Well then, given your answer, I will have to assume you agree with me. The argument provides no support for its (trivial) conclusion.
I frankly don't understand your talk of "reason" and "reasonable things that aren't logical". What does it mean? And what does that have to do with reaching true conclusions and supporting attitudes? Nothing.
Quote:
|
You have already said that it is reasonable to say that negroes are in general more dangerous
|
Was that the point? No. Stop pretending it was.
I do indeed think it is reasonable to "say" so. In that it is
technically the case. On its own however, that line is near meaningless.
I would never "say" such a thing without qualification, since most would draw conclusions well beyond the information given.