|
October 30th, 2014 | #381 |
Diversity = White Genocide
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Doom Fort II
Posts: 2,800
|
|
October 30th, 2014 | #382 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Armorica
Posts: 36
|
Likewise, if you are already in control of government and the media, you can spew nonsense instead of valid ideas, and it will be enough to stay in power. The Jewish nonsense is used to fill up the space and keep up appearances. We are told that we need race replacement because we are not vibrant enough. No one believes that, but there would be more resistance if the Jews said to our faces that the aim of race replacement is to get rid of us. Maybe the Jewish/leftist nonsense is not entirely apparent until people stop and think about it. At least, it allows lazy people to behave as if nothing was wrong. That's a good way to avoid trouble. And most white people don't want to admit to themselves that the government wants to destroy them: the idea is too awful to contemplate. And if that was really the government's intention, how come there is no massive rebellion? I think it is because people are lemmings. They would rather not join the rebellion before it is in full swing. So far, most white people still refuse to believe that the government wants to kill them, but they don't buy the Jewish propaganda either. I think the Jewish vilification campaigns are effective and will dissuade many voters from voting for David Duke or Robert Ransdell (or Marine Le Pen in France), but it doesn't mean that the voters do not basically agree with David Duke about the desirability of saving white civilization and white people. The Jewish brainwashing is a mile wide, but only an inch deep.
Quote:
It isn't a long term viable option for the USA to ship its industry to China. That policy destroys the country and eventually hurts the investors too. For similar reasons, the richest segment of white society cannot survive independently of the large population pool that it comes from. It so happens that the economy no longer works the way it used to, fifty years ago. Jobs have disappeared due to industrial concentration, automation and the use of computers. The new jobs are largely ill-paid flunky jobs, and there are not even enough of them. There is no reason to accept the widening gap between rich and poor. Some way must be found to protect the white population pool, not just for racial and idealistic reasons, but also because that is the only way to continuously provide the White ruling elite with new smart people. After we get racial separation, there will be more jobs for the children of White people, but I don't think that the invisible hand of Adam Smith will be enough to keep everything running smoothly. Government intervention will be needed. Obviously, until we get racial separation, the priority for White people should be to stop the anti-white "affirmative action" coupled with mass immigration. |
|
October 31st, 2014 | #383 | |
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
|
That kind of thinking is just so wrong. And it doesn't work.
Longshanks did just that in 1290. It took 400 years that time before they came slithering back. All he really accomplished was to export the jew problem, temporarily, to other White nations in Europe. What would work is a medium to large size dozer with a competent operator to excavate a trench, line the bastards up along side the trench, administer a reasonable dose of lead to each kike, problem solved. If that offends your sense of fair play then they could be given a quick trial for their treason, crimes against humanity, or other capital crimes, all of which somewhere around 98% of them are guilty of. The rest can be deported, after being spayed and neutered of course.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
October 31st, 2014 | #384 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
|
|
November 1st, 2014 | #385 | |
Switching to glide
|
Quote:
Provided there are still enough white people around to do it. Otherwise, planet Earth is going to be comprised of variations of Brazil everywhere but China and North Korea.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder |
|
November 1st, 2014 | #386 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
He is saying that somebody that can't get a job should be sterilized. Totally stupid -- and probably what a lot of conservatives really think. People who think this way are ignorant about economics. They don't take account of the fact that under capitalism the demand for labor gets smaller and smaller, with massive unemployment as the result -- not as a fault of the worker, but simply because there are fewer and fewer jobs to go around. It is not a mark of inferiority to lose at musical chairs. There are certainly people in the USA that should be sterilized, but not because they lost in economic competition.
