|
September 14th, 2009 | #21 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 933
|
Quote:
Libertarianism was designed to do the very thing it does: create confusion in the political arena. Last edited by richyrichard; September 14th, 2009 at 09:27 PM. |
|
September 14th, 2009 | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 933
|
Gigantic dictatorial control??? I think we are discussing the real Hitler here, not the Jew Hollywood/History Channel version, you know, the Hitler that stands 30 feet tall, has horns growing out of his head, and has large fangs and green eyes. Yeah, that one.
|
September 14th, 2009 | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 933
|
Individualism has been re-defined along humanist lines: government of the people, by the people, and for the people.
The Jews mock our ancestors for their individualism, but the sly Jew has re-defined that individualism. Our ancestors were religious. They believed in God, the Manefest Destiny, and that all men should be guided by the Holy Spirit. Now, that's unity! That's cohesiveness! That's brotherhood! That's a strong central government! A free people, meaning free of domination by other people, united in their allegiance to their God. Even in paganism, the people are united in their allegiance to their gods and live to fulfill their assigned missions in life in a co-ordinated way. But the Jew definition if individualism is devoid of any unifying force. We all scatter and live as a divided mass, easily conquered, selfishly persuing our own interests. Having persuaded (tweaked) the masses to believe this humanist rot, the Jews then offer salvation by enticing the people to join some group or faction, a group which the Jew will always pit against an opposing group. Business has their Chamber of Commerce while labor has their unions, for example. These institutions become the news gods. Then, the Jews get the people arguing over which human-designed system or program will work the best for their group or faction. Whatever it is, it must be given power by merging it with the government, a process that ends in Marxism. Its a funny thing about religious zealots. They can arouse the slumbering masses in a way like no other. Its all very subjective. They paint idealistic scenarios, then use objective examples to sublimate the subjective consciousness of the people. Alter the subjective and you alter the objective. The outer world changes when the inner subjective concept of it is changed. Its like sympathetic magic or mesmerism. All creative work is preceed by imagination. |
September 14th, 2009 | #24 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Read some history. It pains me deeply that about 50% of this forum cannot tolerate anything that is not black or white. Hitler was not the fellow the jews make him out to be, most notably in that he never attempted to genocide the jews. He certainly was a dictator. The fact that a Nazi state would be better than what we have now does not mean there's not a better state than Hitler's still, and that better state is what I'm laying out. You might disagree, but I'm only interested in calm, thoughtful dissent, not in childish rants involving abstractions. |
|
September 14th, 2009 | #25 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 933
|
Quote:
No, Hitler was not a dictator. Nor did the Nazi Party seize control of the national government by force, nor did Hitler issue orders and force everyone to obey him as a dictator would. The only difference between Germany and other western countries was the program of the NSDAP and Hitler's use of the swastika to unite Germans on racial grounds and rail against the Jews. If you are going to lay out a better state, then you must first understand what kind of state Germany was. Personally, I wouldn't spend the time making the comparison. I don't think renouncing the Treaty of Versailles or dealing with the Polish Corridor has any relevance to us here today. The issues that confronted Germany are not our issues. It the last election, Hitler only got 56% of the vote, as I recall reading somewhere. Probably no more that half the German people really bought into Hitler's pan-Germanism. I think Germans liked the Party's labor stance, re-uniting the German States, the foreign policy, and the national bank. But all that was their time. It was their experience. We need something for us today that addresses our concerns and the direction in which we want to go as a nation. We can lecture on nationalism and promote America as a nation-state. We can present solutions to the border problem, bailouts of banks, deficit spending, gun rights, pro-life, anti-porn, the pressing issues. And, more importantly, we need to address the problem of Jewish capitalism. As for developing a philosophy of living, you can talk about it, but it can't be part of a program because people will think you are trying to force them into a lifestyle. Hitler spoke of his weltunchaing (sp), or whatever that was, but it was just his idea of things. He didn't try to impose it on anyone. We also need to distinguish between party functions and national functions if we are to correctly understand Germany during the 1930s. The Jews mingle the two. Hitler never wore his party uniform except to party rallies and functions. As Chancellor, when officiating in national affairs, he wore his Chancellor's garb. He wore a suit and tie to international conferences. Party parades bore the swastika flag, while national holiday parades bore the German national flag. The separation was always there. We must also have programs that address immediate needs that are different from long range programs. For instance, we may ultimately want to abolish the income tax but we can't do that now. For one thing, we need to reclaim all the wealth that has been stolen from us by the elite. We need a strong national defense. Its going to take power to straighten out America's problems. After they have been resolved, then we can move toward the ideal, such as decentralization. So we need to explain this so people understand. Last edited by richyrichard; September 14th, 2009 at 09:22 PM. |
|
September 15th, 2009 | #26 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 251
|
A point I made in the other thread:
Quote:
__________________
Occidental Dissent "A functioning police state needs no police." —William Borroughs |
|
September 16th, 2009 | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 56
|
Business?
Sorry I misspelled business Alex.
