Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 19th, 2015 #41
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,683
varg
jewsign

Jewess Says That Anti-Abortion Speech Should Be Outlawed in Australia as "Hate Speech"

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=260034
 
Old May 19th, 2015 #42
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
jewsign Jews Continue Pressure for Internet Censorship

Quote:
Back in March TOO came under sustained cyber-attack from the enemies of our people.

This vital resource for truth was brought to a stand-still by a large number of bogus service requests, with Kevin MacDonald noting that one IP address in Israel “attempted to access the site 13,125 times within the span of three days.” Our mission of enlightenment and liberation is deeply loathed by those intent on bringing our race to its knees.

*The Occidental Observer is a truly unique site, and we can be sure that the commentary and research it continues to present is giving our enemies sleepless nights. I’m certain that TOO, and other sites sharing our goals and worldview, have a special place in the hateful hearts of the alien elite. They won’t stop until they have found a way to silence us. But cyber-attack is just one prong in this assault on truth and our right to self-determination. Another major frontline in the assault on our mission is the international legislative effort to permanently shut us down.

A few days ago the fifth biennial meeting of the Global Forum for Combating Anti-Semitism convened in Israel. Run by the Israeli government, mainly its many-tentacled Foreign Ministry, the Global Forum makes a priority of fighting ‘cyber hate.’

A few days ago it issued statements recommending steps for international governments and major websites to radically restrict material critical of Jews and Israel. The Forum has also very cleverly presented the issue of restricting internet freedom as a moral imperative — our enemies are obviously playing to our weakness. A statement issued by the Forum on Thursday night read:

Given the pervasive, expansive and transnational nature of the internet and the viral nature of hate materials, counter-speech alone is not a sufficient response to cyber hate. The right to free expression does not require or obligate the internet industry to disseminate hate materials. They too are moral actors, free to pursue internet commerce in line with ethics, social responsibility, and a mutually agreed code of conduct.



The Forum should be seen as an exercise in the spread and influence of international Jewish power and activism.

The number of representatives alone from various organizations totalled just over one thousand.

That number also includes a number of non-Jewish representatives and delegates from governments under Jewish influence. The latest convention of the Forum, the largest of its kind in the world, included the Justice Ministers of Germany and Romania, the Education Minister of Bulgaria, the Mayor of Paris, and the Minister of State for Multiculturalism from Canada. More predictably, leaders from many of our most prominent opposition groups were in attendance, including the Anti-Defamation League; Simon Wiesenthal Center; American Jewish Committee; Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations; Conseil Représentatif des Institutions Juives de France; the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance; B’nai B’rith; World Jewish Congress; and the Institute for the Study of Global Anti-Semitism and Policy.

The ‘recommendations’ of the Forum include a demand to adopt “a clear industry standard for defining hate speech and anti-Semitism.” This, of course, would be a definition of ‘hate speech’ and ‘anti-Semitism’ that would serve Jewish interests most effectively. This definition would be sufficiently wide-ranging that it would preclude, under threat of severe punishment, any criticism of Jews or Israel. This effort cannot be seen as isolated but as part of a conscious broader, global strategy. In January I wrote in The Noose Tightens on Europe that:

The Guardian reports that European Jewish leaders, backed by a host of former EU heads of state and government, are preparing to call for pan-European legislation outlawing ‘anti-Semitism.’A panel of four prestigious international experts on constitutional law backed by the Orwellian European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR) have spent the last three years drafting a 12-page document on “tolerance”. In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo shootings, and in line with a renewed and intense Jewish drive for complete invulnerability, they are lobbying to have it converted into law in the 28 countries of the EU.

Efforts to enact legislation or enforce government policies that eliminate criticism of Jews and Israel are just another means to procure the immunity and special privileged status of Jews in our societies. To that end, the ‘cyber-hate’ activism is no different from more explicit efforts to criminalize anti-Semitism.
Andrew Joyce
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...ip/#more-27925
 
Old May 25th, 2015 #43
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
Default Australia: Jews rage over books exposing their retarded holocaust hoax

Quote:
AMAZON has come under fire for offering books on Holocaust denial to the public and could be in breach of the Racial Discrimination Act.
The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) has slammed Amazon for offering titles such as Did Six Million Really Die?, The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?, The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews and The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry.

All these titles are available from the online provider through a simple Google search that takes readers to the Amazon site.
ADC chair Dr Dvir Abramovich told The AJN this week that Amazon Australia could be in breach of Section 18C of the federal Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits material likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the basis race or ethnicity.

He said Amazon Australia “should not be a hothouse and a cesspool of racism, xenophobia and bigotry and should not act as a gateway for young people to enter a world of hatred”.

“It is inexcusable for Amazon Australia to serve as a vehicle and a platform for bigots to disseminate and propagate their toxic and harmful invective. Literature that promotes and incites hatred against the Jewish people by demonising and defaming them, that denies and trivialises the Holocaust, and which foments racial violence, should not be normalised and mainstreamed,” he stated.
http://www.jewishnews.net.au/fury-ov...al-books/41998







Quote:
Look at this insanity written by this Jew from the Australian Jewish News. He and other Jews are apparently upset that Amazon is selling Australians books that expose their stupid Holocaust hoax. They are crying that the sale of these books violates absurd hate laws that were implemented in the country by Jews and traitors.

Please note that once again we don’t see any logical arguments from these rat faced pig demons as to why the authors of these books are wrong. Instead they provide emotionally charged arguments about “racism”, “xenophobia” and “hurt feelings.”

They even go so far as to claim that debating historical facts somehow represents extreme hatred of Jewish people.

Hey kikes if you can provide evidence that 60 trillion Jews were gassed in shower rooms I would like you to present said evidence. Until that time comes, stop crying like a bunch of little pussy bitches. We are sick of you and your constant victimization crap. The Jews are such weak and feminine creatures who deserve nothing but our disdain.
AMAZON has come under fire for offering books on Holocaust denial to the public and could be in breach of the Racial Discrimination Act.
The B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) has slammed Amazon for offering titles such as Did Six Million Really Die?, The Six Million: Fact or Fiction?, The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews and The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry.

All these titles are available from the online provider through a simple Google search that takes readers to the Amazon site.
ADC chair Dr Dvir Abramovich told The AJN this week that Amazon Australia could be in breach of Section 18C of the federal Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits material likely to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” on the basis race or ethnicity.

He said Amazon Australia “should not be a hothouse and a cesspool of racism, xenophobia and bigotry and should not act as a gateway for young people to enter a world of hatred”.

