Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old September 12th, 2009 #1
Richard Bailey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 56
jewsign Libertarianism Is Poison

Why do so many people here support this perverse ideology?

It seems incompatible.

Libertarianism offers the worst of conservatism and liberalism. On the economic side of things, Libertarians worship money above everything. On the social side of things faggotry and perversions are promoted.

Why are you a Libertarian?

This is the most vile ideology I have ever read about. It is also the most Jewish. Rothbard, Rand, Friedman etc. What do they they all have in common?!

So why would I join this cult?!

Those of you that promote "Judaism For The Masses" are whacko.

Libertarianism does not care for borders, culture, language or anything of the sort. That which forms a cohesive and well functioning society. Libertarianism offers you "freedom" in the worst possible way. I dare you to take your "racist" views to other Libertarians and see how they react. Liberals would actually be more receptive to your hatred than Libertarians. Communities don't matter, the borders should be open, corporations should provide oxygen, child porn should be legal, we welcome everyone, regardless of race, regardles of ethnicity, regardless of sexual orientation blah blah blah.

You are not free under this perverse ideology, you are a slave to mindeless shallow consumerism and hedonism. FUCK THAT. If it feels good, do it. Right? I don't think so.

Libertarianism offers the worst aspects of "freedom". You will not be free under this sickness, you will continue to be a slave to the system. So go ahead, call yourself a Libertarian and keep on posturing with your bullshit about how you are not part of the "Two Systems" and therefore free. YOU ARE NOT. You are just another spineless Conservative with a self destructive streak. Fuck Yeah!! That's what society needs, a pussy who is on his way to killing himself all in the name of rebelliousness. Yeah!!
 
Old September 12th, 2009 #2
Robert Bandanza
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: JUDEAware, originally MassaJEWsetts
Posts: 8,901
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Bailey View Post
Why do so many people here support this perverse ideology?

It seems incompatible.

Libertarianism offers the worst of conservatism and liberalism. On the economic side of things, Libertarians worship money above everything. On the social side of things faggotry and perversions are promoted.

Why are you a Libertarian?

This is the most vile ideology I have ever read about. It is also the most Jewish. Rothbard, Rand, Friedman etc. What do they they all have in common?!

So why would I join this cult?!

Those of you that promote "Judaism For The Masses" are whacko.

Libertarianism does not care for borders, culture, language or anything of the sort. That which forms a cohesive and well functioning society. Libertarianism offers you "freedom" in the worst possible way. I dare you to take your "racist" views to other Libertarians and see how they react. Liberals would actually be more receptive to your hatred than Libertarians. Communities don't matter, the borders should be open, corporations should provide oxygen, child porn should be legal, we welcome everyone, regardless of race, regardles of ethnicity, regardless of sexual orientation blah blah blah.

You are not free under this perverse ideology, you are a slave to mindeless shallow consumerism and hedonism. FUCK THAT. If it feels good, do it. Right? I don't think so.

Libertarianism offers the worst aspects of "freedom". You will not be free under this sickness, you will continue to be a slave to the system. So go ahead, call yourself a Libertarian and keep on posturing with your bullshit about how you are not part of the "Two Systems" and therefore free. YOU ARE NOT. You are just another spineless Conservative with a self destructive streak. Fuck Yeah!! That's what society needs, a pussy who is on his way to killing himself all in the name of rebelliousness. Yeah!!
This post would of worked well in the Ron Paul subforum too.
 
Old September 12th, 2009 #3
Mr Murray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,284
Mr Murray
Default

My guess is that the WN's that support libertarianism assume that having the freedom to discriminate will only work in their favour. Also, the thinking seems to go that if the goverment is corrupt, then government equals corruption. A fallacy of course.
 
Old September 12th, 2009 #4
Rab4
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,692
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Murray View Post
My guess is that the WN's that support libertarianism assume that having the freedom to discriminate will only work in their favour. Also, the thinking seems to go that if the goverment is corrupt, then government equals corruption. A fallacy of course.
Right. Supporters see it as the elimination of affirmative action and fair housing. The playing field will be leveled, allowing whites to excel. In and of itself, that would be good. But, with no borders, it might make that a moot point.
 
Old September 12th, 2009 #5
SA Mann
National Socialist
 
SA Mann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,446
SA Mann
Default

I'm not a fan of their politics. I took one of their little quizzes at the State Fair and I rated "Leftist Liberal" (lol!). My "sins" were being against open borders, free trade and drug laws.
 
