Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old March 28th, 2006 #1
Sunwheel
Junior Member
 
Sunwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 244
Default The Seperate Ethnogenesis of Aryan Man

http://normannii.org/guilds_lore/lor...EmergenceofMan

The Emergence of Man

For the last two centuries, mankind has looked to the past for clues; clues to our ultimate origin. But by looking at man today, science has caught up with our desire to find the common bonds of humanity. Advanced molecular bio-chemistry, genetics, and physical anthropology work together to solve the mystery of humanity's genesis. Thanks to these advanced scientific methods, we can begin to answer the question, "Where do we come from ?".

While the dominant view of evolutionary anthrpology is leaning towards a modified Out of Africa modern sapiens genesis, studies performed at John’s Hopkins University are putting increasing pressure on these African genesis models. More DNA testing and methods of refining genetic flow theory have produced a body of evidence for the Multiregional Evolution Model[1]. Studies of DNA utilizing mitochondrial lineage tracking, a recently perfected process which can trace the mutanagenic history of the mitochondria (which is passed on exclusively, matrialineally, by this cellular parasitic powerhouse) in a gene's makeup, track the common ancestral line of modern North-Western Hominids to an "Eve" who probably existed c. 200kya in Asia. (Her predecessor and counterpart in Africa, emerged c.250kya and gave rise to the South-Eastern Hominids, a common ancestor of both likely appeared c.300-350 kya.) And would be the progenetresses of all Homo sapiens[2] It is also important to note that Hominids can trace their ancestry back at least 3.8 million years;[3] Recent finds on the Indian subcontinent, verified by Argon Dating indicate that Homo erectus' migration and adaptation spurred a dichotomy in Sapiens genesis. Approximately 1.8 million years ago, the erectus split along the adaptive environments they reproduced in. The core African populace (who gave rise to the other Hominids via that H.Erectus line) continued their linear development, in the stable African Savannah. The Erectus populations in the Indian subcontinent expanded into differing ecologies. This resulted in sweeping differentiation, and the two Sapiens that emerged, differed significantly.[4] H. sapiens Archaic was the Western, and H. sapiens Neanderthalis was the Eastern. This lends itself neatly to explain the conflicting fossil finds in the Middle East, and the European problem of cohabitating populations.[5]

Examinations of H.sapiens neanderthalis reveal that their traits, while modified by further evolution, and supplanted by it's descendant, sapiens sapiens (Africanus), are still visible in her progeny, and likely represent either a linear evolution from the African Eve, or a dead end in the evolutionary off shoot of the African Eve. Prolonged and bony supraorbital torus, dental caries and abcessing, with more pronounced canine and incisor teeth, are still evident in African populations[6] (modified in Afro-Americans, who have been subjected to genetic diffusion, and alteration). This sapiens migrated north and east, and populated across the Eurasian continent. In the H. sapiens archaic, the populations had been lightened in overall pigmentation, developed straight hair, and softer facial features, evident in modern Europeans and Indo-Iranians. These humans initially did not move far from their homeland, and probably practiced endogamy (the practice of breeding within the social unit) for the first few thousand years[7]. DNA evidence strongly suggests the earleist Sapiens were a small inbreeding social unit However as with the spread of Neanderthalis, they were introduced to exogamy (the practice of breeding outside the social group) with their migrations. The sapiens sapiens migrations occur in the period between 125,000 and 45,000.

These migrations, were fragmented into stages, and in them, were periods of repetition and cross-transversing; caused by climactic changes during the glacial and interglacial periods. This oscillating retreat and advancement tactic created periods of use and abandonement in the archaeological record of Europe that are only explicable in light of such cycles. { The depiction in figure 1.1 is a reasonable compilation of these earliest wanderings, based on our knowledge of the dates of emergence of modern man in particular regions of Europe based on archaeological excavations.} OMITTED IN PROOF

These Hominids, unlike those that had come before, were more than social, they were consciously "emotional" and intellectually "thoughtful". This sapiens had evolved abstract reason to the point of subjugating instinct. Early man had evolved a brain capacity and sphereic specialization that gave him new gifts. Paramount were rationality and abstract reason. He began developing a "culture", based on where he was in the rapidly changing world, with an appreciation beyond simple self preservation; an awareness of spirituality had emerged[8] This man not only cared for his young out of biological need, and inhumed his old in death, but cared for the weaker members, and crafted things for their aesthetic pleasure, not just for their utility. Beyond the simplicity of Mousterian tools, floral inhumation of the dead, and cave art of the Neanderthalis, we now find man gathering technology beyond simple hafting... he is moving towards social development, material designs, and abstractionin art.

After "Eve", and as specialization occurred in early regional sapiens, a radical genetic divergence began again anew. All of the sapiens forms in the Middle/Upper Paleolithic Transition were adapting and refining traits that we recognize as "modern" man's, but were impacted by climactic, preditory, agricultural, and geographic conditions in the areas that they migrated to. This movement away from the cradle of his birth, brought significant alterations (through evolutionary processes) in man's replicative DNA, such that today, there is a dualistic, nine-step division in sub-typing sapiens sapiens.[9] Adaptation has invariably played the largest role in this differentiation, and figure 1.2 illustrates the genetic distances between these types.

As this emergent sapiens sapiens (Cro-Magnon) encountered the older, Eastern sapiens neanderthalis (Neanderthal), c. 35,000 BE [10] in Eurasia, s.sapiens out-thought and out-reproduced them. In isolated cases, he may have mated with him; a hybridization that did not impact the relationships of the European cultures significantly (but, the aboriginal Australians may indeed be the only decisively remnant Neanderthalis - Sapiens hybrids; Australia, already semidetached at the Pacific tectonic plate, had become completely separated from mainland Asia by the rise in the Pacific Ocean. This separation occurred during the glacial redistribution of the Third Interglacial period, at nearly the same time as the accession of sapiens sapiens began). [11]

Being among the furthest displaced from the progenitor strain of Western sapiens[12] by refinement and adaptation, and therefore the most recently emerged subspecies of man[13], the Proto Indo Europeans were among the first to be able to utilize the higher abstract reason in a large social manner. They began to enculture, and civilize first themselves, and then the others they were in contact with, on a large scale, through social adaptation, interrelation, and migration; while maintaining an acutely homogenous society, reflecting the specialization (Sapiens Sapiens) and adaptation that the climate of Eurasia produced.
 
Old March 28th, 2006 #2
Bardamu
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,571
Default

Fascinating subject, especially the theory that Australian aboriginals are surviving neanderthalers. The dating acronyms are confusing. What the hell does kya and BE stand for?
 
Old March 28th, 2006 #3
Sunwheel
Junior Member
 
Sunwheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 244
Default

BE - Before Common Era AKA B.C.

CE - Common Era AKA A.D.

KYA- Million years ago

TYA- Thousand years ago

OE - Old English

ON - Old Norse

HD - High German

LA - Latin

GR - Greek

HB - Hebrew

CRT - Cultural-Religious Formations Theory

CET - Combinative Evolutionary Theory

CED - Conflict & Expansion Developmental Th.

TR - Teutonic Religion

FU - Futhark

IE - The Religious Attitudes of the Indo-Europeans

PE - Poetic/Prose Eddas

IE - In Search of the Indo-Europeans

KG - Kveldulf Gundarsson

CJ - Carl Jung

FO - Francis Owen

HG - Hans Gunther

ET - Edred Thorsson AKA Dr. Stephen Flowers

ED - H.Ellis-Davidson

TP - Turville-Petre

DV - Jan deVries

DZ - Georges Dumezil

JM - J.P. Mallory
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.
Page generated in 0.21075 seconds.