“It is inexcusable for Amazon Australia to serve as a vehicle and a platform for bigots to disseminate and propagate their toxic and harmful invective. Literature that promotes and incites hatred against the Jewish people by demonising and defaming them, that denies and trivialises the Holocaust, and which foments racial violence, should not be normalised and mainstreamed,” he stated.
 
Old May 27th, 2015 #44
SlavicSerb
Junior Member
 
SlavicSerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 7
SlavicSerb
Default

I have noticed the same you are talking about
 
Old May 27th, 2015 #45
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
Default

The Jewish version of “freedom of speech" – ADL letter, 1933

http://www.jrbooksonline.com/images/...orship_50p.jpg
 
Old September 23rd, 2015 #46
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
jewsign Ex-Stasi Jewish Activist Tasked with Eradicating “Xenophobia” on Facebook in Germany

Quote:
According to Vice Chancellor Sigmar approximately 1 million migrants will arrive in Germany this year alone and Chancellor Merkel says there is no limit to how many they will take in.

Politically incorrect Germans who voice their skepticism can look forward to censorship – at least on Facebook.

Minister of Justice, Heiko Maas, has had quite enough of the uppity Germans who have the gall to criticize the ongoing population replacement so last week he sent an open letter to Facebook demanding that the social-media company commence systematically erasing “xenophobic” material.

On Monday Facebook sent a delegation to meet with the Minister who has set forth a plan – namely that a special task force scour Facebook and delete comments deemed inappropriate by the State.

“The goal is to ease identification of criminal statements”

– says Heiko Maas to Bild.

The task force’s members are appointed by the government and Facebook, but the the left-wing organization Network against Nazis (“Netz gegen Nazis”) will also be represented.

The network was founded in the year 2007 by the Antonio Amadeu Trust, led by the Jewish-German left-wing activist Anette Kahane who, during the years 1974-82, worked as a secret agent for the East German Security Service known as Stasi.

Today Anette Kahane works as a professional anti-racist and last year proclaimed in an interview with RT that European countries must open their borders and adapt completely to immigrants from the third world.
http://renegadetribune.com/ex-stasi-...ok-in-germany/
 
Old October 11th, 2015 #47
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,377
Crowe
jewsign Ohio to pass legislation to punish entities who boycott Israel.

Quote:

Ohio’s House of Representative is expected to pass legislation opposing boycotts of Israel in the coming weeks, Ohio Speaker of the House Cliff Rosenberger (R) announced after MK Hilik Bar (Zionist Union) addressed the House Thursday.

“Ohio will fight BDS and boycotts against Israel,” Bar said. “They’ve already started working on the bill, and will pass it very soon. It was a great gift to hear about it on my visit.”

The legislation is expected to be similar to South Carolina’s anti-BDS law which prevents the state from doing business with companies or individuals engaged in the “boycott of a person or entity based in or doing business with a jurisdiction with whom South Carolina can enjoy open trade.” The law is based on the premise that the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement discriminates against Israel and weakens the state’s economy.

The Speaker’s announcement came after Bar became the first foreign parliamentarian to address the Ohio State Senate, at the invitation of Ohio Senate President Keith Faber (R), and the House of Representatives, an event initiated by Rosenberger.

Bar spoke of the many threats Israel faces these days, in an unstable Middle East.

“The restoration of Jewish statehood after two thousand years in exile is a historic miracle,” he said. “We had to fight six wars in seven decades. We did not lose one; we can’t afford to lose. We had to defend ourselves.”

“From a dispersed people, we became a united democracy. Not one day of war ever interrupted a day of democracy – not even one,” he added.

Bar talked about growing up in Safed, where there were constant threats from terrorists in Lebanon, and of having grandparents who survived the Holocaust, and said that these two things made him committed to “fighting for the safe existence of our people in their rightful historic homeland…[and] to ensure that the Jewish people in the State of Israel will always be able to defend themselves, but it also shaped my never-ending desire for peace.”

Still, he said, seeking peace is difficult and complex with all the changes in the Middle East, and with the Arab Spring and ISIS, Israel is facing many new challenges.

“Israel's strong deterrence has afforded – in the past – relative quiet on its borders, and an advantage against its potential enemies,” he explained. “This deterrence seems to be narrowing today, I then face of the fall of regimes in our bordering states, and a possible nuclear Iran.”

Bar discussed instability in Egypt, which has left a power vacuum in Sinai allowing terrorist activity and attacks on the Egyptian Army as close as 20 miles from Israel, and the civil war in Syria, where ISIS controls almost a third of the territory, including parts that are close to the border with Israel.

“And to top it all off, there is Iran,” he continued. “Peace in the Middle East is a dream for most of its people, but it is a nightmare for the Ayatollahs in Iran. Iran has an evil, cruel, morally corrupt regime.”

Bar pointe

----- snip -----


read full article at source: http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Ohio-t...BDS-law-422594
Boycotting is free speech, and a fair and reasonable display of protesting. Yet the jewish run government insists on passing legislation to punish those who refuse to tow the line.
 
Old November 8th, 2015 #48
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,495
Serbian
Default

__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
 
Old March 14th, 2016 #49
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,344
Robbie Key
Default

ADL Working With Leading Internet Giants, Top Social Media Outlets To Combat “Hate Speech”

March 13, 2016 Realist Report 6 comments

The Anti-Defamation League, easily the most subversive, anti-American organization masquerading as a “civil rights” group operating on U.S. soil today, has a long history of combating “anti-Semitism” and “hate speech,” which in reality amounts to speech critical of Jews and their tyrannical, anti-White agenda. In short, the ADL (and the organized Jewish community generally) works tirelessly to shut down any sort of criticism or exposure of their subversive, destructive activities. Telling the truth about the Jews and making basic, factual statements about their agenda is fundamentally “anti-Semitic.”

As we’ve previously reported, the ADL has partnered with Twitter, the social media giant, and other leading Internet companies in an effort to shut down speech they view as harmful to Jewish interests. The Israeli Foreign Ministry has even boldly demanded that governments around the world regulate social media platforms in an effort to combat and ultimately ban “anti-Semitism” and “incitement of violence,” which we also reported on here at The Realist Report.

As I noted at the time:

Quote:
The organized Jewish community is literally demanding national governments around the world and private social media and web hosting companies cater to their feelings and tyrannical, anti-free speech agenda. Anyone criticizing or exposing Jews must be shut down.

