|July 20th, 2013||#22|
Join Date: Jan 2013
The Psychology of a Turncoat
by Andrew Hamilton
The SPLC, a powerful Southern Jewish hate group and anti-First Amendment organization with extensive ties to the media, police, secret police, and judiciary, has announced triumphantly that Derek Black, 24, the activist son of Stormfront founder Don Black, has renounced his views and joined the bloated ranks of the anti-white multitude. (“Activist Son of Key Racist Leader Renounces White Nationalism,” July 17, 2013)
Not too many years ago the media, goose-stepping like Soviet troops to the SPLC’s tune, muttered darkly about young Black’s AM radio program (paid for out-of-pocket, we now learn, by his father) and activist outreach to white youth. We were assured once again that Jews and “minorities” were under dire, imminent threat from white speech. Next . . . the ovens!
As ever, a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing. The same old racist defamation.
In what follows I assume for purposes of argument that the statement by Black to the SPLC is a) reported accurately and b) sincere on Black’s part. (He wrote, “I realize not all will instantly believe me, or may perceive this as a seemingly abrupt change when it has been instead a gradual awakening process.”)
I have no reason to doubt his confession, which is why I discuss it. Indeed, denunciation of whites and genuflection before Jews is the social norm.
Since I wrote the last two paragraphs, the SPLC has released a new Internet article clarifying the issue. Derek’s father Don Black is quoted as expressing his “shock” on Stormfront:
Why did the SPLC release Derek Black’s statements? (In part, obviously, to hurt and demoralize his family.) Why did it publicize his conversion the way it did in light of its usual target audiences—Jews, anti-white and anti-First Amendment international, federal, state, and local police and secret police agencies, sympathetic politicians, prosecutors and judges, high-level federal and state bureaucrats, academics and university administrators, mass media outlets and, finally, antifa domestic terrorists?
What is the SPLC’s motivation? What purposes does the information, presented the way it is, serve among these moderately diverse constituencies by enabling them to work effectively toward shared goals of white dispossession and oppression and development of increasingly racist, illiberal, anti-Constitutional, and anti-democratic social structures?
Secondly, why was the story not picked up by the mass media? At the very least, there should have been a handful of stories, and conceivably even widespread coverage, as in the recent arrest of anti-Breivik Norwegian musician Varg Vikernes in France. It is, I assume, within the SPLC’s power to determine to some extent the level of media coverage of its material.
In the same article the SPLC quotes reactions from various whites on the handful of Web forums that still exist. One post advocating exile to Africa was by a “Maxfield Parrish” on Occidental Dissent:
The Jews overthrew 500 years of painfully-won humanitarian moral and legal progress overnight in their contempt for human rights and greedy demands for torture and assassination. Congratulations!
The SPLC added that “there were those who acknowledged the most obvious conclusion—that it’s an error to indoctrinate young children” (i.e., teach your children to care about the fate of their own kind). Not until you fully grasp the true nature of the Jew will the arrogance, irony, and self-righteous hypocrisy of this genocidal sentiment hit home to you.
Black’s public confession has a ritualistic quality. Further, it contains elements of what in the Soviet Union was known as self-criticism, and in Red China jiǎntǎo (检讨).
The most striking feature of the statement is its triteness. It could have been lifted directly from any college professor, textbook, Hollywood celebrity, or TV commentator. Or, for that matter, from the SPLC’s or ADL’s own propaganda. There is nothing original in his beliefs whatsoever. Americans have heard the identical clichés thousands and thousands of times before.
In the confession, Black denounces an alleged “white power” configuration responsible for the “structural oppression” of Jews and non-whites.
Brain teaser: If Derek Black were to send a letter to the white power structure he decries, castigating its members for their sins, where would he mail it? To the White House? To Microsoft’s Jewish CEO? Wal-Mart? Wall Street? Hollywood? (Remember, for Black, as for most whites, Jews are not the problem—indeed, they are not part of any problem, and cannot be criticized.)
