Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 19th, 2005 #81
lawrence dennis
Anti-anti-antisemite
 
lawrence dennis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,265
Question Will Prussian Blue's TV appearance be online?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ittybitty
I just saw a commercial last night for this weeks episode of Primetime, and it talked about Prussian Blue. They said "Is this the new face of hate?" Then it showed Lynx & Lamb. So tomorrow night (Oct.20) on ABC.
Does anyone know if this program will be streamed over the internet? If not, I hope someone will make the show available online at some point in the future and post a link here on VNNF.

To be honest, I don't have a TV and could generally care less about what appears on it, but my curiousity is peaked about how the jewsmedia can possible deal with two darling telegenic young women with semitically incorrect politics without seeming heavy-handed and also without accidentally 'promoting' what they wish to portray as 'evil.'

More power to you, Lynx, Lamb, and April. :cheers:
__________________

How is the faithful city become an harlot! It was full of judgment: righteousness lodged in it, but now murderers. Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water. Thy princes are rebellious, and companions of thieves: every one loveth gifts, and followeth after rewards.

Xian WN!

"The Jew can only be understood if it is known what he strives for: ... the destruction of the world.... [it is] the tragedy of Lucifer."

Holy-Hoax Exposed, Hollow-Cost Examined, How Low Cost? (toons)
 
Old October 24th, 2005 #82
T.I.
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 316
Default jew Drudge makes mention

Drudge's on-air replacement had a caller on last night who discussed the twins. Every other word from the guys mouth was a derogative, quickly echoed by the milquetoast host, appropriately named Crummy Typical hit piece scripted direct from inner party hdqtrs.

White children proud to be White and actually singing of that fact no less - in a talented and entertaining manner? We must all feign the proper amount of outrage and disgust musn't we - to get the nice little pat on the head from the kike komisar and 15 seconds of fame. The white lemmings are really too stupid and soft to take, I swear.

I really look forward to the success of this talented "dangerous" duo :cheers:
 
Old October 24th, 2005 #83
Abzug Hoffman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,483
Default Who defines hate?

http://holocaustnow.blogspot.com/200...-what-isnt.htm

This blogger defends the girls and points out the hypocrisy of Drudge and his tribe.
 
Old October 24th, 2005 #84
SlagMaster
Senior Member
 
SlagMaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,081
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ittybitty
I just saw a commercial last night for this weeks episode of Primetime, and it talked about Prussian Blue. They said "Is this the new face of hate?" Then it showed Lynx & Lamb. So tomorrow night (Oct.20) on ABC.
What else would the crud JEW(s) of ABC say.
 
Old October 25th, 2005 #85
Jenab
Senior Goatly One
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Posts: 1,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abzug Hoffman
http://holocaustnow.blogspot.com/200...-what-isnt.htm

This blogger defends the girls and points out the hypocrisy of Drudge and his tribe.
That blog is gone.

The airing of Prussian Blue on ABC Primetime was followed immediately by a blizzard of pornographic and defamatory spamming of the new official Prussian Blue board by leftists. Some of the images were especially obscene, including an ugly, saggy old woman passing fecal matter through her vagina into a toilet. That sort of thing.

At about the same time, someone put up an obscene entry on Prussian Blue on Wikipedia, in which Lynx and Lamb were asserted to be drug addicted whores. I'm not certain how many hours that abusive entry was allowed to remain on Wikipedia, but that's what I found when I turned my browser there.

I changed it to a form at once more favorable to Prussian Blue and more in accordance with the facts. I got rid of all the obscenities. I deleted a gratuitous link to the anti-Prussian Blue Blog and replaced it with a link to the official Prussian Blue Blog. I also added links for this forum and to my Prussian Blue fan page. I added a link, also, to the music segment I made of PB's chorus from The Stranger.

Wikipedia invited, or at least permitted, Ted Shaw, president of the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, to be quoted as some sort of authority on the mental conditioning to which Lynx and Lamb were subjected by their mother and grandfather. I replaced that obviously ignorant comment with the truth, that Lynx and Lamb are simply children who are free of the conditioning to which most children their age are subjected.

After I changed the Wikipedia entry for Prussian Blue, a leftist came along and changed it to a version that, whereas not as obscene and abusive as the one I replaced had been, was nontheless prejudicial to Prussian Blue as well as inconsistent with the facts.

So I reverted the article back to what I had made it before.

The leftist reverted the article.

I reverted it again.

The leftist reverted it again.

I reverted it again.

The leftist reverted it again.

I reverted it again.

The leftist reverted it again... and had Wikipedia lock the entry and warn me that I was committing "vandalism."

Where was this warning by Wikipedia to the persons who posted that obscene stuff that I saw at first?

Why was the leftists version permitted to remain, while my more factual version was considered vandalism?

Of course, this is simply Jewish influence in evidence. Naturally, truth tellers are regarded as vandals, and it goes without saying that telling the truth is a subversive act in a political environment controlled by Jews.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Abbott, on the discussion page behind Wikipedia's article on Prussian Blue,
I am a moderator at the official Prussian Blue website. I have been a friend of Lynx and Lamb's mother for several years. Although I live in West Virginia and no longer have much personal contact with the Gaede family, I used to see them once in a while around Hillsboro.

There is something that makes me doubt your devotion to the truth. You have accepted a quote from Ted Shaw, president of the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, regarding how Lynx and Lamb Gaede came by their beliefs. Ted Shaw has NO CONNECTION with Prussian Blue. Ted Shaw has NO KNOWLEDGE about Lynx and Lamb Gaede. And yet you have accepted his biased quote regarding these girls as if he were some sort of "expert."

Why?

When I changed the reference to Ted Shaw, I wrote something much more in line with what Mr. Shaw might be expected actually to know: "Some people, including Ted Shaw, president of the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, believe that Lynx and Lamb have been "brainwashed" by their mother and grandfather..." I downplayed Shaw's authority on this subject BECAUSE HE HAS NONE. And yet you prefer the post in which he claims knowledge that he does not really have to my more honest account.