Old September 12th, 2009 #6
The Bobster
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Filthydelphia
Posts: 10,095
Default

The ones I've met at Ron Paul meetings were more concerned with anarchy, open borders and drug legalization than anything else.
 
Old September 12th, 2009 #7
Robert Bandanza
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: JUDEAware, originally MassaJEWsetts
Posts: 8,901
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Bobster View Post
The ones I've met at Ron Paul meetings were more concerned with anarchy, open borders and drug legalization than anything else.
Yes, but Ron Paul would still be president under the same capitalist ideology. The Jew elections would still exist(Two party). He also claims Arabs were behind 9/11 even though in a less serious manner with saying "America got the Arabs mad and that's why they attacked us." He has a Jew mentor von Mises and claimed there was gun control in NS Greater Germany.
 
Old September 12th, 2009 #8
Peer Fischer
Senior Member
 
Peer Fischer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,877
Peer Fischer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rab4 View Post
Right. Supporters see it as the elimination of affirmative action and fair housing. The playing field will be leveled, allowing whites to excel.
Absolutely. It represents the elimination of most (not all) government interference in our lives. It means the right to associate with whom we please, to literally create our own communities once again and defend them (2nd Amendment.) Government not eliminated but reduced to bare bones protection of private property and contract enforcement, which means far lower taxes and thus more money to do what we need to do.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rab4 View Post
In and of itself, that would be good. But, with no borders, it might make that a moot point.
This is a problem but it could be debated later on. Protection of borders could be argued to be one of those "bare minimum" requirements that government must handle, at least to protect us from less-libertarian neighbors (Canada and Mexico.)

I see libertarianism as a sort of clearinghouse of basic ideas in which different concepts of community can be hammered out and even exist side by side (but not too close.) Every other ideology seems to take its premises as a conclusion, putting the cart before the horse.
 
Old September 13th, 2009 #9
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Mike Parker
Default

Nice work. So many Jews push libertarianism because it encourages individualism for whites, while the Jews continue to act as a cohesive group and destroy us.
 
Old September 13th, 2009 #10
Mr Murray
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,284
Mr Murray
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peer Fischer View Post
Absolutely. It represents the elimination of most (not all) government interference in our lives. It means the right to associate with whom we please, to literally create our own communities once again and defend them (2nd Amendment.) Government not eliminated but reduced to bare bones protection of private property and contract enforcement, which means far lower taxes and thus more money to do what we need to do.
What you've described there is minarchism (minimal government), not libertarianism.
 
Old September 13th, 2009 #11
Richard Bailey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 56
Thumbs down Keep The Jew

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peer Fischer View Post
Absolutely. It represents the elimination of most (not all) government interference in our lives. It means the right to associate with whom we please, to literally create our own communities once again and defend them (2nd Amendment.) Government not eliminated but reduced to bare bones protection of private property and contract enforcement, which means far lower taxes and thus more money to do what we need to do.



This is a problem but it could be debated later on. Protection of borders could be argued to be one of those "bare minimum" requirements that government must handle, at least to protect us from less-libertarian neighbors (Canada and Mexico.)

I see libertarianism as a sort of clearinghouse of basic ideas in which different concepts of community can be hammered out and even exist side by side (but not too close.) Every other ideology seems to take its premises as a conclusion, putting the cart before the horse.
I am for big government where I think they are necessary. I really like the axis models of WWII. These nations offered more to their citizens than what we have now. Is it not because of Libertarians we have niggers in the U.S.? I think that Big Government can exsist with Big Bussiness, but the government must be brutal in their efforts, when an enemy is recognized it must be brutally destroyed, no mercy.

Under a Libertarian system it seems we would replace your big bad government with big bussiness. Big government might have to answer to it's people in one way or another, big bussiness does not. They answer to foreigners and their interest. What would prevent them from stabbing their fellow country men for higher profits?! White doesn't matter, green does. Big bussiness could choose to associate themselves with those who do not serve the nations interest and could actively be working against us, It's money that matters, not your town losing it's jobs just so they could take it elsewhere, they have no loyalty to their people, only to themselves.

But government with STRONG leadership could be great. Look at what Hitler did with Germany in a short amount of time. He recognized the enemy, called it out and dealt with it. Libertarians sound as if though they somehow wish to keep the Weihmar Republic with it's decance and libertine attitude but with out the Jews and niggers. Even then, without them, Libertarianism sounds awful. About the most important aspect in a Libertarians life seems to be to make about as much cash as possible by any means necessary even if it means fucking over your neighbor, getting high, and fucking like crazy niggers anything with a hole. Libertarians claim free asssociation but the majority of Libertarians I have dealt with have no interest in an actual community, they generally choose to embrace the depraved and socially destructive all in an effort to feel like they belong to a group of lethargic hipsters who don't give a shit.

