|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
February 19th, 2014 | #1 | |||||
Administrator
|
Coach Strategies: Nick Saban: "Total-Control, Detail-Oriented, Evaluation-to-Graduation system"
If we, as a movement, or as individuals, want to succeed, we need to look at how winners do it, find the right model, and follow it.
From Sports Illustrated (August 2012): Pat Buchanan says rising movement are intolerant. Same with successful people in every sector: they don't tolerate mistakes. They don't leave things to chance. They don't walk around drooling "everything happens for a reason" because they are passive losers who can't figure out why nothing they do ever turns out right. They take responsibility and they insist and ensure that things are done correctly. Those not on the same page are gotten rid of. This creates confidence and buy-ins among the indians, and soon enough success for the program. This example's in football but it could just as well be in business, in politics, or in (anything). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The right process...the right system...the money to make it work...the right people...all of a sudden you might have something. Quote:
Last edited by Alex Linder; February 19th, 2014 at 01:32 AM. |
|||||
February 19th, 2014 | #3 |
Holorep survivor
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The wild frontier
Posts: 4,849
|
With difficulty.
US WN needs to learn the concept of inner and outer circles. Foundations with a publicly acceptable outer circle, and which can accept tax free/tax deductible donations are the start. Within those, one can then channel support to the inner circle, and work on the real cause. Written material is essential, but for mass appeal videos are needed. A video of a few minutes, like a news show, can reach thousands. I read somewhere that 10 % of people read newspapers and magazines and books, which seems accurate. That's why we struggle to reach the masses. Football is well financed, players well paid and government supported, its leaders can do and say as they please, the players have little say, coaches have immense power. US WN is the opposite. American football would become White if it removed the protection its players wear, and they dressed as rugby players do. Once a few blacks had been thrown onto the ground and scraped along the dirt, blacks would run away. For Whites on the other hand, it's a rush of note sliding along the ground grinding your opponent into the dirt and putting the boot in as you do so. The worse it hurts, the more determined you are to stay in the game and hit back. Most WN starts with trade unions, and the men in them love playing sports, the rougher the better. Most European nationalism recruits its core from the soccer ultras, hard core sports fans, particularly at international games, when national feelings run high. It also needs unemployed hooligans as the street fighters, and these are found at soccer events.Most of the young soccer fans are fathers or their sons have fathers in the trade unions, and trades. Poor, hardworking men are the core supporters of nationalism, but they are unable to lead. When they find an intellectual who can work alongside them, then they are unstoppable. Whilst the leadership of the EDL in the UK were fakes, their followers were not. Within months, the message had recruited thousands and thousands. The leaders have now destroyed the EDL, but the message lives on, and spreads. In time, it will find genuine organisers. It will be the same in the US. A focus on the issues and message relevant to Whites in the US today, not other countries decades ago, and WN in the US will take off. The insistence that WN is only true WN if it worships other parties from other countries in other times is a major factor in its irrelevance for most Whites, especially poor ones, who make up the bulk of WN, as they have the most to win from government change. If US WN focused more on mass appeal via sports, and better, more normal music, instead of mostly untalented screaming, and on the issues unemployed Whites face, it would go far. It's mostly an intellectual exercise at present, necessary in the early stages. Unplanned action, without forethought, means nothing. Actions planned within wider strategy make changes happen.