Why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowolf
In regards to Ted Shaw, if you feel it is biased and unnecessary information, then you can certainly bring it up here... Wikipedians will discuss if it is appropriate to keep. It may be that Ted Shaw is deemed appropriate of a person to quote, as a possibly-notable member of a civil rights activist group (I don't know him to well, as I’ve just seen his name for the first time, so I can't say) - a strong contrast of white nationalist activism. Please keep in mind - criticism is not biased information in Wikipedia, if provided from a legal or professional expert of a related subject in their field, or if expressed by a large number of people (for example, most people might agree that the latest Star Wars had quirks that a number of people will commonly agree upon). Even if what the general populace sees is in fact misunderstood, that view is deemed notable if it is largely expressed in the media. It might be wrong, but it is a popular assumption, and therefore, is deemed notable.

Due to ABC as a reliable source of information (whether you or I like it or not), Ted Shaw may be deemed notable to express an opinion, based solely on that ABC feels that he is appropriate to ask. However, to avoid the kind of bias that he may attribute as you point out, it may be a good idea to add in something alone the lines of "ABC asked Ted Shaw..." or similar, to the sentence. By this, people can judge for themselves what to accept, based on their views with ABC.

Still, the duo will not be without its criticisms, and if Ted Shaw speaks for the general population of what they feel, it may certainly be notable to keep. The article says that he adds that “the girls aren't expressing their own opinions, but ones they're being taught”, which is actually popular (and logical) assumption. If you feel there is a contrast to that view, then you are welcome to add it as a counterstatement, if it expresses another popular view.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Abbott
Ted Shaw does not know anyone in the Gaede family. He misdescribed the relationships within that family with falsehoods that he finds advantageous. Ted Shaw does not care whether his statement is true or false. He merely wishes it to be perceived as accurate.

ABC News knows that fully well. ABC News undermined its credibility in two ways: (1) ABC News treated Ted Shaw, who is not an authority on the relationships within the Gaede family, in a manner that conveys the false impression to the public that he is precisely this sort of authority, and (2) ABC News treated Ted Shaw's opinion on the relationships within the Gaede family as though it could be regarded as an assessment by an objective, disinterested source, whereas in truth Ted Shaw is neither objective nor disinterested in what the Gaede twins are doing. In fact, Ted Shaw should have been presumed to be hostile to the Gaedes because they are on opposite sides of a political struggle.

No one's credibility, certainly not that of a TV Network with political interests of its own, should be regarded as being some kind of natural law to which we may all refer with confidence in its immutability. ABC News's credibility rises or falls just as anyone else's does, and a news organization that resorts to tricks such as they did with Ted Shaw in relation to the Gaede family requires a downward revision in our estimate of the credibility of that news organization.
And that's where that debate stands as of now. I've a hunch that Wikipedia is about as objective as ePhilosopher turned out to be. At first, when you arrive on one of these pseudo-fairplay sites, you think the moderators will play be politically neutral rules, much as an honest referee at a ball game does. But sooner or later, you find out that they are part of the corrupt system of political correctness, and that in one way or another you will be put at disadvantage in the forum, in relation to someone whose ideas the moderators favor more. Note that I am not among those who can lock or unlock the Prussian Blue entry at Wikipedia, yet those who favor the idea of promoting the words of fake "authorities" on Lynx and Lamb do have such powers.

Jerry Abbott
 
Old October 25th, 2005 #86
Jenab
Senior Goatly One
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hillsboro, West Virginia
Posts: 1,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wyss
I too am curious as to how those two paragraphs are POV. I haven't seen the ABC interview, so am interested to know if the girls didn't really deny the holcaust, or praise Hitler for (apparently not) killing people. Though, in my opinion, I can see how the facts about the swastika brand and such might seem POV, seeing as they make the family look bad. Accursed facts! His brand must be a Jewish conspiracy! But seriously, If anyone has some links on what the girls actually said in this interview, I'd be interested.
The ABC Interview with Lynx & Lamb Gaede went on for quite some time, much longer than the total footage with the girls that was included in the Primetime show. The rest remains on file in ABC's archive folder on the Gaede family, available to be exploited at any time the Jews who run ABC see some advantage in doing so. The Gaedes violated a standard rule for protecting yourself from the Jewish media, namely: Never give them an interview unless you can simultaneously record everything that they do. That way, if they take you out of context, you can at least go on the internet and set the record straight. If they won't agree to simultaneous filming, then do not give them an interview.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Abbott
I changed it to a form more favorable to Prussian Blue and more in accordance with the facts. I got rid of all the obscenities. I deleted a gratuitous link to the anti-Prussian Blue Blog and replaced it with a link to the official Prussian Blue Blog. I also added links for this forum and to my Prussian Blue fan page. I added a link, also, to the music segment I made of PB's chorus from The Stranger.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eztli
Doesn't seem like the reason it was removed was exactly NPOV.
The reason the anti-Prussian Blue blog exists is partisan; it is run by people who are hostile to the politics of the Gaedes. The Official Prussian Blue Blog is a family project, which mostly concerns what the girls are doing, which song they are working on, when their next album will be released, and where the family went on vacation. The politics on the Official Prussian Blue Blog is at a low level. Compare that with the politics on the anti-Prussian Blue blog, which is much more intense, critical, and often false. Many of you hereabouts don't seem to know what "neutral" means. That might explain why, when I first arrived here, the Wikipedia article on Prussian Blue asserted that these two 13-year-old girls were whores who engaged in obscene acts in exchange for crack cocaine. I was the one who changed that. It certainly wasn't any of you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eztli
And for the guys on the PB forums, no, Wikipedia is not a "Jewish media" site.
ABC News is a Jewish media organization. They are ideologically opposed and politically hostile to White nationalism. When you respect them as credibile authorities and accept their statements, therefore, at face value, you side with them. Wikipedia is, in other words, one of many pseudo-fairplay sites, of which the Jews operate many.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isotope23
Page will need to be monitored if it comes off protection because per the PB forums there is apparently a concerted effort to revert to the version they want up (which is less NPOV).
Any version of the Prussian Blue article that presumes that a lawyer for the NAACP is an objective and authoritative source of information on the relationships within the Gaede family is less NPOV than an alternative version that presents the NAACP lawyer's opinion as the ignorant and politically hostile opinion that it actually is. The NAACP and White nationalism are opposed to each other in a political struggle.