In a nutshell, the Jews are openly and brazenly attempting to destroy the revolutionary nature of the Internet, which allows people like me (and many, many others) to compete with, expose, debunk, and offer alternatives to the Jewish monopoly on information, mass media, and historical perspective. Think about that.
To further underscore and document the organized Jewish community’s desire to regulate the Internet and prevent legitimate and factual criticisms of their subversive agenda from reaching the masses, we have this report published by Access ADL, the official blog of the Jewish supremacist organization, describing the ADL’s participation in the Online Harassment Summit at the South by Southwest festival in Austin, Texas which is currently taking place:

Quote:
On March 12, the Anti-Defamation League will play a key role at the first South by South*west (SXSW) Online Harass*ment Sum*mit. In a series of pan*els at this day-long event, the Sum*mit will focus atten*tion on var*i*ous man*i*fes*ta*tions of hate online, includ*ing every*thing from cyber*bul*ly*ing to the sale of offen*sive mer*chan*dise to hate speech on social media to online extrem*ist recruit*ment and pro*pa*ganda. The over*ar*ch*ing goal will be to iden*tify the most effec*tive strate*gies to counter all of these forms of cyberhate.

ADL rep*re*sen*ta*tives at the Sum*mit will all focus on the Anti-Defamation League’s rec*om*mended approach to respond to hate online. That approach, sim*ply stated, is that all of us – those in the indus*try who cre*ate the plat*forms and the tools, and those of us who use them – have a shared respon*si*bil*ity to pre*vent hate online when*ever pos*si*ble and to respond effec*tively when we encounter it.

There are two key com*po*nents to this approach: indus*try best prac*tices and effec*tive coun*ter*speech. ADL’s experts will empha*size these two com*po*nents on five sep*a*rate pan*els at SXSW:
  • Indus*try Inno*va*tion and Social Respon*si*bil*ity – fea*tur*ing ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt;
  • How Far Should We Go to Pro*tect Hate Speech Online? – fea*tur*ing ADL Senior Vice Pres*i*dent for Pol*icy and Pro*grams Deb*o*rah Lauter;
  • Respond and Pro*tect; Expert Advice Against Online Hate – fea*tur*ing ADL Assis*tant Direc*tor for Cyber*hate Response Jonathan Vick;
  • Pro*fil*ing a Troll: Who They Are and Why They Do It – fea*tur*ing the Direc*tor of ADL’s Cen*ter on Extrem*ism Oren Segal; and
  • Tech and the United Front Against Online Hate – featuring ADL Deputy Director of Policy and Programs Steven Freeman. […]

To address the industry’s responsibility, ADL has published a set of Best Practices intended to serve as a guide*post. In a nutshell, these Best Practices call for platforms to ensure that their relevant guidelines on hateful content are clear, that mechanisms to flag such con*tent are user-friendly, that they will review and respond promptly to flagged con*tent, and that they con*tinue efforts to develop new technological tools that could help them iden*tify a greater per*cent*age of the prob*lem*atic con*tent by themselves.

To address the respon*sibil*ity of users, work*ing together with the indus*try, ADL has recom*mended that var*i*ous coun*ter*speech initiatives be given the high*est pri*or*ity. These include, but are not lim*ited to, edu*ca*tional pro*grams, iden*ti*fy*ing and encour*ag*ing promi*nent voices to speak out, and cre*at*ing start-ups and new ven*tures designed to assist vic*tims in reclaim*ing a safe space online.

In advance of the Sum*mit, ADL is pleased that ask.fm, Qui*zlet and Whis*per have agreed to join such major play*ers as Face*book, Google, Microsoft, Twit*ter, Yahoo and YouTube in endors*ing the Best Prac*tices. We will be ask*ing oth*ers to fol*low their lead, at SXSW and after*wards. Those who part*ner with us will send a mes*sage that it is pos*si*ble to con*front cyber*hate effec*tively, pro*tect*ing the free flow of ideas that lies at the core of the Inter*net while at the same time ensur*ing that every*one can freely par*tic*i*pate in this unique forum with*out fear and with*out risk*ing their per*sonal safety or well-being.
You have to tip your hat to the organized Jewish community – they work hard at what they do, and they almost always get their way.

Notice how the ADL frames this issue – combating “online hate” – in moralistic terms, as if what they are doing is beneficial and indeed necessary for everyone’s safety and well-being. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth, as the ADL is primarily concerned with advancing Jewish interests and shutting down any form of opposition to their Marxist, anti-White agenda.

In a sane world, this subversive organization would be shut down immediately, especially given the fact that the ADL blatantly violated their 501c3 status recently by attacking Donald Trump and interfering in the U.S. political process.

http://therealistreport.com/adl-work...t-hate-speech/
 
Old June 2nd, 2016 #50
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,344
Robbie Key
Default

WORLD JEWRY’S CRACKDOWN: SOCIAL MEDIA ORDERED TO CENSOR ALL DISSENT

JUNE 1, 2016 THE SOCIAL NATIONALIST LEAVE A COMMENT

Many on the Alt-Right believe their “memes” are enough to change the discourse. To an extent, they are correct in that the intelligent use of social media has been instrumental in the growth and empowerment of the national dissident movement. The huge bind spot in the thesis of the people who dismiss traditional political organizing for internet activism shows one thing: all of the platforms we use to disseminate are message are run by Jews, or answer to them. Once your free speech starts to make difference, it will be taken away…and then what?

I have been closely monitoring the transition of Jewish propaganda power from increasingly irrelevant traditional media to social media. In the last five years or so, the situation has become alarming, and the right to free expression on these public goods (regardless of what libertarians argue) has its days numbered–whatever last remnants of free speech exist on these platforms is solely due to the logistical problems of policing different views.

The Zionist monopoly of Google (Larry Page, Sergey Brin) , whose subsidiaries have no tolerance for different political or historical views, as well as CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg’s Facebook , are two of the worst offenders. Reddit and Twitter, the only two Gentile run social media networks of note, continue to be the freest, but at least in the case of Reddit, major investment from Jewish co-owned financial firms like Andreesen-Horowitz coincided with attempts to crackdown on Semitically Incorrect sub-Reddits that thankfully sparked outcry and resistance from the community. Twitter, which has also gone public, has similarly become increasingly hostile to criticisms of Jews. As Jews pour and more money into buying up or becoming shareholders in the biggest social media entities, free expression for anyone outside of political minorities using force to impose themselves on the majority will decline just as quickly.

European Jewry Makes Its Move

A coalition of Jewish and homosexual activist organization led by France’s “Union of Jewish Students” NGO has succeeded in litigating for highly restrictive new speech regulations on Twitter, Facebook, Microsoft and Google affiliates, etc in order to operate in the European Union. These corporations of course claim they simply have to follow the law of the nations in which they operate (including censoring criticism of Erdogan in Turkey), though curiously enough don’t do so in Iran .

