Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old August 30th, 2011 #1
Stuart Green
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2
Default There was a coup d'etat in the Catholic Church in 1959 the Pope is not the Pope!

There was coup d'etat in the Catholic Church on October 26th, 1958 and the Church has been governed by impostors since that time.

Is this really that important? In my opinion it is. The Catholic Church is the largest and oldest institution on earth, with roughly a billion nominal members, roughly 3 times the population of the United States.

Since 1958 however, despite the numbers, the institution has been largely ineffective in combating the social ills they had so effectively handled for centuries.

Abortion, pornography, divorce, obscenity all became prominent after the papal chair was usurped in 1958. To demonstrate the power of the Church before this, look at the time when Pius XII excommunicated President Peron of Argentina in 1955 when he tried to contradict the constitution and allow divorce.

As a result of the excommunication, the populace of Argentina rose up and Peron was removed from office and Catholic teaching was upheld. Who would have thought that 50 years later Argentina would be legalizing "gay marriage."

Also, for those familiar with Catholicism you may know that the original Mass, which can be traced back to the 4th century (but could very well be apostolic in origin), was abandoned in 1969 to make way for a "new mass," a ceremony that bears little resemblance to the traditional Mass.

Again, who would want to destroy the sacred rite but an enemy agent masquerading as Pope.

Part 8 The Destruction of the Mass

To find out why the "Catholic" Church of today has become a sick caricature of the Catholic Church of two millennia we have to look back to the papal conclave of 1958. I believe the documentary posted below will provide the key to understanding what has happened.

At the center of the film is the election of the conservative prelate, Cardinal Giuseppe Siri, in 1958.

You will see a very clear emission of white smoke from the Sistine Chapel 2 days before the election of John XXIII.

On this night, 200,000 people turned to the balcony to see the new pope emerge on the balcony while news reports went out around the world that a new pope had been elected.

Vatican radio later announced that the white smoke was a mistake and that no Pope had been elected. A FBI Consultant claimed there are FBI and State Department files which stated that Cardinal Siri was elected Pope and took the name Gregory XVII.

In addition, former papal adviser Father Malachi Martin gives his testimony that Cardinal Siri was elected and was put under duress in at least 2 if not 3 conclaves. This is the centerpiece of the film (part 4) which is about 10 minutes.

The very clear signal that a pope had been elected 2 days before John XXIII emerged on the balcony is very suspicious, but in itself does not provide enough reason to believe that the Chair of Peter was stolen. To arrive at a clear conclusion regarding this one, must take several things into account.

Historical Precedents

The papacy does get usurped. In the history of the Catholic Church the papacy has been usurped more than 40 times, which is easily verifiable by getting a list of anti-popes. In the movie we highlight the case of Innocent II who was elected pope and then forced to flee by an impostor pope, Anacletus II. Anacletus II ruled for 8 years until his death, upon which, Innocent ascended to the papal throne many years late. Anacletus and all the clergy ordained by him were then condemned at the second Lateran Council.

The Men Who Took Over

The men who took office instead of Cardinal Siri, namely John XXIII ( Angelo Roncalli) and Paul VI (Giovanni Montini) we're more just bad apples.

John XXIII's Masonic initiation is described in detail in Pier Carpi's book, "The Prophecies of John XXIII" and there is a vast amount of evidence and testimony that he was indeed a Mason. For this alone he would be ipso facto excommunicated and obviously ineligible for the Papacy.

Upon his election, he immediately made Montini (future Paul VI) a Cardinal and called the Second Vatican Council, two of the most disastrous decisions in the history of the Catholic Church. He also received Nikita Khrushchev's son-in-law and daughter at the Vatican in a private meeting, this after communist regimes murdered and imprisoned millions of Catholics.

The well publicized meeting earned an extra million votes for the Communist party in Italy in the national elections. He also began introducing changes to the Mass that would culminate in the complete destruction of the Tridentine Mass under Paul VI.

Part 5 Who was John XXIII?

Paul VI, who never spent so much as a day a parish priest before becoming Pope, enjoyed reading books by Oscar Wilde during his seminary days. This wouldn't seem so bad if it weren't for the multiple public accusations of sodomy against him that emerged during and after his pontificate.

If this wasn't bad enough, ex-member of the Vatican noble guard Franco Bellegrandi recounts in his book Nikita Roncalli that Pius XII conducted a secret investigation and found out that Montini, then secretary of state, was providing names of priests operating behind the iron curtain to the Soviet secret police. The priests were then shot or sent to the gulag.

Part 7 Who was Paul VI?

Indeed these two men were not simply "bad popes". They were enemy agents who set the Church on a carefully designed plan to destruction.

Once the treachery of these two men has been established, the 3 week period between the death of Pius XII (a true pope) and the so-called election of John XXIII (an impostor) become crucial.

Did anything significant happen between these two dates? Yes, there was a five-minute signal indicating a pope had been elected billowing out of the Sistine Chapel two days before John XXIII emerged on the balcony in St. Peter's Square. Was the true pope elected on this night, and was he Cardinal Siri? I'll point to three sources that say he was.

FBI informant Paul Williams in his book, The Vatican Exposed quotes State Department files that state Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was elected and took the name Gregory XVII on Sunday October 26th but the French Cardinal annulled the results.

Fr. Malachi Martin in an interview in the late nineties says that Siri got enough votes to become Pope but refused the office because they thought they would not let him live.

Father Charles-Roux claims that Joseph Cardinal Siri of Genoa had been elected and also accepted the Papal office, but a very serious threat was delivered by the dean of the College of Cardinals. Siri was immediately shoved aside, without actually abdicating.

Here we have three people claiming that Cardinal Siri was elected and was subject to some kind of threat. This along with Cardinal Siri's indirect admissions that he was elected pope make a very good case that he was elected when the white smoke emerged on October 26th , 1958 was Cardinal Giuseppe Siri of Genoa.

Furthermore there is a great deal of evidence that Cardinal Roncalli and the whole 1958 affair was planned by unholy forces, which is described in Part 3 of the film.

Part II The Chosen Candidate

Somehow people expect the forces of darkness to provide a detailed explanation of how they did it.

Others expect that Siri would come out and claim that he was pope, when obviously nobody would believe it, even if did manage to get the word out before being eliminated. By remaining quiet, he was allowed to die a natural death in 1989.

The film will give some basic instructions on how to find traditional churches, priests, catechisms, etc and a word on activism.

Part XII The Underground Church

The film is otherwise broken down into 12 parts, the subject matter of each part described in the title.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.
Page generated in 0.59204 seconds.