__________________
Secede. Control taxbases/municipalities. Use boycotts, divestment, sanctions, strikes. http://www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/...d-Jan-2015.pdf https://canvasopedia.org/wp-content/...Points-web.pdf Last edited by Hugh; February 19th, 2014 at 04:21 PM. |
February 19th, 2014 | #4 |
Administrator
|
Frank Carroll, ice skater coach
http://deadspin.com/the-coach-who-do...s-i-1525870117 "There's a difference between being a coach and being a teacher," Carroll told me in December. "Teaching involves being able to on-pass knowledge about how to do a skill; how to teach someone to use their body to do a jump, or use their feet to create speed, or how to make a spin go faster. A coach is somebody who can prepare people for competition and give them a philosophy about how to be champions, how to deal with the disappointments and the triumphs, how to budget their time. And a coach teaches them the philosophy of being a competitor." This involves a little roleplaying. From the first day Carroll begins working with a skater, he emphasizes the importance of carrying oneself like a champion. That's how WN should act. "I tell the student to pretend I am a very mean, cranky, nasty judge, and that I want to see them go on the ice and warm up as they would at a competition. Not their jumping, not their spinning, but their stroking and skating," he said, referring to the brief group warm-up sessions skaters are allowed before taking the ice in competition. "I tell them, 'I want you to convince me, by the way you step on the ice and the way you move around, that you're the very best skater in this group.' Then I'll let them loose, and I'll see what their idea of impressing people is." In this world, you get taken as seriously as you take yourself, generally. As has been said, you teach other people how to treat you by what you allow. WN has allowed too much. It has been too tolerant. This is one reason it has not gained respect. It's not the main reason - that would be enemy suppression/attacks, which are continual - see the enemy equating;mixing National Socialism with Satanism and pedophilia in the new popular HBO show "True Detective" - but it is a minor one. Be a serious man, or woman. If white nationalism is something more than entertainment, then what does that imply on one's part? How does it change how one lives and behaves? Last edited by Alex Linder; February 19th, 2014 at 05:57 PM. |
February 19th, 2014 | #5 | |||||||||||
Administrator
|
Not at all. Of course, one needs a vehicle to start. But after that, you need complete control of details through the entire process. Everything thought out. WN remains mired, with one foot in the yee-ha-ism of the Old South, and the other foot stuck tight in the scared-shitless pile of money-mulcting conservatism.
Quote:
Quote:
No video will be truly "mass" unless it goes out over cable tv, unblocked. Which is tantamount to having taken power already. Some youtube videos no matter how popular aren't on that level, although that is one good distribution. Just don't overrate its effect. Quote:
The masses follow the strong lead, they don't need to be persuaded the white cause is right, they already marry white and move white. And mostly even live white. But it's not ideological tot hem, as it is to us. It needs to be made ideological through effective leadership, which it is the business of our enemy to prevent forming, and he has been good at that so far. One of his cleverest strategies is to create imitation white leaders who claim the 'west is committing suicide,' as opposed to be murdered, or that 'whites are doing it to themselves,' rather than having it done to them. Quote:
Quote:
The key is to focus on what-who is preventing our kind from organizing and getting what it wants. Organizing has never been a difficulty for any white people. Therefore, it is some external force preventing us from doing it today. We know what that force is. Pretending it doesn't exist, as many so-called WN do, doesn't make that power go away or reduce the need to confront it head on. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||||||
February 19th, 2014 | #6 |
Administrator
|
"If you see your coach getting emotionally worked up, it just gives his students the opportunity to be the same way," said Mauro Bruni, one of Carroll's former skaters. "He'll never get wrapped up in the emotion. He never raises his voice. He's very businesslike on the ice, and I found that different from other coaches I'd worked with in the past. He's calm, straight to the point. There's no bullshit."
"If my eyes would start to well up because I was having a bad day, he'd say, 'I don't want to see any tears today,'" recalled Fratianne. "I never crossed Frank or pushed back against Frank; if I ever got angry, it was mostly at myself." "I don't want to hear, you're emotionally upset. I don't want to hear, this didn't go right. I don't want whining. I want training," Carroll said. "The only way to have success is through preparation and, yes, I understand you're nervous, but I don't care. Neither do the judges care. No one cares. What they want to see you do is get through this program from the start to the finish very, very well." |
February 19th, 2014 | #8 |
Diversity = White Genocide
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Doom Fort II
Posts: 2,800
|
We need a plan to defend ourselves from enemy action and eventually to attack. Not with guns, with the same kind of weapons the enemy uses on us, media weapons.