The new EU rules will call on social media platforms to be able to shut down satire (such as Dieudonne’s comedy), silence discourse about the Second World War, eliminate meaningful criticism of Israel, and put an end to complaints of Europeans being raped or beaten by immigrants in the historically unprecedented “refugee crisis” that have undermined the mass media’s propaganda narrative. Most of these things are already banned by Facebook and YouTube (including in the United States, where it is legal), but because of the scope and volume of content uploaded, the European Union will be demanding a task force–almost certainly composed of tyrannical Jews–in order to censor speech Jews find threatening to their political power in under 24 hours, in fear that someone might see it. Of course the stated motive is to “combat terrorism” so as to get it under the radar, but reading the details of the lawsuit and the examples the Jewish plaintiffs have given, we see what the real intention is.

So post your final Pepe’s and pretend Sweden’s 68 IQ Somalis are on the brink of imposing Sharia law, because if you think things are bad now, wait for Judah to fully transition from orthodox press to social media. It is Talmudic law, and no other kind, that you need to fear, and the only way to combat it is by marching in the streets and pressuring the system to respect our civil liberties–or else.

But hey, if you still think the “internet struggle” and “dank memes” should be the ends rather than the means, they will happily trot out Glenn Beck to speak on your, and all “right-wingers”, behalf.

Choose wisely.

https://thesocialnationalist.wordpre...r-all-dissent/
 
Old June 2nd, 2016 #51
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,964
notmenomore
Default

...so what will they do with Linder?
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old June 3rd, 2016 #52
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,344
Robbie Key
Default

Dreams of Control: Israel, Global Censorship, and the Internet

By Dr. Binoy Kampmark
Global Research, June 02, 2016
Region: Middle East & North Africa

“Under the cover of darkness, there is no limit to the expansion of Big Brother.”

Ilan Gilon, Meretz Party (Israel), Times of Israel, Feb 4, 2016


While Israel’s central justification for its often reactionary policies is couched in hyper-exceptionalist rhetoric, current interest in censoring the Internet is far from exceptional.

Like a machine of justification against its critics and its enemies, Israel enlists various projects under the banner of the remarkable and precious, when it is simply accomplishing what other states have done before or since: the banal and ordinary. All states want to limit expression, control criticism and marginalise the sceptics. Some do it more savagely, and roughly, than others.

Israel’s military censor, Col. Ariella Ben Avraham, who is part of the IDF’s Directorate of Military Intelligence, gave a good example of this in February by insisting that social media activists and bloggers submit material relevant to security matters for approval prior to posting.[1] The move also revealed an increasing interest to police the digital realm, previously considered an anarchic jungle incapable of effective policing.

Up to 32 Israeli bloggers and social media activists were informed about the directive, one of the first being Yossi Gurvitz, a left-wing activist running the “Friends of George” Facebook page. In rather unceremonious fashion, he was informed via Ben Avraham’s private Facebook account that he was obligated to run future submissions by her office. To his credit, he promises to defy the order.

Internal censorship is but one aspect of this policy. Israel Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan has dipped into the discourse of censorship to convince others that limiting various social media platforms on a global scale is the way to go. In January, he revealed the inner ambition of Israel’s security establishment to internationalise the censorship effort.

To achieve that goal, Erdan speaks of an “international coalition” that would make limiting criticism of Israel its primary objective. The central aim is hardly imaginative: making such providers as YouTube, Twitter and Facebook face up to responsibility as to what they host on their sites.

The Erdan plan suggests that various countries would form a “loose coalition that would keep an eye on content and where it is being posted, and members of the coalition would work to demand that the platforms remove the content that was posted in any of their countries at the request of members.” The simple idea behind this collusion is extra-territorial cooperation, effectively circumventing the global nature of such platforms.

As for the scurrilous subject matter itself, the issues are universal fare for states keen to control matters that supposedly stimulate the darker side of human nature. (Read: contrary to state interests.) Erdan’s office gives the example of material from a Palestinian (of course) disclosing the best locations on the body to inflict fatal stab wounds.

This begs that grand question about how far such an effort goes: control the more sordidly violent sides of the Old Testament because it encourages various unsavoury practices? Limit suggestive literature being discussed in the whirl of social media, buzzing away with malicious promise? The mind is an untidy place filled with remarkable things, and not all of them necessarily make it to actual perpetration. This is a point that continues to elude the mighty warriors of the security state.

Another justification is being thrown in: they, the social media giants, rake in the proceeds, and should therefore man the barricades. “We are planning to put a stop to this irresponsibility,” claimed Erdan’s office, “and we are going to do it as part of an international coalition that has had enough of this behaviour as well.”

Other governments have also done their bit to limit the internet and content available to their citizens. Most famously, Beijing runs its own “Great Firewall of China”, overseen by the Ministry of Information Industry (MII), while the State Council Information Office and the Chinese Communist Party’s Propaganda Department examine content.

In recent times, countries of a supposedly democratic character have taken to the blinds and endeavoured to do what Erdan dreams about. Dangerous thoughts are seen as the reason for dangerous actions. To that end, the country that gave Europe the Enlightenment has been busy forging its own vision of global internet censorship, using a mixture of security and privacy concerns.

The latter has proven to have potentially pernicious consequences, framed largely as an effort to protect the privacy of the French citizen. From that vantage point, a vision of global control has been built on a premise forged in European law: the right to be forgotten. The Court of Justice of the European ruling of May 13, 2014 (Google Spain v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González) has supplied the subject matter for the latest enlargement of censorship powers.

The French response has been intrusively enthusiastic, with the privacy regulator, CNIL, fining Google 100,000 Euros in March for not applying the right to be forgotten across the global network. In the chilling words of the regulator, “For people residing in France to effectively exercise their right to be delisted, it must be applied to the entire processing operation.”[2] Erdan may well be irritated he did not come up with that one.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/dreams-...ternet/5528564
 
Old November 12th, 2016 #53
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
Default The Secret Evils Behind "Political Correctness"

Quote:
Leon Trotsky (Jewish name Leon, or sometimes Lev, Davidovich Bronstein). Trotsky is most often credited, with good reason, with coining the term “Racist” as a derogatory term for his political enemies, the White Gentiles.

Leon Trotsky, born of wealthy parents, was the principal Marxist intellectual, second only to V. I. Lenin (part Jewish) himself, behind the Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917. The wealthy New York Banker and Rothschild associate, Jacob H. Schiff, funded the Jew’s Red revolution to the tune of around 20 million dollars in gold (well over 200 million in today’s money), which Trotsky then deposited in a Warburg bank (he later married a Warburg) for transfer to Sweden and hence into Russia.