I do not want this, I want something more dymamic, something more adventurous. Libertarianism basically offers me a joint and bestiality videos. No thank you, you can keep those.

Libertarianism in part gave us what we have today. Libertarians don't have the balls to stand up and fight, to do what is necessary to our enemies. The "non-agression" principle. LOL Fuck it. I, WE should instigate aggression when it's necessary for whichever reason. I am for war, I am for expansionism, I am for taking what should rightfully belong to us. Why? Because were BETTER. THAT'S why!!!
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #12
T.I.
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 316
T.I.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Bailey View Post
I am for war, I am for expansionism, I am for taking what should rightfully belong to us. Why? Because were BETTER. THAT'S why!!!
Well said (well, except for the “were” part anyway).

Expanding a healthy White community should be the sine qua non of any WN state. Why some here see it as irrelevant - or individual preference - is just beyond me (maybe their hearts are 2 sizes too small).
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #13
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,342
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Bailey View Post
I am for big government where I think they are necessary. I really like the axis models of WWII. These nations offered more to their citizens than what we have now. Is it not because of Libertarians we have niggers in the U.S.? I think that Big Government can exsist with Big Bussiness, but the government must be brutal in their efforts, when an enemy is recognized it must be brutally destroyed, no mercy.
A retard who can't even spell business wants government running everything. Makes sense to me.
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #14
T.I.
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 316
T.I.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
A retard who can't even spell business wants government running everything. Makes sense to me.
He may be a “retard” but at least his heart is in the right place – with his community. Where is yours, Alex?
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #15
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,342
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.I. View Post
He may be a “retard” but at least his heart is in the right place – with his community. Where is yours, Alex?
How do you know where his heart is?

He, like you, is an anonymite on the internet.

He deals wholly in generalized blather. Make him debate specifics on any particular issue, he couldn't hold his own with any of the LRC crowd.
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #16
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,342
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.I. View Post
He may be a “retard” but at least his heart is in the right place – with his community. Where is yours, Alex?
Check your assumption too: they only love white race who want gigantic dictatorial control over...individual white men.

You sure you know the difference between a white man and a white ant?

Last edited by Alex Linder; September 20th, 2009 at 09:38 PM.
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #17
T.I.
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 316
T.I.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
How do you know where his heart is?
I read his post and took it at face value.

Quote:
He, like you, is an anonymite on the internet.
What difference does that make here. I was 5 minutes late in Knoxville or else you might have met me. Enough here know me anyway.

Quote:
He deals wholly in generalized blather. Make him debate specifics on any particular issue, he couldn't hold his own with any of the LRC crowd.
Again, what difference does that make. Give me a man with heart over a man with logic any day. A man with flawed logic can be straightened out; a man without a heart will never grow one.

Could you ever write something like this, Alex? http://www.lewrockwell.com/reed/reed166.html

Until you can feel people’s pain your logic is always going to leave them cold.
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #18
T.I.
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 316
T.I.
Default

Quote:
Check your assumption to: they only love white race who want gigantic dictatorial control over...individual white men.
We won’t ever know that answer for sure until we get that control again, will we. Maybe next time people with heart will be in control. Right now – it’s just a throwaway line.

Quote:
You sure you know the difference between a white man and a white ant?
White men will always need some form of representation. We all can’t look after everything all the time, can we. Isn’t that why we had Republicanism to begin with. I know it’s hard for you to accept, but some people really do have our best interest in mind and do deserve our trust.

How many more of these
Triangle_Shirtwaist_Factory_fire Triangle_Shirtwaist_Factory_fire
would we have had if we didn’t have men like this
Al_Smith Al_Smith
?

The “free market” said these people were expendable. Do you, too?
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #19
Rick Wright
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 107
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Check your assumption to: they only love white race who want gigantic dictatorial control over...individual white men.

You sure you know the difference between a white man and a white ant?
And millions of white men don't act like ants? Buying the same stupid sports merchandise and following the same centrally controlled talking heads (O'Reilly/Olbermann)?
 
Old September 14th, 2009 #20
richyrichard
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
A retard who can't even spell business wants government running everything. Makes sense to me.
What a chickenshit remark that is!
 
Reply

Tags
jew talk, jew von mises, liberaltarianism, libertarianism is jewish, libertarianism is white, state withers away

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.
Page generated in 0.15255 seconds.