[psychologicalshock]

Originally Posted by Larry Heinberg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validit...y_of_arguments


If all you have to support an apparently correct position are invalid arguments, perhaps that position is not quite correct. That's why I point out invalidity.

The arguments aren't invalid, can't you read your own damn link you fucking idiot? You haven't done any logical analysis on any of our arguments whatsoever, you declared them to be invalid but you never showed that to be so. Way to be an idiot, how about actually reading about logic before talking about it Larry?

If you need wikipedia here's what I said before in Wikipedia format:

"The following argument is of the same logical form but with false premises and a false concusion, and it is equally valid:

All cups are green.
Socrates is a cup.
Therefore, Socrates is green. "