No "neutral point of view" can fail to take into account the fact that the NAACP and White nationalists are political adversaries when estimating the value of Ted Shaw's opinion.

No "neutral point of view" can fail to downwardly revise its estimate of the credibility of a third party who fails to take into account the fact that the NAACP and White nationalists are political adversaries when estimating the value of Ted Shaw's opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wyss
The fact is, there is no valid useful reason to have information on this topic posted on Wikipedia. There is no actual band, in the real sense, these are two abused and exploited children. What's next? The six year old kidnapped NAMBLA polka dancers? The idea that this topic deserves more publicity is asinine, as we are dealing with children here, the more publicity the more the lives of these kids will be ruined down the line.
Here we have another ignorant opinion holding itself out as being both objective and authoritative, when it is neither. Why does no one ask whether the girls themselves should be consulted on the question of whether they are abused or exploited, or whether, on the other hand, their mother is facilitating their musical hobby? I think that the answer is that you all know that the girls' answer would not be the one most politically convenient to you. So you go looking among their political opponents for "expert" (actually ignorant) opinions, and then you misrepresent such opinions as being, heh, NPOV.

Not that I've checked, but does Wikipedia have articles on Black rappers? Some of those "kill Whitey" rap songs are much more vicious than anything Lynx and Lamb have sung. The steet leftists and the Jewish media don't criticize the rappers because the direction of their musical animosity is the politically correct direction. Again, I say, most of the people I find here don't really know what "neutral" is. Wikipedia is another of those pseudo-fairplay sites, for which the illusion of neutrality vanishes when it is probed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussia...merican_duo%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pr...merican_duo%29

Jerry Abbott

Last edited by Jenab; October 25th, 2005 at 10:28 AM.
 
Old October 25th, 2005 #87
Abzug Hoffman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,483
Default missing blog - pro Prussian Blue, anti-Drudge

Sorry, IF this printed out super messed up. If you hurry you can still find the link to the missing blog in yahoo cache at number 30 result for "Drudge Prussian Blue dating".

Holocaust Now: Who decides what is hate and what isn't?
... other Jews. Prussian Blue expresses the desire that whites ... worth noting that Matt Drudge is Jewish as well. ... search on "white dating" or "Caucasian dating", you only come ...holocaustnow.blogspot.com/2005/10/who-decides-what-is-hate-and-what... - 50k - Cached - More from this site - Save - Block

Help - Help for Webmasters
« back to results for "drudge Prussian Blue dating"
Below is a cache of http://holocaustnow.blogspot.com/200...what-isnt.html. It's a snapshot of the page taken as our search engine crawled the Web. We've highlighted the words: drudge prussian blue dating
The web site itself may have changed. You can check the current page (without highlighting) or check for previous versions at the Internet Archive.

Yahoo! is not affiliated with the authors of this page or responsible for its content.

Notify Blogger about objectionable content.
What does this mean? BlogThis!Holocaust Now
Our drug policy effectively promotes the use of the most deadly and addictive drugs, alcohol and tobacco, while using violence to deter people from using far safer and less addictive drugs, like marijuana and ecstasy. Millions of people are dead as a result of this policy. This makes me angry. Shouldn't you be angry too?
2005-10-24
Who decides what is hate and what isn't?
THE DRUDGE REPORT is at this moment linking to two stories that by themselves aren't very interesting, but when taken together are most revealing.

Let's start with the story titled Young Singers Spread Racist Hate. It's about a pair of twin 13-year-old girls who call themselves Prussian Blue and who sing about white nationalism, or, at least that's what the story claims they sing about, and it's laced with captions like "Teaching Hate" or "A Taste for Hate" that suggest that the writer/producer really wants us to believe that these are really very hateful 13-year-old girls.

The only thing is, they can't really make the case for that. There is this quote, attributed to one of the girls, which reads:
""We're proud of being white, we want to keep being white," said Lynx. "We want our people to stay white … we don't want to just be, you know, a big muddle. We just want to preserve our race."
Is that hate?

I ask because DRUDGE links to another story on the same page titled Palm Beach County: 'More Jewish' than N.Y., from which it can be quoted:
If Jews can assert their heritage by going to a show at the Kravis featuring a Jewish comedian or by enjoying a bowl of matzo-ball soup at their local deli, they may not feel the need to join a synagogue, local Jewish leaders say. Add to that the challenges the religion has faced in recent decades from interfaith marriages.
Clearly, the desire is being expressed here that Jews continue to marry other Jews.

Prussian Blue expresses the desire that whites marry whites. So that's hate. But when Jews express a desire that Jews marry Jews, that isn't hate?

Nor is it hate when Israel, the Jewish state, passes legislation aimed at preventing Muslims marrying Jews?

Nor is it hate when foreigners who work in Israel are forced to agree to not have sex with Jews?

Readers who've read my previous blog entry titled Why didn't you know know where I'm going with this. Hatred is in the eye of the beholder. And in these cases, the eye of the beholder sees things through a decidedly Jewish filter.

The Prussian Blue story is by ABC News. The President of ABC News is David Westin, who is a Jew. ABC News of course is owned by The Disney Corp. The President of Disney is Robert Iger. Who is a Jew. The Chairman of the Board at Disney is still Michael Eisner. Who is a Jew as well.