Most of what the enemy (Jews and anti-white whites) does depends on public opinion and that is shaped by the media. When a white nationalist needs help or is in trouble he can count on the police, courts, juries, academics, businesses, and the man on the street to be biased against him. That bias is constantly reinforced by the controlled media. To fight back white nationalists need to produce their own media and begin shaping public opinion. This is a long term plan, though maybe not as long term as we'd expect. The Jews were fighting an uphill battle turning whites against themselves. Our message is much easier to sell if we can reach whites with it. To accomplish this whites have to control their own media from production to distribution. Behind the scenes we need writers, camera men, directors, lighting and sound technicians. In front of the cameras we need spokesmen and spokeswomen, pundits and experts, comedians, talk show hosts and eventually actors and actresses for pro-white scripted programming. Way behind the scenes we need administrators and programmers to keep the video and audio streaming servers online. The Fox Network programs just nineteen hours a week. They have distribution that we never will (until we win) with broadcast stations in every big market. But our media can reach most whites in the US with internet streaming. Nineteen hours of programming every week can be achieved by starting with one day and expanding over time. That's how Fox did it. Applying Saban's ideas to this recruiting the right people and holding them to high standards is the key. Everyone involved above an intern must be a loyal, honest, intelligent, hard working white man or woman. And even interns have to behave themselves. Quality television (in the technical sense) doesn't happen by chance. Influential programming requires even more planning and craftsmanship. This doesn't require the army of people employed in Hollywood film production or big four network news broadcast, but it does require the essential technical personnel and propaganda writers to know what they're doing. One element of quality television is the man or woman in front of the camera. Are they well dressed? Are they the correct type of person for their intended role? Are they playing the part of a Jay Leno, Dan Rather, Rush Limbaugh or Angelina Jolie? Are they dressed appropriately for that role? You can be sure that when you watch a network newscast, talk show or news magazine program all of these things have been carefully considered, and if they've been overlooked (in the case of elderly, unattractive Jewish reporters who won't retire, yes, 60 Minutes, I'm looking at you) the production people are well aware of the problem. Another element of quality television is basic, sound and vision. Is the sound clear? Is there background noise? Is it mixed so you can easily hear and understand everyone? Is the image in focus? Are camera movements fluid? Is the editing smooth, always showing what needs to be seen and hiding what needs to be hidden? Are flesh tones natural? Does the set's color scheme clash with the performers wardrobe? Does some of this seem petty, like something a real he-man shouldn't concern himself with? The Jews don't think so. They were meticulous in crafting the media weapons that have brought us to the brink of extinction. Pay attention to how they did it. Thanks to the media equivalent of Moore's Law now we can do it too. |
February 21st, 2014 | #9 | |||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
The best we can do for now is use the internet. This is what Golden Dawn does in Greece. It's good enough to get them 20% of the vote, by some polls. They complain daily, though, about extreme hatred toward and bias against their party in the medai. Even when they're an established, successful party with at least ten percent of the nation behind them, they are either treated unfairly in or frozen out of the televised media. Quote:
It's fine to say we should control distribution, but that's only possible on the internet. There's not even any conceivable way to get into cable tv, and that's where the big numbers are. Quote:
The circumstances in my view dictate that a ju-jitsu approach is best. We use the opponent's weight against him. He has his agenda, but we can take his stories - the stuff most people are talking about, because it's what they see - and give them our spin. And then add side dishes that are purely our own stuff. What's effective with smart, driven people is the jew Jon Stewart approach at COMEDY Central - mocking. White nationalists are perfectly position to do that, given what the mainstream controlled media are hiding. But do we have the talent and the perseverance, let alone the funding? Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
February 21st, 2014 | #10 | ||||||
Diversity = White Genocide
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Doom Fort II
Posts: 2,800
|
Quote:
Quote:
But that would take serious financial backing, you'd have to offer full time employment and pay the going rate, adjusted for the regional cost of living. You'd have to keep some alternate candidates for all the key positions waiting in the wings (maybe employing them in a lesser capacity) for the inevitable walkouts when the Jews went after the technical staff. Ideally you'd have white nationalists in every technical position, but even they might capitulate under pressure. Quote:
Quote:
You're right, a white nationalist comedy/commentary show along the lines of Jon Stewart's is exactly what we need. Much better than white nationalist weather reports. If the right host can be found. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
February 27th, 2014 | #11 | ||||||||||
Holorep survivor
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The wild frontier
Posts: 4,849
|
Quote:
