View Single Post
Old July 6th, 2010 #67
J. Holmes
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ray bateson View Post
Semantics.



Any half-assed spearman would break through either sword-form and kill the wielder nine times out of every ten. Let's all carry spears, while we're still tripping through 1600 AD.
There's nothing semantic about it. Advances in lamellar armor were made because it was easy to sever the ties that held the chest piece in place. After a few slashes a man's chest was exposed.

And I'm not sure why you're promoting spears--if you read my last post, you'll see I said swords are impractical. The Japanese didn't usually use swords for war--they used yari(spear) and yumi(bow). The sword was a secondary weapon.

The best thing to do today is carry a knife and learn escrima.