A news organization that answers exclusively to Jews sees hatred in one race expressing a desire to foster "racial identity", but declines to see the same when their own express the very same desire.

It's worth noting that Matt Drudge is Jewish as well.

If by white nationalism the producers means white supremacy, then yes, I agree that the implication of such an agenda must be considered hateful. White supremacy as I understand it means seeing to it that America become a nation of whites-only, on the basis that it is God's will, and which implies that everybody else is made to leave. And it isn't difficult to imagine what apparatus would be employed to see that happen.

White separatism on the other hand is quite a bit different. As I understand the term, this is about whites seeking to live amongst other whites, and I don't find that to be necessarily hateful. After all, if you look at most civilizations around the world, you will see that the vast majority of people live amongst people of their own race. The complication here is that, in America at least, we have groups like Native-Americans and African-Americans who have been historically denied that choice, and continue to bear hardship because of it. In the context of creating opportunities for equality for those who still suffer their ancestors' inability to exercise free choice — to the extent that such a thing exists — the idea that whites should continue to seek to live amongst themselves is worrisome. But is it hateful? No, I don't believe that.

The difference ultimately comes down to force. Forcing people to leave because you don't like their race is wrong. But then too, forcing people to live together because you don't like their attitudes towards race is wrong as well. Integration will happen over the course of time. The great cities are like huge magnets attracting our young and who with each new generation are less and less concerned with questions of race. Just let it happen.

So, getting back to hatred for a moment, if a white supremacist is somebody who believes that God meant for white people to rule this land and that therefore they are entitled to use violence to drive all others from it, doesn't that then mean we should describe those Jews who advance the notion of the Jewish state — as opposed to a Jewish homeland — as Jewish supremacists?

They see that land as being given to them by God, and that therefore they have the right to use violence against all others who would stake claim to it, do they not?

Somebody please, tell me... what is the difference?

Why is the hatred expressed by Jewish supremacists any less offensive than that expressed by white supremacists?

And how do Jews in the media here in America get away with continually pointing at white hatred while never paying any attention to Jewish hatred in Israel, even though it can be reasonably argued that it is the reason we've been made to fight this so-called war on terror?

Yeah, I know, we're there because of the oil too.

But you know what? Bush is on his way out. Come 2008, Karl and Libby and Condoleeza and Rummy and Cheney and the dullard himself will all be gone.

But Sulzberger will still be here. And though Judy Miller is certain to be gone, there's lots more where she came from. Most of the bad guys are going to stick around.

We can keep them in check. We just need to be willing to call them on their hatred if and when they show it.

Who decides what is hate and what isn't?

People who have the moral clarity to see it and the personal courage to speak out when they do.
posted by Donald Way at 4:08 AM

Last edited by Abzug Hoffman; October 25th, 2005 at 11:06 AM.
 
Old October 25th, 2005 #88
Abzug Hoffman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,483
Default Comments under the blog article

32 Comments:
NHMom said...
Thanks, Donald, for having the clarity and courage! Keep the posts coming ...
8:58 AM Anonymous said...
Good work.
Dont forget
Revelation 2:9 and 3:9.
12:16 PM FRank Galland said...
Jews can call themselves "chosen race" but when a white person considers themselves to be part of the master race , that is wrong
12:55 PM Anonymous said...
i think you make a lot of sense, however i frown upon white nationalism, simply because it's rooted in institutionalized racism. let's not kid ourselves here.

as far as the jews go: i agree that it's religious bigotry(can't be racism since judaism is not a race) to prevent non jews or non-jews or non-whites from marrying white jews.

on the other hand, black nationalism in my opinion is simply a response to centuries of racism against blacks.

all in all, i think 'nationalism' is used too freely and that to determine whether or not it's racist or not depends on the history of the group of people.

there's nothing wrong with diversity. fighting to preserve a so-called race is like so primative in my opinion. the human race is capable of living together in harmony, so long as we want to.
12:55 PM Anonymous said...
frank galland, there's no such thing as "master race" or "chosen people". both are wrong and bigoted and should not be tolerated.

it's all an illusion. get over yourselves.
12:59 PM Anonymous said...
hey, i came to your site while surfing, and you know what? i heard every word you said good post
1:05 PM Anonymous said...
Interesting that when you do a GOOGLE search on "white dating" or "Caucasian dating", you only come up with one site, way down the list. Now try "Jewish dating" and see the plethora of services that GOOGLE considers politicaly correct since their only goal is to preserve the master race bloodlines.
1:16 PM Anonymous said...
Judaism is not a religion. It's an patchwork of different beliefs and traditions that today is labelled "Judaism" . But the Israel Jews don't want to grant the right of return to Ethiopian black jews.

They are all about the Kazhar jews from Eastern Europe, which don't descend from hebrews
1:26 PM Anonymous said...
Take heart friends, the Chosen have overplayed their hand.

The Jews aren't always so clever as they would like themselves to believe. Whenever they are in danger they prove to be the stupidest devils" (Goebbels Diaries (1948)Pg 183).

The Jews in England now demand laws to protect them from anti-
Semitism. We know these tactics from our own past when we were struggling for power. I didn't help much. We were always able to find loopholes in the law. Besides anti-Semitism cannot be eradicated by law once it has taken root with the people. A law against hating Jews is usually the beginning of the end for the Jews (Goebbels Diaries. Lochner (1948) Pg 336).
1:38 PM Anonymous said...
"as far as the jews go: i agree that it's religious bigotry(can't be racism since judaism is not a race)"

If being a jew is only religious and not race-based then how does Israel use geneticly based tests (DNA tests) to determine if potential immigrants are jewish or not? Look it up up on google if you don't believe me.
1:38 PM Anonymous said...
Search google for Christian Identity. Now do the same search for Jewish Identity.

"Christian Identity" is BAD. "Jewish Identity" is GOOD.

Personally, I have no use for either of them. But they should be terms of either equal contempt or equal honor.
1:50 PM Anonymous said...
You guys are missing the point of a pure Jewish blood.

