Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Ronsavelle
A question for those wanting socialist medicine:
Suppose there was/is a totally non-state system. No licensing, no union monopolies, no state funding, etcetera. The system seems to be working, and offers itself to be evaluated by a panel of socialists.
The socialists issue a report. There is a range of opinions- the non-state system is evaluated as being anywhere from superb, to adequate. The lowest rank is adequate.
Even though all agree the system is, at minimum, adequate, the socialists still oppose it!
What is the basis of their opposition?
|
Why don’t you first find out who opposes socialism (i.e., a Healthy Aryan people) then you might see through the labels they use to slander viable alternatives:
http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/haken32.htm