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; November 1st, 2014 at 04:05 PM. |
|
November 1st, 2014 | #387 | ||
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
|
Quote:
Jebus christ, now I'm starting to sound like a hippy.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
November 8th, 2014 | #388 |
Administrator
|
[guy makes a lot of my points]
SD Posted December 15, 2012 at 3:22 am | Permalink Re: Mechanic If the whole argument is about biology, as you suggest, then no reasoning and no strategy will suffice and the fact that you are here arguing about such things is inconsistent with itself. You’re probably right, and my only purpose here was to make a funny jab at Kurtagic’s muddled thinking. My original comment involved tasteful barnyard metaphor but alas, it was not allowed. “It is reasoning, however poor after all, that has allowed the “ideas of our ruling parasites” to hold such sway.” Simply false. The overwhelming majority of white people disagreed with anti-white policies every step of the way. White people have voted against all of it. It didn’t matter, because the courts dismissed their votes. Then the government enforced the courts decision against the white majority. We have countless examples. Brown v Board, SB 1070, Prop 187, etc. The problem is not white people being “convinced” that anti-white policies are “right.” They never believed that. Even self-hating white liberals usually live in all-white neighborhoods. Given a free choice, whites decide live in white neighborhoods, marry whites, and send their kids to white schools. I’m willing to admit that today things are a bit different, but that’s after fifty years of nonstop propaganda and government coercion. This is not a matter of opinion. The historical record is unequivocal and repetitive. U.S. government forces races to mix. Whites resist. Government deploys troops. Whites flee to suburbs. Again and again and again. Government refuses to enforce immigration law. Whites vote for local enforcement. Court system throws out white vote. Etc, etc. I’m not too familiar with Europe & Australia. What I do know seems to suggest that those governments silently allowed non-white immigration while ignoring it in national politics. There’s a book about Australia by Katherine Betts(?) in which a politician admitted to this tactic. South Africa. Something like 97% of whites voted to keep apartheid policies even in its final years. Apartheid didn’t go away because whites were “convinced” it was wrong. It went away because South Africa was facing a guerrilla war and foreign sanctions. If I remember correctly, over a million whites fled the country after the blacks took over in 1994. Summary: no white population has ever supported its own racial demise. The “suicide” myth is something encouraged by Jews like Gottfried, Kaufman, and Mercer. Getting crushed by governments and international sanctions then fleeing by the millions? Yeah, that’s not suicide. Re: Greg Johnson Rather than talk past you I’m going to accept that there are fundamental disagreements. Very few of us can agree on what’s happening or what needs to be done about it. I think the latter depends on the former. Being politically effective means striking at the causes of problems rather than their symptoms. That’s the difference between WN and conservative boobery. But we need to agree on those causes. We need a common frame of reference. Then we debate goals and strategies. That’s the A3P’s real problem. They tried to merge WN and Tea Party and the result is an inability to move in a clear direction. They’re a pro-white party whose presidential candidate admitted to being uninterested in racial politics. If they had sorted themselves out beforehand this kind of inner contradiction wouldn’t appear. |
November 8th, 2014 | #389 | ||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Hitler didn't resist? Rockwell? The 20s clan? Lindbergh? Ford? The Bund? The White Citizens Councils? The klan again? Chester Doles? Matt Hale? The Order? Glenn Miller? What do they have in common? They were all shut down by illegal means, or simply crushed by cops/military. Then some academic brony says whites don't resist. White organization is crushed by the enemy. That's why it seems like there isn't any. Why is Nick Michaloliakos in prison, Johnson? Can someone explain that? Quote:
The enemy hasn't persuaded people one tenth as much as it has taken power by stealth and then slowly but surely crushed/silenced all competing views. Made people's social status and income dependent on their mouthing the current lies. How can you not see this? How can you not acknowledge this? You act like our enemy won a debate and has some kind of valid moral standing that we must somehow reverse. This is wrong, and worse, insane. Quote:
