Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old June 6th, 2019 #41
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Default

How much money has Carlos Maza cost creators? If you mess with someone's legal income and livelihood, and expect no reaction, then maybe you're not living in reality. Or maybe you are and everyone is really a coward.

This fag is prancing and celebrating that he took bread out of the mouths of thousands of people.

Here's his website. I advocate sending him an email asking politely why he did what he did. Maybe he doesn't understand the First Amendment?

According to Wikipedia, the Washington Blade named Carlos Maza one of the 20 most eligible "gay" singles in the Washington, D.C. area. Yuck.

__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action
 
Old June 13th, 2019 #42
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

.
Here's an article that was published yesterday:

Quote:
Facebook emails seem to show Zuckerberg knew of privacy issues, report claims


Firm has uncovered emails that appear to show chief executive’s connection to potentially problematic practices, WSJ reports

Facebook has uncovered emails that appear to show Mark Zuckerberg’s connection to potentially damaging privacy practices at the company, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday.

The emails were uncovered as part of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigation that began after the Guardian reported that the personal data of 50 million Facebook users had been improperly harvested by Cambridge Analytica, a data firm that worked on Donald Trump’s election team and the winning Brexit campaign.

The unearthing of the emails has raised concerns inside Facebook that they would be harmful – at least from a public-relations standpoint – if they were to become public, the WSJ reported.
Facebook’s shares fell 2% on the news.

The Journal report said it could not be determined exactly what emails the FTC has requested and how many of them relate to Zuckerberg.
https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...-emails-report
 
Old June 16th, 2019 #43
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

.
YouTube Crackdown: Trump's Online Base Eviscerated. Good Luck in 2020.

https://russia-insider.com/en/societ...k-2020/ri27206

 
Old July 4th, 2019 #44
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Facebook censored a post for ‘hate speech.’ It was the Declaration of Independence.


By Eli Rosenberg
July 5, 2018

At first glance, the Vindicator’s Facebook promotion did not seem designed to make waves.

The small newspaper, based out of Liberty, a Texas town of 9,175 outside of Houston, planned to post the Declaration of Independence on Facebook in 12 daily installments leading up to the Fourth of July — 242 years since the document was adopted at the Second Continental Congress in 1776.

But on the 10th day, the Vindicator’s latest installment was removed by Facebook. The company told the newspaper that the particular passage, which included the phrase “merciless Indian Savages,” went against its “standards on hate speech,” the newspaper wrote.

The story about how Facebook had censored one of the United States’ founding texts on the grounds that it was hate speech has traveled around the world. And it is another glaring example of how the mechanisms that tech companies use to regulate user content — many of which involve algorithms and other automated processes — can result in embarrassing errors. Facebook uses a mix of human work and technological efforts to moderate its content.

Facebook has since apologized to the Vindicator and restored the newspaper’s post.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.da073207a334

 
Old July 4th, 2019 #45
jaekel
Senior Member
 
jaekel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,358
Default

Of course it's rigged.
Communist news network will lie. Their ratings are down in the sewer.
Most folks know it's fake news.
 
Old July 10th, 2019 #46
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaekel View Post
Most folks know it's fake news.
You're right, most people know it's fake.

But the problem is, how many people (humans) are left in the Kwa?
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action
 
Old July 22nd, 2019 #47
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Google Denies Blacklisting Under Oath, Despite Leaked Docs Showing Otherwise


Calvin Freiburger

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 17, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — Google vice president for government affairs and public policy Karan Bhatia declared under oath Tuesday that the internet giant does not employ blacklists to slant its search results, despite leaked materials detailing the practice months ago.

Yesterday, the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution held a hearing focused on alleged political censorship affecting Google’s search results. Breitbart reports that Bhatia made the claim in response to questioning from Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.).
https://russia-insider.com/en/google...erwise/ri27479
 
Old July 28th, 2019 #48
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Tulsi Gabbard Sues Google for Censorship of Ads


Allum Bokhari 25 Jul 2019

Presidential candidate and military veteran Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) is suing Google after the tech giant blocked her ads account shortly after the first Democrat presidential debate, when Gabbard became the most-searched-for candidate in the Democrat field.