The jews are still waiting for their Messiah (or King). That person has to be Jewish, 100%. He cant be 1/2 Italian or 1/2 black. He needs to be pure.
2:13 PM Anonymous said...
The Jewish saviour will be someone, anyone, who stops the Israelis from treating Palestinians like dogs and start treating them like Israelis. Until that happens, they are on the wrong road (pun intended)....
2:35 PM Anonymous said...
You neglected to mention the part about the "Prussian Blue" twins' father's love of the Nazi swastika, which made it pretty clear where they're coming from. Your selective reading of the story and attempt to link it to the Palm Beach Post article was, quite frankly, dishonest.
4:26 PM Anonymous said...
>>>You neglected to mention the part about the "Prussian Blue" twins' father's love of the Nazi swastika, which made it pretty clear where they're coming from. Your selective reading of the story and attempt to link it to the Palm Beach Post article was, quite frankly, dishonest<<<

This is true! To the author of this blog, why did you fail to mention that?

There's no such thing as Jewish identity. Ethiopian Jews(The truth decendents of Ancient Israelites) cannot and will never identify with Eastern European Jews. The so-called Jewish identity is based on a small group of Jews of European decent who are looked upon as the sole representatives of Judaism.

Matt Drudge may be Jewish, but he's still White. The effort to disassosiate White Jews from the White population is like so Nazi like.
4:55 PM Anonymous said...
DONALD, THANK YOU FOR SPEAKING TRUTH.
NOW, LET'S SHOUT IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS.
5:01 PM Anonymous said...
OH, but I SO WISH that more intelligent, thinking individuals will read this. I was directed here by a buddy in the military that was unhappy with the 'real agenda' he felt that he was serving, but I'll be coming here a lot more now.
Logic, and truth. You can't go wrong.
5:10 PM weefs said...
Fervent Jews are pretty racist. And while being racist AND using the ADL to bludgeon criticism of their racism, you have one slippery eel to dispose of.

HH
5:56 PM Anonymous said...
You neglected to mention the part about the "Prussian Blue" twins' father's love of the Nazi swastika, which made it pretty clear where they're coming from. Your selective reading of the story and attempt to link it to the Palm Beach Post article was, quite frankly, dishonest


And you neglect to mention that swastikas are ancient symbols that were around long before Hitler. Swastikas even appeared on Jewish artifacts. The use of the swastika by many pro-whites is an attempt to reclaim the symbol for its original meanings of light, auspiciousness and life - rather than the common Nazi and post-Nazi symbol of hatred. The swastika appears in many forms thoughout the world and is one of the world's oldest written symbols. I agree that it is time to move beyond Hitler and to reclaim something that is rightfully ours.

In any case, I agree with Donald. Furthermore, I can show you many books authored by Jews for Jews in the 50 years or so leading up to Hitler. The open racial superiority and desire for world rule is shocking. Hitler responded (wrongly) to something that was a genuine threat; only we are no longer allowed to know how bad the Jewish Supremacism was during that time.

The history of the pre-Nazi period has been conveniently whitewashed to keep people in the dark. You won't find these books in ordinary libraries but only in places such as academia or the Library of Congress. I myself was shocked when I came upon these books in the stacks of a world famous library.

I have no problem with any people wanting to preserve itself and its ways; but no group has the right to do it at the expense of others and through deliberate deceit. Unfortunately, many Jews are kept in line by threats from their own community watchdogs like the ADL. There have been other ages when Jews were more likely to criticize each other in public; but this is now labeled as "self-hatred." Open minded Jews need to stand up to the leaders that are promoting Jewish Supremacy.
6:18 PM steve-o said...
Donald,

Are you aware that the Supreme Court played the largest role in bringing integration into our country ?
There's nothing wrong with expressing pride in your ancestry, but did you know that Prussian Blue has lyrics about how she adores Hitler ? Why not be proud without associating with hate symbols, Like I am? Oh and I consider Jews to be white as well by race, but different ethnicity/religion. Your anti-Jewish disease called anti-semitism is chronic out of proportion *sighs*
8:23 PM Anonymous said...
You neglected to mention the part about the "Prussian Blue" twins' father's love of the Nazi swastika, which made it pretty clear where they're coming from.

Typical reaction,as soon as a Jew gets into a tricky spot they reach for the good old reliable swastika to serve as a distraction.
9:26 PM Donald Way said...
... but did you know that Prussian Blue has lyrics about how she adores Hitler ?

This appears to be false.

Indeed, it appears that much of the ABC News article may be false, judging from the talk page on Prussian Blue over at Wikipedia.

Apparently, people are trying to correct the page, but those who've invested so much in hating these little girls have seen to it that the page stay locked, and the statements continue to remain unchallenged.

A very ugly display.

Why not be proud without associating with hate symbols, Like I am?

If you are Jewish I presume you identify with the Star of David. If you are Muslim, esp. Palestinian, I presume they see the Star of David as a hate symbol too.

There was some other comment that the girls must be hateful because their father wears a swastika as a belt buckle. Meanwhile, we're engaging in policies the world over that actually kill people, policies that are advanced by organizations like ABC News by lying to the American people.

They know that such lies will surely result in the death of many innocents, and yet they have the gall to point a finger at these two little girls and accuse THEM of hatred?

Because daddy wears a swastika as a belt buckle?

Wow.
9:41 PM Anonymous said...
Why shouldn't the be proud of their white power? I remember Spain taking pride in anihilating 200 million darkies in the western himisphere after liberating them of their gold, and that white superiority is still being celebrated on Columbus Day.

Wasn't it also white power that liberated the darkies' soul from their body in Africa and South/Southeast Asia? If they didn't liberate all of that loot from those dark beasts, they might not have enriched themself to the point where everyone are today, and instead we/they might still be in some feudal warlord world where they/we could only oppress the lower class white people.
10:37 PM Anonymous said...
You guys. Swastikas come from Theosophical Far Eastern Mysticism mumbo jumbo. blah!

