|
|
April 8th, 2013
|
#81 | ||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
 It is not a communistic (as in commune, not communist) philosophy.SF doesn't claim to allow ALL opposing viewpoints. Nor does it claim to allow all freedom of expression. Quote:
It has nothing to do with CAN he be debated... it all has to do with a private entity does not legally have to allow the debate in the first place. Having a meeting of a group of people that exist just to plant trees is very nice... when a person shows up that wants to argue and annoy because he wants to cut all the trees down.. not so much. Just because YOU want to argue, that doesn't mean we all want to argue with you. Honestly, Valdez... I couldn't care less what your beliefs are... arguing with you would be a waste of time.. because I simply wouldn't care. That's why I rarely post in OV anymore. I'm at the point now that if a retard wants to believe something stupid... let them. |
||
|
April 8th, 2013
|
#82 | ||||
|
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_D%C3%A9jacque "Joseph Déjacque (December 27, 1821, Paris – 1864, Paris) was a French early anarcho-communist poet and writer. Déjacque was the first recorded person to employ the term libertarian (French: libertaire) for himself." This is the original and authentic form of libertarianism, libertarian socialism: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||||
Libertarian_socialism|
April 8th, 2013
|
#83 | ||||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
Valdez... not all libertarians believe the exact same thing. It is NOT a single ideology. And that guy called himself a libertarian, but he was anarcho-communist. He is a libertarian socialist.... just as your link states. (sometimes called [1][2] or left-libertarianism) Didn't you even pay attention to your own link? Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-libertarianism Quote:
It is not a free speech zone. Quote:
That tagline does not make it mandatory that they allow you to post. It is not a promise.
|
||||
|
April 8th, 2013
|
#84 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
These are all forms of libertarianism, Valdez...
|
|
April 9th, 2013
|
#85 | |
|
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Libertarian socialists don't believe that any so-called form of libertarianism that supports capitalism is authentic. Similarly, most rightist pseudo-libertarians claim that libertarian socialism is inauthentic.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
April 9th, 2013
|
#86 | |||
|
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
April 9th, 2013
|
#87 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
I even listed all of the kinds of libertarianism.. and you are still being a retard. Yet you wonder why you can't post on SF. It seems facts escape you. |
|
|
April 9th, 2013
|
#88 | ||
|
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
Look, East Germany was a "Democratic Republic"! But wait... Wow, China is a "People's Republic," even better. But there's more... Damn, North Korea is a "Democratic People's Republic"! It's on Wikipedia so that means it must be true!
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
April 9th, 2013
|
#89 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
You started posting wikipedia articles first, nitwit. So if you think wikipedia aren't true, stop posting wikipedia articles. Seriously, every time you post you prove how retarded you are. The fact is, that listing I posted are all real variations of libertarianism... wikipedia or not. |
|
|
April 9th, 2013
|
#90 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Gotta love it.
Retard posts wikipedia links to try to make his point. I post a group of links that I got to by following the link that he posted. Retard doesn't like being proven wrong, so he says wikipedia is not a good source. NM Valdez... stop being a retard.
|
|
April 9th, 2013
|
#91 | ||
|
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
I was making a comment about you referencing the names of the articles themselves, as though what people named their ideology meant that name was etymologically or semantically accurate. People can call China a people's republic or North Korea a democratic people's republic, but that doesn't make those countries democratic or republics. Similarly, merely referencing the names of so-called libertarian philosophies does not make those ideologies "libertarian."
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
April 10th, 2013
|
#92 | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
It has to do with those being types of libertarianism. They are known types of libertarianism... and I got them by following your libertarian wikipedia link. /facepalm You say I'm being retarded, but you can't understand that simple concept. Why don't you click on one of the links, for example.. autarchism? In fact, since you are stupid... http://autarchism.org/What_is_Autarchism_.html Quote:
http://heathenautarchist.wordpress.com/autarchism/ http://earthsociety.org/wordpress/ar...tag/autarchism http://www.wordaz.com/autarchism.html Quote:
|
|||
|
April 15th, 2013
|
#93 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
|
|
April 15th, 2013
|
#94 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
|
|
 |
| Share |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.
Page generated in 0.50979 seconds.