonstration object of "Revisionist" imbecility you are.

The nightmare leading to post # 984 must have been real bad, judging by how it led to more of Gerdes’ infantile "show me, show me" and "let’s see photos" – yelling in post # 985 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=985, post # 987 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=987 and post # 988 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=988.

In the last of these posts, the fellow kept yelling for information about analyses of core samples that were taken during an investigation (Kola, 2001) the results of which – as Gerdes well knows – have not yet been published.

That being so, please tell us, Mr. Gerdes: how the fuck am I supposed to know if (as would correspond to good professional practice and is therefore likely to be the case) the core samples from Prof. Kola’s 2001 investigation were analyzed and what the results of the analysis were?

Time for you to get a brain, Mr. Gerdes.

Poor Gerdes’ discomfort over his nightmare must have been such that he again, as becomes apparent from his post # 989 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=989 , forgot about my being on vacation. In his post # 990 under http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php...&postcount=990 , Slanim2 had to remind him of this fact.

Over the last three weeks, while enjoying sunny southern Spain in the company of my daughters and my beloved Berlin with my wife, I didn’t waste a thought on this pitiable intellectual midget Gerdes. His attacking me while I was gone, on the other hand, suggests that his pathetic obsession with me never left him alone. There’s the difference between someone who is comfortable with his arguments as I am, and someone who for all his bigmouthed verbosity knows how full of shit he is and how vacuous his "Revisionist" articles of faith are. And there’s also the difference between a reasonable person who has a life and the frustrated monomaniac haunted by fixed ideas that Gerdes obviously is.

Thanks for making it so clear what a small and unhappy creature you are, Mr. Gerdes. And what small and unhappy creatures it is that "Revisionism" appeals to.