|
|
View Poll Results: confine antis to opposition forum yea or nay? | |||
Yea | 16 | 44.44% | |
Nay | 8 | 22.22% | |
Yes and define anti broadly to include all disruptors | 9 | 25.00% | |
Yes but define anti narrowly | 3 | 8.33% | |
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
June 21st, 2005 | #101 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
June 21st, 2005 | #102 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I feel bad that no one has yet pointed out to her that she is a "corruptor or souls".
As I wrote that, an ice-cream truck's playful tin melody trailed past my house into the sunset. |
June 21st, 2005 | #103 | |
Angry Shiksa
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the unholy land
Posts: 10,011
|
Quote:
|
|
June 21st, 2005 | #104 | |
Dodging vacuous stares
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Currently visiting Bellevue
Posts: 1,803
|
Quote:
__________________
At VNNF, liberty ain't marketing. Join us! |
|
June 21st, 2005 | #105 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Actually, his philosophical construction bothers in the same way that, say, Nietzsche was bothered by other "systematizers". So much is passed over, polished-out in favor of abstract generalities which leave nothing for passion or dialectics of any kind, positive or negative. Our blood thrills to the sound of "Aryan", yet Prozak sticks to "Indo-European". Here & there one glimpses something to be taken seriously, but then one remembers the page is called "ANUS". I have met someone with his basic ideas before—a basically scatological type who emerged from his pot-smoking, Nietzsche-reading days at Uni with a vague idea that he should emulate the yogi and go off into the forest, sit on a couple square feet of grass and not eat or think. The difference is huge, though: that guy never wrote more than his name and wanted to change only his own life, while Prozak is indeed robotically "logical" and weaves out of his idea a "platform". But then again, he has written some fine pieces, for example: http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/mixed-race/. And considering I haven't written a quarter as much, even in my own notebooks, I can only admire him. I don't have a personal issue with Prozak, needless to say; I simply don't find his manner congenial. |
|
June 28th, 2006 | #106 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Apparently, some people are too afraid of a little opposition to even confine me to OV. I was banned summarily. I always wondered why there was no real 'debate' in the OV forum in this place, and now I know why. This place is worse than SF with the censorship. Will debate with a teenage girl with an inferior 'nigger' IQ going to make you all look bad? :box:
|
June 29th, 2006 | #107 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Believe it that if we were afraid of opposition we would not be White racists.
|
July 3rd, 2006 | #108 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,473
|
Quote:
|
|
April 8th, 2010 | #109 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Detroit
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
|
|
December 28th, 2010 | #110 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 33
|
If they are allowed to post everywhere, it would be easier for me to quickly identify known anti's/non whites on the forums if they were put into a usergroup with a marker.
Perhaps an icon below their name. Moving said persons into usergroup would auto show the icon upon next post or running maintenance feature. Usergroup settings can then be adjusted according to how seen fit by forum Owner should he ever decide to limit the area of availability. Just my .0002 cents worth. (Inflation) Lily |
December 29th, 2010 | #111 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
December 29th, 2010 | #112 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 33
|
Thank you for your reply.
I think perhaps I have misunderstood or poorly stated my thoughts. I was under the impression that persons who actively identify themselves (openly say they are anti or non-white) post everywhere and was referring to those. Not the finger pointing accusation type of thing that goes on. I meant that if one comes to the board and volunteers they are anti-white or some sort of announcement, it would be convenient for me to be able to spot their posts and know not to put much stock in it. I suggested the icon/usergroup as a means to identify without restricting access but having an easy option in the future should you change your mind. As I may be further inserting my foot into my mouth, I will just hush up now before I end up in the women's section of Tard Corral. Good day to you Sir, Lily |
December 29th, 2010 | #113 |
Administrator
|
First, people don't need to worry about hurting my feelings, won't happen. I already know the worst about me, and can taunt myself more effectively than any you.
Second, the ideal, yes, ideal, here is that we WN can demonstrate in a free-speech forum that we can defeat all comers - in arguments, insults, whatever. Head, heart, hands, we'll kick their ass. We moderate by the north star of that ideal. Third, free speech is not an absolute anywhere. It is secondary here to what is good for Whites. That said, we are not going to stop anyone from making an ARGUMENT, a political argument, as long as he observes the few simple declared known obvious easily decipherable rules. Fourth, we'd like to attract more intelligent posters than stupid ones. More intelligent people see past externals (name, rep, clothes) to internals and essentials. Hence, the focus here is on the contents of the poster, not his signature, his rep, his fantasy name. Fifth, anti doesn't really mean anything on a forum other than someone with a different view from the majority. We don't pretend we are a political organization or party here, just a discussion forum. |
July 3rd, 2011 | #114 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In the new south
Posts: 235
|
I see the nigs in opposing views are really getting away with some bullshit. It didn't use to be like this . But I do see some of the real pieces of shit are gone now
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|