Gabbard’s complaint accuses Google of censoring the candidate at the very moment when millions of Americans wanted to learn more about her. It also accuses Google of sending Gabbard’s campaign emails to people’s Gmail spam folders at a “disproportionately high rate.”

The campaign seeks a legal injunction against Google to prevent further election meddling, as well as $50 million in damages.
(...)
According to the complaint, “Google could unilaterally and decisively end a presidential candidate’s bid for office if it chose to, for example by tweaking its search algorithm to disfavor the candidate; or blocking the candidate from its ad platforms; or keeping the candidate’s communications from getting to interested voters who use Gmail for email communications.”
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/...orship-of-ads/

Tulsi Gabbard opposes zionist wars in the Middle East, so the jewish search engine Google tries to prevent the public from learning more about her. That makes sense.
 
Old August 14th, 2019 #49
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Facebook has been listening to users' voice messages without their knowledge


Facebook has been paying hundreds of people to listen to users' private audio clips without their knowledge.

The social media giant confirmed that, until very recently, it had employed human contractors to transcribe voice messages sent via its Messenger app in order to check the work of its AI systems.

It is the latest major tech firm to be caught listening to users' messages without their explicit knowledge, following similar revelations about Amazon, Google and Apple.

A spokesman said the company had "paused" the practice "more than a week ago" after other companies' audio listening attracted scrutiny from the press.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technolo...out-knowledge/
 
Old August 16th, 2019 #50
Albert Muller
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 53
Default Rigged

Interesting points, what do you guys think?
 
Old November 2nd, 2019 #51
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Meddling in journalism: Google funding media to fulfil radical liberal agenda


Robert Bridge
Robert Bridge is an American writer and journalist. Former Editor-in-Chief of The Moscow News, he is author of the book, 'Midnight in the American Empire,' released in 2013.


1 Nov, 2019 15:45

The world’s most powerful company claims political bias plays no role in its day-to-day operations. Yet how do we explain its funding of left-leaning media amid elections and calls to regulate the Silicon Valley monolith?

Google has announced it will be funding 34 media organizations in North America – 29 in the US, four in Canada, and one that has remained undisclosed. The project is being undertaken by the so-called Google News Initiative (GNI), a three-year, $300 million effort designed to “help journalism thrive in the digital age.”

But is it really Google’s job to meddle in journalism?

The fact that Google is financing media organizations, regardless of their political ideology, is in itself very problematic. After all, from the time of its founding, the search engine giant was expected to remain a neutral platform from which clients could freely access a variety of news and information; the more popular selections among users would automatically rise – in pure democratic fashion – to the top of the searches. However, in our post-Russiagate, fake news media hell-scape, Google has taken it upon itself to manually steer the algorithms, which in effect gives audiences a distorted perception of reality. Let’s call it the ‘Google reality’.

The situation becomes doubly disconcerting when it is understood there is a clear political bias in Google’s decision-making process. This is obvious by the organizations GNI has decided to partner with on various projects. Among the 29 various groups, as detailed by Neiman Lab, is the Dallas Morning News, which supported Hillary Clinton for president in the 2016 election. The newspaper will receive, among other freebies, a cash infusion for a “searchable guide to pre-K through 12 education in North Texas” to assist parents in choosing the right schools for their kids.
(...)
Meanwhile, Google also singled out a partnership with the Lenfest Institute, which partners with the Democracy Fund, Facebook, and the Bezos-owned Washington Post, one of the most prominent left-wing media outlets. With Google’s financial blessing, Lenfest will team up with the Philadelphia Inquirer to distribute newsletters in the region that will “empower residents to stay informed and connect with their neighbors.”
(...)
In recent months, a string of whistleblowers (here, here, and here) began to pull back the company’s heavy curtain, which revealed more than just a bunch of fun-loving computer nerds enjoying generous campus perks, like bean-bag chairs, free food and on-site fitness club. Insiders, like James Damore, a former Google engineer-turned whistleblower, described a radically different atmosphere behind the feel-good facade. Despite these PC-conscious and very woke times, Damore said that being a political conservative at Google in 2017 is like “being gay in the 1950s.”