“Six or eight weeks ago the Jews would have heeded the call to arms as a duty, but with heavy hearts, as they would have known they would be fighting to perpetuate Russian autocracy.* But now all that has changed. Russian democracy has become victorious, and thanks are due to the Jew that the Russian revolution succeeded.” — Jacob H. Schiff, called the “greatest Jew in America” in this NY Times article, May 1917 (PDF of original here)

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive...in&oref=slogin


When Trotsky accompanied the gold aboard a ship (also chartered by Schiff and Warburg), the Canadians intercepted the vessel and arrested him. But soon him and his gold were released after efforts by the British Jew Sir William Wiseman, who would later go on to join the NY Banking firm Kuhn, Loeb and Company (still around) and Colonel House, the enigmatic adviser (probable Crypto-Jew) to Woodrow Wilson and the figure who hounded Wilson behind the scenes, into signing the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913 which, more or less, owns this country to this day and who you pony-up to with every lousy paycheck.

So, we can clearly see all the direct connections between the International Jewish Agenda, International Jew/Zionist Bankers, the Federal Reserve (the Rothschild people who own your butt) and historical, global efforts to bring down the Gentile nations, such as Russia, to advance the cause of Jewry.


When Trotsky accompanied the gold aboard a ship (also chartered by Schiff and Warburg), the Canadians intercepted the vessel and arrested him. But soon him and his gold were released after efforts by the British Jew Sir William Wiseman, who would later go on to join the NY Banking firm Kuhn, Loeb and Company (still around) and Colonel House, the enigmatic adviser (probable Crypto-Jew) to Woodrow Wilson and the figure who hounded Wilson behind the scenes, into signing the Federal Reserve Act on December 23, 1913 which, more or less, owns this country to this day and who you pony-up to with every lousy paycheck.

So, we can clearly see all the direct connections between the International Jewish Agenda, International Jew/Zionist Bankers, the Federal Reserve (the Rothschild people who own your butt) and historical, global efforts to bring down the Gentile nations, such as Russia, to advance the cause of Jewry.



But just who came up with that word “Racist,” now being used constantly to slur White people? And how about the cult of minority victimhood that currently plagues the US? You know, all the business with everyone being “so oppressed” all the time. You’ve surely noticed it — every group in the US has some kind of beef and gripe: Blacks, Jews (professional, full-time victims), Hispanics, Mestizos, Native Americans, Homosexuals, Bisexuals, Transgenders (Drag Queens), Radical Feminists (some really hate White men with a passion), Midget S&M Fetishists!

It’s ALWAYS “Evil Whitey” (usually the White, Heterosexual male) who’s at fault and the eternal “oppressor” par excellance. But who started all this mess and why?

One dictionary defines Racist as:

Racist:1932 as a noun, 1938 as an adjective, from race (n.2); racism is first attested 1936 (from Fr. racisme, 1935), originally in the context of Nazi theories. But they replaced earlier words, racialism (1907) and racialist (1917), both often used at first in a British or South African context.

— Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper


Make note how this author blithely ascribes it to French descriptions of “Nazi theory,” when this is in error. Ironically, a German Jew is often given credit for the word; he had gone into exile in France after the Nazis came to power and, being sick of his Jew “intellectual” activities, gave him the big boot. It was more than likely his writings in France that spawned the above French source.




Trotsky didn’t appear to be using it in a black versus white way, but was using it in a anti-Gentile fashion. That’s the key concept — it was a Jew versus White thing.

He was attacking his political and subconscious enemies, the White Gentiles of Russia and Europe as something he called “Slavophiles” and later, the Fascists of Italy and Germany. Here are some of Trotsky’s use of the word; make note the underlying hatred toward Whites:

“The History of the Russian Revolution” 1930:

“Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Mark remarked upon this theme: “In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them.” This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the ‘Racists.'” Read Trotsky's own words here:https://www.marxists.org/archive/tro...0/hrr/ch01.htm

“What is National Socialism?” 1933:

“On the plane of politics, racism is a vapid and bombastic variety of chauvinism in alliance with phrenology. As the ruined nobility sought solace in the gentility of its blood, so the pauperized petty bourgeoisie befuddles itself with fairy tales concerning the special superiorities of its race.Read Trotsky's own words here:https://www.marxists.org/archive/tro...933/330610.htm


“Political Correctness” (PC) is, of course, the policing or censorship of certain language and ideas in the White, Western countries. An example of PC would be the banning of an essay which a Black, Mexican or female citizen might find “offensive.”

It appears that Jewish communist Georg Lukacs (1885-1971 probably created the first hands-on, working program in which PC was used to indoctrinate the citizenry of a White country.


That occurred just a bit before the Jewish-led Frankfurt School began its own journey towards creating PC ideas with the help of the School’s Max Horkheimer , who was also a Jew and who invented the concept of “critical theory,” which amounted to criticizing White, Western culture and values (Lukacs himself was a fringe Frankfurt Schooler). “Critical theory” paved the way for modern PC by portraying White culture as something oppressive and foul. Interestingly, “critical theory” borrowed some ideas from yet another Jew: Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis.


However, sometimes several historical events happen at the same time. While Lukacs (as commissar of culture in Jewish communist Bela Kun’s Hungarian regime in 1919) was creating a Marxist-based PC program to indoctrinate Hungarian schoolchildren with using politically left-wing propaganda, other Jews, such as Franz Boas, were also creating ideology based wholly or partly on Marxism. Whether their creations were social, economic, racial or a combination of all three, they were all rooted in Marxism, or very similarly, egalitarianism/universalism (i.e., the historically-new idea that all humans and cultures are, or can be, “equal” in importance, and that White/Western/capitalist culture is oppressive and evil). Marxism and egalitarianism/universalism are very nearly the same thing, except one is based more on economics while the other is based more on social/cultural matters. (It can be argued that Marxism was an attempt to use economic ideas to transform the social, and, by default, racial features of society, so in that sense Marxism wasn’t only economics-based).

But no matter the type of Marxist/universalist programs that those men created, they all amounted to the same thing: cleverly-disguised Jewish attacks upon traditional, White culture. Their programs were designed to end White control of most of the world for the benefit of the Jewish people. Theirs were racial programs masquerading as mere political or social movements. Jews instinctively know that movements that “equalize” the cultures of White countries in one way or another are good for the Jews, since that equalizing helps to ensure that nationalist movements cannot rise up and “oppress” the Jews, such as happened in Nazi Germany in the 1930s. (Note that those disguised cultural attacks by the Jews often use confusing words and phrases, and are often made to appear scientific, in order to give the attacks an air of legitimacy and sophistication).