The Jewish answer, of course, is: Whites as a group are inherently racist from birth— “the cancer of human history” as one of their most eminent and revered spokesmen famously put it[/I]. The only way to eliminate “racism” is to eradicate the whites who carry it (ultimately, all of them).
What else do you do with “cancer”?
What are they doing?
Revealingly, Black made his confession directly to the SPLC, a Jewish organization in bed with the government. He thereby abased himself simultaneously before the “Party” and the US’s ruling race. His compulsion—unerringly correct from the perspective of a turncoat—was to propitiate the Jews. He did not confess to the Negroes: he ignored blacks and confessed to those who rule.
Black is not the first turncoat to ritually confess directly to the SPLC. It seems that whites inside and outside of the power elite hold the Jews of this organization in quasi-sacred awe. Racialists even grant friendly interviews to these deadly foes.
At 24, Black is not a child. He has not grown more radical. Rather, he has gravitated to the far Left—to the Establishment. It seems unlikely that he will ever hold pro-white views again.
I have the definite sense that Black’s distinctive hairstyle and vaguely Amish- or Orthodox-style garb in past photos says something meaningful about his personality and psychology, though I am not sure what.
Black must have been exposed while quite young to a thorough understanding of our situation, given that his father was imprisoned by the state. Presumably, he was educated about the facts in a non-superficial way.
In a totalitarian state, cultural values proscribed by the ruling class cannot generally be transmitted successfully to children by their families. Under most circumstances the values of the power elite and the state will prevail instead. Also, it has been a core policy objective to thoroughly undermine the family, and it has been quite successful.
Without knowing the details, it seems certain that the mass media played an important role in altering Black’s beliefs. They are all-pervasive, and speak day and night with a fanatical, unified voice about race. You cannot go one hour without being exposed to anti-white or philo-Semitic messages.
The “educational” system was also a factor. Mark Potok, a Jewish racist employed by the SPLC, indicates that Black recently finished his third year at the “elite” New College of Florida.
I’ve never heard of this “elite” college, although I am familiar with elite Jewish universities like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.
Evidently an oppressive atmosphere of institutional and peer discrimination at the college caused Black last November to post a racial mea culpa to a private, students-only forum.
The Jews, natural communists, immediately recognized the psychological significance of the ambiguously-worded statement. Of course, they do lots of illegal spying besides, and thus had a rich context within which to interpret his words.
The abusive put-downs at New College probably involved a substantial face-to-face component, which Jews know is psychologically and emotionally extremely stressful to their prey. Not for nothing do they prattle endlessly about “hurtful” words and looks, epithets, and “bullying” for their favored constituencies while ruthlessly employing the same modus operandi against their white, conservative, heterosexual, and Christian victims.
Black mentioned in his private student post that “terrifying” accusations of hatred and racism “have been posted in [college] threads about me.” To refute the evidently hurtful and hateful messages he pleaded defensively (in part):
I am not a white supremacist, nor do I identify with white supremacy.
I have nothing against anyone because of their race, religion, or anything similar.
I am not a Nazi, nor do I identify with Nazism.
I’m also pro-choice (regulated by states), pro-gay marriage (with gov’t not defining marriage between people), and anti-death penalty (regulated by states).
The Jews call hurtful falsehoods of the kind propagated by New College “defamation” when done to them. No, that’s not right. They call truthful statements defamation.
But, it goes without saying that Jews are free to lie outright, spew hatred, and threaten violence against anyone. After all, they’re Jews.
The SPLC, which operates an elaborate spy network to monitor, harm, and bankrupt whites everywhere in America who speak out or organize, proceeded to expose Black’s private message in an article.
About the facts of anti-white racism and discrimination, ongoing genocide, Jewish power and privilege, and the tyranny under which we suffer, there can be no reasonable dispute. The facts are plain and irrefutable. The Jews know them, governments know them, the Left knows them, and we know them.
Imagine if the positions were reversed, with Jews treated like whites, with pervasive, systematic, institutionalized discrimination (“affirmative action” and “minority preferences”) the least of the actions taken against them. The terrorism and bloodshed they would have unleashed would have destabilized the government long ago.
