Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder
|
Great articles in all, very interesting reading. The thrashing of that caricature of a historical jew fraudster that has spent 40 years(!) of his life writing and re-editing a book that is just an unbelievably brazen and sloppy work of lies, half truths, distortions of the truth, omissions, etc., trying to portray Frank as innocent and pinning it on southern "anti-semitism", was especially enjoyable.
As regards the last one, posted on nationalvanguard, which was also excellent; it had 2 comments that I thought sums up what the average white needs to take away from this unbelievably over-hyped story of what really only should have been the clear cut conviction and execution of the remorseless, perverted, child raping, child murdering jew Leo Frank:
Quote:
Bill* (*Jew looking to obscure and relativize)
August 30, 2012 at 7:44 pm · Reply
Conley said this, and Conley said that.
This is treated as proof positive that Frank committed the murder. It’s even treated as an admission by Frank that he killed the girl.
Oh, but Conley was UNDER OATH. Gee, that must mean he was telling the truth. Case closed.
What nonsense. The anti-Semitism of most pro-Conley articles is clearly evident.
Stick to the facts. Who did what in this 100-year-old crime will probably never be known.
BTW, I visited Mary’s grave a few days ago during a visit to Atlanta. I even read Oney’s 700-page book. Little toys, dolls and stuffed animals are still being placed at the grave site. The only truth — it remains one hell of a great story.
|
Quote:
Leo Frank
September 4, 2012 at 1:22 am · Reply
Dear Bill Weylmann,
The prevailing genetic disease of the nation-wrecking Jewish ethno-religion appears to manifest itself in a kind of mental myopia mixed with a masochistic persecution pathology. Perhaps more government funding should be invested to study the disfigured Jews psychology, and why they promote one set of values for outsiders and a completely different set of values for insiders.
The refusal of most Jews to consider all the facts, testimony and evidence when it concerns one of your own is evident. You are the only people in the world who have attempted to exonerate a serial pedophile rapist and admitted child murderer, Leo Frank the Toilet Strangler.
This is why Jews can not be considered reliable sources of information about history, sociology, law or anything for that matter when the subject involves Jews. Simply, the fragile and sensitive ego of the Jew, for the most part, prevents it from being able to examine subjects dispassionately. Wikipedia is proof of this fact.
Thank you for once again showing your mental myopia to be true, instead of actually reading the Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence (1913) and offering some intelligent commentary here, isntead you regurgitate pedophile cheerleadering chants. Blah blah blah Conley this and blah blah Conley that….
Thank you for proving what everyone has been saying all along about this case, that “the chosen ones” – the genetic enemies of Western Civilization – will pretend that only with the testimony of Jim Conley, the conviction of Leo Frank was reached.
Tom Watson solved this equation in the September 1915 issue of Watson’s Magazine. Leo Frank can be convicted without the testimony of Jim Conley.
http://www.leofrank.org/confession/
|