Marxism, feminism, socialism, leftism, egalitarianism, PC – they are all Jewish-created assaults upon White, Western culture. And they have all been embraced by many Westerners as legitimate, with few exceptions. All of those ideas employ “equality” as a main argument and main goal. All of them are unnatural and universalist, and all require governmental or bureaucratic force to make the public accept them.



Starting with Karl Marx, and moving on to Sigmund Freud, V. I. Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Georg Lukacs, Franz Boas, the Frankfurt School theorists, Ashley Montagu, and Stephen J. Gould, we can see the roots of the movement(s) that led directly to today’s PC movement. All of those men were racially-Jewish (Lenin was part-Jewish), all held non-traditional ideas that could be called anti-Western, all were socially and politically influential, and all played vital roles in first creating, and then paving the way for the acceptance of, PC.

Even though non-Jews push PC ideas today, they are actually only unwitting helpers of the Jews who created PC. Without the Jews, it is very likely that Political Correctness, as we know it today, wouldn’t exist.
http://incogman.net/2008/05/the-secr...l-correctness/

Last edited by littlefieldjohn; November 12th, 2016 at 05:31 PM.
 
Old February 11th, 2017 #54
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
Default

Quote:
Friends’ Central School in Wynnewood (PA) has called off a talk by a Swarthmore College professor who is a Palestinian Quaker after receiving complaints from the school community that he is an anti-Israel activist. The cancellation prompted students to protest twice this week.

Sa’ed Atshan, an assistant professor in Peace and Conflict Studies at the elite Quaker college, had been invited to speak to Upper School students on Feb. 3.

In a letter to parents Thursday, head of school Craig N. Sellers said teachers had invited Atshan because students were interested in learning more about the Middle East and “peaceful activism." Atshan, who graduated from Swarthmore, has a doctorate in anthropology and Middle Eastern studies from Harvard University.

However, the choice of Atshan “raised concerns from some members of our community,” Sellers said, and the talk was canceled. According to pro-Israel websites, Atshan is a leader in the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement that targets companies supporting what it calls the occupation of Palestine.

In his letter, Sellers said he decided to “pause” in inviting any more speakers to discuss the Middle East at the City Avenue school.

At the weekly Meeting for Worship on Wednesday, some students stood up together and read a statement “expressing their disappointment and dismay,” and others walked out of the room, Sellers said.

The walkout was led by the teachers who invited Atshan and run a club that promoted peace and equality in Palestinian territories, according to parents who asked not to be named in order to avoid problems for their children.

“It’s a very complicated situation for everyone," said Philip E. Scott, clerk of the school’s board of trustees. "It reflects complications in the broader society, and we’re working our way through them as best we can.”

On Friday, an assembly was disrupted by about 30 students wearing black and chanting, "Let him speak," led by the teachers, parents said.

Sellers sent another email Friday saying that many students had expressed their feelings on the Middle East to him, and that he was convening a task force to shape an educational forum around the issues.

"Our school simply has no place for any kind of disrespectful conduct that stereotypes, leaves anyone feeling unsafe or threatened, or leaves anyone feeling 'less than,' " he said.

Friends' Central was founded in 1845 in Philadelphia and has about 800 students in nursery school to 12th grade. Many graduates go to Swarthmore, also founded by Quakers who were prominent in social justice causes, such as the abolitionist and women’s rights movements.

Atshan, also an LGBTQ advocate, joined Swarthmore’s faculty in 2015. According to his biography, he taught courses in peace and justice, the Arab Spring and nonviolent strategic action, and gender, sexuality, and human rights in the Middle East at Tufts University before coming to Swarthmore.

He also designed and taught courses at Harvard and Brown Universities on social movements in the Middle East and the Arab Spring, among other topics. He earned four Harvard excellence in undergraduate teaching awards.

Atshan did not respond to calls and emails.

Frequently at Friends schools, the issue of the Israel-Palestinian conflict is fraught with tension, since many families who enroll at the schools are Jewish, said Shan Cretin, secretary-general of the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) in Philadelphia.

“They are concerned about the defaming of the State of Israel” because the AFSC has long supported BDS work, she said.

Cretin said she had spoken to parents about her own beliefs on the issue and noted that most schools teach their students to listen, reflect, and inquire.

“I’m a little surprised,” she said of the Friends’ Central decision. “Canceling the speaker is not what I hoped.”

She said she knows of Atshan, who attended Ramallah Friends Meeting School, which has produced a number of Palestinian academics and intellectuals. Quakers have been in that area since the late 1800s.

In 2015, according to the Jewish Exponent, a Friends' Central parent complained to Sellers and the board of trustees that $200 raised from a student peace concert was being sent to the AFSC. She reportedly told them that parents were pro-Israel and that the AFSC’s position was wrong.

The Parent Teacher Organization also decided it could not support the AFSC's Middle East position and would not donate money to it. The board of trustees said it would not take a position on either side.
http://www.philly.com/philly/educati...n-speaker.html
 
Old April 8th, 2017 #55
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
Default The New Observer is currently offline

Quote:
The New Observer is currently offline.

This is because of a sustained attack by the enemies of free speech upon our right to express a view contrary to that which they seek enforced upon the rest of the world.

The TNO Staff are currently working on an alternative, and request your continued patience.

We will not be silenced, and we will be back.
http://www.newobserveronline.com
 
Old September 19th, 2017 #56
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,344
Robbie Key
Default

Fighting ‘Hate,’ Killing Free Speech

September 16, 2017 Realist Report 7 comments

Anti-Defamation League undercutting free expression by indoctrinating mayors, police
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), an organization openly hostile to the First Amendment that seeks to advance pro-Israel interests and shut down free expression with often baseless charges of “anti-Semitism,” has partnered with the United States Conference of Mayors in the wake of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Va. in an effort to combat “hate” and “extremism,” Marxist buzzwords that are applied to patriotic Americans willing to buck the tyrannical system of political correctness plaguing the West. The United States Conference of Mayors is an official, non-partisan organization representing American cities with populations exceeding 30,000. More than 300 mayors from major American cities across the nation have collaborated with the ADL on the project, and have pledged to implement the 10-point Mayors’ Compact to Combat Hate, Extremism, and Bigotry, developed almost entirely by the subversive, anti-American organization.