What kind of a cause doesn't even acknowledge enemy action? Literally does not even seem to believe an enemy exists? This is a large part of what empowers the jews. No one talks about what they're doing. What they've done. Just take VNN: 1) jumped on me for actually trying to talk directly to public 2) server contract canceled after illegitimate FBI investigation prompted by clown up in canada 3) Chester Doles, for who we raised money, is thrown in prison on some bs charge - very parallel to the greek case, in that he was jailed because he was getting dozens to hundreds of people at his white Local Unit (NA) meetings. 4) our whale backer Marc Moran, subjected (along with his late-pregnant wife) to intense media abuse, pulls out. So we lose the funding for extra writing. I could give you a thousand lesser examples. All of the above were brought about by jews, purely because of our ideas here. And you want to say that we are doing it to ourselves and no one is being hauled off to prison. You're seriously stupidly full of shit to belch garbage like that. Quote:
|
||||
November 8th, 2014 | #390 |
Administrator
|
[guy destroys johnson's argument]
SD Posted December 15, 2012 at 5:23 pm | Permalink “Most people don’t want to mix with blacks or see their country flooded by non-whites. But many people think that desire is morally discreditable, so they will not stand up for it.” 1) The number of people willing to fight for an idea is tiny. Most people won’t even take risks for tangible goods. Principled fighters are a minority within a minority. It follows that the majority of people do what they’re told so long as it doesn’t entail significant personal sacrifice. Stanley Milgram arguably proved this. “It is not all a matter of force, after all. A Bolshevik-style bloodbath has not been unleashed against us.” 2) The masses may be herdlike but they aren’t stupid. They don’t need a Bolshevik-style massacre to realize when they’re beaten. All they need is an adequate show of force. The government ended any question of active resistance when it deployed federal troops against white protesters. Little Rock, Arkansas is the best known example but troops were also sent to places like Clinton, Tennessee and Clay, Kentucky. The government also deployed troops against white rioters in the 1970s after it implemented ‘forced busing.’ Boston is a good example. 3) Following this show of force, active resistance became passive resistance. People moved from areas with large but segregated non-white populations to 96% or 97% white communities. Forced busing schemes were implemented to overcome this form of “cheating the system.” “The problem with your narrative is that you do not explain why our people have failed to resist their dispossession.” 4) I think my explanation is perfectly clear. Whites have resisted every step of the way. They tried voting and the courts overruled it. They tried legal challenges and the courts overruled them again. They tried physical violence and the government sent in the troops. In the face of bayonets, tear gas, and tanks, white people made the reasonable choice to simply avoid the problem rather than try to fight an unwinnable battle. Look at the historical record. It’s all there. 5) It’s an error of hindsight to assume that people could have known that what started as calls for “fairness” and “equality” would become forced busing, racial quotas, and mass exodus. Some did understand, but it was not self-evident at the time. It would have sounded totally absurd to an American in 1950 that by 2008 whites would be approaching minority status under the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama II. Likewise, most white people today don’t understand, due to insufficient grasp of facts, that what awaits us is another South Africa. “What is lacking in our people is the moral courage and conviction to fight their dispossession.” 6) Moral conviction is like intelligence. It’s either there or it isn’t. White people don’t need a new morality to understand that the enriching diversity of the “rape capital of the world” is a bad thing. If we get them to accept our worldview then the solution is self-evident. For the reasons I’ve outlined, most people won’t take a stand on racial issues because they are, by instinct, susceptible to browbeating and social pressure. And since any legal means of redress is trumped by government force, they see it as a moot point. Even people willing to make sacrifices need to believe their sacrifice will have an effect. |
November 8th, 2014 | #391 | ||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
November 8th, 2014 | #392 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
The problem isn't that Whites are convinced that anti-White policies are right. The problem is that, regardless of how they may feel, they don't know what to say. The political tradition in the USA is entirely liberal. Political arguments in the USA generally have to be couched in liberal principles -- built around individual rights/equality, or some kind of argument that individual rights/equality are being violated -- to be accepted as legitimate. When there is an argument to be made on the marginally pro-White side, it is usually because the anti-White agenda itself has abandoned liberal principles and crossed over into illiberalism. At that point you get the plea of "equal rights for Whites." That's about as far as most White people will go. But that's not really pro-White. It's just anti-anti-White, like the BUGSters.