I'm new to this and granted, I might not be as "learned" as others here, but I do want what is best. Besides, many books out there contain the "wrong" type of information; sanitized!! I do not want the government to run everything, Alex. I want them to play the role that is necessary. Libertarianism offers minimal, I want larger in areas where I think they are needed. Needless mental masturbation is not my style. I am not an intellectual nor do I aspire to be one. I recognize my limitations and my strenghts. I am not the type of man who is impressed by those that can recite epic poems in Greek, neither I'm I amused by those who can pull "quotations out of their ass. I mean really, what does that prove?! That you have read far too many books and are incapable of independent thinking? It reminds me of those Liberal Professors that live in ivory towers, away from the peasants they claim they understand, yet, secretly, hold contempt for. I have far more respect and "use" for the illiterate carpenter than I do for the poet who speaks Latin. Politics seem to work like this, you have the economic side and you have the social side. Currently, in "economics", we have this mindless selfish system based on shallow consumerism. Americans are out there working their asses off to buy useless shit they don't really need like flat screen T.V.'s and iPod's or iPhones or whatever the hell it is. Why is that? On the social side of things, people, especially the youth, are constantly bombarded with anti-White, pro race-mixing propaganda which they eat by the spoonful. Faggotry and other perversions are promoted and anything resembling self control and modesty is mocked. What effect does this have on society as a whole? Libertarians seem to want to take this two and make them HARDCORE?! Alex, what exactly are you offering these people? A more advanced version of what they already have but without the niggers and "culcha'"?! Why would they give up their nigger cocks? Give them up for what?! Plain white bread?! That ain't gonna' happen. You know, we could learn a thing or two from the Japanese and their more "group" oriented culture. Our "individual" one has left us weak, disenfranchised, disorganized, apathetic, unhappy etc. Libertarianism could not offer us this with it's "individual" mentality. The Japanese seem to be pretty "untouched" don't you think? Now why would that be?! Oh man I wasn't going to do this but what the hell, here's a "quote" from George Carlin. Enjoy. "One of the more pretentious political self-descriptions is "Libertarian". People think it puts them above the fray. It sounds fashionable, and to the uninitiated, faintly dangerous. Actually, it's just one more bullshit political philosophy." Cheers! |
September 16th, 2009 | #28 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,006
|
A point I made in the other thread:
Quote:"Indeed, there is nothing “libertarian” at all about what we are proposing to do: overthrowing civic institutions and replacing them with a new blut und boden racial order, mass violations of sacrosanct individual rights and property rights, engaging in ‘aggression’ against sovereign individuals in the name of collectivism, engaging in racial and religious intolerance, imposing ethical and aesthetic standards on a libertine populace, etc. A true libertarian (whose mind is governed by universal abstractions) would never entertain such measures. In many ways, the White Nationalist worldview (based solely on collective self interest, not highminded universal principles) is the polar opposite of libertarianism and the other species of liberalism." This was written by Prozium. Are you Prozium? |
September 20th, 2009 | #29 |
Administrator
|
Interesting that while libertarianism is a philosophy of individualism, yet still the libertarians in the real world work together much more effectively than White Nationalists do. What explains this paradox?
|
September 20th, 2009 | #31 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Your blather about heart is just making excuses for idiots and incompetents. |
|
September 20th, 2009 | #32 | ||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
its decadence without I know - what do details matter to a big man like you, dealing with the important stuff. Little men, incompetent men, are the biggest fantasists, and they are the ones in love with STRENGTH! Quote:
|
||||
September 20th, 2009 | #33 |
.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: England
Posts: 764
|
I think the signature of Gabry (Ponte) sums up what people should be thinking and feeling:
"You are Nothing, Your Volk is Everything." Individualism is nothing more than mental jewish trickery. A strong centralised government is the way to go. |
September 20th, 2009 | #34 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
You are not nothing. If you are nothing, then the White race is no better than the nigger race. Would you like your kids indoctrinated at school to turn you in if you made the wrong remark? That's what actually happened with Hitler youth. Both the race and the individual are something. Both have their proper sphere. Pure collectivism is as wrong and dangerous as pure individualism. |
|
September 20th, 2009 | #35 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,006
|
"You are Nothing"
"Are" pertains to existence. "Nothing" pertains to non-existence. A logical fallacy, suitable for a government-lover. That central state you advocate: Do you want to be the giver, or the receiver, of the bullets? |
September 20th, 2009 | #36 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Quote:
Last edited by psychologicalshock; September 20th, 2009 at 10:39 PM. |
|
September 20th, 2009 | #37 | |
.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: England
Posts: 764
|
Quote:
The Priests are the mind, the Soldiers are the arms and legs, and the Workers are the organs. "You are Nothing, Your Volk is Everything."....there are NO individuals. |
|
September 20th, 2009 | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,006
|
Did your volk type the above post?
|
September 20th, 2009 | #39 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
All things that are naturally deep purple elephants like to dance on the sun.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
September 20th, 2009 | #40 |
Administrator
|
That's the key to understanding about 90% of the ones who think they are NS: they don't realize that the people wielding the whip are .00001% and they would be among the 99.999% getting whipped.
|
Tags |
jew talk, jew von mises, liberaltarianism, libertarianism is jewish, libertarianism is white, state withers away |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|