|
November 13th, 2008 | #41 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,029
|
"The point of this thread is to prove that the top ten law schools, from which the lower ones take their lead, discriminate against heterosexual White men and in favor of jews and coloreds. It will be seen that jews as a percentage of the law school professoriate at these schools never falls under 25% and usually is around 50%."
Affirmative Action is code for discrimination against the White Male. |
November 13th, 2008 | #42 | ||
The paranormal silent type
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Where you least expect
Posts: 8,265
|
Sounds Jew to me?
Here's something a little off-topic. But, for archiving, I thought this might fuel the discussion:
http://www.law.georgetown.edu/news/r....11.2007b.html Oy! Sounds more than a little Jewey tom me: Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Yarmolinsky Quote:
This is how Oxford students entertain themselves with: http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/vermisc...nachtklub.html
__________________
|
||
November 29th, 2008 | #43 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Mazonnawar Citadel
Posts: 775
|
Quote:
|
|
December 8th, 2008 | #44 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
question is why isnt it completely freakin obvious that the Jews are all in it together when a socalled liberal like alan dershovitz becomes the attack dog of zion in academe?
|
December 8th, 2008 | #45 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 171
|
Quote:
A White Media needs to glamorize the Law profession. Until know the Jew Hollywood has been showing smart Jewboy lawyers getting the White woman. We need to change that to interest more Whites in Law. |
|
December 9th, 2008 | #46 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
Legal Tyranny
by Daniel W. Drezner 12.02.2008 Last month, Dani Rodrik looked at the initial slate of Obama administration appointees and observed that a surprisingly large fraction of them were lawyers. As a professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, he found this somewhat perturbing: If you are bright and are contemplating a potential career in American politics, you go to a top law school—not a public policy school. This does not seem to have changed much in recent decades despite everything [Harvard's Kennedy School of Government] has done to make itself visible and relevant. When one looks at the people picked for foreign-policy positions in particular, Rodrik might be onto something. The top two nominees for the State Department—Hillary Clinton and James Steinberg—both earned degrees from Yale Law School. Tom Donilon, the rumored deputy NSC adviser, and Janet Napolitano, the nominee for Secretary of Homeland Security, earned their J.D.s from the University of Virginia. As a professor at a rival public-policy school I share Rodrik's concern (though we can claim at least one cabinet appointment). Why do law school grads get the foreign-policy jobs coveted by public-policy school grads? The first reason is historical legacy. When the United States became the global hegemon after World War II, public-policy schools were exceptionally rare. The original gangsters of the foreign-policy community—think Dean Acheson, John Foster Dulles, Clark Clifford, John J. McCloy—were lawyers. This matters because the best way to get a top foreign-policy job is to make your mark by serving as a loyal deputy to past top foreign-policy makers. Since people are more likely to hire their own, it is hardly surprising that lawyers would hire other lawyers. The second reason has to do with signaling. Presidents want their foreign-policy appointees to be politically successful, which requires a complex, interlocking set of skills. Analytical rigor and policy expertise are obviously necessary but hardly sufficient (expertise can be earned via a public-policy degree, but there are also other avenues). Dedication, determination and political discipline count for a lot as well. Earning a law degree and then working on foreign-policy issues sends two powerful signals to prospective presidents that earning a public-policy degree does not. Simply put, a law degree is much less fun to earn than a law degree. One-L courses require a tolerance of a high level of drudgery. A public-policy degree, on the other hand, is much more fun to earn than a law degree. Which means that it requires less discipline. By getting a law degree, aspirants to top policy-making jobs are signaling to observers that they can grind their way through a serious amount of drudgery. By going into public policy, lawyers are also signaling the monetary sacrifices they are willing to make. Compared to the median wage, most public-policy jobs pay a decent salary. Compared to the median legal wage, most public-policy jobs pay peanuts. Most Fletcher graduates would be delighted at the prospect of a six-figure salary in the corridors of power. Most Harvard law school graduates would be appalled at any job with the phrase "low six figures" attached to it. So there are logical reasons why lawyers might be getting the top foreign-policy posts. Are these substantively good reasons, however? As a professor with an interest in seeing his graduates thrive in the public sector, I think attending a public-policy school should send an even stronger signal. It should say that the person in question is well-trained and has the other traits necessary for a leadership position. Perhaps the next step should be to make the first year of a public-policy degree more like the first year of law school. After all, why should one-Ls have all the fun? Daniel W. Drezner is a professor of international politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a senior editor at The National Interest. http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=20322 |
December 20th, 2008 | #47 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
|
Quote:
F. Lee Bailey Melvin Belli Vincent Bugliosi . All of the above possesed fantastic legal minds . The only prominent Jewish lawyer is that dunce Alan Dershowitz who was cahrged with plagiarism which sums up Jewish lawyers for you . So wha ever list their is I wouldnt worry to much us Gentiles still rule . |
|
December 20th, 2008 | #48 | |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Quote:
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
|
December 21st, 2008 | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
|
|
December 22nd, 2008 | #50 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
were talking about jews here
Oh, we have some top gooks too. The one that wrote the Constituttion shredding patriot act for one. but lets not get distracted eh?
Viet Dinh, http://www.globalsecurity.org/securi...0129-voa02.htm |
December 27th, 2008 | #51 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North dakota
Posts: 332
|
id be willing to bet the top medical schools arent fairing much better.
|
December 27th, 2008 | #52 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North dakota
Posts: 332
|
|
January 13th, 2009 | #53 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 122
|
I was a student not too long ago. "They" were everywhere.
|
January 28th, 2009 | #54 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
|
You guys belong in law school! You all seem so smart and worldly.
|
January 29th, 2009 | #55 | ||
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
melvin belli was just an ambulance chaser with a big ego, a personal injury lawyers out to line their pockets off big plaintiff awards. f lee bailey was a decent crminal defense lawyer and represented a lot of high profiles but he didnt and doesnt rule jack shit. vincent bugliosi is a talking head on tv end of story. No the matter of RULE and RULING is the province of CONSTITUTIONAL LAW which is ultimately decided by the US Supreme Court. Which has had Jews on it for decades. Do these names mean anything to you? Quote:
As Linder said-- they are framing the terms of our debate. We need to break out of that. Last edited by Antiochus Epiphanes; January 29th, 2009 at 02:59 PM. |
||
January 30th, 2009 | #56 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
Otherwise you bias your information gathering. |
|
February 4th, 2009 | #57 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
You butted into this thread with some kind of criticism but failed to communicate a coherent thought. What the fuck are you trying to say?
|
February 4th, 2009 | #58 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
Be nicer please. |
|
February 6th, 2009 | #59 | ||
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
Quote:
Wish we could get the admissions data! |
||
February 6th, 2009 | #60 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,633
|
Suffice it to say, they're vastly overrepresented there also. On the upbeat side (if there is one) is recent news that there are NO JOBS for law school graduates this year. None of the firms are hiring. I guess when the world is broke there's no shekels to be picked up by counsel. In that case counsel dosen't have the wherewithal to continue affording legal flunkies to do all the work while the senior partners fuck off. A sad state of affairs, itz.
__________________
No way out but through the jews. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|