View Single Post
Old November 13th, 2010 #35
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Referring to our adversaries as "Niggers" or "Kikes", and assuming any position that appears to have a supremacist foundation, will only turn the White masses away, while giving our adversaries the angles they need to discredit and condemn us. So you would have to be either a mole or a fool if you willingly (or absentmindedly) turn the vast majority of your intended audience away, before you are able to make a single point.
Where's the evidence that what you say is true? I say the evidence backs the opposite view and you're simply parroting dogma you picked up at Stormfront.

There's no evidence at all that white men are bothered by slurs. Go to the highly popular Gawker ring (Deadspin, Jezebel, Gawker, etc.) and read the denunciations of racists, homophobes, slut-shamers, rednecks, Texans, Southerners. It's not niggers on these sites, its whites. And they love slurs. Snark and slurs is about all they do. But only in one direction: supporting the mainstream taboos. They've been trained to slur their own race and fellate the others, and that's exactly what they do, without even thinking about it. The way to fight that warped mentality is not to yield to it, and adopt its rules and taboos, but to break through the crust by shocking them with laughter -- not reason, with laughter, scorn, ridicule - their beloved snark - from 180-degrees the opposite direction.

There's a reason our oppressors don't want us using the term nigger. And that reason is that it suggests that niggers exist, which is the entire point of the cult to deny. Nigger is shorthand for rejecting their entire worldview, and it will cause them to cry. We're not in a debate, we're in a fight. And nigger is one of our very best weapons. Not to use it is the ultimate in foolish counsel.

Quote:
Why make their task of attacking the messenger any easier on them than it needs to be?
Why not worry about attacking your enemy instead of this passive, girlish conservative concerns for what everybody else will think? You're going to get attacked if you defend Whites, doesn't matter how you dress or behave, and nothing will change that. All you do when you harp endlessly on appearances, as is the SF way, is show fear and weakness to the enemy. Insisting on your bona fides is the conservatives' game, and the reason they always lose in the end. To win you must attack, and you must rely on emotional appeals. The reason and logic comes in in your strategy, not in your appeal. Anyone with five minutes to spare can discover the roots of the case against the jew or the nigger, if the evidence of his eyes and nose don't suffice. The reason they're not with us is their fear. Your spiffy dress and polished shoes and slurfree rational argument won't move people an inch. They can agree with you all day long, but at the end of the day, you have no power and no willingness to act on your words. In the old days, when niggers even hinted at acting up, white men would put them in their place. Today those who say they're white advise others not even to disrespect those niggers verbally. That's what we've been reduced to. There is no equality. Either one is on top or the other. If we yield to the taboos of our enemy, we can't win. Cuz they aren't going to stop slurring us and smearing us and framing us and murdering us and lying about our history and luring our youth into destructive practices. They think we're cowards, and we won't dare fight back, not even verbally. Evidence says they are right.

Quote:
They simply cannot offer a (reasonable) rebuttal to anyone who demands their FREEDOM, can they
Why do they need to? Why can't they keep on crushing you and laughing at you. This isn't a debate, it's a fight. They use the weapons they have, and have no qualms about illegal or immoral behavior. But you assure us you will not stoop to their level. When you're in a fight, sometimes the enemy determines the weapons or the battlefield, and you either react in kind or you lose. That's the position we're in. You seem to imagine politics is some kind of debating society, it's not. The up-front illusion is we all can speak our piece, then vote in private, and the most votes wins. The reality is the governing mechanism is controlled by an age-old racial enemy that will use ANY MEANS to obtain and maintain power. THEY DONT NEED TO REBUT ANYTHING WE SAY. Only in your fantasy world. In the real world, they simply stamp you a hate-filled extremist and move on. If they can defame and get fired the guy who discovered the genetic code, they sure as hell can do even worse to the rest of us. We are in a fight, not a debate.

Quote:
And that is what this all boils down to. We don't want or need ANYBODY else to do anything for us, and we should settle for nothing less than absolute freedom (separation).
More SF influence. The point here is we aren't calling the shots. They are. All we control is our own behavior. If we want things other than they are, we are going to have to initiate the change. And they have proved 1,000x over they will not allow White men to use the system to produce peaceful change.

Quote:
Leave the emotional responses, supremacist views ("God's Chosen"), name calling, posturing, lying, and unscrupulous ways to the Jew. White MEN have no use for any of it.
No, you've got it confused. Emotion is the only thing that can save us. The logic and reason are mere technical supports - they're for the how, not the why. Only the heart can supply the why, the brain is just there to map the route once the heart has determined the direction. Emotion is the most powerful tool we have, yet you're advising people to throw it away, fold their hands primly, and reason in a nice indoor middle-class voice. Again, you're simply parroting Stormfront dogma, and it's wrong. Reason doesn't move people to enlist in the Serious Change Army. Only a belief that the army is well led by men who mean it does. And those men prove they mean it through seriously emotional appeals. You're basically telling Adolf Hitler and Braveheart their way doesn't work, in spite of the evidence that in fact it does. That isn't reasonable.

Last edited by Alex Linder; November 13th, 2010 at 04:51 PM.