View Single Post
Old July 3rd, 2009 #24
Rick Ronsavelle
Senior Member
 
Rick Ronsavelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,006
Default

A question for those wanting socialist medicine:

Suppose there was/is a totally non-state system. No licensing, no union monopolies, no state funding, etcetera. The system seems to be working, and offers itself to be evaluated by a panel of socialists.

The socialists issue a report. There is a range of opinions- the non-state system is evaluated as being anywhere from superb, to adequate. The lowest rank is adequate.

Even though all agree the system is, at minimum, adequate, the socialists still oppose it!

What is the basis of their opposition?