If Google displays this sort of intolerance to its employees who espouse right-leaning views, then it is reasonable to ask if the company is monkeying with its algorithms to prevent conservative and alternative media from receiving fair representation in the competitive field of search results.
(...)
Google’s ability to literally alter reality with the manipulation of its algorithms represents one of the deepest threats to democracy today, and must be challenged. Even by those media organizations that benefit from Google’s immense wealth.
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/472399-goog...funding-media/
 
Old November 3rd, 2019 #52
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Google buys Fitbit, acquiring users’ health histories & triggering privacy backlash


1 Nov, 2019 19:39

Google has acquired the fitness tracking device manufacturer Fitbit, unnerving users who hoped to keep their health data out of Big Tech’s clutches. It promises not to use the data for ads, but does anyone really believe that?
(...)
It’s not Google’s first foray into the health data market – the company paid $40 million for smartwatch tech from watchmaker Fossil earlier this year, and Google has had access to data from British patients on the NHS since 2016, when the company inked a deal that the UK’s data watchdog later found violated privacy regulations. That access has only expanded, with several NHS trusts moving their data to Google’s cloud. Google has also invested in US health insurance provider Oscar.

Nor is Google the only Big Tech firm greedily eyeing health data – Facebook executives have been making the rounds at hospitals and medical companies, trying to sweet-talk them into sharing customers’ health information. Facebook was reportedly interested in buying Fitbit as well, but Google offered twice as much, according to the Information.
https://www.rt.com/usa/472423-google...vacy-concerns/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Muller View Post
Interesting points, what do you guys think?
Oh, Jewgle is definitely rigged. The proof is in this thread..
 
Old November 7th, 2019 #53
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Facebook ordered to cough up Zuckerberg emails after stonewalling California privacy probe


6 Nov, 2019 18:58

Facebook is stonewalling a California investigation into the company’s violations of user privacy, refusing to turn over internal communications of its executives, court filings show. Maybe they do believe in privacy after all!

Facebook refused to respond to the state’s subpoena requesting the communications of CEO Mark Zuckerberg and other senior executives, according to a Wednesday court filing in California’s ongoing probe of the social media behemoth’s privacy abuses. Attorney General Xavier Becerra has petitioned the court to force the company to comply.
https://www.rt.com/usa/472792-facebo...ms-california/
 
Old November 13th, 2019 #54
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Google’s ‘Project Nightingale’ Triggers Federal Inquiry


Deal with Ascension health system aimed at improving patient care provides Google with health-data gold mine

By Rob Copeland and Sarah E. Needleman
Updated Nov. 12, 2019 11:13 pm ET

Google’s project with the country’s second-largest health system to collect detailed health information on 50 million American patients sparked a federal inquiry and criticism from patients and lawmakers.

The data on patients of St. Louis-based Ascension were until recently scattered across 40 data centers in more than a dozen states. Google and the Catholic nonprofit are moving that data into Google’s cloud-computing system—with potentially big changes on tap for doctors and patients.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/behind-...ts-11573571867
 
Old November 23rd, 2019 #55
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Why The World Needs a Google Detox


Dr. Joseph Mercola
Mercola.com
Sun, 17 Nov 2019 00:01 UTC

In this interview, Google whistleblower Zach Vorhies, who worked as a senior software engineer at Google and YouTube for over eight years, shares his inside knowledge of this global monopoly, revealing why Google is not a reliable source of information anymore.

Google's monopoly over search is matched by a continued reassurance that it is an unbiased search platform. Google is actively suppressing and censoring information, proving it is anything but unbiased.
https://www.sott.net/article/424085-...a-Google-Detox
 
Old November 26th, 2019 #56
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Major New Book on Destruction of Free Speech by Big Tech - the 'Google Archipelago', by Michael Rectenwald - a Review


James Kirkpatrick

The Wall Street Journal just published a shocking expose, How Google Interferes With Its Search Algorithms and Changes Your Results, [by Kirsten Grind, Sam Schechner, Robert McMillan and John West, November 15, 2019], revealing not only that Google is exploiting its market power in ways the clearly raise anti-trust questions, but also that it shadow-bans sites that promote “hate or violence” even if “expressed in polite or even academic-sounding language”—i.e. VDARE.com and all immigration patriots.

