View Single Post
Old July 21st, 2009 #4
Steve B
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmy smith View Post

White broke no laws in obtaining the juror’s personal information, Adelman wrote in a 35-page opinion, "and an intimidating context alone does not remove the protection of the First Amendment."

White’s attorney, Chris Shepherd of Chicago, said of the ruling: "The First Amendment is at its best when it protects unpopular speech. If the First Amendment only protected us from expressing opinions that everyone agrees with, it would become useless, because that type of speech needs no protection."
It took the jewess 35 pages of bs to figure out the charges against White were bogus and what was posted on his blog is clearly protected under the First Amendment?

White should never have been arrested in the first place.