Vanguard News Network
Pieville
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 14th, 2013 #1
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default "it's a jewish conspiracy" says Labour lord

Quote:
The Labour party today suspended one of its peers over claims he blamed a Jewish conspiracy for being jailed for dangerous driving.

Lord Ahmed was imprisoned for three months for sending texts minutes before his car was involved in a fatal crash on the M1.



But Britain’s first male Muslim peer has blamed his prison sentence on pressure placed on the courts by Jews ‘who own newspapers and TV channels’, The Times reported.

The 55-year-old allegedly told an Urdu-language broadcast in Pakistan that the judge who jailed him for 12 weeks was appointed to the High Court after helping a ‘Jewish colleague’ of Tony Blair during an important case.

As the controversy emerged, the Labour party moved to suspend him from the party and condemned ‘any sort of anti-Semitism’. Labour leader Ed Miliband is Jewish.

In 2009 Lord Ahmed of Rotherham admitted in court sending and receiving five messages at 60mph on the M1.

The last was sent two minutes before the former magistrate's Jaguar speeded into Slovakian father-of-two Martyn Gombar, 28, who died.


Sentencing Ahmed, 51, at Sheffield Crown Court, Mr Justice Wilkie accepted his texting had not caused the crash.

But he said the 'prolonged, deliberate and highly dangerous driving' of the peer meant only jail time could be justified.



According to the Times, Lord Ahmed used an interview to claim it should have been sentenced by a magistrate.

‘My case became more critical because I went to Gaza to support Palestinians,’ he said.

‘My Jewish friends who own newspapers and TV channels opposed this.’

He claimed that Jewish-owned media groups put pressure on the courts to charge him with a more serious offence.

He also alleged Mr Justice Wilkie rose to prominence during Tony Blair's premiership in ‘an important case involving a Jewish colleague of ours’.

The interview, given during a visit to Pakistan, is thought to have been aired in April last year.

Today a Labour spokesman said: ‘The Labour Party deplores and does not tolerate any sort of anti-Semitism. Following reports in The Times today we are suspending Lord Ahmed pending an investigation.’


In 2009 Lord Ahmed was jailed for 12 weeks for dangerous driving after sending and receiving text messages minutes before his car crashed into a stationary vehicle on the M1 near Sheffield on Christmas Day 2007.

He was freed by the Court of Appeal after serving only 16 days of his prison sentence and later supported an AA/Populus poll into mobile phone use among motorists, saying he had 'learnt the hard way' about the problem.

He joined the Labour Party in his teens and was made a life peer in 1998.

Lord Ahmed was suspended from the Labour Party for three months last year over reports that he offered a 10 million-dollar 'bounty' for the capture of US President Barack Obama and his White House predecessor, George Bush.

The peer denied having made the comments, published in a Pakistani newspaper, and was reinstated after an investigation by Labour Lords Chief Whip Lord Bassam after it was found he had been misquoted.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-sentence.html

So he caused someone's death and was subsequently jailed for dangerous driving yet this didn't appear to be a problem to the Labour party. He appears to have been critical of jews and they suspend him.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old March 14th, 2013 #2
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Speeded?

How can the jews be responsible for him receiving and responding to text messages before crashing into a man who died.
__________________
 
Old March 14th, 2013 #3
Ghetto-Blaster
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 511
Default

It's like a Paki on Slovak version of the carriage crash from TOTC.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Speeded?

How can the jews be responsible for him receiving and responding to text messages before crashing into a man who died.
You don't want to ask that question. Who said Jew-naming was the white man's way anyhow? It's clearly been corrupted by muds.
 
Old March 14th, 2013 #4
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Speeded?

How can the jews be responsible for him receiving and responding to text messages before crashing into a man who died.
'xactly. There may be merit for him to argue that his Gaza exploits led the media to slam him harder, but three months for causing a fatal crash is friendly by anyone's measure.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old March 14th, 2013 #5
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
'xactly. There may be merit for him to argue that his Gaza exploits led the media to slam him harder, but three months for causing a fatal crash is friendly by anyone's measure.
If anything it would be the jews helping him out by not throwing the book at him.

Muzzies rambling on their personal persecution being an 'jewish conspiracy' tends to muddy the waters quite a lot (it allows the jews quite a lot of intellectual wiggle-room on a wide range of different things from ritual murder, to the Israel Lobby and the Protocols of Zion). I remember reading Ed Hussein's 'The Islamist' and it does quite accurately characterise the whole muzzie mentality, but what it doesn't say is that it is a simple inversion of the jews and 'anti-Semitism'/'Nazis'.

After all whenever a jew is brought to book for anything that's the first thing they do: scream that it is an 'anti-Semitic' conspiracy against them personally.

Edit: I wonder if; in order to keep in with the politically-correct current of things, rather than throwing the book at Muslims we should throw a Koran instead? Or perhaps a tennis ball machine firing the various tomes of Hadith? It'd certainly be far more entertaining than a three month prison sentence for effectively killing someone.
__________________

Last edited by Karl Radl; March 14th, 2013 at 12:48 PM.
 
Old March 14th, 2013 #6
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
If anything it would be the jews helping him out by not throwing the book at him.

Muzzies rambling on their personal persecution being an 'jewish conspiracy' tends to muddy the waters quite a lot (it allows the jews quite a lot of intellectual wiggle-room on a wide range of different things from ritual murder, to the Israel Lobby and the Protocols of Zions). I remember reading Ed Hussein's 'The Islamist' and it does quite accurately characterise the whole muzzie mentality, but what it doesn't say is that it is a simple inversion of the jews and 'anti-Semitism'/'Nazis'.

After all whenever a jew is brought to book for anything that's the first thing they do: scream that it is an 'anti-Semitic' conspiracy against them personally.

Edit: I wonder if; in order to keep in with the politically-correct current of things, rather than throwing the book at Muslims we should throw a Koran instead? Or perhaps a tennis ball machine firing the various tomes of Hadith? It'd certainly be far more entertaining than a three month prison sentence for effectively killing someone.
Exactly. That's what any person of normal thinking processes would infer but this moron is so out of touch that he doesn't realise three months (of which he probably served half) is extremely friendly, but you don't see anyone screaming "conspiracy" because he got such a light sentence.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old March 14th, 2013 #7
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Exactly. That's what any person of normal thinking processes would infer but this moron is so out of touch that he doesn't realise three months (of which he probably served half) is extremely friendly, but you don't see anyone screaming "conspiracy" because he got such a light sentence.
He sounds just like your typical politician (a-la Andrew Mitchell and 'plebgate') but instead of it just being a 'frame-up' it is phrased as a 'jewish conspiracy'.
__________________
 
Old March 14th, 2013 #8
fyc
fine young casuals
 
fyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: oldham
Posts: 7,558
Default

the real story here is the lienient sentence the immigrant received . only 3 months when it carries 10 years for indeginous people
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.
Page generated in 0.12984 seconds.