This confirms the terrifying message of Michael Rectenwald’s new book Google Archipelago: The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom: the combination of Woke Capital and monopoly power is turning America into an open-air prison.
https://russia-insider.com/en/major-...review/ri27899
 
Old November 30th, 2019 #57
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
How Google Interferes With Its Search Algorithms and Changes Your Results


The internet giant uses blacklists, algorithm tweaks and an army of contractors to shape what you see

By Kirsten Grind, Sam Schechner, Robert McMillan and John West
Nov. 15, 2019 8:15 am ET

Every minute, an estimated 3.8 million queries are typed into Google, prompting its algorithms to spit out results for hotel rates or breast-cancer treatments or the latest news about President Trump.

They are arguably the most powerful lines of computer code in the global economy, controlling how much of the world accesses information found on the internet, and the starting point for billions of dollars of commerce.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-goo...e4ce2e3a162a17
 
Old March 17th, 2020 #58
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Google admits it let random strangers download your videos… as it seeks monthly fee for rifling through your photos


5 Feb, 2020 04:40
by Helen Buyniski, RT

Google has admitted some users’ private videos were sent to “unrelated users” who downloaded data through its Takeout service for a few days in November – but wants you to pay the company to dig through your photos itself.

The search behemoth has quietly notified users of its Google Takeout service, which downloads a user’s Google Data archive, that an unspecified number of their private videos ended up in random users’ Takeout archives. The emails, sent a mere three months after the fact, are ominously vague, merely letting the user know that “one or more videos in your Google Photos account was affected” by the bug between November 21 and 25 of last year. Nowhere are users told which videos, or in whose hands they ended up – a fact that will no doubt keep some users awake at night. The company did say that still photos were not affected in a statement to 9to5Google on Monday.
https://www.rt.com/usa/480094-google...-subscription/
 
Old April 11th, 2020 #59
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Apple and Google team up in bid to use smartphones to track coronavirus spread


Alex Hern and Kari Paul
Fri 10 Apr 2020

Apple and Google announced on Friday an unprecedented collaboration to leverage smartphone technology to help trace and contain the spread of coronavirus.

The collaboration will open up their mobile operating systems to allow for the creation of advanced “contact-tracing” apps, which will run on iPhones and Android phones alike.

The apps would work by using the Bluetooth technology in mobile phones to keep track of every other phone a person comes into close contact with over the course of a day; if that person later finds out they have Covid-19, they can use the same system to alert all those people, dating back to before they would have become infectious.

The idea is to help national governments roll out these contact-tracing apps to allow lockdowns to be lifted earlier, by letting authorities much more readily identify new clusters of infection. The technology would also help those who have been exposed to a person with Covid-19 self-isolate before they themselves become infectious.

Concerns are already being raised about the effectiveness of such technology and privacy concerns surrounding its implementation. The companies are opting to use Bluetooth to track who has been in contact with Covid-19 cases rather than location services to protect some user privacy, but advocacy groups are still wary.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...us-app-privacy
 
Old May 30th, 2020 #60
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,511
Default

Quote:
Donald Trump Signs Exec Order to Curb Big Tech’s ‘Unchecked Power’


Charlie Spiering 28 May 2020

President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday in the White House to defend free speech on social media and regulate social media companies for selectively censoring users.

“We’re here today to defend free speech from one of the greatest dangers,” the president said, referring to the “unchecked power” wielded by social media companies in the United States.

The president signed the order in the Oval Office on Thursday afternoon.
“They’ve had unchecked power to censor restrict, edit shape hide alter virtually any form of communication between private citizens or large public audiences,” Trump said.

The president criticized the growing monopoly of social media companies in America, vowing to act to change the regulatory framework for the companies.

“There’s no precedent in American history for so small a number of corporations to control so large a sphere of interaction,” he said.

Trump said the increasing editorial actions by social media to control the content on their platforms endangered their liability shield under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act as a neutral public platform.

“The choices that Twitter makes, when it chooses to suppress, edit, blacklist, shadowban are editorial decisions, pure and simple, they are editorial decisions,” Trump said.

The president accused the companies of political activism, calling it “inappropriate.”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...checked-power/
 
Reply

Tags
big tech censorship, google, jewgle, jews, masters of the universe

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.
Page generated in 0.28173 seconds.