Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikola Bijeliti
So when Siegfried rescued Brunhilde, was he doing that for idealistic reasons, or was he simply terrified of being alone?
Non-Whites put a very strong emphasis on coupling and mating because it assures their racial survival, that is true, but that is not what people typically mean when they say romantic. When people use the word romantic, they typically mean a relationship based on passion, not the practical need for survival. Based on the way the word is typically used, non-White relationships are quite unromantic.
You're saying that the Jews introduced some unhealthy and dysgenic notions of male-female relationships into the culture, which is true, but then you go on to ascribe those practices to non-Whites in general. But the examples you site from non-White cultures are eugenic, not dysgenic. The importance non-Whites attach to relationships ensures their survival, whereas the Romanticism that White people practice, to the extent that it still exists, prioritizes women's feelings over survival. This is quite the opposite of the non-White practice.
You keep repeating the history of the word romantic over and over again. Please answer these points directly rather than repeatedly copying the same text.
|
Based on the examples I gave such as a Chinese woman bit a man's arm and tore her clothes off in a subway train over marriage problems, a Chinese man lies on top of his mistress in the street to shield her as his raging wife and her friends kick them and tear strips off the woman's clothes while a crowd watches, an Indonesian man hangs himself just because his girlfriend breaks up with him, a Malaysian woman vandalizes a man's house because he cheated on her, and an Indian man burns his wife alive because her family refused to pay the dowry, the Asians do seem to be extremely obsessed with romance.
But I think that this obsession with romance in Asia or elsewhere is caused by the Jews who keep promoting it using the media. Because in the past, the Asians and other races would not engage in this sort of behavior since there was no feminism during those times. When a man willfully chooses or has a marriage arranged with a woman, the woman is completely submissive and obeys the man without question which causes the relationship to run smoothly. Since men in those times had higher testosterone levels because there were no anti-androgens during those times and because they were not sex addicts since there was no pornography that encouraged promiscuous behavior, the man could dictate the terms of the relationship and no problems would occur because the elevated testosterone levels would ensure that he always made logical decisions.