Any student of Myron Fagan knows the Illuminati/CFR has been setting up a race war for years.

(See this article)
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=19920

They tried with the Nihlists and the Western Religions, but were totally shocked when America fought with the Russians against Germany in World War II.

So, since they can no longer pit the Nihlists vs the Western Christian Religions, they naturally have to pit the Blacks vs the White, or the Jews vs the White.

In the Illuminati "Law of 5's," they consider Law I - "Chaos" to be the pristine state of the planet. They view history as one big cycle, with 5 states, or laws.

If you know anything, they hope to set up a Social Cataclysm in which the whole Bureaucratic Systems will come crashing down, and in the Aftermath the world will revert back into Chaos.

I find nothing wrong with Prussian Blue saying they want to preserve the White Race. In the Old Testament, God told Israel that they couldn't marry other races.

Their choice of singing about Rudolf Hess was kind of freaky, cause, he was a nut case.

Please don't play into the plans of the Illuminati/CFR by infighting against one another.

Your real enemy is the Council on Foreign Relations. Til we root these people out of government, our of organizations, out of our lives, we will never truly be free.

Myron Fagan
http://100777.com/myron

For the Illuminati Law of 5's, get the book by William Schnoebelen

Masonry: Beyond the Light

http://www.withoneaccord.org
12:05 AM Anonymous said...
My grandmother was a victim of the russian red army and the german nazi army, having been kidnapped and forced to work until she escaped. but no she isn't jewish, she's ukrainian, and yes i'm sick of hearing all about how many jews were killed - 2,4,6 million... try 10 million ukrainians. we don't hear about it much, if at all. the point i want to make though isn't about jewish domination of the media (which is definately the case) but about the fact that power = wealth and once you have as much wealth as possible what can you have next? answer = a pure bloodline, all the world's elites are, and have always been into it. Things get interesting when the prole's start getting all supremacist-like. ever been to an inter-racial porn site?
12:49 AM Anonymous said...
Look, the jews have you all arguing about what they do and not about whom they are . This is the tactic often used by the Jew. And as long as you follow along there is no problem with it.

First, the word Jew is an English word invented in America in 1775 Before that there was no word Jew in any language.It did not exist in any language . Don't confuse the word Judeo with the word Jew. The hebrew language has no letter "J" or "J" equivilent. The letter "J" was one of the last letters introduced to the English language. In English the word "JEW" means those who practice a religion called judaism, the name could not refer to the true children or anciant Hebrews because they did not practice a religion called judaism. The name Jew could not refer to the biblical children of Israel or their modern day decendents.

Jews can historically be traced from anciant Bible times to today . Many historians including Jews have found that Jews decended from the tribe of Pharisees and today have masked that with the newly inventive word of "JEW" . Yes , I know, you have been taught that Pharisee means something other , but in fact Pharisee is a real tribe which consist of "Khazarres" whom today are known as JEWS. The Kahzarres were the money changers of Biblical times at which Jesus rebuked them many times for their USURY ( charging large sums to loan mony) which the bible forbids and is also a sin and exclusive amongst most Jews today.

Now the Bible clearly states in hundreds of instances that the Jews are not the chosen ones. For one it is clear historic fact that the word "JEW" does not appear nor anyone called "JEWS" in the bible untill KINGS 16:6 over 1000 years after Abraham , Issac and Jacob. So Biblically we can attest that it were impossible for the Jews to be present when GOD made his covenet with ISRAEL.

Let us also remember that ISRAEL is a people NOT a state! God NEVER called any state Israel. He always refered to Israel as "MY PEOPLE" never a state or piece of land.

Let us remember that the Jews of the state of Israel stole that name (Israel) in 1948 and applied it to their land known before as Judea . Before that time there was Never a state of Israel.

No prophecy promised to Israel was ever fullfilled by any Jew. That is a matter of historic fact. All prophecies of the Bible have been fullfilled by anglo Saxons ( true Pronounciation by God as SACCSONS.

BTW the word Saxon is a 1700 perversion of the real word, perpetrated by exclusive Jewish control over printing presses and media in this country.They didn't want the true people to find out whom they were.

Abraham said " in Isaac shall thy seed be called , and shall be called the house of Issac.
All of the chosen were decendents of Isacc, that is biblical fact. Therefore Isaccs son ( drop the "I" vowels are not used in Hebrew spelling) and you have the word "Sacc Sons" .
In the days of Isacc they always called their son by their name plus son. For istance if a man named Jack had a son he would later be refered to as Jackson. That is were many of the anglo saccsons got their name.

This does not include the Negro because they were given their English names by their English slave masters . Yes Slvery was aloud in the Bible as long as a slave master did not mistreat the slave. Note that at that time slavery was exclusive to Blacks but whites. Blacks were brought over to America by Jewish slave ships. This is also a matter of hsitoric record. They made great money in the slavery busines.

In reality the first true slaves were the white Anglo Saccsons whom were known before as Israel. You'll note in your Bible that the Jews tell Jesus they were Never in slavery to any man.

This statement alone proves they are not Israel because everyone knowns that Israel ( Anglo saccsons ) were enslaved. That is part of the Israel identity. So in all reality whites were the first enslaved people,enslaved longer than any race in history.

Isaacs tribe was refered to as the Tibe of Isaac then later ISACCIANS, and finally SACCSONS. Biblically the correcct pronounciation and spelling for the 1700 Jewish invented word SAXONS should really be SACCSONS thusly giving clue to the true tribe of ISRAEL.

God told Isareal "I shall leave your name (ISRAEL) as a curse unto them ( JEWS who stole your heritage) So we see here by Gods admission that he would no longer refer to Israel by that name. He them gave them many new names.

