Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 26th, 2021 #1
alex revision
Senior Member
alex revision's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,761
alex revision
Default How National Socialism Rehabilitates Itself

How National Socialism Rehabilitates Itself

April 25, 2021

One of the most outstanding features of our time is that so many people fling the N-word around, but if you ask them, “What is National Socialism?” they are at a loss for words.

It is no surprise that there is no meaningful definition of National Socialism from post-war established sources.

The best definition is from, which tells us that NS is “the principles and practices of the Nazi party in Germany.” What are those principles and practices, and what is the inner logic that holds them together? It doesn’t say, which means they don’t know, or don’t want you to know.

Cambridge dictionary offers no definition. Mac Millan acknowledges that nazi is a slur: “an insulting word for someone who likes to control people or someone who does not like people who are different from them.” In that sense, those outsiders who want to control Germany are the nazis because they don’t like Germans who different from them.

What, then, is National Socialism (NS)?
Old 3 Weeks Ago #2
Gerry Fable
Senior Member
Gerry Fable's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,567
Gerry Fable

I was really surprised when linking to the article to read the words: Volk teleology.

I wonder if the author is familiar with Chris Langan?

National-Socialism is a political system necessary in order to create a teleologic and evolutionary society in which man co-evolves with the creator of the universe.


Teleologic Evolution (TE) is a process of alternating replication and selection through which the universe “creates itself” along with the life it contains. This process, called telic recursion, is neither random nor deterministic in the usual senses, but self-directed. Telic recursion occurs on global and local levels respectively associated with the evolution of nature and the evolution of life; the evolution of life thus mirrors that of the universe in which it occurs. TE improves on traditional approaches to teleology by extending the concept of nature in a way eliminating any need for “supernatural” intervention, and improves on neo-Darwinism by addressing the full extent of nature and its causal dynamics.

In the past, teleology and evolution were considered mutually exclusory. This was at least partially because they seem to rely on different models of causality. As usually understood, teleology appears to require a looping kind of causality whereby ends are immanent everywhere in nature, even at the origin (hence the causal loop). Evolution, on the other hand, seems to require a combination of ordinary determinacy and indeterminacy in which the laws of nature deterministically guide natural selection, while indeterminacy describes the “random” or “chance” dimension of biological mutation.

In contrast, the phrase teleologic evolution expresses an equivalence between teleology and evolution based on extended, refined concepts of nature and causality. This equivalence is expressed in terms of a self-contained logic-based model of reality identifying theory, universe and theory-universe correspondence, and depicting reality as a self-configuring system requiring no external creator. Instead, reality and its self-creative principle are identified through a contraction of the mapping which formerly connected the source and output of the teleology function. In effect, the creative principle itself becomes the ultimate form of reality.

The self-configuration of reality involves an intrinsic mode of causality, self-determinacy, which is logically distinct from conventional concepts of determinacy and indeterminacy but can appear as either from a localized vantage. Determinacy and indeterminacy can thus be viewed as “limiting cases” associated with at least two distinct levels of systemic self-determinacy, global-distributed and local-nondistributed. The former level appears deterministic while the latter, which accommodates creative input from multiple quasi-independent sources, dynamically adjusts to changing conditions and thus appears to have an element of “randomness”.

According to this expanded view of causality, the Darwinian processes of replication and natural selection occur on at least two mutually-facilitative levels associated with the evolution of the universe as a whole and the evolution of organic life. In addition, human technological and sociopolitical modes of evolution may be distinguished, and human intellectual evolution may be seen to occur on collective and individual levels. Because the TE model provides logical grounds on which the universe may be seen to possess a generalized form of intelligence, all levels of evolution are to this extent intelligently directed, catalyzed and integrated.
CTMU by Chris Lagan
Gottgläubig: The Religion of the Blood

Socialist People's Community:

Last edited by Gerry Fable; 3 Weeks Ago at 06:36 AM.
Old 3 Weeks Ago #3
Miguel Dias
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 226
Miguel Dias

hi, Guys!
What can you tell me about Savitri devi?
Old 3 Weeks Ago #4
Fico's Avatar
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Alpine central european area
Posts: 817
Blog Entries: 5

Originally Posted by Miguel Dias View Post
hi, Guys!
What can you tell me about Savitri devi?
As I heard,she was racial traitor because of marriage with one non-white man from Indian upper class. Please correct me if it is true. My general opinion about NS is that it is not solution for times of today. Best choice for you is according to me read book "Against Democracy and Equality" by Tom Sunic because his book is part of European New Right,group behind Alain de Benoist. Pan-europeanism more then pan-germanism.


Display Modes

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.
Page generated in 0.06643 seconds.