Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key
What I don't understand about people like you is the apparent contradiction between your very negative and bleak view of the average White man's behavior and morals yet you think the best solution is to centralize authority so they can boss everyone around else. You want to institutionalize the same people and their power you denounce as opposed to let them compete on a free market. You have some kind of secret Nazi cabal where you will breed new generations of ultimate Avatars or something?
I just don't understand that line of reasoning. 
I am not a libertarian or anything but there is a lot of valid criticism against how governments generally look today. I'd suggest you look into Tom Woods and what he's doing. His podcast is very, very informative on these issues. |
Power will be centralized under any and all systems, including and especially capitalism, whose end result is always dictatorship of the billionaires that will use both private and public means to trample all over you "rugged individualists". The question here isn't whether natural organization of hierarchy is pyramid shape, but whether the people who will be at the top of the pyramid will be sleazy merchants (capitalism) or Plato's Guardians (National Socialism).
The main problem with "socialist" states like Sweden isn't any inherent problem with the system. It's that the massive influx of unproductive , low IQ muds is a burden on society and community. In low trust multi-racial societies, people understandably prefer less collectivism, but this is an unsustainable path towards hell on earth in the long run.
If you're a racialist, you're a socialist. If you feel a "centralized dictatorship" needs to protect the race, you indirectly admit that government is necessary and can do something very important better than the private sphere. Why do you do that Robbie, don't you have faith that the average white man's morals will be able to protect the race without supervision?
Tom Woods' ideal society and economy is what the Jew Von Mises advised as economic policy maker in Engelbert Dolfuss' Austria. If you want to compare and contrast , this case is the perfect example of which system is better. Go look at a before and after of unemployment rates, wages, productivity, harvests, etc in Jew Mises' Austria vs Nationalsocialist Austria a few years later and come to your own conclusion. Economic planning is superior to market economies in every case except in the small and racially irrelevant world of light industry and consumer goods (which I agree free enterprise is superior). The only nations that can afford a full market economy are ones with lots of resources to waste, like Britain when it had its world empire to exploit, or the massive USA, but even in these cases planning would've been far superior.
Merchants and peddlers might be a necessary evil in some cases, but these low lives need to be curtailed and contained, and for sure, someone like Cecil Rhodes who helped Jews fill South Africa up with niggers to work in his De Beers diamond mines should be kept far away from government.