View Single Post
Old February 18th, 2011 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default On the Need for Ideological Politics: Linder

[When will it end? a poster asks of one of the miseries of the multicult milieu]

We will end this when we accept it's worth risking our lives over, rather than pretending it can be cured by talking and voting.

Right now, WN is simply dirty rice. The rice is conservatism, and the 'dirty' is our focus on race.

Conservatism loses - always. It does not intend to win, it intends to whine. It is a "game; a way of making a living." - Joe Sobran's words about professional conservatism. It sells the suckers called the public the idea that there's an opponent to the liberal order, when in fact, if the public looked more carefully, it would see that the conservatives agree with the liberals on the deep stuff. That is why there is never any positive change, over time, simply the seemingly inexorable march of liberalization, no matter what the public says in polls or what levers it pulls in the voting booth.

As Solzhenitsyn has said, there is no true self-defense -- and this goes for communal self-defense, too -- unless you are willing to risk dying. Until then, there is only compromising and excuse-making.

Dirty conservatism, as WN is, is simply online entertainment at this point. Perhaps this phase is necessary; at the least there are more sites and writers than ever discussing the same problems VNN brought up back in 2000. That is good.

For WN to be more than entertainment, its adherent must be willing to submit to discipline. There is no willingness to do that right now.

Nor is there willingness honestly to discuss why WN can't organize effectively. That would mean taking Mao's dictum seriously (Power comes out of the barrel of a gun), whereas conservatives prefer the comfortable dream that if they just buy the right suit, employ the right euphemism, smile at the right person - their key will start the engine. Because they reject the principled, ideological, impersonal politics of the judeo-left -- as recently exemplified by Ed Asner in the article about conservative actors -- and allow their personal relations and whims to overcome what they know they should do, they will continue to fail to foster any real development beyond mutual backscratching.

Jew tool Jared Taylor serves as a bellweather for our movement. So long as he is accepted as a White nationalist, no serious movement exists. The minute he is rejected with spitting hostility as the enemy by those who call themselves White men, then something real may be in the offing.

Let me spell this out since the dim cannot understand what I mean.

If you say that jews are the problem...

...then you can't accept men who willingly embrace the jew while calling their cause by the same name you call yours.

This ought to be self evident.

It is the farthest thing from self-evident to our movement.

This inability to spot, let alone be troubled by, out-and-out contradictions, is a good part of the reason we're in such serious political trouble.

Where does this inability come from?

A number of places.

1) from the genetically low intelligence of the Southern-Midwestern rural demographic base. These people are not overly intelligent, so contradictions don't bother them, because they often don't notice them. They know to respect men who dress and speak well, and these individual successes mean far more, in their eyes, than consistent, principled political lines.

2) our British culture. Anglo (British and colonial) culture is noted for non-ideological "muddling through." In England, society is rigidly stratified between the rich and the proles. The rich all went to Oxford or Cambridge. Any political debate these tories and labour lords may have matter far less to them, at the end of the day, than the fact that they belong to the same social class. England's preference is for experimenting, for pragmatism, for muddling through - not for ideology, philosophy, and principle - these are seem as Continental, European, French or German.

This attitude carried over to America. Although class is less rigid here, the hands-on, can-do pragmatism, a natural response to an open continent needing labor to make things rather than think about things, already a part of the English heritage, only strengthened the anti-ideological streak.

In America, you say what you want when the cameras are rolling, but when the red light goes off, you repair to the bar to drink with your liberal buddy, like Ted Kennedy and Orin Hatch, or Pat Buchanan and Alan Colmes.

This system can only be overcome by people who are radically principled, and impersonal in their politics. If someone falls on the wrong side of the line, they reject him. Just as Ed Asner rejected the conservative starlet for being pro-Bush. Even though he personally liked her, the minute the jew found out she was part of the hated other, he never spoke to her again. That is awesomely impressive. But the conservatives, even most WN, will simply find it inhuman and unthinkable.

Well, my friend. That is why jews are running the world, and we're running our mouths.

3) a final cultural source of the problem is Christianity. The christ cult emphasizes the soft virtues over everything else: love, mercy, forgivenness. You should be able to see how this dovetails with overlooking the flaws or contradictions in others and their politics. Christianity strengthens the cultural tendency to play down differences, rather than make them dividing points. This is what women instinctively do within a family. But when important distinctions are glossed over in the wider community, genocide can be the result. For this reason, among a thousand others, the christ cult imperils the white race.

Like liberals with niggers, WN are always making excuses and extenuations for people who are doing overtly anti-White things, like mixing with jews. Greg Johnson making excuses for Jared Taylor is the perfect example. He wastes his valuable time, and vitiates the psychic strength he and the cause needs, by fighting to defend a position he knows is utterly untenable and indefensible.

If jews are as bad as I and all true VNN people say they are, then why are so many of you willing to make jokes of yourselves by going, oh, that's ok. We don't really mean it. We don't mind if you work with jews, and make excuses for them. And tell whites to blame their own farmer grandparents rather than the jew commies who fucked up our countries. We'll just ignore all that and throw our principles out the window cuz we like your conferences and how you dress and speak. The willingness to do this is testament to the too-low intellectual, moral and political quality of far too many who call themselves White Nationalists.

I will not stand for anti-White garbage like Jared Taylor, and you shouldn't either. Instead, you should join me in pointing him out for what he is: the jew-appointed head of the White NAACP; his Am-Ren an organization designed to fool white nationalists the same way William F. Buckley suckered conservatives, and the same way the original NAACP suckered blacks (out of going back to Africa, or relying on their own efforts rather than blaming the white man).

What we say about jews is right. And men must either be with us, or be the enemy. There is no ignoring, overlooking, splitting down the middle, pretending you compartmentalize the nigger question from the jew question. On some things there is no compromise, and jews are one of them.

A principled, stern, uncompromising, rigidly ideological politics is what we need. Where do we look for examples? To the jews, the communists, and the German loyalists who evolved techniques to combat them. Not to England. Not to the church. To the people who faced the same problem we do and had more success than any other group in solving that problem.

When WN politics becomes ideological and physical - then we might have something. Until then we are simply dirty rice: race-flavored conservatives.

You know what the problem with white rice is, don't you? And this goes for dirty rice too... It tastes good, but it has very little nutritional value to the White body.

Last edited by Alex Linder; March 5th, 2011 at 04:47 AM.