The first name was when the Khazarres chased Israel into the CAUCACUS MTs. Wereas these Jews mocked them and called them caucasions. Yes thats true people it is in your Bibles. Second God called them SACSONS later HE called them Chrsitians because They (SACCSONS ) were the only ones given by God to spread the gospel of Christ Jesus.

Would you believe that the Bible clearly proves that JESUS was not a Jew . Yes thats right and Jesus denies being Jew or king of the Jews and Pilate affirms it. Its right in your Bible!

Would you also believe that the Bible tells us to beleive NOTHING that comes from the mouth of a JEW? Thats right , it also is in your Bible ,and if Jesus is a Jew then the Bible is self defeating in that it would instruct you not to believe Jesus which of course it is not true that Jesus is a Jew.

Would you also believe that the Bible explicitely shows that it was the Jews whom He was delivered unto for crusifixtion and Jesus Himself exclaims that NONE of his followers were there. Its in the Bible

If you would like me to elaboate I sure would with scriptures included.

The whole Jewish chosen one is a myth and God warns us from believing Jewish myths. It says so in explicite scripture.

Thessalonians 2:15 " you suffered from your own countrymen the same things the churches suffered from the JEWS , WHO KILLED JESUS and his prophets and also drove ISRAEL) out. They displease God and are hostile to all men."

Here we see that God clearly makes it known that the JEWS are not Israel since God clearly states that it was the JEWS whom drove Israel out. HE also clearly states that they (Jews) are "hostile" to all men.

Also Scripture points out that ISRAEL fought the Jews and God was pleased! Tired of being lied to from your preachers and the Jews. Read the bible for clearity

Bronson
1:18 AM Anonymous said...
Bronson,
The word jew was in the geneva bible published 1599, well before 1775 or America. It is likely in the 1561 printing as well.

Jesus was a jew and so were his
disciples(more appropriately called yehudite). For more read Matthew 1:1 where Jesus lineage is traced to Abraham and Judah, himself.

Khazars existed many centuries later than Jesus, and Pharisees arent a tribe, you are very mistaken.

Get your facts straight.
Do your own research.
Think for yourself.
Dont spread mis-information!

My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
Hosea 4:6
2:05 AM Anonymous said...
Th only thing that make sense to me, a white South African, is the fact that we were brought up by a lie.

Yes, I prefer white with white marriages, or in fact balcks with blacks etc.

It does not mean that I hate the other races.

However, our parents and their parents brought their children up believing that other races are inferior to my own. The hypocracy we believed in resulted to other races not being able to progress in the country of birth.

Bulldust! If you can allow the sun to shine on your neighbour, that is not hate. However, if you deny the very freedom that you enjoy to another, that is hate.

That is my opinion.
 
Old October 25th, 2005 #89
Abzug Hoffman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,483
Default blog comments continued

3:27 AM Anonymous said...
I think your wrong about that . There is no word of Jew in the hebrew language. In the original KJV 1611 authorized version there was no mention of the word Jew. In fact there is no word Jew in the Septuagint which was the original book from which Jesus quoted .

You still neglect to comment on other articals that I have presented which makes your defense weak.

I can prove that this is wrong by scripture alone. Fact is there is no word Jew in the hebrew language , only judean which means a member of judea. The word Jew is most certainly an American inventive word and is quite infant in reality.

Do your research and find that Kharzares have been around since Jesus time and were known later as the Pharisees. The Pharisees were as much a tribe as the Seducess.

Now I ask you to point to one scripture in the bible that proves jesus was a Jew and I'll show you dozens that prove He was not and even one wereas he denies it and Pilate also agrees with him. You won't find one!

Not god nor any of the angels in heaven once refered to Jesus as a Jew. It is a myth of the Jews in order to show kinship with Jesus so that people will also see them as the chosen ones. The bible clearly shows that we are not to believe the Myths and stories of the Jews.

For instance:

Titus 13-14 Ths witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them (JEWS) sharply ,that they (JEWS) may be sound in the faith ( JESUS)

14 : not giving heed to JEWISH FABLES ( MYTHS) and commandments of men ( rabbi's) , that pervert the truth ( word of God)"

Now we can clearly see that this scripture is talking about JEWS and that fact that this warning is bascially telling us not to believe these people because they are not sound in the faith, they tell fables and Myths ( some bibles say myths) and that we are to rebuke them sharply for their myths and lies. Also we are not to listen to commandments of their men ( Rabbi's) whom the Bible says will pervert the truth.

Now if Jesus is in fact a Jew and the whole Bible was written for Jesus and his cause on earth , this scripture alone tells us we must sharply rebuke Jesus because He is not sound in the faith and he spreads Judaisng myths ( lies) and that his commandments are that of a man and he will also pervert the truth because he is Jew.Jesus never practiced any form of Judaism. In fact He rebuke many forms of Judaistic ritual throughout the Bible! I can prove that also.

Thats pure Bull and you know that Jesus is not a Jew. I can show you tons more wereas the Bible clearly proves Jesus not a Jew nor are the Jews the chosen people.

It is the Jews whom have proclaimed themselves the chosen not God! Many people of old know the bible and know that the Jews were never the chosen, The Bible in many ways clearly shows the Jews to be liars and theives of the rightfull place of Gods real chosen people. God has left many clues in the bible that prove whom the real chosen are .

The bible says that ISRAEL ( real chosen people) will be rich never borrowing money and will be a lender to many. The tiny little state of israel not much bigger than road island and it is the biggest wellfare state in the world and the biggest wellfare burden on American tax payers than anything.

They get billions a year from America to survive. Without the American tax payers billions to israel (the state, not the people) it will dry up and they would fall back into their mid-evil days they knew before 1948 when we aloud them to steal the land from the Palistinians and blasphemy the name of Israel and call this stolen land Israel.

While we are suffering in America with New Orleans and other disasters the money keeps rolling into Israel but not to New orleans simply to keep the illusion alive that these phonies are the true people of Israel.

