[T.I.]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

A market where people buy and sell without state interference in the form of endless licensing, restrictions and taxes. This is where the libertarians are way ahead of us racialists

An economic free-for-all under the “free market” mythos is largely responsible for the mess we are in now. Each man for himself in the realm of economics means each man for himself in the realm of politics, too. Libertarian thinking has no answer for us politically and it has no answer for us with economics either.

Without jews our current capitalist system of economic exploitation will not magically improve. Finance will still take precedence over all – what force is there in the “free market” to say that it does not?

The Defenders will have to be schooled as essentially religious civil servants. They will be elite but they will not weigh heavy on the people. They will have to see things as a matter of honor rather than money and personal interest.

This just does not make sense. What code of honor do libertarians have? The god religious civil servants worship is the “free market” – is it not? You are desperately trying to clothe NS economic principles in neo-libertarian rags, why make such a disingenuous effort? Why not call a NS a NS and be done with it? If the WN State is our friendly big brother in the political realm why can’t it be our friendly big brother in the economic realm too? Politics for the good of the race + economics for the good of the race = National Socialism no matter how you want to avoid it.

People can use whatever criteria they want to judge their purchases; it's not the government's job to make things safe, just to defend us against other races and foreign threats.

This is just nonsensical too. Robber Barons, sweat shops, quacks, frauds, etc all THRIVED under laze faire capitalism. Are you unaware of Sinclair’s The Jungle? Or do you just not give a damn? You really need to think this attitude through.

Things need to be accorded the power appropriate to their position and ability. The opposite of what we have now, where every single substantial decision is taken by the federal government, and anyone who disagrees is beaten down. Only the worst and lowest forms of white man prefer that system. The only function that fits whites as a collective is defense against foreign enemies. The rest can by individuals through private arrangements.

Where do the rights of Corporations and monopolies fit into your scheme of things?

Individuals STAND NO CHANCE against their collective interests.

You are walking us right back down the path that we trod 100 years ago. Reforms on destructive corporations and monopolies were only won at the expense and ruination of 10s of thousands of White lives and families. “OSHA/union bullshit” also saved White lives. Why do you insist that we play this same game out again? Call a spade a spade – place a National Socialist structure regulating a healthy series of guidelines and restrictions on businesses - and be done with it.

Turns out virtually all functions of the state are unnecessary.

White victims of economic exploitation just don’t enter into your way of thinking at all do they? A free-for-all Willie Wonka world with children’s heads being lopped off by bubble mixing machines is hardly worth the struggle we are facing.

The conclusion is that even the dumber and poorer whites don't need anybody or anything but themselves to prosper.

Do you want your gastro surgery at your local hospital or would you prefer it at the Mayo clinic? Small and simple is not always the most desirable or what we should be aiming at. The point is that we Whites should be collectivizing to rule our world and advance to the stars – because we find it good, necessary and challenging - not dispersing and escaping to the backwoods - because we find it momentarily satisfying. The former is Life-Affirming and the latter Life-denying. Our economics SHOULD BE MADE TO CONFORM TO THE FORMER.

I mean by "hard," not what I said about, that's just verbal hardness, but actual leadership. This is the crux of the matter as we get to late 2009: no one -- me included -- is offering any leadership, and leadership, honest to god political leadership, is what Whites need. Not lectures about IQ. Not demands for fairness. Not flipping the left's verbal tricks and civil rights bromides against them. Leadership. Uncompromising jew-naming, White-defending leadership.

The reason I criticize Francis in the past, and KM for the stupid mistake of using Sam to write his book foreword, and Greg for in some way finding no problem with this when from his VNN past he should know better, is that Sam did what I said in the other post, and KM looks to be following the same route: BLAMING the people. Rather than helping them and inspiring them and LEADING them. Sam's position, expressed in KM's book foreward, is that NOT of a leader but of someone standing to the side and saying, gee, you whites should be really mad about this. You're really getting screwed here. I will be real surprised if you don't rise up. Sam wrote as a neutral party, with no stake in the outcome. Always he kept himself at arm's length. He NEVER ONCE called himself a White nationalist or anything theresimilar. Sam Francis was unmanly, and it came through in nearly everything he wrote. That's what made him Canny. He knew just where the line was, and he always made sure his belly was on the side of safety.

Now Greg can say all day long he's not a conservative, but when that's the kind of man and attitude you're subsidizing with your support, you are in functional fact, a conservative.

This must always be kept in mind: there is a world of difference between leading and analyzing. One is jock-sniffing, the other is playing linebacker.

Let's not lie to ourselves. Just as the dumb guys with the swastikas fantasize they are warriors, we smart guys are apt to fantasize we are leaders because we are chock full o' good ideas.

We should know, if we've ever been in business or had any experience in anything, the world is full to its eyeballs of good ideas. What is rare as hell is anybody to execute them.

That's why Rounder is here. A forty-year-old Rounder is worth a dozen Macdonalds and infinite Sam Francises.

Didn't Mao say a revolution is not a dinner party.

We will never be led to freedom by the White Dinner Party.

The nation we seek will not come from temporizers, publishers, analysts, writers and remonstrators and 501c3 intake valves.

Let's just keep that in mind and not kid ourselves. NO ONE credible that I know of offers to leadership to the White race. Greg says my editing grew erratic. Well, Greg, after five years of daily writing more than most columnists write in a week, under difficult circumstances, perhaps I burned out. Perhaps too, Greg, VNN had achieved its most fundamental mission, to set a new tone, and knock WN into a new way of thinking. You say I worked with others who were bad. You have to take chances to make progress, Greg. A bunch of aged Ph.D.s who won't lead have no chance of winning. They just write more books saying the same thing. I would rather take a chance on destroying my reputation and website through alliances with people who in my judgment have some of the elements of victory in their makeup than keep on doing the same old things until I turn into an old clown.

Don't tell me about intellectual leadership, there's no such thing. Our cause is easy to define, and the outcome is easy to measure. What we need, what matters now, is leadership. I don't see anybody willing to offer it. I see endless conservative kibitzers and analysts, make the same old points that have always been made. That doesn't lead anywhere.

Who will offer the white community leadership? Him I do not see, not on the stage, not in the offing.

Yes. Greg knows better. But, he is following Macdonald, who is following Francis. They tell themselves they are cleverly insinuating themselves into the elite, and influencing it. They are not. When I ask Greg to lay out their strategy, nothing but crickets. Who is this mysterious elite you are influencing, Greg? Show me how this works from the White state we seek back to your actions?

All they have is, uh, let's write a bunch more books saying the same thing, uh, maybe we run The Turd for representative, uh, maybe we hold a conference with Pat Buchanan on how those gosh-durn liberals destroyed the fifties. That's what they have.

Above all, let's never form a White advocacy group. That could have implications. Let's never speak to the public, only to private donor groups. Let's never confront the opposition outdoors. Let's never make an HS curriculum so the young have something prepared for them, forming the basis of a new nation. Let's do what we've always done and maybe this time it will bring results.

You are on a roll. Some of the best stuff I have ever read you write. Bravo on every point.