Some of the 10 key initiatives outlined in the compact include “rejecting extremism, white supremacy, and all forms of bigotry,” as well as prioritizing and promoting “anti-bias” and “anti-hate” programs—which are also developed by the ADL—in America’s public and private schools. Additionally, the compact encourages local residents and community members to report “hate incidents”; seeks to strengthen “hate crime” laws; and promotes training for law enforcement officials across the country to respond to and deal with “hate.”

The compact represents an attempt by the ADL to institutionalize its subversive, anti-free speech agenda, a major and long-running goal of the anti-American organization. The Unite the Right rally, which was legally organized by leading members of the alt-right, a burgeoning, loose-knit, right-wing movement that embraces racial identity and populism while rejecting globalism, multiculturalism, and massive non-white immigration to America and the wider Western world, has been used as an excuse to advance a number of blatantly anti-free speech agendas, including the censoring of some alt-right commentators on the Internet.

The rally was legally permitted, yet faced enormous obstacles from local political leaders in Charlottesville. The entirely distorted narrative spun by the political and media establishment portrayed the alt-right organizers and supporters as hateful, racist bigots who were determined to violently confront and attack the counterprotesters who showed up to peacefully demonstrate against the rally. The fake news media and establishment political and media pundits hysterically condemned everyone in the alt-right as violent extremists and terrorists, white supremacists, neo-nazis, and even Ku Klux Klansmen. Meanwhile, Antifa and other leftist extremists who engaged in physical confrontations and violence against the alt-right were portrayed as righteous and honorable protesters simply attempting to exercise their First Amendment rights. Needless to say, the concept of “hate” will be defined by the ADL and will, of course, encompass any form of criticism or resistance to its subversive, anti-American agenda.

“What happened in Charlottesville . . . reminds us all that violent hate and racism are very much alive in America in 2017,” Tom Cochran, the CEO and executive director of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, said when the compact was announced. “For decades, America’s mayors have taken a strong position in support of civil rights and in opposition to racism and discrimination of all kinds. At this critical time mayors are doing so again through this compact in an effort to combathate, extremism, and bigotry in their cities and in our nation.”

The ADL has played a key role in politicizing and militarizing law enforcement in the United States for decades, and routinely offers training courses for local, state, and federal law enforcement officials and entities across the country. The ADL openly describes itself as “the foremost non-governmental organization in the United States that offers law enforcement training on terrorism, extremism, and hate crimes” and boasts that it has “trained well over 100,000 federal, state, local, and military law enforcement officers.”

Law enforcement officials at all levels of government also regularly travel to Israel to receive training and advice from their Israeli counterparts, particularly in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, which many prominent researchers believe the Zionist state played a central role in carrying out, further militarizing American law enforcement, as is the case in Israel. This often involves U.S. law enforcement working closely with the Israeli military and police, both of which have been accused of carrying out war crimes against Muslims and Christians in the Holy Land.

Interestingly, Anita Gray, a regional director for the ADL in Cleveland, Ohio, admitted in a revealing interview with Cleveland Jewish News shortly after the rally that her organization had been “working on the ground and behind the scenes leading up to, during, and after the rally” in Charlottesville. “We remain in close contact with law enforcement, elected officials, community leaders, and others and continue to provide critical research, resources, and community support,” Ms. Gray went on to explain. “All of our offices have been working around the clock to respond, inform, and take action.”

The insidious agenda of the ADL could not be clearer in the aftermath of the Unite the Right rally, i.e., to stamp out criticism of Israel.

http://therealistreport.com/fighting...g-free-speech/
 
Old October 13th, 2017 #57
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
jewsign Has the Israel Lobby Destroyed Americans’ First Amendment Rights?

Quote:
"Israel’s unique ability to discredit all criticism of its policies as a mere expression of anti-Jewish sentiment is the greatest public relations success in the history of PR"

"It is disingenuous to deny the influence of this small minority in American life. This influence becomes a problem when it is used to silence free speech."




The power of the Israel Lobby is today so widely recognized and feared that editors, producers, and tenure committees anticipate the lobby’s objections in advance and avoid writers, subjects, and professors judged unacceptable to the lobby.

The latest example is The American Conservative’s firing of former CIA officer Philip Giraldi.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47942.htm Giraldi wrote an article for the Unz Review about Israel’s influence over American foreign policy in the Middle East.

http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas...americas-wars/

The article didn’t say anything that the Israeli newspaper Haaretz hadn’t said already.

The editor of The American Conservative, where Giraldi had been a contributor for a decade and a half, was terrified that the magazine was associated with a critic of Israel and quickly terminated the relationship. Such abject cowardice as the editor of The American Conservative showed is a true measure of the power of the Israel Lobby.



M(a)ny seasoned experts believe that without the influence of the Israel Lobby, particularly as exerted by the Jewish Neoconservatives, the United States would not have been at war in the Middle East and North Africa for the last 16 years.
These wars have done nothing for the US but harm, and they have cost taxpayers trillions of dollars and caused extensive death and destruction in seven countries and a massive refugee flow into Europe.

For a superpower such as the United States not to be in control of its own foreign policy is a serious matter. Giraldi is correct and patriotic to raise this concern.

Giraldi makes sensible recommendations for correcting Washington’s lack of control over its own policy. But instead of analysis and debate of Giraldi’s proposals, the result is Giraldi’s punishment by an editor of a conservative publication anticipating the Israel Lobby’s wishes.

Americans should think about the fact that Israel is the only country on earth that it is impermissible to criticize.

Anyone who criticizes Israeli policy, especially toward the Palestinians, or remarks on Israel’s influence, is branded an “anti-semite.” Even mild critics who are trying to steer Israel away from making mistakes, such as former President Jimmy Carter, are branded “anti-semites.”

The Israel Lobby’s purpose in labeling a critic an “anti-semite” is to discredit the criticism as an expression of dislike or hatred of Jews. In other words, the criticism is presented as merely an expression of the person’s aversion to Jewishness. A persistent critic is likely to be charged with trying to incite a new "holocaust".


It is possible to criticize the policy of Germany, France, Spain, UK, Italy, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, China, Iran, the US, indeed, every other country without being called anti-German, Anti-French, Anti-British, Anti-American, etc., although US policy in the Middle East is so closely aligned with Israel’s that the Israel Lobby regards critics of US Middle East policy as hostile to Israel.

Despite the failures of US policy, it is getting more and more difficult to criticize it without the risk of being branded “unpatriotic,” and possibly even a “Muslim sympathizer” and “anti-semite.”