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; November 8th, 2014 at 06:36 PM. |
|
November 8th, 2014 | #393 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
Rockwell, as everybody knows, was killed by one of the many psychos that uniformed "Nazi" groups typically attract. Matt Hale was not shut down through illegal means. Matt Hale knowingly allowed an informant/provocateur to associate with him for two years until an interaction between Hale and this person occurred that could be interpreted as soliciting murder. In many countries, as I understand, using a provocateur in that way is illegal, but in the USA it is strictly legal. That is why it is imperative especially in the USA to avoid people who advocate illegal activity, because you can very easily get locked up for nodding or saying yeah to somebody talking like that. It's not fair, but in the USA it's legal. Chester Doles, as I recall, made a mistake by not checking with Federal as well as State authorities about what laws affected his possession of firearms as an ex-convict. He was not railroaded. The amount of money spent on his defense was an extravagant waste. (Much like Ed Steele.) Only part of what happened to Glenn Miller in the legal system was crooked. Miller unfortunately set himself up for that by signing a consent decree to get out of a suit being prosecuted by Morris Dees in a North Carolina court, thinking that it was a meaningless "scrap of paper." The result was that Dees could then, when the opportunity arose, take Miller to a Federal court where a crooked judge indeed -- perhaps Dees' crony -- presided. Glenn Miller would have avoided a lot of trouble by not signing that Devil's Pact in the first place. I never heard before that the 1920s Klan was broken up through illegal means. I have only heard that they fell into disrepute because of the behavior of one of their leaders, and then they broke into factions. The Federal Government, as I understand, did use some illegal means to get evidence against Klansmen who had killed "Civil Rights workers" in the 1950s. The Order, as everybody knows, was an illegal enterprise from the get-go. You are really not being very careful here in compiling this list. I did a little research on the German-American Bund a few years ago, and it seemed that there was a lot of bias in the way that organization was treated. The instigator of that persecution, Congressman Samuel Dickstein, was a Soviet agent as well as a Jew. Now, the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg was a mockery of justice, and many people said so at the time. The same is true of the trial of Saddam Hussein and his associates in Iraq, and I think also in the case of Slobodan Milosevic. But this kind of pseudo-trial outside of the USA does not fall under the same rules and the same scrutiny as occurs with a civilian trial in the USA. The scandal here is that people may think that such "trials" follow rules similar to civilian trials in the USA, when in fact they are just glorified lynchings. To suppose that civilian trials in the USA are just like the IMT at Nuremberg is to make the converse error. Crooked things happen in the legal system, but even somebody known as a White racist can probably avoid a bad outcome in court 9 times out of 10 by being well informed about what not to do. The key things that I know are, (1) don't associate with people who advocate committing crimes, and (2) if you get dragged into interactions with the legal system, get expert advice. The fact that provocateurs working for the government are allowed to break laws in order to get you to do the same (and you'll be prosecuted but they won't), is crooked -- which is what tripped up Hal Turner, because he didn't know about that double standard -- but not only racists are affected by this. I think that a much bigger problem than crooked proceedings is bias in the legislation itself, like so-called Civil Rights legislation, and hate-crime laws.
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; November 9th, 2014 at 12:39 AM. |
|
November 8th, 2014 | #394 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
November 8th, 2014 | #395 | |||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
November 8th, 2014 | #396 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
What pattern? You said that most of them were "shut down through illegal means." That's not accurate. They were mostly shut down through legal means. Were traps laid? Yes, but it was done for the most part legally.
It's an important distinction. If the government were going to ignore the law entirely to shut us down, then the best thing would be to abandon all hope now. Fortunately that's not the case. If we are a little bit intelligent, and if we learn from the experience of others, we can avoid most of that kind of trouble.
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com |
November 8th, 2014 | #397 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Look..the jewshtick is...Oy, for thousands of years you hateful vicious xtian whiteskin goys have poysecuted us in every white nation around the globe, capped off by The Holocaust (TM). Which is what you always wanted to do all along. And what you'll do again if we let you keep your white nations after that nasty thing you did. How do we fight back morally and not take this jewish fabricated history-morality into account? I see no way. In fact, even to pose it that way, the usual way, is to miss the point: the H is not a problem, not a thing to be run away from, it's a great opportunity - because our scholars have proved that it's nothing but a tissue of lies! The H is something we can use. it's a great opening for us. But even if we wanted to avoid it, we couldn't. There's also the very significant fact that it's hard just to get our people even to recognize jews, or to think about them. Well, these are the points where the jews have done our work for us: everyone knows about the holocaust and anne frank and elie wiesel and their works and such. So they have, counterintuitively, prepped people for the WN cause. Because we have some common base of knowledge that WE know aint so, and if we can communicate our understanding to people, just maybe the whole edifice goes boom! The right analogy might be to beating up the biggest member of a gang so the rest of the gang runs off in terror. If jews use A, B, C to make us feel bad, and A is the one we never stop hearing about, AND it's completely factually baseless, how is that not an incredible opportunity for us to exploit? |
|
November 8th, 2014 | #398 | ||
Administrator
|
Quote:
I don't. It was an illegal decision under cover of law. Quote:
|
||
November 8th, 2014 | #399 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Your attitude, Hadding, is exactly like the carny encouraging the rube to have another toss at the bottles, this time he's sure to win. Keep playin' that rigged game, white man. |
|
November 8th, 2014 | #400 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
#1, white nationalism, wn infighting |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|