Immagin what we could have done in America with the Billions per year that go to phony and wellfare state like israel. I'll bet your state alone does not get the money Isreal does? Immagine the education system we could have if we got rid of these leachs on society

And you call them biblical Israel? They could never even in another 2000 year fullfill the chosen ones shoes simply because they are not!

There are dozens of prophecies that not one Jew has fullfilled in accordance to scripture and Gods promise to Israel. In order to be israel, one as a nation must fullfill these prophecies. The tiny wellfare state of Israel is not a nation! they have never been more than their current number in all of history.

These guys believe that some dead Rabbi will come back as the new mesia not Jesus the Christ. How can they then be Israel. For one, it is forbidden and a sin to call any MAN Rabbi. Only Jesus the Christ is the true Rabbi.


Now prove me wrong in the other scriptures I have presented. Why did you not elaborate on them? Have you ever read the Septuagint the oldest of all the manuscripts? Have you ever read the Talmud? I will give you a link to the Talmud if you wish. It is the most hate filled pedophilic book one would ever read. It is pure sickness! And yes it states all Christians must die. Christians meaning children of Christ. Does that sound like blood kinship to Christ Jesus when a book of judaism proclaims all Christians must die? Yes Christians , those of the Christ Jesus, that is whom they are talking about

I bet you even believe that Adam and Eve actually ate an apple as sin? Another Jew insert (myth ) into our Bibles.

I bet you also believe that Adam and Eve are the parents of all creation (And Committed incest) even though the Bible clearly states they are not. Not all blood lines come from Adam and Eve, only that which was created by God for his own purpose came from Adam and Eve.

Bronson
3:33 AM Anonymous said...
Hey Bronson,

What a lot of garbage you write. If you truly believe in the Bible and Jesus Christ, why then do you quote scripture to make a point.

In South Africa, we are chosen ones. In America, you feast on the third world richest and empower demons to enslave the people of God's paradise on earth.

Why do you rebuke Israel when scripture clearly command us to pray for Israel??

Leave the Jews alone. If you were brought up Muslim, how easy would it be to laugh at the God of the Jews, or spit in the face of Jesus. If you were an Indian, praying at tree trunks and whites arrive in your country and spit at your tree trunk, how would it make you feel? Enraged?

Think about it.

Mind the tree trunk in your own eye.
7:26 AM Anonymous said...
Bronson; first of all, there is a word in the Hebrew Bible which means Jew, it is Strong's Hebrew 03064 (yod-he-vav-dalet-yod), it occurs roughly 70 times in the Tanakh. The word is derived patronymically from Strong's Hebrew 03063 (yod-he-vav-dalet-he), which means descendant of Judah. It was translated into the LXX as Ioudaios (Strong's 2453). The New Testament uses this same word to refer to a Jew. Josepheus also used it.

Secondly, Jesus was a Jew. He is called the King of the Jews many times in the New Testament. I should not have to prove this.
The Jews did not invent a myth that Jesus was a Jew so as to "show kinship with Jesus so that people will also see them as the chosen ones." Actually, some Jews called Jesus 'son of pantera,' claiming his father was a Roman soldier named Pantera to make his birth seem illegitimate; ie., not a Jew.

Thirdly, the Pharisees are not a tribe. The best contemporary comparison would be that they were a political party, only in a religious sense; a school of religious teaching. Furthermore, Paul (who wrote Titus) says in Acts 23.6 "Men [and] brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question."

in 22.3 Paul says that he was taught by Gamaliel, a Pharisee mentioned in the Talmud, and again in Philippians 3.5, Paul says that as a Hebrew of the tribe of Benjamin he was a Pharisee.

Pharisees were a Jewish sect, like the Sadducees, the Essenes, or the Christians (until 80-90 with the split between church and synagogue).

Does the scripture not say "For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him." (Romans 10.12)?


And regarding prussian blue and Hitler, this photo was found
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1...0/DSCN0105.jpg
the photo is posted under Thursday, September 15
http://prussianbluefan.blogspot.com/
Forget about what ABC or Donald Way says about anything - a google search for 'hitler' proves absolutely nothing. nothing.
use primary sources and it will cease to be a game of 'he said she said'
http://www.prussianblue.net/

Under lyrics, the song "The Snow Fell" says it all re: Hitler
read Napoleon, minarets and red flag (Read: soviet Union), berlin
and it all comes together.

read victory day:
"Soon will come a great war, a bloody but holy day. And after that purging our people will be free ... Our Cause shall never tire. Our gift to you we bring: A holy creed of Racial purpose, A mighty Race to defend. And when we fly our holy flag Their oppressive reign shall end…."

YES THIS IS HATE PLEASE WAKE UP
Donald, do some actual research before you post
Bronson...go get a decent education, maybe take an introductory course in the Hebrew Bible or New Testament.
7:50 AM Anonymous said...
"I bet you also believe that Adam and Eve are the parents of all creation (And Committed incest) even though the Bible clearly states they are not. Not all blood lines come from Adam and Eve, only that which was created by God for his own purpose came from Adam and Eve."

Well what is the truth then? I mean the only lineage of people we know about came from Adam and Eve originally. And where did other bloodlines come from? What texts are you reading?
 
Old November 2nd, 2005 #90
JohnAFlynn
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,789
Default

Jerry:

It looks like the version on wikipedia now has omitted the nigger quote. It actually appears to be about as NPOV as I could ever expect from the shabbos goy "moderators" at wikipedia.
 
Old November 2nd, 2005 #91
whiteprussian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pale Horse
My twelve year old son is in love! lol
Me too! I joined this form after reading stuff on the interent about Prussian Blue over the last couple of weeks. THen just yesterday i managed to get hold of a copy of some of their music. It is awesome!

Unfortunatly here is england things are even worse than in the US. We have to put up with this kind of liberal rubbish:

http://www.thefridayproject.co.uk/hi...ess/001889.php

Good luck Lamb and Lynx gaede!
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.
Page generated in 2.69380 seconds.