The many anomalies in the Israel Lobby’s power pass unremarked. For example, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) defines criticism of Israeli policies as defamation and brands critics “anti-semites.” In other words, the ADL itself is set up in the business of defamation or name-calling. The incongriuty of an organization created to oppose defamation engaging in defamation as its sole purpose passes unremarked.

Israel is very proud of its power over the United States. Israeli political leaders have a history of bragging about their power over America. But if an American complains about it, he is a Jew-hater.

The only safe way for an American to call attention to the power Israel has over the US is to brag about it. It is OK to acknowledge Israel’s power if you put it in a good light, but not if you complain about it.

So, let me put it this way: Israel’s unique ability to discredit all criticism of its policies as a mere expression of anti-Jewish sentiment is the greatest public relations success in the history of PR.



Here is Giraldi:
http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/how-i-got-fired/
http://www.unz.com/proberts/has-the-...ndment-rights/

Last edited by littlefieldjohn; October 13th, 2017 at 08:46 PM.
 
Old March 3rd, 2018 #58
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
jewsign Jewish Lobby Demands Google, Twitter, and Yahoo Internet Censorship—or Face Lawsuits

Quote:
The self-described “legal arm of the pro-Israel community” Jewish lobby has issued “cease and desist” legal threats against Google, Twitter, and Yahoo, demanding that they censor content critical of the Jews’ “Holocaust” narrative—or face legal action.

https://i2.wp.com/newobserveronline....size=768%2C486

According to a press release issued by the New York-based Lawfare Project—which on its website claims to be the “Legal Arm of the Pro-Israel Community,” that organization’s Executive Director Brooke Goldstein has announced the legal action in Spain “against internet giants Yahoo, Google, and Twitter, for failing to address the proliferation of Holocaust denial websites” on their platforms.

“Unless Google, Yahoo, and Twitter take down the anti-Semitic content on their platforms, they will be taken to court in Spain, and elsewhere,” said Goldstein.

In the last week, these Jews sent “cease and desist letters to a number of search engines, including Google and Yahoo, with possible action planned against Twitter.”

The letters state that if the platforms “do not act decisively and quickly to take down the anti-Semitic and defamatory content, as defined by Spanish law, a lawsuit will be filed against them.”

“Google, Yahoo, and Twitter are all hosting antisemitic websites and content on their platforms that violate Spanish law. If they do not respond positively to the cease and desist letters sent last week, we will file lawsuits against them,” said Ignacio Wenley Palacios, The Lawfare Project’s Spanish counsel.

The Lawfare Project is also known for being the first of at least three Jewish lobbies
http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Belgia...aughter-536905
to file legal suits against the Belgian government in 2017 and early 2018 for that country’s law banning Jewish and Muslim ritual slaughter of animals, a cruel and backward process which inflicts great pain upon the animals and is increasingly being rejected by all civilized people for the animal cruelty that it is.

http://newobserveronline.com/jewish-...face-lawsuits/


 
Old March 16th, 2018 #59
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,424
Blog Entries: 1
RickHolland
Default

__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.
 
Old 1 Week Ago #60
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 7,564
littlefieldjohn
jewsign Jews Force 11,000 Pro-Israel Changes to US School Textbooks

4/29/18
Quote:
The Jewish lobby in America has forced through more than 11,000 changes to US school textbooks issued by National Geographic, Prentice Hall, Five Ponds Press, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and McGraw-Hill over the past several years, it has emerged.


According to a press release
http://www.israellobby.org/ICS/default.asp
issued by the Institute for Research Middle Eastern Policy (IRmep) and posted at the Israel Lobby Archive, the latest changes were revealed in a set of changes demanded by the Jews in textbooks and teaching guides used in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Requested changes include:

– Deletion of references to Israel “occupying” territories captured during the 1967 Six-Day War and substituting “controlled.” International conventions clearly outline the responsibility of occupying powers and the illegality of collective punishment and population transfers.

– Changes to maps to recognize Israel’s declared “annexation” of East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights. The U.S. and most other countries do not officially recognize Israeli annexation of either territory.

– Substitution of references to “occupied territories” to “captured areas.”

– Substitution of references to “Jewish settlers” and “settlements” with “building of homes and communities.”




– Deletion of a lesson reviewing a video documentary by Iranian-American religious studies scholar, author, producer and television host Reza Aslan.

– Deletion of an activity based on reading the biography and work of Palestinian legislator Hanan Ashrawi.

– Substitution of an editorial cartoon titled “The Mideast Peace Game Rules” with a cartoon of an Arab suicide terrorist holding a “Road Map to Peace” game hostage.


California-based Institute for Curriculum Services (ICS) proposed changes were submitted to the Virginia Department of Education on February 28 on behalf of the Jewish Community Federation of Richmond, the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington, the Jewish Community Relations Committee (JCRC) of Richmond, and the JCRC of Tidewater.

In a January webcasthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNaecm9LyR0&feature=youtu.be
on YouTube, ICS chief Aliza Craimer Elias claimed that “working behind the scenes” through state advocacy organizations ICS had successfully made more than 11,000 changes to U.S. textbooks.

Publishers of the textbooks targeted for changes include National Geographic, Prentice Hall, Five Ponds Press, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and McGraw-Hill.

Common themes in ICS requests to make changes to Virginia textbooks.

Qualify claims of Islam as “expressing Muslim religious belief” while referencing those of Judaism as “God’s covenant.”


Replace Christian versions of key texts (such as the Ten Commandments) with Judaic versions.


Emphasize the “Jewish ethnicity”“ of major American historical figures.
Eliminate terms such as “settlers,” “occupation,” “land theft” and “wall” or replace with more neutral terms such as “disputed,” “captured areas,” “security fence” and “controlled.”


Emphasize Arab culpability for crisis initiation (Israel’s 1948 War of Independence) leading to military action, but not Israeli culpability (e.g. surprise Israeli airstrikes on Egypt commencing the 1967 Six-Day War).


Discourage students from conducting open internet research on current events lest they run into controversial content. Instead recommend approved websites such as the ADL and the JewishVirtualLibrary.org
Eliminate or replace historical artwork created for predominately Christian audiences.


Add content that augments Israeli claims to occupied territory in the Middle East, such as changing maps of the Golan Heights as belonging to Israel rather than Syria.


Reference Israeli claims such as “Israel annexed East Jerusalem” as settled fact, without referencing lack of official recognition by other nation states.


Delete all references to “Palestinian Territories.”
Where ICS has already successfully lobbied for changes in national editions of textbooks, it demands that these changes also be made to State of Virginia editions.
http://newobserveronline.com/jews-fo...ool-textbooks/
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 AM.
Page generated in 0.20494 seconds.