Yet, while denying freedom of speech and association to whites, and any access to the mass media or role in the democratic process—i.e., all methods of peaceful change—they preach: “Don’t even think or speak of violence.”
And, of course, we obey. They ARE Jews.
Fascinatingly, Jews and governments are hoist by their own petard. Choose any buzzword, “principle,” or law you want—”racism,” “hate,” “genocide,” “crimes against humanity,” “discrimination,” “offensive,” “hurtful,” “equal rights,” “religious bigotry,” and on and on endlessly, and you will discover a perfect description of their own behavior.
If you desire to see the Jew, the Left, the tyrant, listen attentively to the epithets they hurl against those they hate. The formerly Invisible Jew will materialize from the shadows, revealed in the starkest light.
It is not possible to credibly maintain, as Black does, that “white power,” much less “supremacy” or “(white) racism,” is entrenched in contemporary society, that whites lord it over Jews and non-whites, or discriminate against them, violently oppress them, are legally privileged, or that replacement migration in every white homeland worldwide does not threaten whites’ existence.
Endlessly repeated claims like these are nonsense on a par with “biological race does not exist” mouthed by genocidal obsessives for whom biological race is everything.
It is possible, or course, to advocate oppression, dispossession, discrimination, and genocide of the white race—or not to care about such evils. Ultimately, that is the position of Jews, the government, Left-wing elites, and now Derek Black.
We know that if Black were a Jew he’d be called a self-hating Jew, if Negro an Oreo (black on the outside, white on the inside), if Amerindian an apple (red on the outside, white on the inside), if Mestizo a coconut, and so on. How instructive it is that no parallel epithet exists for whites—the race in greatest danger of extinction, and which suffers the brunt of ruling class enmity.
In many ways, “self-hating white” seems the appropriate label for Derek Black.
But run-of-the-mill whites like him are generally not self-hating. Rather, they are self-righteous. Internalization of prevailing dogmas invariably imparts a smug sense of moral superiority.
|May 10th, 2017||#23|
[comment on internet]
Mao's self- incrimination sessions are modeled on the Yale Theological schools examination of conscience sessions that became popular during the 'perfectionists' time- early 1800s. They sent missionaries to China for one hundred years, all of them soaked in these practices. Mao's wife was educated by missionaries. Mao's innovation was to take this obscure religious practice and apply it wholesale to an entire country in political practice.
|May 10th, 2017||#24|
This thread is for material pertaining to the ORIGINS and DEFINITION of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS - not to examples of it.
What we want in here are people attempting to EXPLAIN where PC comes from. NOT EXAMPLES OF IT WHICH ARE A DIME A DOZEN AND OBVIOUS.
|May 10th, 2017||#25|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
I genuinely hate those meddling holier-than-god scum who're responsible for so much murder & suffering.
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath
"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
|November 12th, 2017||#27|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
"... strong majorities of Republicans (73%) and independents (58%) say they keep some political beliefs to themselves."
This exactly explains why Trump got elected when the polls strongly showed him losing. It is why libs/democrats are livid with hate and convince themselves that Trump must have been elected by the Russians or aliens or gods know what.
I see this discussion-silencing often, particularly in middle aged men who know that they simply will be screamed away if they state any even mildly conservative view. And it can be far worse than this.
So people just keep their opinions to themselves, eat their meal, drink a beer...but Trump would likely be re-elected today, and maybe by an even larger margin.
As far as "where does PC come from?" The authoritative source is of course the "intellectual" jews and their hangers-on. In fact, more to the workings of it, Cultural Marxism. To its manifestation among libs/dems/college-kids it's purely emotional. Maybe the Briggs Meyer personality test can explain it. Libs/dems/college-kids tend to test very F (emotional) on the test.
You have to remember I live in Denver and some things are perfectly legal here that aren't where you live.
Last edited by Mike in Denver; November 12th, 2017 at 12:20 PM.