View Single Post
Old July 15th, 2009 #42
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,756
Blog Entries: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Ronsavelle View Post
A question for those wanting socialist medicine:

Suppose there was/is a totally non-state system. No licensing, no union monopolies, no state funding, etcetera. The system seems to be working, and offers itself to be evaluated by a panel of socialists.

The socialists issue a report. There is a range of opinions- the non-state system is evaluated as being anywhere from superb, to adequate. The lowest rank is adequate.

Even though all agree the system is, at minimum, adequate, the socialists still oppose it!

What is the basis of their opposition?
Good questions.

The problem here is twofold.

1) 50% of "white nationalists" don't realize the government brainwashing extends beyond race, and the foundational brainwashing, to which all are exposed around the clock, is the basic false axiom of governmental competence. This survives any amount of evidence, it seems.

2) the invisibility of government activity in (health care). you can't see the suffering caused by unapproved drugs, by people who never went into medicine because of low salaries/affirmative action discrimination/restrictions on who can practice medicine.

Even WN are 95% like the lemmings they deride: they literally cannot imagine what being a free man means. "Bu-bu-who will protect us from quacks?"

No imagination. No knowledge. Just fear and stupidity.