The Jews shabbos goy frontmen running the US politically and its corporations since WW 2 have been WW 2 and Vietnam vets, who have to justify WW 2 and Vietnam, Serbia etc by opposing nationalism, but their days in power are almost over as they are at retirement age. Also, the USSR and Eastern Europe, as well as their many client states, had immense resources to pour into the US and Western Europe to back up the Jews, that's gone. Quote:
It also needs resources. My point is don't try to create foundations identifiable for such purposes. Call them foundations for sports development, health, civil rights, better governance, anti-abortion, better city services, workers rights, create many, with single purposes, that don't ripple the surface, and that the public will buy into, and use them for such purposes, which benefit Whites. The inner agenda is that they provide offices, furniture, computers, and resources and salaries etc. that can then or later be used for other purposes as well. That's what most NGO's do, and how political parties run locally, people use their work and NGO and own resources most of the time. The 80/20 rule always applies. The 80 percent that accomplishes 20 percent of the real goal is what the public sees The 20 percent that accomplishes 80 percent of the real goal, is unseen. Many NGO's and parties and governments fail because their members are incompetent, and incompetence and inexperience in running groups and activities is a major reason WN fails as well. Quote:
Start simple, like Pierce did, with a monthly/weekly article, then develop that later into videos as is being done with Pierces work on Youtube. The former National Alliance members have had no leadership or direction. They are all there, waiting and wishing someone would take the lead. You can provide that. Quote:
Quote:
Look to the US founding fathers, and the federalist papers, who took on the greatest empire in history, broke free and then created the freest, most developed, richest and most powerful empire ever. They had committees of correspondence, we have websites, blogs, youtube etc. A government falls when the police will not back it, as we saw across the USSR, and have just seen in Ukraine. The military are irrelevant politically inside a country. Its always the police and intelligence agencies who keep the government in place. Armies can put their own into power, but can only keep them there by becoming the police. The intelligence capabilities and kill ratios of police and their paramilitary groups dwarf those of the military. Look to the founders of the state you live in. Who even knows the names of the founders of the various states? The US states are each countries, held together in an empire. Power starts with paradigms and perceptions. When the paradigm that the US is a single country is broken, and people realise they already live in dozens of countries held inside an empire, and that they don't need to bear the cost of the failed countries in the US, then things will change. When the WN movement begins to refer to and think of the states as countries, that paradigm will begin to take hold. Maybe we should start the trend here. Countries I've lived in have withstood military style attacks for decades unharmed, but fallen within months or a couple years when the attacks turned to focus on their economy. The USSR fell as Russia ran out of money to maintain internal control, and its member states realised that by just not paying their contributions to Russia, they could bring it all down, and keep their money for themselves. The federales are the same. As more US countries collapse due to non-Whites and Jews, the federales have to take more and more money from solvent countries to give to them. As solvent countries see themselves going bankrupt to finance failed countries like California , they will resent it. People only rise when they are hungry and have no money, then like cattle they mill around making noise and breaking things till someone leads them, then they all stampede together over all obstacles. Quote:
The English have not ruled England for over a 1000 years. First conquered and ruled by Viking descended Normans since 1066, then ruled by Dutch and German kings, Queen Elizabeth is a descendant of William the Conqueror, to this day. For over a 1000 years, the English have been virtual slaves, robbed by kings and aristocracies, forced into their mines and factories, massacred when trying to break free, transported to Australia and other colonies as slaves in chains, pressganged into the navies, forced into the fyrd and then armies under pain of death. Most European violence is pent up frustration from the sheer misery of life in Europe under its rulers. Why do you think so many left for the colonies, preferring to start life over with nothing in often barbarous lands, just to get away? Europe's wars have been fought by European dynasties, not countries or peoples. Europe's countries were created out of their lands, and those of their supporters in the various aristocracies, forcing together hundreds of small nations into the "countries" we see today. The people had no say. Both world wars against Germany were declared and fought by the German monarchs who rule Britain to this day. Their House is centred in Germany to this day at Coburg. http://www.sachsen-coburg-gotha.de/en/ German monarchs of Britain created and ruled the greatest Empire on earth for 300 years, and were the driving force behind founding the US colonies in the first place. The US backed by France fought its war of Independence and of 1812 against the German King George III of Britain who could barely speak English, and who was in a global war with 5 European countries at the time. Britain made more money from it's sugar plantations in the Caribbean than all of the US, that's why it sent such a small force, compared to the immense forces it sent to fight the other European countries. Hitler could not grasp the British empire was the greatest German ruled Empire in history. When Wilhelm of Prussia then Hitler confiscated those monarchs own personal lands, and attacked their cousins who ruled various European countries, then Britain's German monarchs declared war on Prussia and NS Germany. George V who waged WW 1 and George VI who waged WW 2, s is Queen Elizabeth, are of the house of Saxe Coburg Gotha. George V was married to Mary of Teck, neither appreciated their lands being taken by upstart Prussian kinglets, nor their cousins kingdom in Belgium being attacked. Hitler confiscated the lands of George VI in Germany, and allied with the USSR, who had killed the Tsarina of Russia, George's first cousin. George V, Kaiser Wilhelm 2 and Tsarina Alexandra were first cousins, and related to the kings of Denmark, Greece, Norway, Romania, Spain. Wilhelm and Hitler appeared to think Britain's monarch's would sit back and do nothing as their lands were confiscated, and family attacked. Quote:
