View Single Post
Old June 12th, 2013 #66
Anders Hoveland
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 86
Default

This is a picture of the "stone slabs" found within the pyramid in Bosnia.
Skeptics say it is just a geological formation, not manmade.

http://badarchaeology.files.wordpres...id_geology.jpg

Although the stone block layers are not perfectly rectangular, the Inca were also known for fitting together misshapen stones. In was more difficult to carve stones in the stone age, so it was easier try to give a general shape and then fit the different shapes together with another stone that would fit against it.

The layer between the two layers of stone slabs in the excavation may look like sedimentary rock, but it is actually dirt with a high clay content. Compacted and left to coagulate for thousands of years, it would take on the appearance of a sedimentary layer.

Huge manmade earthen mounds and pyramids have also been found in the Mississippi flood plains of the United States.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_mound

One thing we do have to be cautious about is that this alleged pyramid does not stand in isolation on a flat plane; it is surrounded by hills. This could be one of the reasons the site had not been noticed before. Combined with the heavy erosion on one side of the pyramid, it seems to blend in with the rugged landscape. In fact, it seems to me that this pyramid is actually connected to the hill range behind it. This does not necessarily mean it is just a natural geologic phenomena, as the builders may have just built the pyramid against the hill in the river valley since there was not enough room. But this pyramid is not Ayers Rock in Australia, if you know what I mean. It could easily just be part of the landscape.