They had absolute power in the USSR and Eastern Europe. No longer. The Jews could use the US military to crush any other power on earth. No longer. Empires only last as long as they expand and can destroy their enemies, and provide plunder for their troops. When they can't, those troops turn on them and rip them apart, their enemies pour in looking for vengeance. Prince Phillip is actually Phillipos, prince of Greece and Denmark, born on Corfu. His uncle was King Constantine of Greece. Phillip and his family were expelled from Greece when the King was overthrown. Maybe he wants Greece back. US politics is conducted with flags and bands and armies on the battlefield. British politics is conducted with bribes, down at the Club. There is a big difference today. Europe's monarchs and aristocracy whilst the remainder are immensely wealthy and powerful, mostly died out in WW1, the balance in and after WW 2.The USSR no longer exists, the British empire is shrunken and weak, the US is no longer a superpower except militarily, but even there it has gone bankrupt. There are no superpowers left capable of projecting their power across the world sustainably, there is an immense gap and vaccuum in the world's power structures. I expect the US to follow a similar route to the USSR and Eastern Europe, mostly just fall apart, with some horrific violence and mini wars in the majority non-white areas and bordering states, but mostly peaceful. Also, with modern technology and science the various countries in the US are self sufficient in most areas in need. Quote:
Streams are created out of little raindrops, post by post, action by action In Ukraine, we've just seen the police turn their backs on the government, and just by their going home, as in the USSR, the government of the day fled. The key is to build an opposition a broad front, as many different groups as possible, and then a small core, a culture stratum or thin layer as Yockey spoke of. Quote:
Whilst the leadership of the EDL in the UK were fakes, The leaders have now destroyed the EDL What I've said about the EDL since 2010 on the UK forum, which applies just as well to other groups. Quote:
__________________
Secede. Control taxbases/municipalities. Use boycotts, divestment, sanctions, strikes. http://www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/...d-Jan-2015.pdf https://canvasopedia.org/wp-content/...Points-web.pdf Last edited by Hugh; February 27th, 2014 at 05:23 PM. |
||||||||||
April 11th, 2014 | #12 |
Administrator
|
Jose Mourinho
But even his defensive ideology isn't the crux of Mourinho's belief system. The only thing Mourinho believes in is winning. That sounds obvious, but it's really not. For him, defense is the best way to ensure results. If you don't concede a goal, you're always one score away from victory. It's the distinction Johan Cruyff picked up on when he bashed Mourinho in an interview ahead of this Champions League second leg: [Mourinho] lost the dressing room at Real Madrid and it's possible the same thing is going to happen at Chelsea. The problem is simply that Mourinho always focuses squarely on the result. Everything else is secondary, even all the top players he has running around for him. That's the fundamental tension in Mourinho's career: Is he so exalted because he really knows how to win, or does he win because he's gone to places with the best players? And can his style last when, come credit-divvying time, he will usually praise his own genius instead of those world-class players? Since you can't easily point to one aspect of Mourinho teams that make them inimitably his—besides their propensity to win, which borders on tautology—he is uniquely susceptible to these criticisms. Even when Guardiola's teams lost, that they always went down tiki-taka-or-bust, an almost noble sacrifice to the manager's chosen religion. When the same United team that coasted to the title last season under Ferguson struggles so mightily the year he retires, we imagine all kinds of magic tricks the Scottish wizard must have been using to hide the limits of his squad. When Mourinho loses, you start to wonder whether there actually is anything deeper to the man than results. But right before that criticism really starts to hit home with Mourinho, he turns around and starts winning again. After a successful-to-everyone-but-the-insatiable-Roman-Abramovich run with Chelsea the first go-round, doubts crept up as to whether his shock Champions League win with Porto really was a fluke. In response, Mourinho moved to Inter and reeled off Serie A's first treble, winning the league, the Italian Cup, and the Champions League. At Madrid, when it looked like Mourinho would never overcome the Best, Most Beautifulest Soccer Team Of All Time, he won La Liga with the highest-ever point total. When Chelsea started this season shakily, and Mourinho made it clear to everyone that he didn't rate their two-time player of the year Juan Mata, the whispers about his management began anew. Then Chelsea took advantage of a couple Man City and Arsenal slip-ups to sit atop the league for much of the latter half of the season, bolstering his credentials almost as soon as they were questioned. http://deadspin.com/typical-jose-che...ght-1561256468 |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|